What does Sadot Group do now?
Sadot Group Inc. is a Nevada corporation headquartered in Burleson, Texas and listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under ticker SDOT. It now sits between agricultural commodities and enterprise commodity technology. In 2025 it shrank its agricultural-commodity platform and sold its restaurant operations; Q1 2026 then produced no revenue. Subsequent acquisitions seek to reposition the company around commodity software, consulting, trade finance, and possibly real estate. Its changing perimeter is described in Sadot's 2025 Form 10-K and subsequent current reports.
Which businesses are inside the current perimeter?
| Business or asset | Status | Economic role | Research implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legacy agri-food trading | Activity sharply reduced; Q1 2026 revenue was zero | Historically generated commodity sales on thin gross margins | Historical revenue is not a dependable run-rate for the new model |
| Anira / TradeOS | Acquired June 2, 2026 | Commodity consulting and a commodity-trading and risk-management platform | Could create software and service revenue, but audited contribution is not yet visible |
| TradeIQ intellectual property | Acquired July 14, 2026 | Additional software intended to complement TradeOS | Adds product scope while increasing execution, financing, and integration risk |
| Los Angeles property option | Six-month option, not a completed acquisition | Potential exposure to 147 apartment units and management fees | Should remain outside a base forecast until exercise funding and closing are demonstrated |
How did Sadot's business model change so quickly?
Sadot's history is a sequence of pivots. It began as restaurant operator Muscle Maker, moved into global agri-food supply chains in late 2022, then retreated after thin margins, working-capital demands, counterparty losses, and litigation overwhelmed the revenue scale. Management now seeks a less volatile cash-flow source.
Which turning points still shape the company today?
-
2019The Nevada corporation was formed around restaurants, leaving discontinued operations and legacy obligations in later filings.
-
Late 2022A services arrangement with Aggia drove the agri-food pivot, rapid revenue, and exposure to commodity credit, logistics, and financing risk.
-
July 2023The name changed from Muscle Maker, Inc. to Sadot Group Inc., signaling that commodity trading—not restaurants—had become the strategic center.
-
2024–2025The company exited SuperFit, sold the restaurant business, and closed several overseas trading locations that failed to generate acceptable cash flow.
-
December 2025A Zambia default judgment drove an $11.8M impairment, while the Indonesia farmland investment was fully impaired.
-
June 2026Sadot acquired Anira and TradeOS for stated consideration of $12.0M, sold Sadot Latam for $1,000 plus contingent recoveries, and signed an option over seven Los Angeles property entities.
-
July 2026The company acquired TradeIQ intellectual property for $6.0M, settled two debts with shares, and arranged convertible-note and equity-purchase facilities intended to finance the new platform.
How does Sadot make money—and what is not yet proven?
Historically, Sadot earned a small spread on agricultural commodities after product, logistics, financing, and overhead costs. FY2025 gross profit was only $4.6M on $246.9M of sales. The intended asset-light model lacks a reported quarter of revenue, retention, recurring revenue, or gross margin for TradeOS and TradeIQ.
What are the intended revenue engines?
| Engine | How revenue could be earned | Main cost or risk | Disclosure status at July 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical commodities | Trading spread and service economics on food and feed commodities | Credit, inventory, freight, financing, and price volatility | No Q1 2026 revenue; legacy platform materially reduced |
| TradeOS software | Potential licensing, implementation, support, and workflow services | Product integration, customer acquisition, development, cybersecurity | Eleven modules described; pricing and recurring-revenue metrics not disclosed |
| Consulting and trade services | Advisory, transaction support, risk, treasury, logistics, and compliance services | Key-person dependence and project-based revenue variability | Anira acquired June 2026; no post-acquisition reported quarter |
| Trade finance | Potential financing spreads, fees, or structured transaction economics | Funding cost, collateral quality, counterparty default, regulation | Strategic intent is visible; operating scale and underwriting record are not |
| Real estate | Potential property cash flow and a stated $100,000 monthly management fee after closing | Large exercise funding requirement, leverage, completion and property risk | Option only; seven entities and 147 units have not been consolidated |
How would the new operating loop work?
What does the latest reported quarter show?
The latest statements are the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. They predate the June and July transactions, so they describe the depleted legacy company rather than the intended new earnings base.
Which Q1 2026 lines matter most?
| Metric | Q1 2026 | Q1 2025 | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $0 | $132.2M | The former trading engine stopped producing sales during the quarter. |
| Gross profit | $0 | $6.0M | No gross profit absorbed overhead or interest. |
| Selling, general and administrative expense | $2.2M | $3.1M | Costs declined, but remained material relative to the cash balance. |
| Interest expense | $1.8M | $1.5M | Financing cost intensified the loss. |
| Net loss attributable to SDOT | $(4.9)M | $0.9M income | Revenue disappearance moved the quarter into loss. |
| Operating cash flow | $(0.8)M | Not used as the comparison anchor here | New borrowings financed the shortfall. |
What did the cash-flow statement reveal?
FY2025 revenue collapsed before the technology pivot
The annual comparison explains the retreat from commodity scale. FY2025 sales fell 64.8% to $246.9M from $700.9M. Gross profit fell faster, while credit losses, impairments, litigation, and financing charges drove a large net loss.
How severe was the annual contraction?
| Metric | FY2025 | FY2024 | What changed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commodity sales | $246.9M | $700.9M | Lower trading volume and closure of locations reduced the top line. |
| Gross profit | $4.6M | $22.7M | Gross profit declined 79.9%, faster than revenue. |
| Operating result | $(40.5)M | $6.2M | Bad debt and overhead converted operating income into a large loss. |
| Impairment loss | $31.0M | Not comparable | Included major write-downs tied to Zambia and Indonesia assets. |
| Litigation loss | $13.5M | Not comparable | Legal exposures became a meaningful driver of the annual loss. |
| Net result attributable to SDOT | $(93.4)M | $4.0M | Net margin attributable to SDOT was approximately (38.1)%. |
Why did gross margin matter so much?
How financially strong is Sadot Group?
Sadot's March 31, 2026 balance sheet was distressed and carried a going-concern warning. Nearly all debt had matured and remained unpaid or in default; current liabilities exceeded current assets by more than twenty-five times, and equity was negative. Later financing may change balances while adding senior claims and dilution.
What does the liquidity gap look like?
| Balance-sheet item | March 31, 2026 | December 31, 2025 | Analytical meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash, including restricted cash | $0.7M | $0.7M | Very small relative to quarterly loss and accrued obligations. |
| Total current assets | $2.4M | $2.8M | Minimal near-term asset coverage. |
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $49.0M | $47.3M | Accrued obligations grew during Q1 despite no revenue. |
| Notes payable | $11.1M | $10.2M | Borrowing increased; the annual filing disclosed rates from 3.75% to 46%. |
| Working-capital deficit | $(57.8)M | $(54.8)M | The deficit widened by about $3.0M in one quarter. |
| Total shareholders' deficit | $(58.4)M | $(54.7)M | Negative book equity creates listing and financing pressure. |
How should financial quality be scored?
TradeOS, TradeIQ, and financing define the new strategic bet
June and July transactions seek to replace low-margin physical trading with commodity workflows, analytics, consulting, and financing. The Anira acquisition filing describes TradeOS as an eleven-module commodity trading and risk-management system covering trade capture, mark-to-market, value-at-risk, KYC and sanctions, logistics, trade documents, hedging, treasury, accounting, and regulatory reporting. The TradeIQ and financing filing adds intellectual property and up to $100M of potential note and equity capacity.
What did Sadot pay for the new technology?
What could become a competitive advantage?
A moat would require proprietary workflows, customer data, embedded financing, regulatory integrations, and switching costs. Eleven modules show breadth, not customer adoption or defensibility.
Who owns and governs Sadot Group?
The 2026 proxy showed dispersed ownership. No holder exceeded 5%; CEO Chagay Ravid and all directors and officers as a group each reported 8,130 shares, under 1%. Later issuances make those figures historical.
What did the proxy show about control?
| Holder or governance group | Reported interest | Source date | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chagay Ravid, CEO and director | 8,130 shares; less than 1% | February 17, 2026 record date | Management did not have controlling economic ownership in the proxy table. |
| All directors and executive officers as a group | 8,130 shares; less than 1% | February 17, 2026 record date | Board and executive ownership was small relative to later financing needs. |
| Disclosed 5% holders | None listed | 2026 proxy | Voting influence was dispersed before the subsequent issuance cycle. |
| Board | 5 directors; 4 independent | 2026 proxy | Independent directors formed a majority and staffed key committees. |
| Authorized common stock | Increased from 2M to 250M shares | May 2026 amendment | The increase enabled acquisitions, conversions, settlements, and financing. |
How do incentives and capital structure interact?
Current governance analysis turns on security terms. July notes are secured by substantially all company and subsidiary assets, carry an 8.25% coupon, initially convert at $17.81, and mature July 16, 2028. Ownership and exchange caps limit immediate conversion, not dilution or creditor influence.
What opportunities and risks could change the story?
Sadot's small reported base creates asymmetric outcomes: modest software revenue could improve results, while a delayed closing, collection failure, default, or listing problem could overwhelm liquidity. Each opportunity therefore needs a measurable prerequisite.
Which milestones would validate the pivot?
What are the most material constraints?
Selling Sadot Latam for $1,000 plus 27.5% of specified recoveries transferred liabilities but left value dependent on collections. The sale filing is best read as a cleanup transaction, not an earnings event.
What matters most in a DCF or research model?
A single-scenario DCF is poorly suited to Sadot. Historical revenue came from an abandoned model, Q1 2026 had no sales, acquired technology lacks reported operating history, and the capital structure is changing. A probability-weighted model should separate operating value, legacy claims, and future dilution.
Which variables should drive the model?
| Valuation driver | Base modeling treatment | Upside evidence needed | Downside signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| TradeOS and TradeIQ revenue | Build from customers, contract value, implementation timing, and renewal—not from legacy commodity sales | Reported recurring revenue, backlog, retention, and collections | Delayed delivery, few customers, or project-only revenue |
| Gross margin | Use a wide range until software and consulting mix is disclosed | Margin substantially above the FY2025 commodity level of 1.9% | Continuing low-margin trading or costly implementations |
| Operating expense | Include public-company, legal, audit, software development, sales, and integration costs | Evidence that overhead grows slower than recurring gross profit | Professional fees and stock compensation absorbing gross profit |
| Cash conversion | Model receivable timing and losses explicitly | Positive operating cash flow and lower credit-loss provisions | Repeat of FY2025 bad-debt and working-capital stress |
| Net debt and senior securities | Deduct notes, accrued obligations, preferred liquidation value, and unpaid claims from enterprise value | Cash settlements below carrying claims or profitable refinancing | Default rates, additional collateral, or preferred arrears |
| Fully diluted shares | Model acquisition shares, settlement shares, note conversion, and equity-facility draws by scenario | Funding generated with limited incremental dilution | Repeated issuance at low prices or conversion near exchange caps |
| Real estate | Exclude from the operating base until the option is exercised and financed | Completed acquisition with verified net operating income and debt terms | Option expiration, financing failure, or property underperformance |
What is the key takeaway from Sadot Group analysis?
Sadot is a transformation case: revenue scale failed to create value when margin, collections, and liquidity were weak. The new thesis is that integrated commodity software and services can produce better revenue quality. It remains unverified because no post-acquisition quarter has shown customers, recurring revenue, margin, or cash generation.
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.