What does Badger Meter do?
Badger Meter, Inc. is a Milwaukee-based water-technology company listed on the New York Stock Exchange under BMI. It helps utilities and industrial customers measure fluids, transmit readings, and convert operating data into decisions. Its portfolio spans flow measurement, water quality, pressure, sewer monitoring, communications, and analytics; the company’s investor overview therefore presents it as a smart-water solutions provider, not simply a meter manufacturer.
Which products form the smart-water stack?
The product architecture begins with mechanical and ultrasonic meters. ORION endpoints transmit encrypted readings through mobile, fixed-network, or cellular systems. BEACON organizes meter data, alerts, billing interfaces, and EyeOnWater engagement. BlueEdge extends the system into pressure, water-quality, network, sewer-line, and lift-station monitoring. The BlueEdge suite is therefore best understood as a portfolio spanning measurement, communications, software, and support.
Who buys these solutions, and where?
Municipal water utilities are core customers, supported by direct sales and distributors. Industrial buyers use flow instruments in water, wastewater, HVAC, building automation, and precision applications. No customer represented over 10% of FY2025 sales. The United States generated $825.9 million, or 90.1%, of FY2025 revenue; Europe contributed $43.9 million, with other regions comprising the balance.
| Dimension | Company-specific answer | Research implication |
|---|---|---|
| Reporting structure | One reportable segment; two disclosed product lines | Analyze consolidated margins, then use utility water and flow instrumentation to explain mix. |
| Primary customer | Municipal water utilities | Budget cycles and project timing create uneven quarterly shipments despite durable replacement demand. |
| Secondary customer | Commercial and industrial users | Flow instrumentation adds diversification but has lower strategic weight. |
| Geographic center | United States, 90.1% of FY2025 revenue | U.S. utility digitization and infrastructure spending dominate near-term economics. |
How does Badger Meter make money?
Badger Meter earns most revenue when customers purchase meters, endpoints, sensing devices, installation-related materials, and other hardware. It also earns recurring revenue from software and network services recognized over time. The model is attractive because a meter replacement can become the entry point for cellular connectivity, software attachment, and later sales of additional sensors across the same utility network.
Which revenue source matters most?
Utility water grew 12.5% in FY2025, while flow instrumentation declined 0.5%. That contrast shows where the strategic momentum sits. Utility water combines replacement demand with higher-value ultrasonic meters, ORION Cellular endpoints, BEACON subscriptions, water-quality products, and sewer monitoring. Management states that meters bundled with radio technology, software, quality sensing, and sewer monitoring generally earn higher average selling prices and margins than stand-alone mechanical meters.
Why is hardware-enabled software strategically important?
FY2025 SaaS sales were approximately $74 million, up 27% year over year and equal to roughly 8% of consolidated sales. The May 2026 Investor Day presentation set a long-term objective for software to reach 11% to 12% of sales, with about 15% annual growth from the 2025 base. Because every cellular AMI endpoint carries software attachment, installed hardware can seed a recurring annuity rather than ending the customer relationship at shipment.
What does the latest reported quarter show?
As of July 21, 2026, the latest reported period is the quarter ended March 31, 2026. The company’s first-quarter release and Form 10-Q show a sharp year-over-year comparison decline caused mainly by the timing of completed AMI projects and weaker short-cycle orders, not by a reported collapse in the long-term project funnel.
What changed from Q1 2025?
| Metric | Q1 2026 | Q1 2025 | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net sales | $202.3M | $222.2M | Project pacing and short-cycle order softness reduced volume. |
| Utility water sales | $178.4M | $197.3M | Down 9.6%; still 88.2% of quarterly revenue. |
| Flow instrumentation | $23.9M | $24.9M | Down 4.1%; water applications grew, de-emphasized uses declined. |
| Gross margin | 41.7% | 42.9% | Lower volume and less favorable mix reduced margin by 120 basis points. |
| Operating margin | 17.4% | 22.2% | Lower gross profit met a higher SEA expense base. |
| Net earnings | $27.3M | $38.4M | Net margin fell to about 13.5% from 17.3%. |
Why did the margin profile weaken?
Selling, engineering and administration expense rose to $49.2 million, or 24.3% of sales, from $46.0 million, or 20.7%, a year earlier. The increase reflected personnel costs, a full quarter of SmartCover expenses, and $1.2 million of acquisition-related costs. This illustrates operating leverage in both directions: strong mix and volume can expand margins, while lower project shipments leave the expense base less efficiently absorbed.
How did Badger Meter evolve from meter maker to smart-water platform?
Badger Meter’s history matters because the current moat was built by layering digital capabilities onto a century-old installed-base business. The company traces its origin to a frost-proof meter invented in Milwaukee in 1905; an official anniversary account connects that invention to its modern flow-measurement position.
Which turning points still shape the business?
-
1905The frost-proof water meter established the company’s measurement heritage and municipal-utility relationships.
-
2010Ultrasonic meter development accelerated the shift from mechanical to static measurement, raising accuracy, feature content, and average selling price.
-
2014ORION Cellular AMI launched, eliminating the need for many utilities to own and maintain proprietary communications infrastructure.
-
2019Cellular AMI adoption began gaining meaningful traction, creating software attachment and competitive meter-conversion opportunities.
-
2023The Syrinix acquisition expanded pressure and network-monitoring capabilities beyond customer water usage.
-
2024BlueEdge unified products, software, and services under one water-cycle portfolio, while Telog/Unity added remote monitoring.
-
2025-2026SmartCover and UDlive extended the platform into sewer and stormwater monitoring, broadening recurring software and international opportunities.
What strategic tension does this history create?
The digital evolution improved revenue quality without eliminating project cyclicality. Supply-only projects concentrate revenue in meters, endpoints, and software. Turnkey projects can add installation management and ancillary materials equal to as much as 50% of the project revenue profile, but those pass-through items are lower margin and can distort comparisons. Medium and large utility projects may take one to more than five years from planning to deployment, followed by 10 to 15 years of SaaS and add-on opportunities. Researchers should therefore separate demand visibility from quarterly shipment timing.
What gives Badger Meter a competitive advantage?
The company’s advantage is not one patent or one meter. It is the combined effect of incumbent utility relationships, a broad hardware portfolio, cellular communications, embedded software workflows, field support, and a growing data layer. The FY2025 Form 10-K notes that no single patent or trademark is material to the whole company, which means the moat is systemic rather than dependent on one legal asset.
Why are switching costs and customer trust important?
Water utilities are risk-averse operators of mission-critical infrastructure. A provider must integrate with billing systems, customer-information systems, field-service workflows, device management, communications networks, and regulatory reporting. Once a utility has deployed thousands of connected endpoints and trained staff around BEACON, replacement becomes more than a hardware decision. Badger Meter’s direct, consultative sales model further embeds the company in capital planning and operational problem-solving.
How do data and product breadth reinforce the moat?
Management reports a 100% software attachment rate to cellular AMI endpoints. That matters because every new endpoint adds device data and another software relationship. OneNetwork is intended to combine Badger Meter sensors, third-party sensors, utility SCADA, and GIS data under a common backend and single sign-on. Cobalt analytics can then operate inside established utility workflows rather than as a detached dashboard. Product breadth also allows the company to enter through metering, water quality, pressure, or sewer monitoring and cross-sell later.
Who competes with Badger Meter?
Competition differs by product layer. In utility water, Badger Meter faces companies that offer meters, endpoints, fixed or cellular communications, software, water-quality instruments, or network-monitoring devices. In flow instrumentation, competition is broader and more application-specific. The market is rational but not easy: several rivals have greater financial resources, wider industrial portfolios, or established utility footprints.
Which rivals pressure the utility-water franchise?
| Competitor named in filing | Primary overlap | Badger Meter response |
|---|---|---|
| Sensus / Xylem | Utility meters, communications, smart-water systems | Cellular AMI, broad meter choice, software attachment, direct utility relationships |
| Neptune / Roper Technologies | Metering and AMI | ORION Cellular and BEACON integration |
| Itron | AMI communications and data platforms | Water-specific hardware plus software and field expertise |
| Aclara / Hubbell | Utility communications and smart infrastructure | Cellular network-as-a-service approach |
| Hach / Veralto | Water quality and analytical instrumentation | Integrated water-cycle monitoring within BlueEdge |
| Mueller Water Products and Kamstrup | Meters, leak detection, smart-water hardware | Installed base, product breadth, customer-success model |
What does the market structure imply?
The company estimates that only about 40% of U.S. water meters have been converted to some form of AMI. This leaves a long conversion runway, but it also invites investment from large rivals. Badger Meter’s strategic defense is to make the meter decision inseparable from software, analytics, customer outcomes, and later network-monitoring use cases.
How financially strong is Badger Meter?
FY2025 set a strong baseline with record revenue, operating earnings, cash flow, and no year-end borrowings. Q1 2026 weakened operationally, but liquidity still supported dividends, buybacks, and the $100 million UDlive acquisition announced in April 2026.
What do the annual trend and cash conversion show?
| Metric | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net sales | $703.6M | $826.6M | $916.7M |
| Gross margin | 39.3% | 39.8% | 41.7% |
| Operating earnings | $118.0M | $157.9M | $183.4M |
| Operating margin | 16.8% | 19.1% | 20.0% |
| Net earnings | $92.6M | $124.9M | $141.6M |
| Operating cash flow | $110.1M | $155.0M | $183.7M |
| Capital expenditures | $12.0M | $12.8M | $14.0M |
A useful cash measure is free cash flow, calculated here as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures. On that basis, FY2025 free cash flow was approximately $169.7 million, equivalent to about 120% of $141.6 million net earnings. Low capital intensity is important: capital expenditures were only about 1.5% of revenue, leaving room for acquisitions and shareholder distributions.
How does capital allocation affect the story?
In FY2025, Badger Meter spent $184.0 million on acquisitions, $14.0 million on capital expenditures, and $43.5 million on dividends. In Q1 2026, it generated $33.9 million of operating cash flow, paid $11.7 million of dividends, and repurchased $38.2 million of stock. The board expanded the repurchase authorization to $150 million, with $114.7 million remaining at March 31, 2026. Management’s long-term framework targets 6% to 8% revenue CAGR, 39% to 42% gross margin, 25% to 30% EBITDA incremental margins, more than 100% free-cash-flow conversion, and 10% to 15% EPS growth; these are objectives, not guarantees.
Who owns Badger Meter stock, and how is it governed?
Badger Meter has one class of common stock and one vote per share. It is not founder-controlled and has no dual-class structure. As a result, governance influence is dispersed among large institutions, directors, and management rather than concentrated in a controlling family or founder. The 2026 proxy statement reported 29,181,598 voting shares outstanding on February 27, 2026.
Which shareholders have the largest disclosed stakes?
| Holder or group | Shares | Stake | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock, Inc. | 4,989,045 | 17.1% | Largest disclosed holder; institutional voting policies can influence governance outcomes. |
| The Vanguard Group | 3,985,421 | 13.7% | Large passive ownership reinforces focus on board quality and long-term capital discipline. |
| State Street Corporation | 1,561,365 | 5.4% | Third disclosed owner above 5%. |
| CEO Kenneth Bockhorst | 105,465 | 0.4% | Meaningful economic alignment, but no control position. |
| All directors and executive officers | 277,606 | 1.0% | Management ownership aligns incentives without insulating the board from outside shareholders. |
What do board structure and incentives signal?
Executive compensation is tied to sales, profitability, return on invested capital, operating cash generation, primary working capital, and overall financial position. The company also uses stock-ownership guidelines, clawbacks, and prohibitions on hedging and pledging. This incentive mix fits the operating model: management is rewarded not only for growth, but also for cash conversion, working-capital efficiency, and disciplined returns.
Which opportunities, risks, and KPIs matter most?
Badger Meter’s May 2026 framework identifies several growth lanes: mechanical-to-ultrasonic conversion, cellular AMI adoption, meter share gains, SaaS expansion, Beyond the Meter sensors, international growth, and acquisitions. It also identifies approximately 2.6 million to 3.6 million awarded connections in selected projects expected to deploy over multiple years, including several beginning in the second half of 2026.
Where could growth come from?
What risks could change the outlook?
| Risk or KPI | Current anchor | What to monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Project pacing | Q1 2026 utility water sales down 9.6% | Award-to-deployment timing, installation labor, and project mix. |
| Gross margin | 41.7% in Q1 2026 and FY2025 | Product mix, pass-through revenue, tariffs, and pricing. |
| Working capital | Inventory rose to $175.2M at March 31, 2026 | Inventory build, payables timing, and cash conversion as large projects ramp. |
| Acquisition integration | SmartCover $184.0M; UDlive $100.0M plus earnout | Integration, growth, amortization, synergies, and return on invested capital. |
| Technology and cybersecurity | Mission-critical connected infrastructure | Reliability, resilience, data protection, certifications, and uptime. |
| Input costs and trade policy | Copper, tin, bismuth, resins, electronics | Tariffs, pricing, sourcing flexibility, and factory productivity. |
| Competition | Large global water and industrial peers | AMI wins, meter conversions, software retention, and reference customers. |
Sustainability is commercially relevant because Badger Meter’s tools can reduce water loss, chemical use, energy consumption, sewer overflows, and field work. Its 2025 sustainability report announcement frames these outcomes within governance and operations. The key constraint is utilities’ ability to fund and execute deployments.
Why does Badger Meter matter for valuation?
A valuation model should not treat Badger Meter as a generic industrial company. The business combines replacement-driven meter demand, project-based AMI shipments, recurring SaaS, low capital intensity, and acquisition-led portfolio expansion. Those elements produce different growth, margin, and risk characteristics, so the forecast should be built from operational drivers rather than a single top-line growth assumption.
Which DCF assumptions deserve the most attention?
The most sensitive debate is whether Badger Meter can sustain above-market growth while preserving a 39% to 42% gross-margin range and converting more than 100% of net income into free cash flow. A high valuation would require confidence that AMI conversion, recurring software, and Beyond the Meter growth offset project volatility. A more conservative model would haircut the timing of awarded projects, normalize margins below peak periods, and treat acquisitions as reinvestment rather than free growth.
What is the key takeaway from Badger Meter analysis?
Badger Meter matters because it has transformed a durable but modest-growth meter franchise into a broader smart-water platform. The core replacement cycle provides a foundation; ORION Cellular adds share-gain potential and software attachment; BEACON and OneNetwork deepen workflows; SmartCover and UDlive extend the portfolio into sewer and stormwater monitoring. FY2025 demonstrated the upside of this mix with $916.7 million of sales, a 20.0% operating margin, $183.7 million of operating cash flow, and no year-end borrowings.
The central caution is visible in Q1 2026. Revenue fell 9.0%, operating margin dropped to 17.4%, and diluted EPS declined to $0.93 because project pacing, short-cycle demand, mix, and a higher SEA base moved against the company at the same time. That quarter does not erase the long-term conversion runway, but it proves that demand visibility and quarterly financial results are not the same thing.
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support


