(SEIC) SEI Investments Company Company Overview

US | Financial Services | Asset Management | NASDAQ

What does SEI Investments Company do?

SEI Investments Company, traded on Nasdaq under the ticker SEIC, is a financial-services infrastructure provider rather than a conventional asset manager alone. It combines investment processing technology, outsourced operations, custody, administration, and investment management for banks, asset managers, independent advisers, and institutional investors. The company’s 2025 Form 10-K describes an integrated model spanning the front, middle, and back office.

$1.93T
assets managed, advised, or administered at March 31, 2026
$8.1T
assets on wealth-management platforms at December 31, 2025
4,997
full-time employees at December 31, 2025
5
reportable segments in fiscal 2025

An infrastructure company inside financial services

The central idea is outsourcing. A client can license software, use SEI as an operating platform, appoint SEI to administer funds, place assets in SEI-managed strategies, or combine several of those services. The principal technology stack includes the SEI Wealth Platform, TRUST 3000, SEI Scope, SEI Data Cloud, SEI Novus, and SEI Sphere. That breadth lets SEI sell a workflow rather than a single product, creating recurring fees and deep operational integration.

Who buys SEI’s capabilities?

Client group Core need SEI solution Economic logic
Investment managers Fund administration, data, accounting, and operations Outsourced middle- and back-office infrastructure Fees scale with assets, funds, and service complexity
Private banks Modern wealth-platform and trust operations SEI Wealth Platform and TRUST 3000 Long contracts and conversion work create recurring processing revenue
Investment advisers Portfolio construction, custody, trading, and practice scale Turnkey asset-management platform and managed accounts Asset-based fees rise or fall with flows and markets
Institutions Delegated investment management OCIO and manager-of-managers solutions Recurring fees tied to advised or managed assets
Financial technologyFund administrationCustodyAsset managementOutsourced operations

How does SEI make money?

SEI earns revenue through two dominant engines. Technology and operations fees are generally recurring monthly charges, transaction-linked amounts, or percentages of assets processed. Asset-management, administration, and distribution fees are usually percentages of assets managed, administered, or advised. Professional services, implementation work, and other activities form a smaller third category.

Fiscal 2025 revenue model mix
Technology and operations — approximately 57% of fiscal 2025 revenue
Asset management — approximately 38% of fiscal 2025 revenue
Professional services and other — approximately 5% of fiscal 2025 revenue
The mix shows why SEI is neither pure software nor pure asset management: processing stability and market-sensitive fees coexist.

Technology and operations create the recurring base

Software-as-a-service arrangements provide applications and information processing. Platform-as-a-service relationships go further by adding outsourced accounting, custody, reconciliation, and operating functions. Private-bank contracts generally run five to seven years, while investment-manager contracts commonly run three to five years. Conversions can be lengthy, but once embedded, replacement is operationally disruptive. That gives SEI switching-cost protection, although clients retain renegotiation and termination rights.

Asset-based fees add growth and market sensitivity

Revenue engine Fiscal 2025 revenue Pricing basis Primary driver
Investment technology and operations $1.304BFiscal 2025 Monthly, transaction, or asset-linked processing fees Client wins, conversions, assets processed, and service breadth
Asset management $877.2MFiscal 2025 Percentage of assets managed, advised, or distributed Net flows, market levels, product mix, and fee rates
Professional services and other $116.0MFiscal 2025 Implementation and project-based charges Conversions, consulting, and special client work
95%of fiscal 2025 revenue came from technology/operations and asset-management activities combined, making recurring client relationships the model’s economic center.

Which SEI business segments matter most?

SEI reports four established client segments plus Investments in New Businesses. Investment Managers is the largest revenue contributor, while Investment Advisors and Institutional Investors generate the highest segment margins. Private Banks is strategically important because platform conversions can create durable, long-duration processing relationships.

Segment revenue ranking — fiscal 2025
Investment Managers$815.0M
Investment Advisors$577.4M
Private Banks$572.9M
Institutional Investors$282.5M
New Businesses$49.5M
Bars are indexed to the largest segment. Period: fiscal year ended December 31, 2025.

Investment Managers leads revenue

The segment serves traditional and alternative managers with administration, accounting, data, regulatory, and operational services. At December 31, 2025, it had roughly $1.5 trillion of managed or administered assets, including about $1.0 trillion in alternatives and $0.5 trillion in public assets. Private credit, retail-access alternatives, and fund complexity expand the addressable workload even when headline market returns are modest.

Advisors and institutions lead margins

Segment Revenue Segment profit Profit margin Analytical interpretation
Investment Managers $815.0MFiscal 2025 $320.7MFiscal 2025 39% Scale leader; exposed to asset levels and operational complexity
Private Banks $572.9MFiscal 2025 $98.0MFiscal 2025 17% Lower margin reflects platform investment and conversion costs
Investment Advisors $577.4MFiscal 2025 $265.7MFiscal 2025 46% Asset-based economics and platform scale support strong profitability
Institutional Investors $282.5MFiscal 2025 $134.4MFiscal 2025 48% Delegated-investment relationships produce the highest segment margin
Investments in New Businesses $49.5MFiscal 2025 $(10.7)MFiscal 2025 Loss Incubation spending trades current earnings for option value

What did SEI’s latest quarter show?

The latest reported period is the quarter ended March 31, 2026. The official first-quarter 2026 earnings release showed double-digit revenue and profit growth, broader segment momentum, and a higher operating margin. The accompanying Form 10-Q provides the balance-sheet and cash-flow detail.

$622.2M
revenue, Q1 2026; up 13% year over year
$189.5M
GAAP operating income, Q1 2026; up 21%
30%
GAAP operating margin, Q1 2026; versus 28% in Q1 2025
$1.40
diluted EPS, Q1 2026; up 20%

Growth broadened across established segments

Q1 2026 metric Reported value Year-over-year signal What it indicates
Net income attributable to SEI $174.5MQuarter ended March 31, 2026 Up 15% Profit growth remained strong after acquisition-related amortization
Adjusted operating income $198.7MQuarter ended March 31, 2026 Up 24% Underlying operating leverage exceeded revenue growth
Operating cash flow $221.6MQuarter ended March 31, 2026 Versus $146.5M Cash conversion strengthened materially
Total ending assets $1.930TMarch 31, 2026 Up 20% Markets, flows, and Stratos expanded the fee base
Sales events $67.2MQ1 2026 Record level Includes $57.1M of recurring sales events

Asset growth and sales events improve forward visibility

$57.1Mof Q1 2026 sales events were recurring, an especially important figure because implementation timing can delay the revenue benefit after a contract is signed.
Annual revenue trend
$1.92BFY2023
$2.13BFY2024
$2.30BFY2025
Fiscal 2025 revenue increased 8.1% from fiscal 2024; column heights are indexed to fiscal 2025.

Which strategic turning points shaped SEI?

SEI’s history matters because the company repeatedly moved from selling a tool to operating a broader client process. The official corporate timeline shows how banking simulation evolved into investment processing, adviser platforms, institutional outsourcing, and global wealth technology.

  1. 1968
    Alfred P. West Jr. formed Simulated Environments Inc. and built a computer-based commercial-credit simulator. The origin established technology as the company’s method for redesigning financial workflows.
  2. 1989
    Mutual-fund accounting and distribution for bank-sponsored funds became the foundation of today’s Investment Managers segment.
  3. 1992
    SEI launched the Investment Advisors business and helped create the turnkey asset-management platform model, extending its economics into adviser custody and managed accounts.
  4. 1998
    Alternative-manager outsourcing expanded the model into complex fund structures, where operational intensity creates higher barriers to switching.
  5. 2007–2011
    The SEI Wealth Platform launched in the United Kingdom and later migrated its first U.S. advisers, creating a modern architecture for private banks and wealth managers.
  6. 2019
    Approximately 7,400 independent advisers had migrated to the platform; SEI also introduced its Developer Portal and SEI Sphere, widening the ecosystem.
  7. 2025
    SEI sold Family Office Services and completed the first stage of its Stratos investment, reallocating capital toward adviser distribution, technology, and scalable platforms.

The 2025 portfolio reshaping was economically meaningful

The Family Office Services divestiture generated $116.0 million of gross proceeds and a $94.4 million gain in fiscal 2025. Separately, SEI paid $440.8 million in cash for the first stage of the U.S. Stratos transaction. Stratos brought an adviser network with approximately $38.1 billion of average client assets at December 31, 2025.

Why the timeline still matters

Technology, custody, and asset management create SEI’s integrated moat

SEI’s competitive advantage is not a single patent or brand claim. It is the combination of regulated entities, technology, operating processes, investment products, custody, and long-standing client relationships. A rival can compete with one layer, but replacing an integrated workflow can require data migration, testing, regulatory review, staff retraining, and client communication.

1Client mandateA bank, manager, adviser, or institution selects a solution.
2Data conversionAccounts, securities, tax lots, and workflows migrate to SEI.
3Embedded operationsAccounting, custody, administration, and reporting become recurring services.
4Cross-sellData, managed accounts, alternatives, and professional services deepen the relationship.
5Scale economicsAutomation and shared infrastructure can expand margins as volumes grow.

Which competitors pressure the business?

Arena Representative competitors named by SEI SEI’s positioning Main pressure
Fund services SS&C, State Street, BNY Mellon, Northern Trust, Citco Integrated administration, data, and technology across traditional and alternative assets Price competition and large-bank scale
Wealth platforms FIS, FNZ, Avaloq, SS&C Innovest, Fi-Tek Platform plus outsourced operations, custody, and investment capabilities Conversion risk and technology modernization
Adviser platforms Envestnet, Orion, Schwab, Fidelity Managed accounts, practice support, custody, and Stratos distribution Fee compression and adviser platform choice
Institutional OCIO Mercer, Aon, Willis Towers Watson, BlackRock, Goldman Sachs Manager-of-managers heritage and integrated implementation Consulting scale, performance, and institutional pricing

A resource-based view of the moat

Switching costsStrong
Revenue recurrenceStrong
Scale and breadthStrong
Market immunityModerate

The last rating is lower because a substantial share of fees depends on asset values. SEI’s infrastructure base dampens cyclicality, but it does not eliminate market, flow, or fee-rate exposure.

How strong are SEI’s profitability, cash flow, and balance sheet?

Fiscal 2025 revenue was $2.297 billion, operating income was $627.3 million, and net income attributable to SEI was $715.3 million. The implied GAAP operating margin was about 27.3%. Operating cash flow reached $607.7 million, demonstrating that reported earnings converted well into cash.

30%
GAAP operating margin for Q1 2026. The increase from 28% in Q1 2025 indicates operating leverage as revenue grew faster than expenses.

Cash conversion and capital intensity

Operating cash flow$607.7MFiscal 2025 starting cash generation.
Less property and equipment$22.6MFiscal 2025 additions.
Less capitalized software$30.0MFiscal 2025 platform investment.
Cash after both items$555.0MCalculated as operating cash flow minus the two disclosed investment categories; not a company-reported free-cash-flow measure.

The business is technology-intensive but not heavy-industrial. Capital needs are meaningful because software must be developed, secured, and upgraded, yet physical capital spending remains small relative to revenue. At March 31, 2026, cash and cash equivalents were $363.1 million. SEI also reported $495.4 million of available capacity under its credit facility after letters of credit, providing liquidity for corporate purposes.

Capital allocation is assertive

Share repurchases
$616.2M
Fiscal 2025 buybacks covered 7.459 million shares at an average price of $82.61.
Cash dividends
$124.2M
Cash dividends paid during fiscal 2025.
Q1 2026 repurchases
$208.3M
SEI repurchased 2.6 million shares in the quarter ended March 31, 2026.
SEI’s financial strength comes from recurring fees, high margins, and modest physical capital intensity; the main capital-allocation question is whether buybacks and acquisitions create more value than retaining cash for platform expansion.

Who owns SEI stock, and why does governance matter?

SEI has dispersed institutional ownership, but West-family-related ownership remains important. According to the 2026 proxy statement, 120,982,101 common shares were outstanding on March 12, 2026. The ownership profile matters because institutions influence governance, while the founder’s legacy and related family holdings preserve a long-term strategic presence.

Holder or group Shares Ownership Source period Why it matters
The Vanguard Group 11,888,519 9.8% 2026 proxy Large passive institution with governance influence
Loralee West 11,141,338 9.2% 2026 proxy Family-related stake, including shares held in trusts for children
Loomis, Sayles & Company 8,808,845 7.3% 2026 proxy Active institutional owner
BlackRock 8,492,433 7.0% 2026 proxy Large passive institutional owner
Directors and executive officers as a group 5,865,399 4.8% 2026 proxy; 17 persons Aligns leadership with long-term equity value, though control is not concentrated in management

Founder transition and board oversight

Executive leadership
2022
Ryan Hicke became chief executive officer in June 2022, separating current operating leadership from the founder era.
Founder transition
2025
Alfred P. West Jr. retired from active board service on December 31, 2025 and became Chairman Emeritus without voting rights.
Board activity
15
Board meetings held during fiscal 2025, reflecting substantial oversight activity.

Incentives emphasize earnings and capital returns

The compensation framework considers diluted earnings per share, revenue, profit margins, sales goals, and corporate earnings. Fiscal 2025 diluted EPS was $5.63, up 28%, and the proxy highlights approximately $740.4 million returned through dividends and buybacks. Those metrics encourage growth and shareholder distributions, but researchers should also test whether platform investment and acquisition integration receive enough weight.

What opportunities and risks could change SEI’s outlook?

The opportunity set centers on outsourcing, alternatives, adviser distribution, data, and automation. In June 2026, SEI introduced a unified technology and AI platform for investment managers, emphasizing automated NAV packages, workflow visibility, and near-real-time data. It also expanded enterprise AI leadership through a Chief AI Strategist and related appointments.

Recurring sales conversion
Track how the Q1 2026 recurring sales-event record of $57.1 million turns into reported revenue after implementation.
Investment Managers assets
Average managed and administered assets reached $1.530 trillion in Q1 2026, up 20%; sustained growth supports administration fees.
Stratos economics
Ending Stratos client assets were $39.9 billion at March 31, 2026; monitor integration costs, adviser retention, and cross-selling.
Private Banks margin
The segment margin improved to 21% in Q1 2026 from a lower prior-year base; conversions and platform spending determine durability.
Managed-account mix
Investment Advisors separately managed account revenue rose 29% to $67.3 million in Q1 2026, supporting tax-aware and personalized portfolios.
Automation benefits
The key test is whether AI and data investment expands addressable markets and margins without increasing operational or regulatory failures.

The most material risks tie directly to revenue and margins

Risk Transmission mechanism Financial line affected What to monitor
Market declines and outflows Lower assets reduce asset-based fees Asset-management, administration, and distribution revenue AUM/AUA growth, net flows, and fee rates
Client attrition or insourcing Contracts can be terminated, renegotiated, or moved in-house Recurring processing revenue and segment margin Renewals, major conversions, sales events, and concentration
Cybersecurity or operational failure Service interruption, data loss, remediation, or liability Expenses, reputation, and client retention Disclosures on incidents, resilience investment, and controls
Fee compression Passive investing, automation, and large competitors pressure pricing Revenue yield and operating margin Revenue growth relative to asset growth
Stratos integration Costs, adviser departures, or delayed cross-selling reduce returns Investment Advisors profit and acquisition returns Stratos assets, revenue, amortization, and retention
Regulation Multiple regulated subsidiaries face compliance and remediation obligations Operating expense, capital needs, and business permissions SEC, OCC, FINRA, FCA, CBI, and CSSF developments

Which valuation drivers matter in a DCF?

Organic revenue growth
Separate market appreciation and acquisitions from recurring sales conversion and net new client activity.
Operating margin
A 30% Q1 2026 GAAP margin suggests leverage, but technology, compliance, and integration costs can reverse it.
Cash-flow conversion
Model operating cash flow less physical and software investment, rather than treating net income as distributable cash.
Capital allocation
Buybacks reduce share count, while acquisitions and incubation spending must earn returns above the cost of capital.

What is the key takeaway for SEI Investments?

SEI is important because it sits behind financial institutions and investment firms, turning technology, custody, administration, and asset management into an integrated outsourced operating model. Its strongest attributes are recurring relationships, embedded workflows, broad client coverage, high margins, and strong cash generation. Fiscal 2025 operating income of $627.3 million and Q1 2026 revenue growth of 13% show that the model can produce operating leverage when assets, sales, and implementation activity align.

The strategic tension is equally clear. Asset-based fees expose earnings to markets; major platform conversions can be expensive; cybersecurity and regulation require constant investment; and the Stratos acquisition must justify a large cash commitment through retention, distribution, and cross-selling. AI can improve efficiency and client experience, but it can also lower industry pricing and raise governance risk.

Final synthesis
For students and researchers, SEI is best understood as a hybrid financial-infrastructure company: more recurring and operationally embedded than a traditional asset manager, yet more market-sensitive than a pure software vendor. The most decision-useful watchlist is recurring sales conversion, assets under management and administration, segment margins, cash-flow conversion, Stratos economics, share repurchases, and the effectiveness of SEI’s technology and AI investment.

DCF model

    5-Year Financial Model

    40+ Charts & Metrics

    DCF & Multiple Valuation

    Free Email Support



Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.