What does Tutor Perini Corporation do?
Tutor Perini Corporation is a New York Stock Exchange-listed construction company operating under the ticker TPC. It manages technically demanding work for public agencies and private owners, especially mass transit, bridges, tunnels, healthcare facilities, detention complexes and other nonresidential infrastructure. The Los Angeles-area company traces its heritage to 1894, while its present scale reflects the 2008 Tutor-Saliba and Perini combination. The 2025 Form 10-K describes an integrated general contracting, construction management, design-build and specialty-trade platform.
A three-segment construction platform
Who buys the work?
The customer base is weighted toward public infrastructure. In FY2025, state and local agencies generated $3.54B, or 63.8%, of revenue; private customers contributed $1.40B, or 25.3%; and federal agencies contributed $604.8M, or 10.9%. About 91.2% of revenue was U.S.-based, making public funding and owner payment cycles central demand drivers.
| Identity item | Tutor Perini fact | Research implication |
|---|---|---|
| Listing | NYSE: TPC | One publicly traded parent consolidates multiple operating brands. |
| Core market | Large civil and nonresidential construction | Qualification, bonding and project-management capability create entry barriers. |
| Main customers | State/local, federal and private owners | Funding and procurement timing can shift revenue between periods. |
| Operating model | Prime contractor plus self-performed trades | Vertical integration can improve coordination but also increases execution responsibility. |
How does Tutor Perini make money?
Tutor Perini recognizes construction revenue and profit over time, generally using cost-to-cost estimates. This matches multiyear project economics but makes estimate quality critical: changes in expected labor, materials, schedule, subcontractor performance or claim recovery can alter profit before final cash settlement.
Contract structures shape the economics
At December 31, 2025, 79% of backlog was fixed-price, 13% guaranteed-maximum-price, 6% cost-plus or other, and 2% unit-price. Fixed-price work offers upside when execution beats the estimate, but transfers greater cost and schedule risk to the contractor. Contingency, early procurement and change-order rights reduce—but do not eliminate—that exposure.
Why self-performance matters
Specialty subsidiaries perform electrical, mechanical, plumbing, HVAC and fire-protection work internally. Self-performance can improve coordination, schedule control and retained trade margin, although intersegment revenue is eliminated in consolidation. The trade-off is greater direct labor, procurement and field-performance risk.
| Revenue mechanism | Economic driver | What can improve margin | What can reduce margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed-price contracts | Deliver scope below the bid estimate | Productivity, procurement savings, favorable changes | Inflation, delays, redesign, labor or subcontractor problems |
| GMP contracts | Manage costs beneath a negotiated ceiling | Shared savings and disciplined coordination | Cost overruns not recoverable from the owner |
| Cost-plus / unit-price | Fee or rate applied to reimbursable work | Volume and efficient deployment | Lower upside and scope variability |
| Claims and change orders | Recover owner-caused cost or scope changes | Well-supported entitlement and timely settlement | Arbitration loss, discounting or delayed collection |
Which segments and backlog matter most?
Civil is Tutor Perini's economic center. In FY2025 it generated $2.85B of revenue, $390.9M of construction income and a 13.7% segment margin. Building produced $1.85B at a 3.1% margin, while Specialty generated $844.0M but lost $7.5M. The key question is whether Civil can expand while the other segments improve profit conversion.
| Segment | FY2025 revenue | FY2025 construction income | Segment margin | Year-end backlog |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Civil | $2.85B | $390.9M | 13.7% | $10.15B |
| Building | $1.85B | $58.2M | 3.1% | $7.33B |
| Specialty Contractors | $844.0M | $(7.5)M | (0.9)% | $3.07B |
Backlog is concentrated in long-duration public work
Year-end 2025 backlog reached $20.56B, up 10%, after $7.43B of awards and adjustments. Roughly $6B, or 29%, was expected to convert to 2026 revenue. At March 31, 2026, backlog remained $19.84B: Civil $9.65B, Building $7.21B and Specialty $2.98B.
Which segment drives profit?
Civil decisively drives profit; its FY2025 construction income exceeded the consolidated total before corporate expense and Specialty losses. Mass transit represented about 62% of Civil backlog, while healthcare and detention each represented roughly 45% of Building backlog. These concentrations improve visibility but make a limited number of megaprojects highly influential to margin and working capital.
What did Tutor Perini's latest results show?
For the quarter ended March 31, 2026, Tutor Perini reported revenue of $1.389B, up 11% from $1.247B a year earlier. Civil revenue rose 14%, Building rose 3% and Specialty rose 24%. The company's first-quarter 2026 release reaffirmed adjusted diluted EPS guidance of $4.90-$5.30 for full-year 2026.
The latest quarter in numbers
| Metric | Q1 2026 | Q1 2025 | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.389B | $1.247B | Broad segment growth, led by Specialty and Civil. |
| Gross profit | $154.6M | $134.4M | Computed gross margin improved to 11.1% from 10.8%. |
| Construction operating income | $59.2M | $65.3M | Higher share-based compensation pressured GAAP results. |
| Net income attributable to TPC | $25.7M | $28.0M | Diluted EPS was $0.48 versus $0.53. |
| Adjusted diluted EPS | $1.03 | $0.65 | Adjusted earnings rose despite GAAP compensation volatility. |
| Operating cash flow | $146.9M | $22.9M | A 542% increase reflected strong collections and working-capital conversion. |
What changed beneath GAAP earnings?
Share-based compensation rose to $30.1M from $6.6M, reducing diluted EPS by an estimated $0.43 after tax and explaining much of the GAAP-adjusted gap. Segment economics were stronger: Civil's computed margin was 12.6%, Building's 3.5%, and Specialty was slightly profitable at 0.3%.
How did Tutor Perini build its current position?
Tutor Perini's present model is the product of scale-building, vertical integration and a deliberate focus on projects too complex for many smaller contractors. Its strategic history matters because today's backlog, risk profile and cash-flow pattern reflect decisions made over decades rather than a sudden infrastructure cycle.
Seven turning points that still matter
-
1894The Perini construction legacy begins. Long operating history supports owner relationships, qualification records and experience on difficult projects.
-
2008Tutor-Saliba and Perini combine to create Tutor Perini Corporation, joining heavy-civil capability with a broader building platform and national footprint.
-
2010sThe company expands specialty-trade capacity through electrical and mechanical operating businesses, increasing self-performance and cross-segment coordination.
-
2021The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law adds a multiyear federal funding backdrop, strengthening the opportunity set for transit, water and other public works.
-
2024New awards reach a company record of approximately $12.8B, establishing the megaproject backlog that drives the current revenue ramp.
-
2025Gary Smalley becomes CEO, while revenue and operating cash flow reach records; the board also initiates a quarterly dividend and a $200M repurchase authorization.
-
July 2026Tutor Perini refinances high-coupon debt, extends its revolver to 2031 and more than doubles revolving capacity, improving financial flexibility for the next backlog cycle.
What gives Tutor Perini a competitive advantage?
Scale, qualification and integrated delivery
Large public projects require experience, financial capacity, safety records and surety support. Tutor Perini can combine civil, building and specialty capabilities for transit systems, tunnels, detention facilities and complex healthcare projects. Management also reports fewer active bidders on some large fixed-price civil opportunities, which can improve selectivity and pricing when owners require proven megaproject credentials.
Where competitors still pressure returns
Civil competes with Kiewit, Skanska USA, Walsh, FlatironDragados and Lane; Building faces Turner, Clark, Gilbane, Hensel Phelps, DPR and Whiting-Turner; Specialty faces regional trade contractors. Price, technical approach, schedule and past performance all matter. Tutor Perini can pursue unusually large work, but one mispriced megaproject can offset the benefit of scale. Complexity is a moat only when risk selection remains disciplined.
How financially strong is Tutor Perini?
Financial strength improved materially in 2025. Revenue rose 28% to $5.54B, construction operating income reached $232.0M, and attributable net income was $80.4M versus a $163.7M loss in 2024. Record operating cash flow of $748.1M accompanied a $126.8M debt reduction. The FY2025 results showed $734.6M of cash, roughly $327M above debt.
Liquidity improved, but cash quality matters
At March 31, 2026, cash was $803.0M versus about $398.9M of current and long-term debt. Current assets of $4.10B exceeded current liabilities of $3.21B, a computed 1.28x current ratio. However, year-end cash included $463.8M held by consolidated joint ventures, leaving $270.7M for general corporate use. Headline cash therefore overstates parent liquidity.
| Balance-sheet or cash-flow item | Period | Amount | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and equivalents | March 31, 2026 | $803.0M | Provides a sizable gross liquidity cushion. |
| Operating cash flow | Q1 2026 | $146.9M | Shows continued conversion of project working capital. |
| Capital expenditures | Q1 2026 | $18.0M | Low relative to operating cash flow; simple OCF-minus-capex proxy was $128.9M. |
| Costs and estimated earnings above billings | March 31, 2026 | $807.5M | A key working-capital and collection metric for unbilled project value. |
| Retention receivable | March 31, 2026 | $699.9M | Cash is withheld until milestones or closeout, extending collection duration. |
Capital allocation changed in 2025-2026
The board authorized a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share and a $200M repurchase program in late 2025; Tutor Perini repurchased $20.0M of shares and paid $3.3M of dividends in Q1 2026. More consequentially, on July 2, 2026 the company redeemed $400M of 11.875% notes using proceeds from new 6.625% notes due 2033 and cash. The refinancing announcement also increased revolving commitments from $170M to $350M and extended maturity to July 2031. A simple coupon comparison implies about $21M of annual gross interest reduction before fees and other financing effects.
Who owns Tutor Perini stock, and how is it governed?
Tutor Perini has a conventional one-share, one-vote structure rather than a dual-class system. Even so, founder-family influence remains material. The 2026 proxy statement reported 52,614,703 shares outstanding as of March 25, 2026. Ronald N. Tutor, Executive Chairman and former CEO, beneficially owned approximately 6.65M shares, or 12.6%. Current directors and executive officers as a group held about 8.16M shares, or 15.4%.
Voting influence is concentrated but not controlled
| Holder or group | Shares | Economic stake | Source period | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald N. Tutor | 6.65M | 12.6% | March 25, 2026 | Largest disclosed individual stake and continued strategic influence as Executive Chairman. |
| BlackRock | 3.82M | 7.3% | Proxy-cited filing | Large passive institution contributes to dispersed outside ownership. |
| Vanguard | 2.77M | 5.3% | Proxy-cited filing | Another meaningful institutional voting block without operating control. |
| Directors and executive officers as a group | 8.16M | 15.4% | March 25, 2026 | Aligns leadership with equity value, while preserving public-shareholder voting power. |
Board structure and succession
Gary Smalley became CEO and President in January 2025 after serving as president and chief financial officer. Ronald Tutor remains Executive Chairman. Seven of ten 2026 board nominees were independent, with Robert Lieber as lead independent director. The leadership roster and board information show founder continuity alongside majority-independent oversight. The succession test is whether bid discipline and cash conversion improve without losing operating knowledge.
What opportunities and risks could change the story?
Growth runway
The main opportunity is converting a large backlog into revenue and cash. Public funding, aging transit and water systems, and demand for specialized contractors support a multiyear market. Q1 2026 awards included approximately $186M for Eagle Mountain Casino Phase 2, $97M for a healthcare project and roughly $66M across two mass-transit projects. Specialty profitability and lower interest expense offer additional upside.
Execution and financial risks
Contract execution is the largest risk. With 79% of year-end backlog fixed-price, overruns, delays and estimate revisions can be material. Claims add volatility: 2025 included a favorable $57.6M mass-transit adjustment and an unfavorable $54.7M Canadian tunneling settlement. Backlog is valuable, but it does not guarantee margin or cash.
| Driver | Evidence or exposure | Financial line affected | What to monitor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Backlog conversion | $19.84B at March 31, 2026 | Revenue and working capital | Quarterly revenue growth and new-award replenishment |
| Fixed-price execution | 79% of FY2025 year-end backlog | Gross profit and construction income | Estimate changes, contingencies and project disclosures |
| Claims and collections | $807.5M CIE and $699.9M retention at Q1 2026 | Operating cash flow | CIE decline, receivable aging and dispute resolution |
| Public funding | 78% of FY2025 backlog tied to state/local owners | Awards and project timing | Appropriations, notices to proceed and owner budgets |
| Specialty turnaround | (0.9)% FY2025 margin; 0.3% computed Q1 2026 margin | Segment and consolidated margin | Sustained profitability rather than one-quarter breakeven |
| Compensation volatility | $30.1M share-based expense in Q1 2026 | GAAP operating income and EPS | Liability-award remeasurement and vesting through 2026 |
What matters most in a Tutor Perini DCF?
A Tutor Perini valuation should not extrapolate backlog mechanically. Free cash flow also depends on project mix, estimate revisions, billing milestones, collections and retainage. A sound model separates revenue conversion, margin and cash conversion, while distinguishing GAAP compensation remeasurement from operating economics without ignoring dilution.
The key valuation levers
Management's 2026 adjusted EPS range can cross-check, but not replace, a cash-flow model. A stronger case requires sustained growth, Civil margins near recent levels, profitable Specialty operations and working-capital release. A weaker case combines project adjustments, slower collections and backlog slippage. Terminal assumptions should remain conservative because construction remains cyclical and project-specific.
What is the key takeaway from Tutor Perini analysis?
Tutor Perini is a scaled, integrated construction contractor positioned for a multiyear expansion in complex infrastructure and nonresidential work. The company enters that opportunity with record FY2025 revenue, record operating cash flow, a backlog near $20B, lower debt, stronger liquidity and a July 2026 refinancing that materially reduces its coupon burden. Civil is the engine: it combines the largest backlog with double-digit segment margins and scarce megaproject qualifications.
The same features that create upside also define the risk. Most backlog is fixed-price, project accounting depends on estimates, cash can be trapped in joint ventures or delayed through retainage, and claims can create large favorable or unfavorable adjustments. The investment-research task is therefore to monitor the quality of backlog conversion rather than the headline backlog alone. Civil margin, Specialty profitability, CIE, retention, operating cash flow, new-award discipline and post-refinancing interest expense are the most decision-useful indicators.
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.
