(NSP) Insperity, Inc. Company Overview

US | Industrials | Staffing & Employment Services | NYSE

What does Insperity do?

Insperity, Inc. is a New York Stock Exchange-listed human resources services company operating under ticker NSP. Its core product is not conventional staffing. Instead, Insperity enters co-employment relationships with small and midsize businesses through professional employer organization, or PEO, arrangements. Under this model, a client continues to run its business and supervise employees, while Insperity handles a broad bundle of payroll administration, benefits, workers’ compensation, compliance support, HR guidance and related workforce services. The company describes this integrated suite as its PEO HR Solutions, including HR 360, HR 360 Select Edition and HR Scale. The latest Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2026 explains that these offerings are delivered through a co-employment relationship.

NYSE: NSP
Public listing and ticker
303,049
Average paid WSEEs, Q1 2026
$1.895B
Revenue, Q1 2026
40 years
Operating history highlighted in 2026

Who buys Insperity’s services?

The target customer is an employer that wants sophisticated HR infrastructure without building every capability in-house. Insperity’s historical focus has been successful small and medium-sized businesses, particularly organizations large enough to face meaningful benefits, payroll and compliance complexity but too small to spread those costs across a massive internal HR department. The company’s value proposition is therefore a mix of administrative relief, risk reduction, employee-benefit access and management advice. Its official about page frames the mission as helping businesses succeed so communities prosper, but the economically important point is that Insperity attempts to embed itself in the client’s recurring workforce processes.

Why does the company matter?

The business matters because HR outsourcing sits at the intersection of labor regulation, insurance purchasing, payroll execution and management productivity. A client can change payroll vendors relatively easily; replacing a full PEO relationship is more disruptive because benefits, tax reporting, employee records, compliance procedures and HR workflows are connected. That breadth can create switching costs, but it also places operational and financial responsibility on Insperity. The company is exposed to payroll timing, healthcare claims, workers’ compensation estimates and client retention in a way that a pure software vendor is not.

How does Insperity make money?

Insperity bills clients for the payroll cost of worksite employees plus a markup. Accounting revenue excludes the payroll cost component, so reported revenue is the markup associated with payroll taxes, employee benefits, workers’ compensation and HR services. This distinction is essential. In fiscal 2025, gross billings were $45.565 billion, worksite employee payroll cost was $38.753 billion and reported revenue was $6.812 billion. The company’s 2025 Form 10-K states that revenue depends primarily on client enrollment, paid worksite employees, benefits participation, payroll levels and pricing.

1. Client payroll base
Client employee wages create the billing base.
2. Direct-cost components
Taxes, benefits and workers’ compensation are priced into billings.
3. HR service markup
Insperity adds the fee for service, technology and risk administration.
4. Gross profit
Revenue less direct employment-related costs funds operating expenses and profit.

Which economic levers drive revenue?

Driver How it affects revenue What can go wrong
Paid WSEEs More employees under contract expand recurring billings. Weak sales, attrition or client layoffs reduce the base.
Revenue per WSEE Pricing and wage inflation can raise monthly revenue per employee. Price increases can pressure client retention or new sales.
Benefits participation Enrollment increases benefit-related revenue and cost exposure. Claims inflation may outpace annual pricing resets.
Client retention Long relationships preserve recurring revenue and lower replacement cost. PEO contracts can be cancelled on relatively short notice.
$1,831Revenue per WSEE per month in FY2025, up 3% from $1,785 in FY2024.

Why gross profit per WSEE matters more than revenue alone

Because a large portion of revenue reimburses or funds employment-related costs, the key unit-economics measure is gross profit per WSEE per month. Fiscal 2025 revenue grew 4%, yet gross profit fell 14% to $900 million because direct costs rose faster than pricing. Gross profit per WSEE declined 15% to $242 per month. This is the central strategic tension in the model: Insperity can grow reported revenue while economic profitability deteriorates if health-benefit inflation, claims estimates or payroll-related costs move adversely.

What does Insperity’s latest quarter show?

The first quarter of 2026 showed modest top-line growth but weaker GAAP earnings. Revenue rose 2% year over year to $1.895 billion from $1.863 billion. Gross profit fell to $302 million from $310 million, while operating income declined to $62 million from $68 million. Net income was $33 million, down from $51 million, and diluted EPS fell to $0.88 from $1.35. Average paid WSEEs declined 1% to 303,049. Management’s official quarterly-results page identifies first-quarter 2026 earnings as the latest reporting package.

$1.895B
Revenue, Q1 2026; up 2% year over year
$302M
Gross profit, Q1 2026; down 3%
$62M
Operating income, Q1 2026
$0.88
Diluted EPS, Q1 2026
Metric Q1 2026 Q1 2025 Interpretation
Revenue $1.895B $1.863B Pricing offset a lower average WSEE count.
Gross profit $302M $310M Direct-cost pressure remained visible.
Operating expenses $240M $242M Cost control partly cushioned lower gross profit.
Net income $33M $51M A higher tax expense amplified the earnings decline.
Average paid WSEEs 303,049 306,023 Unit growth remained the weak point.

What changed in the earnings mix?

Quarterly income-statement comparison — Q1 2025 vs Q1 2026
$1.863BRevenue 2025
$1.895BRevenue 2026
$68MOp. inc. 2025
$62MOp. inc. 2026
Revenue increased, but operating income moved lower; period: three months ended March 31.

The quarter suggests that management’s margin-recovery efforts were beginning to stabilize operating expenses, but the model had not yet returned to healthy volume growth. Revenue per WSEE increased 3% on higher pricing, while average WSEEs declined 1%. That combination can support revenue temporarily, yet sustainable earnings recovery requires pricing, client selection and healthcare cost trends to improve without causing excessive client attrition.

How did Insperity’s strategy evolve?

Insperity’s history is strategically relevant because the company moved from a narrower PEO provider toward a broader HR service-and-technology platform. The company’s official materials emphasize four decades of service, while filings show the current business remains economically anchored in co-employment and recurring WSEE-based fees.

  1. 1986
    The company was founded around the idea that small businesses could outsource complex employer functions. That original co-employment model still defines the revenue engine.
  2. 1997
    The company became publicly traded, creating access to capital and a governance framework suited to national expansion.
  3. 2011
    The company adopted the Insperity name, signaling a broader positioning around business performance rather than administrative staffing alone.
  4. 2010s
    Insperity expanded complementary services such as recruiting, retirement, insurance and performance tools, increasing wallet share and integration.
  5. 2023–2025
    Technology modernization and the strategic partnership with Workday became major investment priorities, increasing near-term expenses while aiming to improve scalability.
  6. 2025
    Benefits-cost pressure exposed the risk of pricing lags and drove a margin-recovery program focused on client selection, pricing and cost discipline.
  7. 2026
    A realignment plan targeted approximately 4% of non-sales positions, while management continued hiring in sales and key strategic roles.

What does the Workday partnership change?

The partnership is intended to combine Insperity’s service depth with Workday technology through HR Scale. Strategically, this addresses a core challenge: larger or more sophisticated clients expect modern digital workflows, analytics and integration, but Insperity differentiates itself through high-touch service. The opportunity is to scale service quality using better technology. The risk is implementation cost, execution complexity and uncertain adoption. Insperity’s filings explicitly identify failure to realize expected benefits from the Workday partnership as a risk factor.

Insperity’s strategic challenge is to modernize the platform without losing the service intensity that supports retention and premium pricing.

What gives Insperity a competitive advantage?

Insperity’s moat is not based on a single patent or a pure software network effect. It is built from accumulated service expertise, regulatory infrastructure, carrier relationships, nationwide sales and service coverage, benefits purchasing scale and the operational switching costs embedded in a co-employment relationship. The company’s investor-relations corporate profile describes an array of HR and business solutions designed to improve business performance.

Service breadth
Strong
Payroll, benefits, compliance, HR advice and complementary tools are bundled.
Switching costs
Strong
Changing providers touches benefits, payroll, records and compliance workflows.
Pricing power
Moderate
Pricing can rise, but clients can leave and rivals compete aggressively.
Cost predictability
Constrained
Benefits and claims costs can move faster than annual pricing resets.

Which competitors pressure the business?

Competitor type Examples Competitive pressure
National PEOs ADP TotalSource, TriNet Scale, brand recognition, benefits access and national distribution.
Payroll and HCM platforms Paychex, Paycom and other software-led providers Lower-touch digital alternatives may appeal to clients prioritizing software and price.
Regional PEOs Local and industry-specialized firms Local relationships, niche underwriting and aggressive pricing.
Internal HR departments Client self-insourcing Larger clients may decide to build capabilities internally.

Why the moat is durable but not invulnerable

The moat is strongest when clients value advice, risk administration and employee benefits more than the lowest possible fee. It weakens when clients view HR outsourcing as a commodity or when technology-first rivals offer adequate service at a lower price. Insperity therefore needs both service differentiation and operational discipline. A premium service model cannot protect shareholder economics if healthcare costs repeatedly outrun pricing.

How financially strong is Insperity?

Insperity’s balance sheet requires careful interpretation because cash includes substantial payroll-related client funds and tax withholdings. At March 31, 2026, cash and cash equivalents were $537 million, restricted cash was $80 million and marketable securities were $18 million. Long-term debt was $369 million. Total assets were $2.196 billion, current liabilities were $1.588 billion and stockholders’ equity was $67 million. The company had $880 million of accounts receivable and $818 million of accrued WSEE payroll costs, reflecting the large working-capital flows inherent in processing payroll.

FY2025
$6.812B revenue
Full-year top line grew 4%.
FY2025
$900M gross profit
Down 14% as direct costs outpaced pricing.
FY2025
$(7)M net loss
Compared with $91M net income in FY2024.
FY2025
$131M adjusted EBITDA
Down 51% from $270M in FY2024.

What happened to profitability in 2025?

FY2025 revenue and gross-profit scale
Revenue$6.812B
Gross profit$900M
Adjusted EBITDA$131M
The chart highlights the thin economic spread between reported revenue and bottom-line earnings in a cost-heavy PEO model. Period: FY2025.

Fiscal 2025 was a margin-reset year. Average WSEEs rose 1% to 310,089 and revenue per WSEE rose 3%, but direct costs per WSEE increased 6%. Health and related benefit costs increased $61 per WSEE per month, while the percentage of WSEEs covered by health plans was 63%. Workers’ compensation costs rose 15%, although favorable claim development produced a $29 million cost reduction. These figures show why underwriting discipline and claims estimation are central to financial quality.

How should cash flow be interpreted?

Quarterly operating cash flow can be highly volatile because client payroll cycles shift receivables, payroll liabilities, tax deductions and prepaid insurance. Q1 2026 operating cash flow was negative $67 million, compared with negative $443 million in Q1 2025. Capital expenditures were $6 million, implying a simple operating-cash-flow-minus-capex measure of negative $73 million for the quarter. That should not be annualized mechanically. The better analytical approach is to compare multi-period cash generation and separate company cash from funds associated with payroll obligations.

Why it matters
A high cash balance does not equal unrestricted excess cash. Payroll, tax and benefit obligations create large matched assets and liabilities that move with processing cycles.

Which KPIs best explain Insperity’s performance?

The most useful KPIs connect client growth, unit economics and risk costs. Revenue growth alone can conceal deteriorating profitability, so researchers should track WSEE volume, retention, revenue per WSEE, gross profit per WSEE and the cost of benefits and workers’ compensation.

KPI Latest reference How to read it
Average paid WSEEs 303,049 in Q1 2026 The recurring unit base; falling volume raises pressure on sales efficiency and fixed-cost leverage.
Revenue per WSEE per month $1,831 in FY2025 Reflects pricing, wages and benefit mix, but is not the same as profit.
Gross profit per WSEE per month $242 in FY2025 Best unit-economics indicator; down 15% in FY2025.
Client retention 83% in FY2025 Improved from 81% in FY2024, supporting recurring revenue quality.
Benefits coverage 63% of WSEEs in FY2025 Higher participation can deepen relationships but increases healthcare-cost exposure.
Workers’ compensation cost 0.26% of non-bonus payroll in FY2025 Measures underwriting and claims-management performance.
WSEE growth
Watch whether new sales and hiring at existing clients can reverse the Q1 2026 decline.
Gross profit per WSEE
The clearest measure of whether pricing and cost actions are restoring economics.
Benefits cost inflation
A key determinant of the spread between revenue per WSEE and direct costs.
Retention
Price increases only create value if client losses remain controlled.
HR Scale adoption
Tests whether technology investment expands addressable clients and improves service productivity.
Operating expense per WSEE
Shows whether realignment and scale produce operating leverage.

Who owns Insperity stock, and why does governance matter?

Insperity has one class of common stock, and each share carries one vote. That means there is no dual-class founder control. However, founder and chief executive Paul J. Sarvadi remains influential through leadership, history and a 3.86% beneficial stake. The 2026 proxy statement reported 38,169,182 shares outstanding at the April 6, 2026 record date.

Holder or group Beneficial ownership Percent Why it matters
BlackRock, Inc. 5,181,289 shares 13.57% Large passive and institutional influence on governance votes.
The Vanguard Group 3,728,331 shares 9.77% Historically significant institutional holder; proxy notes later reporting realignment.
Reinhart Partners 2,745,035 shares 7.19% Concentrated active ownership can sharpen attention to capital allocation.
Paul J. Sarvadi 1,472,582 shares 3.86% Founder-CEO incentives remain economically meaningful without majority control.
Directors and executives as a group 2,200,699 shares 5.77% Management has material exposure to long-term share performance.

What does the ownership structure signal?

The structure balances founder continuity with institutional oversight. Sarvadi’s stake aligns him with shareholders, but he cannot dictate outcomes through voting control. Large institutions can influence director elections, compensation policy and engagement around performance. The board also maintains finance, risk-management and audit oversight; the official committee charter assigns responsibility for financial affairs, reporting integrity, compliance and risk-management processes.

How does compensation connect to strategy?

The proxy links executive incentives to financial and shareholder outcomes through annual and long-term programs. For an investor, the critical question is whether targets reward durable gross-profit recovery and disciplined WSEE growth rather than revenue expansion that underprices risk. The company’s use of adjusted EBITDA in performance analysis is useful, but GAAP earnings, cash conversion and insurance-cost estimates remain essential cross-checks.

What opportunities could improve Insperity’s outlook?

Growth
Margin recovery

Pricing, client selection and improved benefits-cost trends could restore gross profit per WSEE.

Technology
HR Scale and Workday

A stronger platform could broaden the addressable market and increase service productivity.

Distribution
Sales-force productivity

Better new-client sales would rebuild WSEE growth and improve fixed-cost leverage.

Retention
Deeper client relationships

Complementary services can raise switching costs and revenue per client.

Can the company regain unit growth?

Insperity’s addressable market remains large because many U.S. small and midsize employers still manage HR internally or use fragmented vendors. The company can grow through new client wins, hiring at existing clients and improved retention. Fiscal 2025 client retention increased to 83% from 81%, a positive signal. Yet Q1 2026 average WSEEs declined, so management must show that stricter client selection and higher pricing do not permanently suppress sales momentum.

Can technology improve operating leverage?

A modern platform can automate routine workflows, reduce implementation friction, improve analytics and allow service teams to support more clients. If HR Scale gains traction, Insperity could serve larger or more complex employers while preserving its advisory model. The upside is not simply software revenue; it is better economics in the existing service model. The strategic risk is that implementation spending becomes a recurring cost without sufficient client adoption.

4%Approximate share of non-sales positions targeted by the February 2026 realignment plan, while disciplined hiring continued in sales and key roles.

What risks could weaken Insperity’s story?

The company’s principal risks are tightly connected to its value proposition. Insperity assumes responsibility for payroll processing, tax remittance, benefits administration and workers’ compensation estimates. Errors or adverse cost trends can damage both earnings and trust. The latest 10-Q lists healthcare and workers’ compensation inflation, client cancellations, regulatory changes, technology disruption, cybersecurity, third-party failures and failure to realize Workday partnership benefits among material risks.

Risk Financial transmission What to monitor
Benefits-cost inflation Compresses gross profit per WSEE when pricing lags. Health-cost trend, pricing changes and claims run-off adjustments.
Client attrition Reduces WSEEs, revenue and operating leverage. Retention, new-client sales and WSEEs from existing-client hiring.
Regulatory or tax changes Raises compliance cost or challenges co-employer status. Federal and state employment, benefits and tax developments.
Technology execution Creates implementation cost, service disruption or weak returns. HR Scale adoption, implementation spending and service productivity.
Cybersecurity and privacy Potential liability, remediation cost and reputational damage. Material incidents, control disclosures and third-party resilience.
Credit and liquidity timing Client nonpayment can leave Insperity responsible for payroll obligations. Receivables, client funding, cash segregation and credit-facility use.

Which risk is most important?

The most immediate risk is the mismatch between annual pricing and faster-moving healthcare costs. Fiscal 2025 demonstrated how quickly that mismatch can reverse profitability. Revenue increased, but gross profit and adjusted EBITDA fell sharply. This is not merely a temporary accounting issue; it tests whether Insperity can estimate costs, select clients, negotiate carrier arrangements and reprice service without destabilizing retention.

Why macro conditions matter

Small-business hiring and formation affect WSEE growth. A weak economy can reduce hiring at existing clients, increase business failures and slow new sales. Inflation can raise wages and reported revenue per WSEE, but it can also increase benefits, salaries and service costs. The business therefore has both defensive recurring characteristics and cyclical sensitivity.

Why does Insperity matter for valuation?

A discounted cash flow analysis should not treat Insperity as a simple high-revenue HR software company. The most important valuation drivers are WSEE growth, revenue per WSEE, gross profit per WSEE, operating expense per WSEE, insurance-cost normalization, tax rate, working-capital volatility and capital allocation. Fiscal 2025 shows why margin assumptions dominate: a 4% revenue increase coincided with a net loss and a 51% decline in adjusted EBITDA.

FY2025 gross profit — 13.2% of revenue, $900M
Direct costs — 86.8% of revenue, approximately $5.912B

Which assumptions matter most in a DCF?

WSEE growth rate
Determines the recurring unit base and sales productivity.
Gross profit per WSEE
Captures pricing, insurance inflation and underwriting discipline.
Operating expense leverage
Shows whether technology and realignment improve scalability.
Normalized cash conversion
Requires adjusting for payroll-cycle working-capital movements.
Capital returns
Dividends and buybacks compete with technology investment and debt reduction.
Terminal risk
Reflects competition, regulation and the durability of the service model.

The company paid $90 million in dividends, repurchased about 232,000 shares for $19 million and spent $31 million on capital expenditures in fiscal 2025. In Q1 2026, it paid $23 million in dividends and repurchased $4 million of stock. Those choices support shareholder returns, but valuation quality depends on whether distributions remain covered by normalized cash generation after technology and service investment. Insperity’s official dividend history provides the company’s declared payment record.

What is the key takeaway from Insperity analysis?

Insperity is best understood as a recurring HR infrastructure and risk-administration business, not merely a payroll processor and not a pure software company. Its competitive position comes from combining service, benefits access, compliance capabilities and technology in a relationship that is operationally difficult for clients to replace. That model can generate durable recurring revenue, but it also exposes the company to healthcare inflation, claims estimation, payroll funding, regulatory complexity and client retention.

The current story is a margin-recovery case. Fiscal 2025 revenue reached $6.812 billion and average paid WSEEs increased to 310,089, yet gross profit fell to $900 million and the company recorded a $7 million net loss. Q1 2026 revenue rose to $1.895 billion, but average WSEEs declined to 303,049 and net income fell to $33 million. The strategic question is whether pricing, client selection, cost control and the new platform can restore gross profit per WSEE without impairing growth.

Final synthesis
For students, Insperity is a useful case study in service differentiation, switching costs and risk-based pricing. For researchers, the critical evidence lies in WSEE growth, retention, benefits inflation and gross profit per WSEE. For investors, the business becomes more attractive economically when margin recovery and unit growth improve together; it becomes weaker when pricing must rise simply to chase direct-cost inflation. The next reporting periods should be judged by that balance rather than revenue growth alone.

DCF model

    5-Year Financial Model

    40+ Charts & Metrics

    DCF & Multiple Valuation

    Free Email Support



Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.