What does Strata Critical Medical do?
Strata Critical Medical, Inc. is a Nasdaq-listed healthcare logistics and clinical-services company trading under SRTA. It coordinates donor-organ recovery, assessment, preservation, transport, and placement, and supplies perfusion staffing and equipment to cardiovascular surgery programs. Its integrated model serves transplant hospitals, organ procurement organizations, and other healthcare providers.
The one-call transplant platform
The Logistics segment, marketed under Trinity Medical Solutions, moves organs, teams, blood, and tissue by dedicated aircraft, commercial courier, and ground transport, while TOPS provides organ-placement administration. The Clinical segment, marketed primarily under Keystone Perfusion, performs surgical recovery, normothermic regional perfusion, preservation, cardiac perfusion, blood management, ECMO support, temporary staffing, and equipment rental. The 2025 Form 10-K reported 601 employees: 223 in Logistics, 359 in Clinical, and 19 at corporate.
How does Strata make money?
Strata earns revenue directly from transplant centers, OPOs, hospitals, and other healthcare organizations. Air and ground transport are generally billed per completed trip. Organ-placement contracts usually carry fixed monthly fees based on program size. Clinical arrangements commonly combine retainers, per-case charges, staffing commitments, equipment rentals, and disposables.
| Service line | Primary customer | Revenue logic | Economic driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| Air and ground logistics | Transplant centers and OPOs | Per completed transport | Trip volume, route distance, aircraft mix, weather, and utilization |
| Organ placement | Transplant programs | Fixed monthly fee based on program size | Program scale, service quality, and retention |
| Transplant Clinical | OPOs and transplant centers | Retainer plus per-case or ad hoc per-case fees | Donor volume, NRP penetration, surgeon availability, and case mix |
| Other Clinical | Cardiac surgery hospitals | Retainer, per-case fees, equipment, and disposables | Contract retention, procedure volume, staffing density, and equipment utilization |
How cash moves through the model
Network density is the core margin driver. Growth requires matching scarce clinicians, aircraft, and ground capacity to unpredictable demand. Selected aircraft ownership can improve uptime and economics in busy corridors, but adds depreciation, maintenance, and capital requirements.
Which segments and services matter most?
Logistics remains the base
Logistics produced $47.6 million of Q1 2026 revenue and $9.2 million of gross profit. Revenue grew 32.4% year over year, while shorter routes and winter airport closures restrained results. Gross margin was 19.3%, down 30 basis points year over year and 220 basis points sequentially.
Clinical is the higher-margin adjacency
Clinical contributed $19.8 million of Q1 2026 revenue and $5.0 million of gross profit. Its 25.0% gross margin exceeded Logistics by 570 basis points. Sequential revenue rose 12.7% and gross profit 29.2%, led by 26.7% growth in Transplant Clinical.
What does Strata’s latest quarter show?
The latest official reporting package is the quarter ended March 31, 2026. The Q1 2026 earnings release and accompanying Form 10-Q show a transformed company: year-over-year comparisons include only the legacy Logistics business in the prior period, while sequential comparisons better capture the post-Keystone structure.
| Metric | Q1 2026 | Comparison | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total revenue | $67.4M | +87.4% vs Q1 2025; +0.9% vs Q4 2025 | Keystone drove the annual step-up; sequential growth was modest. |
| Gross margin | 21.0% | +140 bps vs Q1 2025; −60 bps vs Q4 2025 | Clinical helped annually; Logistics route mix pressured sequential margin. |
| Operating loss | $(3.0)M | Improved from $(5.7)M in Q1 2025 | GAAP operations remained loss-making before fair-value gains. |
| Net income, continuing operations | $2.4M | Versus $(1.6)M in Q1 2025 | Included $5.4M of non-operating income. |
| Adjusted EBITDA margin | 9.5% | 1.2% in Q1 2025; 10.4% in Q4 2025 | Scale improved, but mix remains important. |
| Free cash flow before aircraft and engines | $2.1M | Company-defined non-GAAP measure | Positive before aircraft and engine acquisitions. |
Why GAAP profit needs interpretation
Q1 operating income remained negative, while continuing-operations net income became positive because non-operating income added $5.4 million. Researchers should track gross profit for unit economics, operating income for fully loaded profitability, and operating cash flow for conversion rather than treating one adjusted metric as sufficient.
How did Blade become Strata?
Strata is the product of a rapid portfolio pivot. The public entity originated through a 2021 merger involving Experience Investment Corp. and Blade, added Trinity later that year, expanded medical logistics, and made healthcare central by divesting Passenger in 2025.
Turning points that still shape the thesis
-
May 2021The Experience Investment Corp. merger made Blade public and created the listed capital base for the later medical pivot.
-
September 2021Trinity added multimodal organ transport and transplant-center relationships.
-
2024Ten fixed-wing aircraft and the $2.2M CJK asset purchase increased control in selected corridors and New York ground logistics.
-
August 2025Passenger was sold to Joby; the company adopted the Strata name and SRTA ticker.
-
September 2025The $124M Keystone acquisition added recovery, NRP, cardiac perfusion, and hospital services.
-
November 2025Investor Day formalized the roll-up plan, a roughly 13% 2029 adjusted EBITDA margin objective, and prospective capital deployment.
-
April–June 2026Ohio Valley, Louisville, and HLT-NRP expanded perfusion and transplant-surgeon coverage.
FY2025 is therefore a transition period: Passenger appears in discontinued operations, Keystone entered only on September 16, and newer bolt-ons closed after Q1 2026. A valuation model should separate organic growth, portfolio change, and acquisition timing rather than extrapolate the 87.4% Q1 headline growth rate.
What gives Strata a competitive advantage?
Strata’s potential moat is coordinated density. A transplant event may require a recovery surgeon, perfusionist, preservationist, aircraft, ground transport, placement support, and continuous communication. Supplying several pieces through one network can reduce handoffs and travel. Approximately 20 air bases, 13 recovery hubs, a national clinical workforce, and customer relationships create the possibility of faster response and higher utilization.
Why density and trust matter
Barriers extend beyond capital. Credentials, aviation compliance, chain-of-custody controls, dispatch reliability, and trust accumulate over time. Technology supports staffing, training, organ evaluation, procurement, and logistics. Cross-selling matters because one recovery can create preservation and transport demand, while regional perfusion staff may support nearby transplant cases.
Where competitors can attack
Competition is fragmented. The 10-K identifies Part 135 operators, logistics coordinators, internal hospital and OPO teams, organ-evaluation specialists, clinical-service firms, and device manufacturers that bundle support. Fragmentation creates consolidation room, but customers can still insource functions or source each workflow separately.
Clinical roll-up strategy is changing the capital profile
Management’s strategy extends beyond organic transplant growth. The 2025 Investor Day framed perfusion and related clinical services as a fragmented market suited to bolt-on acquisitions. The logic is both financial and operational: acquired clinicians and hospital contracts add recurring revenue, while the same workforce may support preservation or recovery cases and improve regional density.
Three post-quarter deals demonstrate the playbook
The Ohio Valley, Louisville, and HLT-NRP announcements imply $38.5 million of stated purchase value or upfront consideration after Q1, excluding Louisville’s potential $4.0 million earn-out. HLT-NRP used approximately 80% cash and 20% stock.
The integration trade-off
Acquisitions can accelerate geographic coverage, cross-selling, and recruiting, but also add amortization, contingent consideration, stock issuance, and integration costs. Keystone cost $124 million, funded about 88% with cash and 12% with stock. Its cited purchase multiple and cash-conversion expectations were forward-looking non-GAAP estimates, so realized retention, gross profit, and overhead leverage matter more than the announcement economics.
How financially strong is Strata?
Annual context shows both scale and transition noise
Liquidity is meaningful, but capital intensity is rising
At March 31, 2026, Strata had $58.7 million of cash, $0.1 million of short-term investments, $327.6 million of assets, $41.9 million of liabilities, and $285.7 million of equity. Goodwill and net intangibles totaled $134.9 million, making acquisition performance relevant to impairment risk. Property and equipment reached $40.1 million.
A $30 million JPMorgan asset-backed revolver, expandable to $50 million subject to conditions, was undrawn at March 31. The latest acquisitions closed afterward, so future analysis must reconcile cash, debt, stock issuance, contingent consideration, and aircraft purchases before treating Q1 liquidity as fully available.
| Cash-flow or capital item | Period | Amount | What it says |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | Q1 2026 | $3.9M | First clear positive cash-generation signal for the transformed structure. |
| Capital expenditures | Q1 2026 | $5.5M | Included $3.7M of aircraft acquisitions plus capitalized maintenance. |
| FCF before aircraft and engines | Q1 2026 | $2.1M | Positive after ordinary capex, but before selected fleet investment. |
| Acquisition cash outflow | FY2025 | $66.5M | Shows M&A, not maintenance capex, is the major discretionary capital use. |
| 2026 guidance | Reiterated May 6, 2026 | $260–275M revenue | Paired with $29–33M adjusted EBITDA and $15–22M FCF before aircraft and engines. |
Which KPIs best explain Strata’s performance?
Revenue alone is inadequate because route length, segment mix, aircraft ownership, transplant activity, and acquisitions all move the economics. The useful dashboard links network density to segment margins, central-cost leverage, and cash conversion.
| KPI | Latest reference | How to interpret it |
|---|---|---|
| Logistics organic revenue growth | 32.4% year over year, Q1 2026 | Separates the legacy network’s growth from acquired Clinical revenue. |
| Logistics gross margin | 19.3%, Q1 2026 | Captures customer mix, trip distance, aircraft utilization, weather, and owned-fleet economics. |
| Clinical gross margin | 25.0%, Q1 2026 | Tests whether recovery, NRP, and perfusion mix can lift consolidated profitability. |
| Transplant Clinical growth | 26.7% sequential, Q1 2026 | Tracks the fastest-growing business line and its cross-sell potential. |
| Hub and base count | 13 recovery hubs; about 20 air bases, Q1 2026 | A practical proxy for local density, response time, and network reach. |
| Adjusted SG&A ratio | 13.7% of revenue, Q1 2026 | Shows whether central costs scale more slowly than gross profit. |
| Cash conversion | $3.9M OCF vs $6.4M adjusted EBITDA, Q1 2026 | Highlights working-capital, non-cash, and transaction-related differences. |
A practical monitoring dashboard
Who owns Strata stock, and how is it governed?
Strata has one vote per common share rather than a founder-controlled dual-class structure. However, beneficial ownership is concentrated enough that sponsors, executives, and specialist investors can influence governance. The 2026 proxy statement used 86.4 million shares outstanding at March 31, 2026 and disclosed directors and executive officers as a group at 15.5% beneficial ownership.
Ownership is influential but changing
| Holder or group | Shares / stake | Source period | Governance relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steele ExpCo Holdings | 12.4M / 13.7% | Proxy disclosure at March 31, 2026 | Legacy sponsor stake and nomination rights add influence. |
| Directors and executive officers | 13.8M / 15.5% | Proxy disclosure at March 31, 2026 | Material alignment, including Robert Wiesenthal’s reported 8.7%. |
| Northern Right group | 4.4M / 5.1% | Schedule 13G, June 17, 2026 | Specialist holder above the 5% threshold. |
| ARK Investment Management | 2.7M / 3.16% | Schedule 13G/A at June 30, 2026 | The stake fell below 5%, showing ownership can change quickly. |
The ownership periods differ and should not be treated as simultaneous current holdings. ARK’s latest Schedule 13G/A supersedes the older 7.4% proxy figure, while the Northern Right filing is newer than the proxy.
Why incentives and board structure matter
Co-CEOs Will Heyburn and Melissa Tomkiel combine finance, legal, and operating leadership. The classified board provides continuity but slows a full board change. Incentives emphasize adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow, while acquisition stock, awards, and warrants make dilution an important per-share consideration.
What opportunities, risks, and valuation drivers matter most?
Growth can come from more deceased donors, wider DCD and NRP adoption, healthcare outsourcing, new customers, deeper cross-selling, and perfusion consolidation. May 2026 guidance calls for $260–275 million of FY2026 revenue, $29–33 million of adjusted EBITDA, and $15–22 million of free cash flow before aircraft and engine acquisitions.
Risk map tied to financial statements
| Risk | Transmission channel | Financial line to watch |
|---|---|---|
| Aircraft availability, weather, safety, and fuel | Delays, higher third-party rates, lower utilization | Logistics revenue, cost, margin, insurance |
| Clinical quality or staffing shortage | Lost contracts, lower capacity, recruitment, liability | Clinical revenue, gross profit, SG&A, reserves |
| Customer insourcing or competition | Pricing pressure and lower share of wallet | Growth, retention, segment margins |
| Acquisition underperformance | Weak retention or synergies; excess consideration | Goodwill, intangibles, amortization, impairment, cash |
| Technology, privacy, and cybersecurity | Dispatch disruption, data exposure, compliance cost | Operating cost, legal cost, churn |
| Regulatory and transplant-system change | Licensing, reimbursement, OPO, or process changes | Volume, pricing, compliance spending |
What matters in a DCF
A DCF should separate organic Logistics growth, Clinical growth, and acquired revenue by closing date. Model segment margins independently, then central costs and fully loaded GAAP expenses. Reinvestment must include maintenance, software, aircraft purchases, and acquisition spending rather than only management’s free-cash-flow-before-aircraft measure.
Terminal assumptions require caution because regulation, clinical liability, labor scarcity, and aviation dependence increase risk. Goodwill, stock consideration, warrants, and compensation also affect per-share value. The decisive bridge is whether network density produces durable margin expansion and free cash flow after required reinvestment.
What is the key takeaway from Strata analysis?
Strata is attempting to coordinate fragmented transplant and cardiovascular workflows in one national network. Logistics supplies customer relationships and transport; Clinical adds higher-margin recovery, NRP, preservation, and perfusion; acquisitions add density and hospital contracts. Q1 2026 showed scale with $67.4 million of revenue, 21.0% gross margin, $6.4 million of adjusted EBITDA, and positive operating cash flow.
The model remains unproven at maturity. GAAP operations were loss-making, Logistics margin was mix-sensitive, acquisitions are accelerating, and aircraft ownership raises capital intensity. The key test is whether service breadth becomes repeatable local density, retained customers and clinicians, expanding margins, and cash after fleet and acquisition investment.
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.
