Eco Wave Power Global AB (WAVE) Company Overview

IL | Utilities | Renewable Utilities | NASDAQ

What does Eco Wave Power do?

Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) is a Swedish renewable-energy technology company whose ADSs trade on the Nasdaq Capital Market under WAVE. Its onshore or nearshore system attaches floaters to piers, breakwaters, or jetties and converts wave motion into electricity through land-based hydraulic and generating equipment. The company is not yet a utility at scale; it is a development-stage technology and project business seeking repeatable commercial deployments.

404.7+ MW
Reported worldwide project pipeline in the 2025 Form 20-F; most capacity remains subject to preliminary agreements.
100 kW
Installed capacity of the grid-connected EWP-EDF One station in Jaffa, Israel.
11
Full-time employees as of February 28, 2026, highlighting the company’s outsourced, partnership-heavy model.
46.7M
Common shares outstanding at December 31, 2025, before the June 2026 strategic financing.

How does the system convert waves into electricity?

Point-absorber floaters move hydraulic pistons; accumulators smooth pressure before a motor, generator, and inverter produce electricity. Sensitive equipment stays on land, and automated protection raises floaters during severe conditions. Eco Wave Power says generation can begin at wave heights of roughly 0.5 meter. The official technology explanation illustrates the intended maintenance and grid-connection advantages.

Step 1 Capture motion Floaters move against a coastal structure.
Step 2 Build pressure Hydraulics smooth irregular wave motion.
Step 3 Generate power Land-based equipment produces electricity.
Step 4 Protect equipment Automation lifts floaters during storms.

Eco Wave Power therefore represents a commercialization thesis, not an established earnings stream. Its 2025 annual report recorded only $38,000 of revenue, making permits, uptime, funding, and project conversion more informative than conventional growth rates.

How does Eco Wave Power make money?

Eco Wave Power describes three commercial structures plus ancillary services. Under build-own-operate, it would retain a station and sell electricity under a PPA that could last up to 25 years. Build-operate-transfer would monetize development and operation before ownership changes. Joint-venture or turnkey arrangements could combine company technology with local sites, manufacturing, financing, and customer access.

Recurring potential
Electricity sales
Long-duration PPA revenue is possible, but Eco Wave Power would retain financing, construction, and utilization risk.
Project potential
Turnkey equipment and construction
Project costs plus a margin could generate earlier receipts, with less lifetime participation.
Partner-led potential
Joint ventures and licensing
Local partners may reduce entry friction; economics depend on ownership, milestones, and revenue sharing.
Current evidence
Feasibility and engineering services
Recognized revenue has come from studies and development work, not commercial-scale power sales.

Which revenue stream is real today?

Possible revenue is not proven revenue. The business-model page describes the intended structures, but the 2025 Form 20-F says none had produced revenue through year-end. FY2025 revenue was $38,000 from South African feasibility work, versus $168,000 from Taiwan in FY2024 and $306,000 in FY2023. The pattern is episodic project work, not a recurring base.

Model How cash could be earned Capital burden Current proof point
BOO Long-term PPA electricity sales. Highest; financing and operating risk retained. No revenue through FY2025.
BOT Development and operation before transfer. High until transfer. No revenue through FY2025.
Turnkey / JV Cost plus margin; possible power-revenue share. Potentially shared with partners. Partnerships remain developmental.
Services Studies, engineering, and potential software. Lower, but project-dependent. $38K FY2025 feasibility revenue.

Which projects can move WAVE from pilots to commercial scale?

Eco Wave Power’s portfolio mixes operating demonstrations, feasibility studies, preliminary agreements, and one larger concession. Maturity matters more than headline capacity: small stations provide data, while larger concessions create value only after permits, financing, construction, and grid connection.

Selected disclosed project capacity — not equivalent to contracted backlog
Portugal concession 20.0 MW
South Africa study 8.3 MW
Portugal first phase 1.0 MW
Israel station 0.1 MW
Taiwan unit 0.1 MW
Scale is shown against the 20 MW Portugal concession. South Africa is a feasibility opportunity, and the smaller projects are pilots or initial units; capacity is not a revenue forecast.

Why Portugal is the central scale test

Portugal is the central scale test. Eco Wave Power holds a 20 MW concession and is engineering an initial 1 MW installation at the Port of Porto. A water-use title was signed in March 2024, and half of the grid-connection fee installment was paid in May 2025. Storm damage later prompted APDL to assess the selected breakwater. The official project page explains the opportunity; clearance, financing, and commissioning determine its value.

What do the pilots contribute?

The 100 kW Jaffa station is grid-connected under a PPA with Israel Electric Corporation. In Q1 2025, the company reported 13% average output in moderate waves, a 40 kW peak, and zero downtime. The Port of Los Angeles pilot launched in September 2025 and completed its demonstration in March 2026; the SEC-filed update reported capital expenditure below $1 million. Both strengthen technical credibility, not commercial unit economics.

Project Status at mid-2026 Economic role Critical next evidence
Jaffa, Israel — 100 kW Operating, grid-connected, with PPA. Reliability and operating-data base. Output, maintenance cost, and receipts.
Port of Los Angeles Pilot completed in March 2026. U.S. demonstration and permitting proof. Funded follow-on deployment.
Portugal — first 1 MW of 20 MW Engineering underway; structural review pending. First megawatt-scale reference. Clearance, financing, and commissioning.
Taiwan — 100 kW unit Local manufacturing and site development. Tests partner-led equipment sales. Installation, acceptance, and revenue.
India / South Africa Feasibility and memorandum stage. Partner-led market entry. Binding scope, funding, and pilot conversion.

What does Eco Wave Power’s latest quarter show?

The quarter ended March 31, 2026 showed lower operating spending but no commercial revenue step-change. The condensed loss statement reported no revenue line, and operating expenses equaled the $682,000 operating loss. Cost reductions improved the operating result, while a swing from financial income to expense widened the net loss.

$682K
Q1 2026 operating expenses, down 11% from $765K in Q1 2025.
$695K
Q1 2026 net loss, versus $505K in Q1 2025.
$5.04M
Cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2026.
$4.82M
Total equity at March 31, 2026, down from $5.49M at December 31, 2025.

Where did spending change?

R&D fell 23% to $140,000, selling and marketing declined 8% to $71,000, and G&A decreased 7% to $499,000. Other income was $52,000 and the EDF joint-venture loss was $24,000. G&A still represented about three quarters of operating expenses, a large burden relative to current revenue.

Metric Q1 2026 Q1 2025 Interpretation
R&D expense $140K $181K Lower spending preserved cash.
Selling and marketing $71K $77K Commercial activity remains partner-led.
General and administrative $499K $539K Dominant expense and leverage hurdle.
Operating loss $682K $765K Improved $83K, or 11%.
Net financial result $(13K) $260K FX and finance reversed operating improvement.
Loss per share $0.01 $0.01 Weighted-average shares: 46.72M.

The Q1 2026 interim report showed $5.64 million of current assets, $2.32 million of current liabilities, $7.15 million of total assets, and $2.33 million of total liabilities. That supports near-term operations but not several commercial builds without partner or external capital.

How financially strong is Eco Wave Power?

Eco Wave Power should be judged as a pre-commercial developer. At December 31, 2025, it held $6.02 million of cash and $251,000 of restricted deposits. FY2025 operating cash outflow was $3.04 million, property-and-equipment purchases were $525,000, revenue was $38,000, operating expenses were $3.15 million, and net loss was $3.72 million.

FY2025 operating baseline
$3.72M net loss
Net loss widened 77% from $2.11M in FY2024, mainly because operating costs rose and finance results deteriorated.
March 31, 2026 liquidity
$5.29M
Cash plus restricted deposits before the June 2026 financing; liquidity remained several times quarterly operating expenses.

What do revenue and expense trends imply?

Annual revenue trend — FY2023 to FY2025
$306K FY2023
$168K FY2024
$38K FY2025
Revenue has been small and project-driven. Falling reported revenue does not measure pipeline size; it shows that commercial conversion has not yet occurred.
FY2025 operating expense mix — $3.22M before other income and JV loss
General and administrative — $2.078M — 64.6%
Research and development — $733K — 22.8%
Selling and marketing — $409K — 12.6%
Percentages are calculated from the three principal FY2025 operating-expense categories, totaling $3.220M.

How does financing change the runway?

In June 2026, the company sold 400,000 ADSs at $10.00 for about $4.0 million of gross proceeds and issued warrants for 300,000 ADSs at $12.00 through June 26, 2029. The financing announcement directs proceeds toward deployments and AI technology. Runway improved, but equity and warrants create dilution.

Financial indicator Reported amount Period Research interpretation
Operating cash flow $(3.040M) FY2025 Primary runway measure.
Property and equipment purchases $525K FY2025 Modest today; BOO could require more.
Cash and restricted deposits $6.273M December 31, 2025 Buffer against current burn.
Related-party loan $1.042M December 31, 2025 Funding source and obligation.
Accumulated deficit $18.768M December 31, 2025 Cumulative pre-commercial losses.

Which turning points still shape the strategy?

Eco Wave Power’s history combines technical demonstrations, public-market financing, and efforts to convert port access into scalable projects. The Swedish parent was incorporated in 2019, adopted the current name in 2021, and listed ADSs on Nasdaq that year. The strategic challenge has moved from proving motion-to-electricity conversion toward proving permits, financing, manufacturing, and replication.

  1. 2011
    The operating venture was founded around the onshore conversion concept and early IP.
  2. 2016
    Gibraltar demonstrated breakwater deployment and later exposed site-compatibility risk.
  3. 2019
    The Swedish parent acquired the operating subsidiary, creating today’s structure.
  4. 2021
    The current name and Nasdaq ADS listing expanded capital-market access.
  5. 2023
    The 100 kW Jaffa station reached grid connection and a PPA.
  6. 2024
    Portugal’s water-use title advanced the 20 MW concession.
  7. 2025–2026
    Los Angeles completed; Taiwan, India, and South Africa expanded the partner pipeline.

What did these milestones change?

The pattern is consistent: a small visible demonstration builds credibility, followed by a local authority or industrial partner. This keeps the internal workforce small and improves site access, but makes schedules dependent on counterparties, procurement, coastal engineering, permits, and grid processes.

1 MW The first Porto phase is the critical strategic bridge: ten times the capacity of the 100 kW Jaffa station, yet still only 5% of the 20 MW Portuguese concession.

What gives Eco Wave Power a competitive advantage?

Eco Wave Power’s proposed advantage is architectural, not scale-based. Offshore devices may require seabed anchoring, subsea cables, vessels, and difficult maintenance. Eco Wave Power keeps the conversion unit on land and mounts modular floaters on existing coastal infrastructure, potentially simplifying access, grid connection, and component sourcing.

Which resources could become a moat?

Access and maintainability Promising
Storm-protection design Demonstrated
Patent and know-how position Developing
Commercial switching costs Unproven
Scale and cost evidence Early

The 2025 Form 20-F lists 13 issued or registered patents and one European application in examination. The company also emphasizes modular sizing, off-the-shelf components, and storm protection. Its competitive-advantages page describes the design thesis. A moat exists only if customers ultimately observe lower lifetime cost, faster permitting, stronger survivability, or better output.

Who are the real competitors?

The annual report does not name a definitive peer set. Direct competition includes other point absorbers, oscillating-water-column systems, tidal platforms, and port-based devices. More important substitutes are solar, wind, storage, geothermal, grid upgrades, and conventional generation, all competing for funding and interconnection capacity.

Buyer power
High before standardization
Ports and utilities can demand pilots, warranties, performance data, and financing.
Supplier power
Manageable but consequential
Outsourcing lowers fixed cost but transfers quality and schedule dependence to suppliers.
Substitution risk
Very high
Established renewables have larger supply chains and bankable histories.
Entry barriers
Technical and regulatory
Patents, marine engineering, permits, and references matter, but do not yet ensure pricing power.

Who owns WAVE, and why does governance matter?

Ownership is concentrated. At February 26, 2026, director David Leb owned 11,850,200 shares, or 25.37%, and founder-CEO Inna Braverman owned 11,441,200, or 24.49%, based on 46,717,308 shares. Directors and executives as a group controlled 49.86%. One vote per common share gives insiders substantial influence over elections, financings, and strategic transactions.

Holder or governance group Shares / structure Ownership or status Why it matters
David Leb 11,850,200 common shares 25.37% at February 26, 2026 Alignment plus concentrated influence.
Inna Braverman 11,441,200 common shares 24.49% at February 26, 2026 Management and control are tightly linked.
Directors and executives Group beneficial ownership 49.86% at February 26, 2026 Minority influence is limited.
Board of directors 6 members 5 classified as independent under Nasdaq standards Independent oversight; concentrated ownership.
Audit committee 3 independent directors Mats Andersson, Annath Abecassis, and Gilles Amar Oversees reporting and controls.

How should researchers interpret founder control?

Founder control can support a long development horizon but reduces outside influence and increases key-person risk. The company reported 1,864 common-share holders of record and 78 ADS holders of record in February 2026; these are not beneficial-owner counts. The annual report contains ownership data, and the official board page identifies directors and committees.

Alignment benefit
49.86%
Leadership owned nearly half the company at February 26, 2026.
Minority-holder constraint
Limited influence
Concentrated votes reduce the leverage of dispersed ADS holders.

What opportunities and risks define the DCF?

Historical revenue extrapolation is unsuitable. A WAVE DCF must probability-weight project conversion, timing, Eco Wave Power’s economic share, required capital, operating performance, and dilution. Because current revenue is negligible, small changes in those assumptions can dominate value.

Where could upside come from?

Upside centers on Portugal’s first 1 MW and later expansion within the 20 MW concession. Taiwan could validate locally manufactured turnkey sales; India and South Africa could convert studies into funded pilots. Jaffa also supports data analytics and digital-twin development. Israel’s July 2026 Blue-Tech initiative allocated NIS 6 million, about $2 million, to marine-energy innovation broadly. The company statement is supportive but does not confirm an award to Eco Wave Power.

What could break the commercialization case?

The central risk is that pilots never become economic assets. Permitting, structural limits, low utilization, maintenance, storm exposure, customer preference for mature renewables, and outsourced supplier execution can delay or destroy returns. Additional funding may be unavailable or dilutive. International operations add currency, legal, geopolitical, and intellectual-property risk.

DCF driver or risk Current anchor What improves the case What weakens the case
Commercial project conversion 404.7+ MW, mostly preliminary Binding, funded contracts Unfunded memoranda
Portugal timing 1 MW within 20 MW concession Approval and construction schedule More site or funding delay
Capital cost $1.4M–$2.1M equipment/MW estimate; excludes installation and grid Lower repeatable installed cost Engineering overruns
Generation economics Jaffa: 13% average output in moderate waves, Q1 2025 Higher output and disclosed maintenance Low utilization or costly repairs
Cash runway $5.29M March liquidity plus $4.0M June gross financing Receipts, partner capital, controlled burn Repeated pre-revenue issuance
Terminal economics No commercial margin or recurring power revenue Reference sites and standard contracts Pilots without repeat orders
Portugal first-megawatt milestone
Track structural clearance, permits, funding, construction, and commissioning.
Contracted versus preliminary MW
Separate binding funded capacity from studies and memoranda.
Recognized project revenue
Look for repeatable equipment or milestone revenue.
Capacity factor and uptime
Demand sustained production and maintenance data.
Quarterly cash burn
Compare operating cash use with unrestricted liquidity.
Installed cost per MW
Track equipment, civil works, grid, and maintenance cost.
Partner-funded deployment
Partner capital can validate demand and reduce dilution.
Share and warrant dilution
Model new ADSs, warrants, and future capital raises.

What is the key takeaway for students and investors?

Eco Wave Power is a clear strategy case with incomplete commercial proof. It has a distinctive coastal architecture, grid-connected experience in Israel, a completed U.S. demonstration, a 20 MW Portuguese concession, and international partners. The first Portuguese megawatt could become a valuable reference project.

Financial evidence remains early: FY2025 revenue was $38,000, operating cash outflow was $3.04 million, and Q1 2026 net loss was $695,000. June financing improved flexibility but added dilution. The 404.7+ MW pipeline should be valued by milestone probabilities—permits, funding, construction, output, and repeat sales—not as contracted backlog.

Portugal execution Contract conversion Capacity factor Installed cost Cash burn Partner funding Dilution Repeat orders
The thesis in one sentence
WAVE becomes economically important only if Eco Wave Power converts accessible, maintainable coastal technology into funded megawatt-scale projects with measurable output and repeatable margins; until then, liquidity, permitting, partner commitment, and dilution are as important as the engineering itself.

DCF model

    5-Year Financial Model

    40+ Charts & Metrics

    DCF & Multiple Valuation

    Free Email Support



Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.

(WAVE) Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$17 $9
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5