What does MYR Group do?
MYR Group Inc. is a Nasdaq-listed specialty electrical contractor, trading under the ticker MYRG. It does not sell electricity and it does not own regulated utility networks. Instead, its operating subsidiaries design, build, upgrade, maintain, and repair the physical systems that move electricity and the electrical systems inside complex commercial and industrial facilities. The company works through local contractor brands across the United States and Canada, while the parent supplies capital, risk controls, fleet resources, bonding capacity, and strategic direction.
Two segments connect the grid to the end user
The 2025 Form 10-K describes a business with roots in T&D since 1891 and C&I work since 1912. As of year-end 2025, about 7,200 of its roughly 9,000 employees were craft workers, and approximately 85% of craft employees were union members. That workforce profile matters because skilled labor availability, safety, productivity, and field supervision are central production inputs rather than supporting details.
| Identity factor | Company-specific answer | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Listing | Nasdaq: MYRG | Single-class public equity with dispersed institutional ownership. |
| Geography | United States and Canada | Regional offices provide local labor and customer knowledge while the parent supplies scale. |
| Customers | Utilities, general contractors, facility owners, agencies, and developers | Demand is tied to utility capital programs and nonresidential construction rather than consumer spending. |
| Economic role | Specialty contractor and project executor | Value depends on estimating, workforce execution, safety, fleet availability, and contract discipline. |
How does MYR Group make money?
MYR Group earns contract revenue by completing electrical construction and maintenance work. The basic economic chain is simple, but the accounting and risk are not: the company wins a project or service assignment, mobilizes skilled labor and specialized equipment, incurs materials and subcontractor costs, recognizes revenue as work progresses, and retains the spread between contract revenue and total execution cost. Profitability therefore depends less on a proprietary product and more on bid selection, productivity, change-order recovery, fleet utilization, and the accuracy of estimated costs to complete.
Contract type determines where risk sits
Fixed-price contracts made up 57.0% of FY2025 revenue. They can reward strong productivity and procurement, but MYR bears more risk when labor hours, material cost, sequencing, or project conditions differ from the estimate. Unit-price work, 22.3% of FY2025 revenue, pays agreed rates for measured output. Time-and-equipment and cost-plus arrangements, grouped as T&E, represented 20.7% and generally shift more cost variability toward the customer. The mix differs sharply by segment: C&I was 84.5% fixed price in FY2025, while T&D had a more balanced blend.
| Contract type | FY2025 share | Segment concentration | Economic interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed price | 57.0% | Dominant in C&I | Highest estimate and productivity sensitivity. |
| Unit price | 22.3% | Concentrated in T&D | Revenue varies with measured output at agreed rates. |
| T&E / cost-plus | 20.7% | More important in T&D | Generally shifts more direct cost variability toward the customer. |
Which segments and backlog sources matter most?
T&D remained the larger segment in FY2025, producing 54.7% of revenue, while C&I produced 45.3%. The mix is close enough that neither segment should be treated as secondary. T&D connects MYR to multiyear grid modernization, distribution reliability, generation interconnection, and emergency restoration. C&I connects the company to data centers, transportation, manufacturing, healthcare, public infrastructure, and other electrically intensive facilities.
Backlog provides visibility, not a guarantee
At March 31, 2026, backlog reached a record $2.84 billion, up 7.7% year over year. C&I represented about 65.5% of total backlog, compared with 34.5% for T&D, even though the current revenue mix was more balanced. That mismatch points to strong future C&I workload, but it also raises the importance of fixed-price execution because C&I carries the company’s highest fixed-price concentration.
Customer concentration is meaningful but not dominant
MYR’s top ten customers generated 38.0% of FY2025 revenue, and no single customer exceeded 10%. This is a favorable middle ground: repeat relationships can lower selling friction and help win negotiated or limited-bid work, while the absence of a single dominant customer limits one-source dependence. Still, a few delayed utility programs or data-center campuses can influence quarterly revenue, working capital, and fleet utilization.
What does MYR Group's latest quarter show?
The quarter ended March 31, 2026 showed strong growth and unusually favorable margin conversion. Revenue reached $1.00 billion, up 20.0% year over year. Gross profit rose 38.7% to $134.4 million, while gross margin improved to 13.4% from 11.6%. Operating income increased to $64.7 million and net income doubled to $46.8 million. The company’s first-quarter 2026 earnings release also reported record EBITDA of $81.5 million and diluted EPS of $2.99.
| Metric | Q1 2026 | Year-over-year change | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1,000.4M | +20.0% | Both segments contributed to growth. |
| Gross profit | $134.4M | +38.7% | Growth exceeded revenue growth because gross margin expanded. |
| Operating income | $64.7M | +88.8% | Operating margin reached 6.5%. |
| Net income / diluted EPS | $46.8M / $2.99 | Net income +100.8% | Earnings approximately doubled year over year. |
| Operating cash flow | $84.7M | +1.8% | Working-capital timing offset part of the income increase. |
| Capital expenditures | $16.1M | +23.5% | Reinvestment supports fleet and tooling capacity. |
Why the margin gain needs careful interpretation
That disclosure is crucial. It does not invalidate the improvement, but it shows that a portion came from project re-estimation and closeout timing rather than a fully repeatable structural shift. Investors should therefore compare several quarters of segment margin, estimate changes, and project mix rather than annualizing one quarter mechanically. The Q1 2026 Form 10-Q provides the detailed bridge.
How did MYR Group build its current market position?
MYR Group’s development is best understood as the combination of old operating companies, a modern public holding structure, selective acquisitions, and recurring reinvestment in people and equipment. The strategy has generally preserved local contractor identities and customer relationships while centralizing functions where scale is useful. This balance matters in construction: customers often buy from a trusted local operating team, but large projects require enterprise-level bonding, fleet capacity, safety systems, insurance, and liquidity.
-
1891T&D operating roots begin. The long history supports utility relationships, field know-how, and credibility on complex line and substation work.
-
1912Commercial and industrial electrical contracting roots begin, establishing a second demand engine beyond utility infrastructure.
-
1995MYR Group is established through the merger of long-standing specialty contractors, creating the holding-company model used today.
-
2019The acquisition of CSI Electrical Contractors expands C&I capabilities and western U.S. exposure, especially in complex electrical markets.
-
2023A five-year $490 million revolving credit facility strengthens liquidity for working capital, fleet, acquisitions, and share repurchases.
-
2024Project estimate problems, including clean-energy and C&I work, compress margins and demonstrate the downside of fixed-price execution risk.
-
2025Revenue reaches $3.66 billion, net income reaches $118.4 million, and year-end backlog reaches $2.82 billion as margins and cash generation rebound.
-
2026MYR agrees to acquire Valley Electric and Comet Electric for about $328.0 million, targeting greater C&I scale, design capability, and West Coast reach.
The Valley and Comet transaction changes the capital-allocation story
On May 27, 2026, MYR announced a definitive agreement to acquire Valley Electric and Comet Electric. The businesses generated combined average annual revenue above $400 million during 2024-2025, according to the company’s investor materials. The proposed purchase price is approximately $328.0 million, funded with cash and revolver borrowings. The official transaction announcement frames the deal as an expansion of C&I geography, design-build capability, and end-market diversity.
What gives MYR Group a competitive advantage?
MYR Group does not rely materially on patents or proprietary software. Its advantage is operational and organizational: a trained craft workforce, a specialized fleet, safety systems, local market presence, customer history, project controls, and access to capital. These resources are difficult to reproduce quickly because they must function together. A competitor can purchase trucks, but it cannot instantly create experienced superintendents, utility relationships, union-labor access, field productivity data, bonding credibility, and a record of safe execution.
Why scale matters in electrical contracting
Large utilities and owners need contractors that can mobilize rapidly, provide financial assurances, absorb working-capital swings, manage safety across dispersed sites, and complete technically complex work. MYR ended March 2026 with $163.2 million of cash, no revolver borrowings, and substantial unused borrowing capacity. That financial position can support large project mobilization and equipment purchases in ways that smaller regional contractors may struggle to match.
Why the moat is not absolute
Construction remains competitive, and price is frequently a principal award factor. Skilled employees can move, customers can rebid work, and project mistakes can overwhelm the benefit of scale. The strongest version of MYR’s advantage therefore appears when it combines selective bidding, repeat customers, experienced local management, and centralized resources. Scale without discipline would simply enlarge risk.
Who are MYR Group's main competitors?
The competitive set changes by project. In T&D, MYR faces large public infrastructure contractors, utility-service specialists, and regional electrical firms. In C&I, it competes with national electrical contractors, diversified building-services companies, and local specialists. The company’s 2026 proxy uses a broader compensation peer group that includes MasTec, Primoris Services, Dycom Industries, Sterling Infrastructure, and Granite Construction; other commonly compared electrical and infrastructure contractors include Quanta Services and EMCOR Group. These are analytical peers, not identical businesses.
| Competitor or peer | Overlap with MYR | Key distinction for analysis |
|---|---|---|
| Quanta Services | Electric power infrastructure and specialty contracting | Much larger scale and broader infrastructure portfolio; useful as a high-scale benchmark. |
| MasTec | Communications, power delivery, clean energy, and civil infrastructure | More diversified end markets and larger acquisition footprint. |
| Primoris Services | Utility, energy, and infrastructure construction | Broader civil and energy exposure; similar project-execution and backlog considerations. |
| EMCOR Group | Electrical and mechanical construction and facilities services | Stronger mechanical and recurring service mix; a relevant C&I margin benchmark. |
| Regional private contractors | Local utility and commercial projects | May compete aggressively on price and relationships but often lack MYR’s fleet and balance-sheet scale. |
MYR competes on selection as much as on price
A useful strategic lens is not “Who can submit the lowest bid?” but “Who can execute this exact scope with the required labor, equipment, schedule, safety record, and financial capacity?” MYR’s stated approach emphasizes projects where technical and project-management expertise matter, plus repeat relationships and selective bid lists. That can reduce rivalry compared with fully commoditized public bidding, but it cannot eliminate price pressure or customer bargaining power.
How financially strong is MYR Group?
MYR entered 2026 with a substantially improved balance sheet and cash position. FY2025 operating cash flow was $326.6 million, while capital expenditures were $94.4 million. That implies approximately $232.2 million of free cash flow before acquisitions and financing, although management noted that favorable working-capital timing was a major contributor. Cash rose to $150.2 million at December 31, 2025.
| Financial measure | FY2025 | Year-over-year change | What it shows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.66B | +8.8% | Growth was led by C&I. |
| Gross margin | 11.6% | +3.0 points | Project mix and execution improved materially. |
| Operating margin | 4.6% | +3.0 points | More gross profit converted through the income statement. |
| Net income | $118.4M | +291.3% | Earnings recovered from project-related margin pressure. |
| Operating cash flow | $326.6M | +274.9% | Working-capital improvement amplified cash generation. |
| Capital expenditures | $94.4M | +24.4% | Reinvestment increased, mainly for T&D opportunities. |
Debt capacity is becoming an acquisition resource
At March 31, 2026, total debt was only $9.4 million, including equipment notes, and the revolving credit facility had no outstanding borrowings. The facility provides $490 million of commitments, leaving substantial capacity after letters of credit. This low leverage supported the decision to fund the proposed Valley and Comet acquisition with cash and revolver borrowings, but the transaction would move the balance sheet away from its near-net-cash starting point.
The central capital-allocation question is whether MYR can preserve underwriting discipline while deploying more cash into growth. The company’s annual reports archive provides the full-year record for comparing reinvestment, repurchases, acquisitions, and cash conversion over time.
Who owns MYR Group stock, and how is it governed?
MYR Group has a conventional one-share, one-vote structure rather than founder control or a dual-class arrangement. The 2026 proxy describes a single class of common stock with one vote per share. BlackRock was reported as beneficially owning 2,511,038 shares, or 16.2%, and Vanguard 1,260,930 shares, or 8.1%, based on the latest filings cited in the proxy. Directors and executive officers as a group beneficially owned 288,881 shares, or 1.9% including units vesting within 60 days.
| Holder or governance group | Reported interest | Source date | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock, Inc. | 2,511,038 shares / 16.2% | Proxy disclosure as of Feb. 27, 2026 | Large passive/institutional voting presence; no operating control. |
| The Vanguard Group | 1,260,930 shares / 8.1% | Proxy disclosure as of Feb. 27, 2026 | Adds to dispersed institutional influence on governance. |
| Richard S. Swartz | 166,504 shares / 1.1% | Feb. 27, 2026 | CEO has meaningful personal exposure but not controlling power. |
| All directors and executive officers | 288,881 shares / 1.9% | Feb. 27, 2026 | Economic alignment exists, while control remains broadly distributed. |
Board structure and incentives
The 2026 proxy statement lists eight director nominees. Seven were independent under Nasdaq standards, with CEO Rick Swartz the only non-independent director. The board has an independent chair, and the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating, Environmental, Social and Governance committees are fully independent. Executive long-term incentives include return on invested capital and total shareholder return measures, while an ESG component also appears in equity awards.
Electrification, data centers, and execution define the forward case
MYR Group sits at the intersection of several long-duration spending themes: grid reliability, renewable and conventional generation interconnection, electrification of buildings and transport, domestic manufacturing investment, and power-intensive data-center construction. These themes can expand the addressable market for both segments at once. A data-center campus, for example, may require utility transmission and substation work as well as extensive on-site C&I electrical systems.
Growth opportunities are broad, but timing is uneven
The principal risks are project-specific before they are macroeconomic
| Risk | Financial pathway | Concrete indicator to monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-to-complete errors | Gross margin revisions, loss provisions, reduced operating income | Quarterly estimate-change impact in basis points and dollars. |
| Labor scarcity or low productivity | Higher labor cost, schedule slippage, liquidated damages, lost growth capacity | Hiring, turnover, overtime, project inefficiencies, and union availability. |
| Customer or permitting delays | Revenue timing shifts, underutilized fleet, working-capital pressure | Backlog conversion, contract assets, project start commentary. |
| Weather and site conditions | Lower T&D productivity and delayed schedules | Seasonal margin changes and project-specific disclosures. |
| Acquisition integration | Leverage, retention risk, goodwill impairment, distraction | Post-close debt, acquired margin, management retention, and synergy evidence. |
| Policy, tariff, and material-cost changes | Customer project delays, procurement inflation, bid repricing | Customer capital budgets and contract protection for cost escalation. |
The company’s latest investor presentations emphasize data-center load growth, utility investment, and a broad geographic footprint. Those demand signals are supportive, but they do not remove the construction cycle’s core discipline: controlled growth must remain profitable growth.
Why does MYR Group's business model matter for valuation?
A DCF for MYR Group should not extrapolate backlog or a peak quarterly margin without adjustment. The most important inputs are organic revenue growth, normalized segment margins, working-capital intensity, fleet capex, acquisition spending, and the probability of project losses. Revenue can grow with electrification demand, but free cash flow may be volatile because billing schedules, retainage, mobilization, and contract assets move cash between periods.
A practical modeling bridge
- Start with segment revenue: separate utility T&D growth from C&I growth because backlog mix and contract structures differ.
- Normalize operating margin: include both the 2024 project-pressure year and the 2025-2026 recovery rather than using only the strongest quarter.
- Model free cash flow as operating cash flow minus capex: then normalize working-capital movements, because FY2025 cash flow benefited materially from billing and payment timing.
- Account for the proposed acquisition: purchase consideration, financing cost, acquired earnings, integration expense, and future capex can materially change enterprise value and per-share outcomes.
- Use a risk-sensitive discount rate: the company has low financial leverage before the transaction, but construction execution and earnings volatility remain business risks.
What is the key takeaway from MYR Group analysis?
MYR Group is an execution-led electrical infrastructure company positioned behind grid expansion and increasingly power-intensive commercial construction. Its importance comes from combining utility T&D capability with C&I expertise across data centers, transportation, manufacturing, healthcare, and public infrastructure. FY2025 and Q1 2026 demonstrate how quickly earnings can improve when project mix, productivity, and estimate changes turn favorable. They also reinforce why backlog and revenue must be interpreted through margin quality and cash conversion.
What should students, researchers, and investors monitor next?
The most decision-useful signals are T&D and C&I operating margins, the dollar impact of estimate changes, backlog composition and conversion, free cash flow after normalized working capital, fleet capex, labor availability, and acquisition integration. The core analytical tension is clear: electrification offers MYR a large opportunity set, but the company creates value only when it selects, staffs, prices, and completes projects with controlled risk.
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.