What does Sky Quarry do?
Sky Quarry Inc. is an early-stage energy and materials company connecting conventional refining with waste-asphalt-shingle recycling. Foreland Refining Corporation owns the Eagle Springs refinery in Nevada, while 2020 Resources LLC owns the Utah PR Spring project, planned for ECOSolv bitumen recovery. The company describes its purpose on its official company overview.
This is not yet a balanced two-segment enterprise. Foreland generated essentially all FY2025 revenue, while PR Spring remained pre-revenue. The analysis therefore has two layers: refinery reliability and a recycling technology that still needs funding, commissioning, and commercial proof.
How the two-asset model fits together
| Business element | Current role | March 31, 2026 asset base | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foreland / Eagle Springs | Produces liquid asphalt, diesel, vacuum gas oil, naphtha, and related outputs | $8.3M | Only demonstrated revenue engine; operating continuity drives near-term liquidity. |
| 2020 Resources / PR Spring | Development-stage extraction and recycling facility | $11.0M | Represents the higher-growth circular-economy thesis but requires more capital and execution. |
| Corporate parent | Public financing, governance, and capital allocation | Included above | Must bridge operating losses and fund both maintenance and development. |
Sky Quarry is a capital-intensive micro-cap special situation, not a mature integrated refiner. Downtime, feedstock, product pricing, debt, and equity access dominate current economics. The recycling thesis may change that profile, but today's statements resemble a financially constrained development-stage industrial company.
How does Sky Quarry make money?
The operating model is a product-spread business: refined volume multiplied by realized price, less crude, freight, fuel, chemicals, labor, repairs, and depreciation. The Foreland business page describes the product set, while the fiscal 2025 Form 10-K provides the financial evidence.
| Revenue stream | Pricing logic | FY2025 revenue | Economic sensitivity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liquid asphalt | Volume times regional asphalt price | $5.07M | Road-construction demand, seasonality, refinery uptime, and petroleum pricing. |
| Diesel | Volume times wholesale fuel price | $4.17M | Crude spread, freight, and regional fuel demand. |
| Vacuum gas oil | Volume times intermediate-feedstock price | $2.99M | Downstream refinery demand and product differentials. |
| Naphtha and other | Smaller-volume spot sales | $0.27M | Product yield and available customer outlets. |
| Future recycled bitumen | Planned sale or internal use of recovered hydrocarbons | Pre-revenue | Commercial commissioning, shingle supply, solvent recovery, quality, and end-market acceptance. |
Which products generated FY2025 revenue?
Where the recycling economics would enter
PR Spring would add asphalt shingles as a bitumen-bearing feedstock. ECOSolv bench work reportedly recovered up to 95% of hydrocarbons and 99% of solvent, but those are technical results, not commercial margins. Value will depend on collection, preprocessing, solvent use, uptime, quality, and sales. Until production begins, recycling belongs in a scenario model.
What did Sky Quarry's latest quarter show?
The quarter ended March 31, 2026 was an outage quarter. Eagle Springs repairs reduced net sales to $383 from $6.33 million in Q1 2025. Repairs concluded after quarter-end. The latest Form 10-Q therefore measures financing endurance more than normal refinery economics.
| Metric | Q1 2026 | Q1 2025 | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net sales | $383 | $6.33M | Refinery downtime removed the revenue base. |
| Gross loss | $(0.39M) | $(0.73M) | Fixed and repair-related costs continued despite negligible sales. |
| General and administrative expense | $1.21M | $1.94M | Down about 37%, but still far above gross profit capacity. |
| Interest expense | $0.33M | $0.90M | Lower by about 63%, yet material relative to liquidity. |
| Net loss | $(2.32M) | $(3.33M) | Improved about 30%, mostly through lower overhead and interest rather than revenue recovery. |
| Operating cash flow | $(0.59M) | $(1.96M) | Cash burn improved about 70%, but remained negative. |
Why did revenue nearly disappear?
Boiler and related equipment problems began in late 2025. With one operating refinery, a prolonged maintenance event can disable nearly the entire revenue stream; this is asset-availability risk, not merely commodity cyclicality. A June 22, 2026 Form 8-K operating update said repairs were complete and operations were expected in July 2026. The next filing should confirm actual throughput, sales, and cash receipts.
Did cost reductions solve the problem?
No. Lower G&A and interest reduced losses but did not prove profitability. Restored production must cover crude, freight, labor, repairs, depreciation, corporate costs, and debt service. Until several periods show that outcome, cost control remains defensive.
What strategic turning points shaped Sky Quarry?
-
2019Sky Quarry was founded around the idea of recovering hydrocarbons from waste asphalt shingles, establishing the circular-materials thesis that still frames the company.
-
2020The company acquired the PR Spring property and development platform in Utah, giving it a physical site for ECOSolv commercialization.
-
2021Sky Quarry acquired Foreland Refining, adding an operating refinery, product customers, and a potential outlet for recycled hydrocarbons.
-
2022–2023Work shifted toward integrating the extraction concept with refining infrastructure, but continued losses increased dependence on external capital.
-
October 2024The company completed its Nasdaq initial public offering, improving access to public equity but introducing listing-compliance and dilution pressure.
-
2025Production disruptions and weaker realized prices drove revenue down 47%, showing that the refinery was not yet a stable funding engine.
-
March–July 2026A 1-for-8 reverse split restored bid-price compliance, Q1 reflected near-total downtime, repairs were reported complete, and debt was restructured while operations were targeted to restart.
Why did the Foreland acquisition change the case?
Before Foreland, Sky Quarry mainly depended on extraction technology. Foreland added a plant, storage, logistics, customers, and a possible outlet for recovered bitumen. It also added crude, spread, maintenance, working-capital, compliance, and fixed-cost risks. Integration increased both strategic potential and financial demands.
The March 2026 reverse split did not change enterprise value or assets, but reduced the share count and restored Nasdaq bid-price compliance. Historical per-share and ownership figures therefore require split-aware comparison.
How do ECOSolv and PR Spring define the growth thesis?
ECOSolv is Sky Quarry's planned closed-loop solvent extraction process. Its technology description reports up to 95% hydrocarbon recovery and 99% solvent recovery. Waste-shingle tests indicated 22%–25% bitumen content, producing about 20.8% bitumen with less than 1% residual solvent. The goal is to monetize hydrocarbons and mineral solids otherwise landfilled.
What is proven, and what remains developmental?
Bench-scale chemistry is supportive, and Foreland has sold conventional products. The unproven element is commercial integration: shingle sourcing, preprocessing, solvent circulation, throughput, quality, cost, permitting, and sales. PR Spring also disclosed no proved oil reserves. Laboratory recovery is not plant utilization or cash margin.
How much capital remains?
Sky Quarry reported about $6.3 million invested in PR Spring and estimated roughly $4.0 million of additional capital. Q1 2026 guidance shifted anticipated completion to summer 2027, subject to funding. With current liabilities exceeding current assets by more than $15 million, PR Spring competes with refinery maintenance and debt service for scarce cash.
What gives Sky Quarry an advantage—and where is it fragile?
A niche regional asset, not a scale moat
Eagle Springs offers regional access and storage exceeding 29,500 crude barrels and about 73,800 refined-product barrels. That provides logistics value, but Sky Quarry lacks major-refiner scale, balance-sheet capacity, supply integration, and redundancy. Its advantage is niche positioning and potential circular feedstock, not cost leadership.
How intense are competitive and bargaining pressures?
| Force | Sky Quarry position | Evidence | Strategic implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customer power | High | Three customers represented 33%, 31%, and 24% of FY2025 sales. | Losing one account can materially affect revenue and working capital. |
| Supplier power | High | No long-term firm crude-supply commitments were disclosed. | Feedstock interruptions can stop production or compress spreads. |
| Rivalry | High | Competes with larger refiners, asphalt suppliers, and alternative recycling technologies. | Price discipline and reliability matter more than marketing claims. |
| Entry barriers | Mixed | Permits, industrial assets, process know-how, and capital are meaningful barriers. | Barriers help only if Sky Quarry can finance and operate its own assets. |
| Substitution | Moderate | Customers can source conventional asphalt and fuels from other providers. | Recycled content must compete on specification, reliability, and total cost. |
How financially strong is Sky Quarry?
Liquidity is the central constraint
At March 31, 2026, current assets were $1.27 million versus $16.40 million of current liabilities. Unrestricted cash was $66,828; current notes were $8.96 million, payables and accruals $5.32 million, and the credit line $1.55 million. The company repeated its going-concern warning.
| Balance-sheet item | March 31, 2026 | December 31, 2025 | Analytical read-through |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | $0.07M | $0.04M | Very limited unrestricted liquidity. |
| Current assets | $1.27M | $1.33M | Little working-capital cushion. |
| Current liabilities | $16.40M | $15.12M | Near-term claims increased during the outage. |
| Total assets | $19.31M | $19.21M | Asset base was broadly stable. |
| Total liabilities | $17.31M | $16.03M | Liabilities absorbed most of the asset base. |
| Stockholders' equity | $2.00M | $3.19M | Quarterly losses outweighed new equity proceeds. |
How was Q1 cash burn financed?
Q1 operations and capital spending consumed about $1.03 million, while financing supplied $1.06 million. Liquidity therefore came from external capital, not operations. The company also sold 426,143 ATM shares for about $0.75 million net, increasing dilution.
What did the Libertas debt exchange change?
The June 29, 2026 debt-exchange filing replaced $3.985 million of merchant cash advances with an 8% non-compounding note and escalating weekly payments. Collateral and transfer restrictions remained, while interim CEO Marcus Laun gave a company-indemnified personal guarantee. The exchange reorganized the liability; it did not eliminate it.
Who owns Sky Quarry stock, and why does governance matter?
Sky Quarry has one common share class, but equity issuance, warrants, the reverse split, and financing changed ownership rapidly. Proxy and SEC ownership disclosures must therefore be read by date rather than blended into one cap table.
| Holder or governance group | Disclosed position | Source period | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Directors and executive officers as a group | 14.1% | September 10, 2025 proxy record date | Meaningful insider alignment, but percentage is historical and pre-reverse-split. |
| David Sealock | 7.0% | September 10, 2025 | Former executive ownership remained material in the proxy snapshot. |
| Marcus Laun | 5.8% | September 10, 2025 | Interim CEO, CFO, president, and director combined operating and financing influence. |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 3,249 shares; 0.0% | June 30, 2026 Schedule 13G/A | Shows how dramatically the institutional position changed from the older proxy snapshot. |
| Board independence | 3 of 5 directors | Fiscal 2025 Form 10-K | Independent directors controlled the standing audit, compensation, and governance committees. |
The historical ownership percentages come from the 2025 proxy statement. The later JPMorgan position comes from a July 2026 Schedule 13G amendment. This contrast illustrates why a stale ownership table can be misleading for a frequently financed micro-cap.
Why does executive concentration matter?
Concentrated executive roles can speed turnaround decisions but increase key-person, control, and succession risk. The Libertas guarantee also intertwines management and financing, making independent oversight and related-party controls important. See the company's published governance materials.
Which KPIs, opportunities, and risks matter most?
Operating milestones to monitor
What could improve the outlook?
Upside begins with reliable Foreland operation, restored shipments, positive contribution margin, and less short-term financing dependence. PR Spring could then add recycled feedstock, licensing potential, or lower-cost asphalt inputs. Landfill diversion and infrastructure demand help, but cannot substitute for plant economics.
What risks can break the model?
- Going-concern and refinancing risk: current liabilities were roughly thirteen times current assets at March 31, 2026.
- Single-asset operating risk: one extended refinery outage reduced Q1 2026 revenue to $383.
- Commodity-spread risk: FY2025 liquid asphalt prices fell 19%, while VGO and diesel prices each fell 13%.
- Customer and feedstock concentration: three customers generated 88% of FY2025 sales, and crude supply lacked firm long-term commitments.
- Development risk: PR Spring requires additional capital and has not demonstrated commercial-scale production or reserves.
- Dilution and listing risk: ongoing equity financing and the recent reverse split indicate continuing capital-market dependence.
- Environmental and permitting risk: refining and extraction operations require continuing compliance, remediation capacity, and permits.
What is the key takeaway for valuation?
How should a DCF be framed without a price target?
A single-case DCF is poorly suited because Sky Quarry lacks stable revenue, positive margins, and self-funded growth. Use probability-weighted cases: model Foreland with throughput, prices, crude, freight, fixed costs, maintenance capex, and working capital; model PR Spring separately with construction spending, timing, utilization, yield, pricing, and commercial-success probability.
The discount rate should reflect high operating, financing, and execution risk. Do not assume mature terminal margins before sustained uptime and positive cash conversion. Equity value must subtract claims and use a fully diluted share count including likely financing. Near-term solvency may matter more than terminal growth.
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.