What does Borr Drilling do?
Borr Drilling Limited is a Bermuda-incorporated offshore contractor that supplies modern jack-up rigs to oil and gas producers in shallow water. It does not own petroleum reserves; it earns fees by providing rigs, crews and operating systems to integrated, national and independent producers. BORR trades primarily on the New York Stock Exchange and also on Euronext Oslo Børs. The official company overview emphasizes safe and efficient global jack-up service.
Why shallow-water jack-ups matter
A jack-up is a mobile platform whose legs are lowered to the seabed so the hull can be raised above the water. Borr’s rigs generally work in depths of up to 400 feet. Shallow-water projects often have lower costs and shorter development cycles than deepwater projects, creating demand for rigs that can move between basins and drill development, workover or exploration wells.
Who buys Borr’s services?
Customers include Eni, PTTEP, Saudi Aramco-linked operations, Petrobras-linked programs and PEMEX-linked projects. Concentration remains material: Eni represented 18% of FY2025 operating revenue and PTTEP 11%. Borr is therefore best analyzed as a global industrial service provider with customer, country and contract exposure.
| Research lens | Borr-specific answer | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Offshore contract drilling, shallow-water jack-ups | Demand depends on customer drilling budgets and oil-market conditions. |
| Asset base | Premium jack-up rigs, all built in or after 2008 | Age, specification and condition affect tender eligibility and dayrates. |
| Core customer | Integrated, national and independent oil companies | Long programs can add visibility but also sovereign and payment risk. |
| Operating model | Single reported operating segment with geographic disclosure | Revenue type and geography matter more than a segment-profit split. |
How does Borr Drilling make money?
Borr’s main commercial mechanism is the dayrate: a customer pays an agreed amount for each day a rig is available under contract. Pricing reflects rig specification, location, mobilization, duration, options and market tightness. Borr also earns bareboat charter revenue and fees for managing or supporting rigs. The 2025 Form 20-F reports one operating segment, so revenue type, geography and fleet status are the practical analytical building blocks.
Which revenue stream is largest?
What determines profit from a rig contract?
A contracted rig is not automatically profitable. Revenue depends on operating days and earned dayrate, while cash costs include crews, insurance, supplies, repairs and shore support. Mobilization, surveys, approvals and upgrades can consume cash before earnings begin. Economic utilization therefore matters alongside technical uptime: contract transitions can create non-billable days even when equipment performs reliably.
What does Borr Drilling’s latest quarter show?
The quarter ended March 31, 2026 showed a larger asset base absorbing transition costs. The Q1 2026 earnings release reported $247.0M of operating revenue, down 5% from Q4 2025 but up 14% from Q1 2025. Adjusted EBITDA was $88.5M and net loss was $29.0M. Results included the five-rig Noble acquisition, Odin’s delayed contract start and an $8.4M credit-loss provision.
How did revenue and costs move?
| Metric | Q1 2026 | Comparison | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | $247.0M | $216.6M in Q1 2025 | More operating and charter days offset lower earned dayrates. |
| Rig operating and maintenance expense | $144.7M | $109.8M in Q1 2025 | Fleet activity, acquired rigs and the credit provision raised costs. |
| Operating income | $46.0M | $60.2M in Q1 2025 | Higher operating and depreciation costs compressed profit. |
| Interest expense | $63.2M | $58.1M in Q1 2025 | Debt added for fleet expansion increased the financing burden. |
| Net cash from operations | $48.1M | $138.7M in Q1 2025 | Q1 2025 included Mexico settlements that did not recur. |
| Investing cash outflow | $182.9M | Quarter ended March 31, 2026 | $175.1M related to completing the five-rig acquisition. |
Why did higher revenue produce a larger loss?
The quarter shows why utilization, accounting profit and cash flow must be separated. Operating income was about 18.6% of revenue, but interest expense exceeded operating income. The Q1 2026 Form 6-K makes financing costs the central constraint. Adjusted EBITDA measures operations before depreciation, financing and tax, but does not fund acquisitions, maintenance or debt service.
Which strategic turning points shaped Borr Drilling?
Borr’s history is compressed. Incorporated in 2016, it assembled a fleet when offshore assets were available from distressed owners and shipyards. Rather than operate across every water depth, it concentrated on premium jack-ups. That decision still defines its customer proposition, cost structure and cycle sensitivity.
How did the fleet reach its current scale?
-
2016Borr incorporated in Bermuda. It began as an acquisition-led platform rather than a legacy driller.
-
2017Large purchases from Hercules, Transocean and PPL. These deals created scale and fleet standardization.
-
2018–2019Further acquisitions from Paragon, Seatrium-related entities and BOTL. Borr deepened its premium jack-up focus.
-
2019NYSE listing. U.S. market access broadened the investor base and financing options.
-
2024Vali and Var delivered. The fleet reached 24 rigs and shifted toward deployment and contract coverage.
-
Jan. 2026Five Noble rigs acquired for $360.0M. The fleet reached 29 rigs, increasing capacity and debt risk.
-
Mar. 2026Five-rig Fontis transaction agreed through a 50/50 joint venture. The structure adds exposure with seller financing.
What changed with the 2026 acquisitions?
The 2026 deals sharpen Borr’s strategic tension. Scale can improve customer relevance, overhead absorption and optionality in a tighter market, but every additional rig needs contracts, maintenance and capital. The reports and presentations archive shows how quickly fleet deployment and financing can change the earnings picture.
Why do modern rigs, backlog and utilization define Borr’s economics?
Offshore drilling is a utilization business. A modern rig on a strong dayrate with little downtime can produce attractive cash contribution; the same rig between contracts still incurs insurance, maintenance and preservation costs. Borr’s economics therefore depend on technical utilization, economic utilization, contract coverage, backlog and dayrate.
How strong was operating execution in Q1 2026?
Borr reported $1.17B of dayrate-equivalent backlog at March 31, 2026 and $1.08B at the May report date. FY2026 coverage was 71% at an average dayrate near $137,000, with second-half coverage at 65%. Backlog improves visibility but remains exposed to options, suspensions, sanctions, start-up delays and termination clauses.
Where is the contracted fleet deployed?
| KPI | Latest disclosed value | How to interpret it |
|---|---|---|
| Technical utilization | 99.4%, Q1 2026 | Measures operational uptime for working rigs; high performance supports customer trust. |
| Economic utilization | 97.0%, Q1 2026 | Captures the proportion of potential earnings days actually billed. |
| 2026 contract coverage | 71%, May 2026 | Coverage reduces idle risk but limits near-term spot upside. |
| Average covered dayrate | About $137,000, FY2026 coverage | A useful revenue anchor before reimbursables, downtime and contract-specific adjustments. |
| YTD contract awards | 13 commitments / $274.0M | Shows conversion of open days into future revenue. |
Who competes with Borr Drilling, and what is its moat?
Jack-up contracts are awarded through tenders or negotiations. Customers assess price, location, water-depth capability, safety, crew quality, equipment condition and operating history. Borr competes with jack-up specialists and diversified offshore contractors including ADES, Shelf Drilling, Valaris and Noble. Barriers are capital, fleet quality, customer qualification, local capability and the time needed to build or reactivate compliant rigs.
How is Borr positioned against major rivals?
| Competitor | Official positioning | Competitive implication for Borr |
|---|---|---|
| ADES | Large global jack-up and onshore fleet | Scale and Middle East relationships intensify NOC competition. |
| Shelf Drilling | Shallow-water specialist with a broad international jack-up fleet | Competes on regional coverage and cost discipline. |
| Valaris | Diversified offshore fleet with modern shallow-water jack-ups | Can leverage relationships across jack-ups and floating rigs. |
| Noble | High-specification jack-up and ultra-deepwater contractor | Technical reputation supports premium tenders. |
What gives Borr a defensible advantage?
Borr’s strongest resource is its combination of fleet age, uniformity and uptime. All rigs were built in or after 2008 and most after 2013. Similar designs can simplify training, spares and maintenance while supporting multi-rig bids. The advantage is valuable but not permanent: competitors can buy modern assets, customers retain bargaining power and idle rigs destroy value.
How financially strong is Borr Drilling through the cycle?
Borr produced meaningful operating earnings in FY2025, but EBITDA alone does not define financial strength. The business is capital intensive, debt financed and exposed to working-capital swings. FY2025 revenue was $1,020.8M, adjusted EBITDA $470.1M and operating cash flow $251.9M. Rig additions were $88.2M and cash interest was $205.1M, illustrating the financing burden.
What does the three-year revenue trend show?
Where is the balance-sheet pressure?
| Financial indicator | Period value | Research implication |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 operating income | $322.1M | The fleet produced healthy operating earnings before financing costs. |
| FY2025 net income | $45.0M | Interest and tax absorbed most operating profit. |
| Cash | $246.0M at March 31, 2026 | Cash declined after the Noble acquisition but remained part of a $480.0M liquidity position. |
| Gross borrowings | $2,360.0M at March 31, 2026 | Debt is the main financial risk and creates sensitivity to refinancing terms. |
| Near-term maturities | $143.6M within 12 months of March 31, 2026 | Manageable relative to liquidity, but larger 2028 and 2030 maturities still matter. |
| Q1 2026 shareholders’ equity | $1,197.2M | Provides capital, though rig values remain cyclical. |
In April 2026, Borr issued $300.0M of 3.5% convertible notes due 2033 and repurchased $195.2M of 2028 convertibles. The transaction extended maturities and reduced coupon cost, but convertibles can dilute shareholders. Borr therefore combines valuable assets and meaningful liquidity with a capital structure that requires sustained utilization and disciplined refinancing.
Who owns Borr Drilling stock, and how does governance affect the story?
Borr has one class of common shares, but ownership is concentrated. The 2025 Form 20-F identifies three holders above 5%, and directors and officers collectively own a significant stake. This can support long-term decisions, while related-party relationships and board affiliations require scrutiny. As a Bermuda foreign private issuer, Borr’s governance framework differs from that of a domestic Delaware corporation.
| Holder or group | Beneficial ownership | Source date | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thiago Mordehachvili / Granular Capital | 46,145,132 shares / 15.0% | March 17, 2026 | Largest disclosed holder and board member. |
| Azvalor Asset Management | 28,606,167 shares / 9.3% | March 17, 2026 | Large external stake supports capital-discipline scrutiny. |
| Tor Olav Trøim / Drew Holding | 25,150,263 shares / 8.2% | March 17, 2026 | Founder-linked ownership makes conflict controls important. |
| Directors and officers as a group | 78,433,028 shares / 25.1% | March 17, 2026 | Insider exposure aligns outcomes but concentrates influence. |
What signals come from leadership and incentives?
Bruno Morand became chief executive officer in September 2025 and Magnus Vaaler serves as chief financial officer. Their task combines commercial execution with balance-sheet management: filling open days, integrating acquisitions, collecting receivables and refinancing debt. Executive performance units include relative total-shareholder-return criteria, while the board maintains audit, compensation and nominating committees with independent directors under NYSE standards.
What opportunities and risks could change Borr Drilling’s outlook?
Borr’s upside and downside are amplified by operating leverage. A tighter jack-up market can raise dayrates and reduce idle time, allowing incremental revenue to flow through after variable costs. Suspensions, sanctions, lower oil prices or project delays can remove revenue faster than crews, maintenance and financing costs can be reduced. The strategy is to convert acquired capacity into contracted days before holding costs erode returns.
Longer-term opportunity comes from shallow-water economics and limited newbuild supply. Borr reported 11 jack-ups under construction globally at March 31, 2026, equal to 2.5% of the marketed fleet, while modern marketed utilization was 90.1%. A young fleet is positioned for stronger customer budgets, but tender timing can lag supportive oil prices.
Why does Borr Drilling’s business model matter for valuation?
Borr should be valued from rig-level capacity rather than a simple revenue growth rate. The key variables are active rigs, contracted days, earned dayrate, economic utilization and operating cost. Revenue can rise sharply when an idle rig starts work and fall abruptly when a contract ends. Maintenance capital, mobilization, working capital and debt service determine how much EBITDA becomes equity cash flow.
| Valuation driver | Borr-specific input | DCF or comparable-company effect |
|---|---|---|
| Contracted rigs | 24 of 29 contracted or committed in May 2026 | Sets near-term revenue and idle-fleet optionality. |
| Dayrate | About $137,000 average on FY2026 coverage | Small changes materially affect EBITDA because costs are partly fixed. |
| Economic utilization | 97.0% in Q1 2026 | Converts contracted capacity into earned revenue. |
| Operating cost | $144.7M rig operating expense in Q1 2026 | Determines margin and idle-period downside. |
| Maintenance and activation capital | Contract and survey dependent | Must be deducted; EBITDA overstates equity cash flow. |
| Net debt and refinancing | Large secured and convertible debt stack | Raises equity and discount-rate sensitivity. |
| Terminal fleet value | Young modern rigs, but cyclical resale values | Requires conservative residual-value and dayrate assumptions. |
Which valuation mistake is easiest to make?
The easiest mistake is applying a stable industrial margin to a cyclical fleet. Backlog can make revenue appear predictable, but contract roll-offs create discrete exposure. A robust model should forecast rigs or rig groups by status, include downtime between contracts, separate sustaining maintenance from acquisitions and treat convertible securities consistently in enterprise value and diluted shares.
What is the key takeaway from Borr Drilling analysis?
Borr Drilling is a concentrated case study in modern shallow-water drilling. It has assembled a young large fleet, achieved high technical performance and built a global customer base. Q1 2026 also showed why fleet quality is only part of the story: delayed starts, transitions, credit losses and interest can offset revenue growth.
The strategy is to convert expanded capacity into long contracts at attractive dayrates. The Noble acquisition and proposed Fontis joint venture increase exposure to a tighter market, but also to idle days, maintenance and financing. Concentrated ownership provides experienced, invested sponsors, while related-party links and repeated capital-market activity require governance discipline.
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support


