Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) Company Overview

MX | Industrials | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | NYSE

What does Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico do?

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V., usually called GAP, is an airport infrastructure operator listed as PAC on the New York Stock Exchange and as GAP on the Mexican Stock Exchange. Its core portfolio consists of 12 airports in Mexico’s Pacific and central regions, including Guadalajara, Tijuana, Los Cabos and Puerto Vallarta, plus Sangster International Airport in Montego Bay and Norman Manley International Airport in Kingston, Jamaica. In May 2026 the group also consolidated full ownership of Cross Border Xpress, the pedestrian terminal linking San Diego directly with Tijuana International Airport. The company’s official investor relations portal organizes its financial reports, traffic updates, presentations and governance documents.

14
Airports operated in Mexico and Jamaica, 2Q26
30.35M
Terminal passengers, first six months of 2026
100%
Ownership of CBX after the May 2026 combination
595.0M
Shares outstanding after the 2026 merger

Why does this airport network matter?

GAP combines business travel, visiting-friends-and-relatives traffic, industrial corridors and leisure destinations. Guadalajara is a large metropolitan and technology center; Tijuana is a border gateway whose economics are reinforced by CBX; Los Cabos and Puerto Vallarta are internationally oriented resort markets; and the Jamaican airports add Caribbean tourism exposure. This mix diversifies demand, but it also creates sensitivity to airline capacity, hurricanes, foreign exchange and tourism cycles. Unlike an airline, GAP does not need to choose routes or bear aircraft-fuel risk. It monetizes passenger and airline activity through regulated airport charges and commercial services around the traveler.

Mexican concessions

Twelve airports operated under long-dated federal concessions, with regulated maximum tariffs and required development programs.

Core cash engine
Jamaican concessions

Montego Bay and Kingston provide tourism and international passenger exposure, reported in pesos after translation from U.S.-dollar-linked economics.

Tourism diversification
Cross Border Xpress

A cross-border terminal serving Tijuana passengers who enter or leave through San Diego, now fully consolidated from May 2026.

New growth platform

How does GAP make money?

The business model has three visible revenue layers. Aeronautical revenue comes from passenger charges, landing, aircraft parking, security and related regulated airport services. Non-aeronautical revenue comes from food and beverage, retail, duty-free, car rental, parking, VIP lounges, cargo, advertising, property leases, hotels and businesses operated directly by GAP. A third accounting layer is revenue from improvements to concession assets under IFRIC 12. That construction revenue is matched by a similar cost and therefore expands reported revenue without representing the same economic margin as passenger charges or commercial activity.

1. Airlines add capacity and passengers use GAP airports.
2. Regulated aeronautical fees monetize passenger and aircraft activity.
3. Retail, parking, cargo, lounges and CBX deepen revenue per passenger.
4. Concession capex expands capacity and supports future regulated returns.

Which revenue stream is most important?

In 2Q26, aeronautical services generated Ps. 5.58 billion and non-aeronautical services generated Ps. 3.03 billion. Excluding IFRIC-12 construction revenue, the two operating streams totaled Ps. 8.60 billion. Aeronautical revenue was still the larger contributor, but it declined 3.2% year over year because passenger traffic fell and the Mexican peso strengthened against the U.S. dollar. Non-aeronautical revenue rose 23.9%, helped materially by the consolidation of CBX and growth in directly operated businesses. That shift is strategically important because commercial and directly operated revenue can raise revenue per passenger and reduce reliance on regulated tariffs.

Aeronautical services — Ps. 5.58B — 64.8%
Non-aeronautical services — Ps. 3.03B — 35.2%
Operating-service revenue mix, 2Q26; excludes Ps. 2.68B of IFRIC-12 construction revenue.

Why is IFRIC-12 treatment important for analysis?

A simple total-revenue multiple can misread an airport concession company. GAP reported Ps. 11.29 billion of total revenue in 2Q26, but Ps. 2.68 billion represented concession-asset improvements. Because the associated cost was also Ps. 2.68 billion, analysts commonly examine revenue and EBITDA excluding IFRIC-12 effects when assessing operating economics. The company itself highlighted a 69.3% EBITDA margin excluding IFRIC-12 in 2Q26, up from 67.1% a year earlier. That measure better captures the margin from airport operations and commercial services, although capital spending remains economically real and must still be included in cash-flow valuation.

What did GAP’s latest quarter show?

The latest official package is the second-quarter 2026 Form 6-K, covering the quarter ended June 30, 2026. The quarter included two months of CBX consolidation and therefore is not perfectly comparable with 2Q25. Even so, it reveals the central operating tension: passenger volumes declined, yet commercial mix, tariffs and the business combination supported higher revenue, operating income and EBITDA.

Ps. 11.29B
Total revenue, 2Q26; up 3.7% year over year
Ps. 4.99B
Operating income, 2Q26; up 8.9%
Ps. 5.97B
EBITDA, 2Q26; up 8.4%
69.3%
EBITDA margin excluding IFRIC-12, 2Q26
Metric 2Q26 2Q25 Change
Aeronautical revenue Ps. 5.58B Ps. 5.76B Down 3.2%
Non-aeronautical revenue Ps. 3.03B Ps. 2.44B Up 23.9%
Operating income Ps. 4.99B Ps. 4.58B Up 8.9%
Comprehensive income Ps. 2.45B Ps. 2.23B Up 9.6%
Terminal passengers 14.99M 15.88M Down 5.6%

What drove the divergence between traffic and profit?

Mexican-airport aeronautical revenue fell only 0.7% in the quarter despite a 4.2% traffic decline, because the gradual implementation of maximum tariffs for the 2025–2029 regulatory period partly offset lower volume and currency translation pressure. Jamaican aeronautical revenue fell 18.3%, reflecting a 16.9% passenger decline associated with Hurricane Melissa and peso appreciation. On the commercial side, businesses operated directly by GAP rose 59.4% to Ps. 1.76 billion. CBX contributed Ps. 468.1 million during May and June from 626,424 users, with average revenue of US$42.8 per passenger.

8.9%Operating-income growth in 2Q26 despite a 5.6% decline in terminal passengers, showing the effect of tariff progression, commercial mix and the CBX transaction.

Which airports and operating KPIs matter most?

Passenger traffic is the fundamental volume driver, but airport mix matters as much as the consolidated total. In 2Q26 Guadalajara handled 4.68 million passengers and grew 4.6%, while Tijuana handled 2.92 million and declined 8.4%. Los Cabos declined 8.0% to 1.81 million, Puerto Vallarta declined 16.7% to 1.40 million, and Montego Bay declined 21.6% to 992 thousand. Smaller airports were mixed: Morelia grew 10.6% and La Paz grew 9.9%, while Mexicali declined 12.7%.

Largest airports by terminal passengers — 2Q26
Guadalajara4.68M
Tijuana2.92M
Los Cabos1.81M
Puerto Vallarta1.40M
Montego Bay0.99M
Guadalajara supplied the largest volume and was one of the few major airports to grow in 2Q26.

Which commercial KPIs reveal revenue quality?

Cargo and bonded-warehouse revenue rose 22.0% to Ps. 627.0 million in 2Q26, parking rose 9.1% to Ps. 194.1 million, convenience stores rose 11.3% to Ps. 179.9 million, advertising rose 58.1% to Ps. 68.5 million and hotel revenue rose 26.7% to Ps. 46.7 million. Third-party commercial categories were weaker: duty-free revenue fell 18.0%, food and beverage fell 4.4%, and retail fell 3.6%. The split matters because directly operated businesses can capture more economics but also require staffing, systems and execution.

KPI Latest reading Interpretation
Total passengers 14.99M in 2Q26, down 5.6% Primary volume signal for fees and commercial footfall.
CBX users 935.9K in 2Q26, down 9.3% Measures utilization of the cross-border platform.
CBX revenue per user US$42.8 in May–June 2026 Shows monetization beyond conventional airport tariffs.
Commercial mix 35.2% of operating-service revenue in 2Q26 Higher mix can support margin and diversification.
EBITDA margin ex-IFRIC-12 69.3% in 2Q26 Core operating efficiency measure used by management.

What strategic turning points shaped GAP?

GAP’s current model is the product of privatization, international expansion and a gradual move deeper into direct commercial operations. Its strategic history is best understood as a widening of the concession platform rather than a sequence of unrelated acquisitions.

  1. 1998
    Mexico awarded the Pacific airport package under the national airport privatization program, establishing the long-term concession base.
  2. 2006
    Shares began trading on the NYSE as PAC and in Mexico as GAP, broadening access to public capital and international investors.
  3. 2015
    GAP acquired Desarrollo de Concesiones Aeroportuarias, gaining control of the company that operates Montego Bay airport and adding Caribbean tourism exposure.
  4. 2018–2019
    The group won and then assumed operation of Kingston’s Norman Manley airport, creating a two-airport Jamaica platform.
  5. 2025
    A new Mexican Master Development Program and maximum-tariff period for 2025–2029 reset the investment and regulated-revenue framework.
  6. May 2026
    GAP completed the CBX and technical-assistance business combination, internalized services, acquired the remaining 25% of CBX and issued 89.7 million net new shares.

Why is the CBX combination a major change?

The transaction changes both economics and governance. GAP now consolidates 100% of CBX, eliminating the prior minority position and bringing a differentiated cross-border asset into the reporting perimeter. It also internalized technical assistance and technology-transfer services that previously generated fees to the strategic partner. In 2Q26, technical-assistance fees were negative Ps. 264.7 million because a prior provision was reversed after the combination. The transaction added Ps. 30.80 billion of preliminary goodwill and Ps. 6.90 billion of identifiable intangible assets, making acquisition accounting and future impairment testing material to the balance sheet.

The strategic question is no longer only how fast passengers grow; it is whether GAP can convert a larger, more integrated airport-and-border platform into durable commercial revenue without weakening returns through heavy capex or transaction complexity.

What gives GAP a competitive advantage?

Airport concessions create unusually high barriers to entry. A competitor cannot simply build another major airport beside Guadalajara, Tijuana or Los Cabos and replicate GAP’s passenger base. Concession rights, regulated tariff frameworks, required capital programs, scarce land, airline networks and ground-access infrastructure make the assets difficult to duplicate. The moat is therefore primarily location and regulation, reinforced by scale in procurement, commercial leasing, operating systems and relationships with airlines and government authorities.

Network strength
12 Mexican airports
Diversifies industrial, border, metropolitan and leisure demand.
Commercial depth
Ps. 3.03B
Non-aeronautical revenue in 2Q26, up 23.9%.
Unique border asset
626K users
CBX users during May–June 2026 after full consolidation.

Who are GAP’s main competitors?

In Mexico, the most relevant listed airport operators are Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste and Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte. They do not usually compete airport-for-airport in the way retailers compete for the same customer, because each operates a distinct concession portfolio. Rivalry instead appears in capital-market comparisons, airline route development, commercial execution, tourism exposure and bids for future concessions. GAP’s portfolio is distinguished by Guadalajara’s scale, Tijuana’s border positioning, major Pacific resorts and its Jamaica platform.

Competitive force GAP position Why it matters
New entrants Low practical threat at existing airports Concessions, land and regulation create high barriers.
Airline bargaining power Meaningful but constrained Airlines can shift capacity, yet major cities and resorts remain strategically valuable.
Passenger substitutes Route-dependent Road travel is relevant domestically; long-distance and international routes have fewer substitutes.
Commercial competition Execution-driven Revenue per passenger depends on tenant mix, direct operations and dwell time.

How financially strong is GAP?

GAP’s operating margins are high, but the business is capital intensive and increasingly leveraged. For the first six months of 2026, total revenue was Ps. 22.66 billion, up 3.3%; aeronautical revenue was Ps. 11.81 billion, up 0.4%; and non-aeronautical revenue was Ps. 5.57 billion, up 15.1%. Net income increased 12.6% year over year. At June 30, 2026, total assets were Ps. 140.37 billion, up Ps. 62.18 billion from a year earlier, largely because of the CBX combination, goodwill, intangibles, cash and concession investments.

2Q26 operating margin bridge
Operating-service revenuePs. 8.60B
EBITDA69.3%
Operating incomePs. 4.99B
EBITDA margin excludes IFRIC-12; operating-income ratio is shown against aeronautical plus non-aeronautical revenue for analytical comparability.

What do debt and capital spending imply?

Total liabilities rose Ps. 27.95 billion from June 2025, including an Ps. 18.10 billion increase in bond certificates and a net Ps. 419.0 million increase in bank loans. Interest expense increased 37.6% in 2Q26, reflecting debt used for airport capex and the acquisition of the remaining CBX interest. Management’s revised 2026 guidance calls for Ps. 12.0 billion of capex. That spending should expand and modernize capacity under the Master Development Program, but it also means free cash flow can diverge sharply from EBITDA.

Financial driver Latest fact Analytical implication
EBITDA margin 69.3% ex-IFRIC-12 in 2Q26 Strong concession economics and commercial contribution.
Interest expense Up 37.6% in 2Q26 Leverage and refinancing costs require closer monitoring.
2026 capex guidance Ps. 12.0B Large reinvestment burden reduces near-term cash conversion.
Goodwill and intangibles added Ps. 37.70B at June 2026 Transaction assumptions and impairment risk now matter more.

Who owns GAP and how does governance matter?

GAP has a more complex control structure than a simple one-share-one-vote U.S. corporation. After the May 2026 merger, it reported 519,226,576 Series B shares and 75,791,619 Series BB shares outstanding. The Series BB shares are associated with strategic-partner rights and governance provisions under the company’s bylaws and concession structure. The transaction increased total shares outstanding by 89,740,731 net shares, creating dilution for prior holders while internalizing CBX and technical-assistance economics.

Governance item 2Q26 fact Why it matters
Series B shares 519,226,576 Represents the large public economic float.
Series BB shares 75,791,619 Carries strategic-partner and governance significance.
Total shares outstanding 595,018,195 New denominator for per-share earnings and valuation.
New net shares issued 89,740,731 Transaction value must be weighed against dilution.

What should investors examine in the annual filing?

The company’s 2025 Form 20-F is the principal source for concession terms, related-party arrangements, board rights, risk factors and beneficial ownership. Researchers should distinguish economic ownership from governance influence and pay particular attention to strategic-partner rights, related-party fees, board nomination mechanisms and the accounting consequences of the 2026 restructuring. The internalization of technical assistance reduces one recurring fee stream but makes management directly responsible for functions previously provided under the agreement.

15.1%Series BB shares as a share of total shares outstanding after the May 2026 combination, based on 75.79 million of 595.02 million shares.

What opportunities and risks could change the story?

The opportunity case rests on regulated tariff progression, airport capacity expansion, stronger commercial monetization and the integration of CBX. Management’s revised 2026 guidance calls for total revenue growth of 7%–10%, EBITDA growth of 10%–12% and an EBITDA margin of about 67%, plus or minus one percentage point. Non-aeronautical revenue is expected to grow 21%–24%, reflecting the enlarged perimeter. The official presentation library provides management’s strategic and capital-program context.

Passenger recovery
Watch whether 2026 traffic moves back toward management’s revised range of down 3% to flat.
CBX integration
Track users, revenue per user and whether full ownership improves cash generation.
Jamaica normalization
Monitor Montego Bay and Kingston after hurricane-related disruption.
Capex execution
Compare Ps. 12.0B guidance with project delivery, debt and future capacity.
Commercial mix
Test whether directly operated revenue continues to outgrow third-party concessions.
Interest burden
Higher debt can offset EBITDA growth through financing costs.

Which risks are most material?

Traffic can fall because of airline capacity reductions, recession, security concerns, health events, weather or natural disasters. Hurricane Melissa illustrates how a local disruption can materially affect Jamaican traffic and translated revenue. Currency is another two-sided risk: a stronger peso reduces the peso value of U.S.-dollar-linked Jamaican and international-passenger revenue, while some debt, capex or operating costs may move differently. Regulation is central because Mexican maximum tariffs and concession obligations determine both revenue potential and required investment. Failure to meet service or development commitments could create penalties or threaten concession value.

The CBX combination adds integration, valuation and governance risk. Preliminary goodwill and intangible values may change as purchase accounting is finalized. Future underperformance could trigger impairment charges. The proposed infrastructure investment trust certificates, announced in May 2026 and still subject to approvals at the time of the 2Q26 release, could alter ownership or financing of the Mexican concessionaires. Finally, higher leverage and capex increase sensitivity to rates and refinancing conditions.

Risk Financial line affected Signal to monitor
Traffic weakness Aeronautical and commercial revenue Monthly traffic reports and airline capacity.
Weather disruption Jamaica revenue, repairs and insurance Airport reopening, passenger recovery and claims.
FX appreciation Translated international revenue Peso/U.S.-dollar rate and revenue bridge.
Capex and leverage Free cash flow and interest expense Debt issuance, rates and project spending.
CBX accounting Goodwill, intangibles and EPS Purchase-price allocation and impairment testing.

Why does GAP matter for valuation?

GAP is best valued as a long-duration concession and infrastructure platform rather than as a conventional transportation company. Revenue growth depends on passenger volume, regulated tariffs, commercial revenue per passenger and the contribution of CBX. Margin depends on operating leverage, direct-business execution, concession taxes and the treatment of technical-assistance costs. Reinvestment is unusually important because the 2025–2029 Master Development Program requires substantial capex, and that spending supports both concession compliance and future capacity.

Which DCF drivers deserve the most attention?

A practical DCF should separate operating-service revenue from IFRIC-12 construction revenue, project aeronautical and non-aeronautical growth independently, and model the 2026 share-count increase. It should also reflect higher interest expense and the enlarged asset base after CBX. Terminal value is sensitive to concession duration, tariff regulation, maintenance capital and the assumption that traffic eventually normalizes after temporary disruptions. Because the company reports in pesos but has meaningful U.S.-dollar-linked activity, currency assumptions affect both forecasts and the translation of an ADR-based valuation.

Upside driver
21%–24%
Management’s 2026 non-aeronautical revenue growth guidance.
Core margin anchor
67% ±1%
Management’s 2026 EBITDA-margin guidance.
Reinvestment burden
Ps. 12.0B
2026 capex guidance that must be reflected in free cash flow.

The latest official material-events page and monthly traffic reports are therefore central inputs for updating a model between quarterly filings.

What is the key takeaway from GAP analysis?

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico is important because it controls a difficult-to-replicate collection of airports spanning Mexico’s second-largest metropolitan gateway, a unique cross-border terminal, leading Pacific resorts and two Jamaican airports. The concession structure creates barriers to entry and high operating margins, while commercial services provide a path to grow revenue faster than traffic. The 2Q26 results demonstrate that advantage: total passengers fell 5.6%, yet operating income rose 8.9% and EBITDA rose 8.4% as tariffs, commercial mix and CBX offset weaker volume.

The same quarter also makes the risks clearer. GAP now carries more debt, more shares, more goodwill and a larger capital program. Jamaica remains exposed to severe weather, international revenue is sensitive to exchange rates, and Mexican concession economics depend on regulation and execution of mandated investment. CBX can become a valuable growth platform, but its purchase price, integration and future utilization must justify the dilution and balance-sheet expansion.

Final synthesis: GAP’s thesis is the conversion of scarce airport concessions and a distinctive border asset into regulated fees, commercial revenue and long-duration cash flow. The strongest evidence will be passenger recovery, sustained non-aeronautical growth, stable ex-IFRIC EBITDA margins and disciplined returns on Ps. 12.0 billion of planned 2026 capex. The clearest warning signs would be prolonged traffic weakness, rising financing costs, underperformance at CBX or Jamaica, or capital spending that fails to produce adequate tariff and commercial returns.

DCF model

    5-Year Financial Model

    40+ Charts & Metrics

    DCF & Multiple Valuation

    Free Email Support



Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.

(PAC) Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$17 $9
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5