(MCO) Moody's Corporation Company Overview

US | Financial Services | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | NYSE

(MCO) Moody's Corporation Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$19 $9
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5

TOTAL:

What does Moody's Corporation do?

Moody's Corporation is a New York Stock Exchange-listed financial intelligence company operating under ticker MCO. It is best understood as two connected businesses: a credit-ratings franchise that helps debt investors price credit risk, and an analytics, data, research, and workflow franchise that helps financial institutions, insurers, companies, governments, and professional investors measure and manage risk. The company describes its purpose as providing decision-grade data, analytics, and insights for high-stakes decisions on its official about page.

$2.079B
Q1 2026 revenue, quarter ended March 31, 2026
$7.718B
FY2025 revenue, year ended December 31, 2025
16,000+
Employees across more than 40 countries in 2025 reporting
2
Reportable segments: Moody's Analytics and Moody's Investors Service

Two segments, one risk-intelligence franchise

Moody's Analytics, or MA, provides risk and finance software, data, economic research, KYC tools, insurance analytics, ratings research, and data feeds. Moody's Investors Service, or MIS, publishes credit ratings and related research on corporate, structured finance, financial-institution, public-sector, infrastructure, and project-finance debt. The two segments are economically different, but strategically complementary: ratings create a global credit-information brand, while analytics turns risk knowledge into recurring subscriptions, datasets, and workflow tools.

Who are the customers?

MIS is paid mainly by issuers that need ratings for bonds, loans, structured products, and public-finance obligations. MA is paid by users who need risk models, research, market data, compliance workflows, and analytics embedded into decisions. That distinction is central: MIS is highly profitable when issuance is strong, while MA is designed to make Moody's less dependent on the debt-issuance cycle through recurring revenue.

How do ratings issuance and subscription analytics drive Moody's revenue?

Moody's business model is a blend of transaction fees and recurring revenue. In MIS, transaction revenue rises and falls with debt issuance, refinancing, acquisition financing, securitization, and infrastructure borrowing. In MA, the economic model looks closer to enterprise software and data: annual recurring revenue, renewals, seat expansion, data usage, and workflow penetration. Moody's latest quarterly filings describe both segment structure and revenue categories in detail in the Q1 2026 Form 10-Q.

FY2025 revenue mix by segment
Moody's Investors Service — $4.119B, 53.4% of FY2025 external revenue
Moody's Analytics — $3.599B, 46.6% of FY2025 external revenue
Calculation uses FY2025 external revenue of $7.718B. Segment split is close enough that both businesses materially shape valuation.

Ratings revenue is cyclical but very high margin

MIS is the profit engine. In FY2025, MIS generated $4.119B of external revenue and $2.746B of adjusted operating income, an adjusted operating margin of 63.6%. In Q1 2026, MIS revenue was $1.153B, with adjusted operating income of $803M and an adjusted operating margin of 66.7%. Those figures show why rated-issuance volumes matter: a strong issuance market can convert into operating income quickly because the ratings business has high incremental margins.

Analytics revenue is stickier and subscription-heavy

MA is less spectacular on margins but important for durability. In Q1 2026, MA revenue was $926M, and 98% of that revenue was recurring. Annual recurring revenue reached $3.607B, up 8% from the prior-year period. MA's Decision Solutions line alone reported $1.601B of ARR, split across Banking, Insurance, and KYC. For researchers, the key point is not only that MA is growing; it changes Moody's revenue quality by adding subscription renewal economics to a company historically associated with transaction-linked ratings fees.

Revenue stream Q1 2026 figure Business logic Investor interpretation
MA recurring revenue $909M Subscriptions, data, research, and workflow solutions Supports predictability and renewal-based growth.
MA transaction revenue $17M One-time or usage-linked analytics revenue Small relative to the recurring base.
MIS transaction revenue $790M New ratings and issuance-linked activity High-margin but exposed to capital-market cycles.
MIS recurring revenue $363M Monitoring, surveillance, and recurring ratings relationships Adds baseline revenue even when issuance slows.

What does Moody's latest quarter show?

The freshest official picture is Q1 2026. Moody's reported record first-quarter revenue of $2.079B, up 8% year over year, in its Q1 2026 earnings release. The quarter was unusually clean for analysis because both sides of the company contributed: MA delivered recurring-revenue and ARR growth, while MIS benefited from more than $2T of rated issuance, including strong investment-grade activity.

44.3%
Q1 2026 operating margin; operating income was $922M on $2.079B revenue.
53.2%
Q1 2026 adjusted operating margin, up 150 basis points year over year.
$3.73
Q1 2026 diluted EPS; adjusted diluted EPS was $4.33.
$844M
Q1 2026 free cash flow, defined by Moody's as operating cash flow less capital additions.

Q1 2026 snapshot

Metric Q1 2026 Year-over-year signal Interpretation
Revenue $2.079B Up 8% Both MA and MIS grew 8%, reducing reliance on a single driver.
Operating income $922M Up from $841M Operating leverage offset higher expenses and a tax-reserve item.
Net income attributable to Moody's $661M Up from $617M Net margin was approximately 31.8% for the quarter.
Operating cash flow $939M Up 24% Working-capital timing and earnings quality supported cash conversion.
Free cash flow $844M Up 26% Free cash flow margin was roughly 40.6% in Q1 2026.

Segment signal in the quarter

Q1 2026 revenue by segment
MIS$1.153B
MA$926M
Bars are scaled to the largest segment. In Q1 2026, MIS was larger, but MA supplied most of Moody's recurring revenue base.

Management also updated FY2026 guidance. It reaffirmed high-single-digit revenue growth, adjusted diluted EPS of $16.40 to $17.00, operating cash flow of $3.25B to $3.45B, free cash flow of $2.8B to $3.0B, and raised expected share repurchases to about $2.5B. For a DCF model, this matters because the company is signaling that both earnings and cash flow are expected to remain strong even after a very high Q1 capital-return pace.

Why did Moody's become a market leader?

Moody's did not become important simply because it sells data. It became important because ratings, credit research, risk models, and financial-data workflows sit inside the infrastructure of global finance. When a company, bank, municipality, infrastructure borrower, or securitization vehicle raises debt, investors often need a comparable, independent assessment of credit risk. Over time, the accumulated trust in Moody's ratings and the embedded use of Moody's research created a brand and data asset that is difficult for a new entrant to replicate.

Turning points that still matter

  1. 1909
    John Moody's early bond-rating work created the foundation for a standardized credit-opinion business. The importance today is comparability: markets still pay for risk opinions that can be read across issuers and asset classes.
  2. 1962
    Moody's became part of Dun & Bradstreet, giving the ratings franchise a larger business-information context. That history helps explain why the modern company combines ratings with data and analytics rather than staying a narrow publications firm.
  3. 2000
    Moody's was separated into an independent public company. Public-company independence made capital allocation, margins, and ratings-cycle exposure easier for investors to analyze directly.
  4. 2007
    The operating model split around MIS and Moody's Analytics. This is the key strategic pivot behind today's two-engine model: one side monetizes ratings, the other monetizes risk intelligence through recurring products.
  5. 2021
    The RMS acquisition expanded Moody's presence in insurance and catastrophe-risk modeling. It deepened MA's insurance analytics, a line that reported $181M of Q1 2026 revenue and $706M of ARR.
  6. 2026
    Moody's named Christina Kosmowski CEO of Moody's Analytics effective June 2026, reinforcing the strategic emphasis on analytics, software, and connected intelligence.

What changed strategically?

The most important change is the shift from a single dominant ratings narrative to a risk-intelligence portfolio. Moody's still depends heavily on rated issuance, but the company is no longer only a call on the bond market. MA's ARR, KYC tools, insurance risk analytics, and data products create a second growth path. That makes the company more complex, but also more resilient than a pure transaction-fee ratings agency.

Moody's central strategic tension is that the ratings business produces exceptional margins when issuance is strong, while analytics is the steadier engine that can compound through subscriptions, data depth, and workflow adoption.

What gives Moody's a durable competitive advantage?

Moody's moat comes from trust, scale, data history, regulatory relevance, and workflow integration. Ratings are not interchangeable consumer products; they are reference points used by issuers, investors, counterparties, and risk committees. Analytics tools also become sticky when they are embedded into underwriting, portfolio monitoring, compliance, insurance modeling, and capital-planning processes. The company's 2025 Form 10-K frames competition and risk around ratings, data, analytics, technology, regulation, and market acceptance.

MIS advantage
66.7%
Q1 2026 adjusted operating margin shows the economics of a trusted ratings franchise with high operating leverage.
MA advantage
$3.607B
Q1 2026 ARR shows the growing recurring-revenue base behind Moody's risk and data products.

Switching costs and trust

For MIS, competitive advantage is partly reputational and partly institutional. Issuers value ratings that investors recognize. Investors value ratings and research that fit into portfolio, risk, and covenant workflows. Regulators and market participants may refer to ratings or rating-agency frameworks in risk-management processes. For MA, switching costs come from data integration, trained users, model validation, and compliance workflows. A bank using Moody's credit, economic, KYC, or balance-sheet tools is not likely to change providers casually if those systems are embedded into approval and audit processes.

Competitor set and market position

Credit ratings
Moody's competes mainly with other recognized rating agencies. Trust, investor acceptance, issuer relationships, and analytical depth are the barriers.
Risk analytics
Moody's competes with market-data, software, and risk-workflow vendors by bundling data, models, research, and domain expertise.
KYC and compliance
The KYC opportunity depends on entity data, ownership mapping, sanctions screening, and integration into client workflows.
Insurance and climate risk
RMS and insurance analytics give Moody's a specialized position where catastrophe, climate, and portfolio-risk modeling matter.
Why it matters
A moat based on trust and embedded workflows can support high margins, but it also raises the cost of reputational, regulatory, or model-quality mistakes. Moody's advantage and its biggest risks are connected.

Which issuance, ARR, and margin KPIs best explain Moody's performance?

Moody's is not best analyzed with a simple revenue-growth screen. The operating questions are more specific: How much issuance is being rated? How much of MA is recurring? How fast is ARR growing? What is the margin gap between MIS and MA? How much cash flow is converted after capital additions? These KPIs let a student or investor connect income-statement performance to the business model.

Q1 2026 recurring and transaction mix
MA recurring share98.2%
MIS transaction share68.5%
Q1 free cash flow margin40.6%
Percentages are calculated from Q1 2026 reported figures: MA recurring revenue of $909M, MIS transaction revenue of $790M, free cash flow of $844M, and revenue of $2.079B.

ARR, rated issuance, and recurring mix

KPI Latest official figure Period How to interpret it
Rated issuance Over $2T Q1 2026 Strong capital-market activity supports MIS transaction revenue.
MA ARR $3.607B Q1 2026 The main indicator for analytics subscription momentum.
Decision Solutions ARR $1.601B Q1 2026 Shows expansion in banking, insurance, and KYC workflows.
MIS adjusted operating margin 66.7% Q1 2026 Measures ratings operating leverage.
MA adjusted operating margin 32.5% Q1 2026 Tracks analytics scale efficiency and product investment.

DCF driver map

1. Issuance cycle
Higher corporate, structured, financial-institution, and infrastructure issuance lifts MIS transaction revenue.
2. ARR renewal
MA renewals and expansion improve revenue visibility and reduce pure cycle exposure.
3. Segment margin
MIS margin near the mid-60s and MA margin in the low-30s create very different operating leverage profiles.
4. Free cash flow
Q1 2026 free cash flow of $844M shows why Moody's can fund dividends, buybacks, and acquisitions.

How financially strong is Moody's?

Moody's financial profile is strong because it combines high margins, low physical capital intensity, and substantial free cash flow. The business does not require factories, stores, or heavy equipment to grow at the same scale as industrial companies. Its capital intensity is mainly technology, data, people, acquisitions, and product investment. Annual context comes from the FY2025 results release, which reported record revenue and strong EPS growth.

53.2%
Q1 2026 adjusted operating margin. The arc represents adjusted operating income as a share of revenue; the remaining track is the non-margin portion.

Margins and cash conversion

For FY2025, Moody's reported revenue of $7.718B, operating income of $3.351B, net income attributable to Moody's of $2.459B, diluted EPS of $13.67, operating cash flow of $2.901B, capital additions of $326M, and free cash flow of $2.575B. That means the company converted about one-third of annual revenue into free cash flow. In Q1 2026, free cash flow margin was even higher at approximately 40.6%, though a single quarter can benefit from working-capital timing.

Financial item FY2025 Q1 2026 Interpretation
Revenue $7.718B $2.079B Scale is meaningful, but margin quality is more important than revenue size alone.
Operating income $3.351B $922M FY2025 operating margin was 43.4%; Q1 2026 operating margin was 44.3%.
Free cash flow $2.575B $844M Cash generation supports capital returns and acquisition capacity.
Diluted EPS $13.67 $3.73 Per-share results benefit from profitability and buybacks.

Debt, liquidity, and capital allocation

At March 31, 2026, Moody's held $1.469B of cash and $41M of short-term investments. Total debt carrying value was about $6.963B, including $576M current and $6.387B long-term. The company returned $1.7B to stockholders in Q1 2026 through repurchases and dividends, declared a $1.03 per-share quarterly dividend payable in June 2026, and had $2.5B remaining under its repurchase authorization at quarter end.

Financial strength scorecard, based on reported Q1 2026 and FY2025 metrics
Margin qualityVery strong
Cash conversionStrong
Balance-sheet flexibilityModerate
Capital-return capacityStrong
Ratings are analytical shorthand, not credit ratings. They are grounded in Q1 2026 cash, debt, margin, and cash-flow disclosures.

Who owns Moody's stock, and why does governance matter?

Moody's has one class of common stock, so ownership influence is mainly economic and voting power through common shares, not a dual-class founder-control structure. The latest official ownership and board context comes from the 2026 proxy statement, filed for the April 14, 2026 annual meeting. For investors, the important point is that large institutional holders and a long-tenured strategic shareholder base can influence governance expectations, capital allocation discipline, and board accountability.

Large holders and board oversight

Holder or governance item Official proxy fact Source period Why it matters
Berkshire Hathaway-related holders 24,669,778 shares; 13.90% 2026 proxy ownership table A major long-term owner, but not a control shareholder.
The Vanguard Group 14,163,962 shares; 7.98% 2026 proxy ownership table Passive ownership makes governance votes and stewardship policies relevant.
BlackRock 12,930,024 shares; 7.28% 2026 proxy ownership table Another large institutional holder with proxy-voting influence.
Board independence 9 of 10 director nominees independent 2026 proxy statement Supports oversight in a company whose reputation is central to value.

Incentives and governance signals

The proxy statement ties executive-compensation analysis to operating metrics that fit Moody's model: MIS operating income, MA operating income, MA ARR, EPS for compensation purposes, MA cumulative revenue, and ratings performance. That mix is relevant because it does not reward only revenue scale. It links management incentives to profit quality, recurring analytics growth, and performance in the ratings franchise.

Governance positioning matrix
High control / low independence
Not Moody's current profile; no dual-class voting control is highlighted in the proxy.
High control / high independence
Relevant for founder-led controlled companies, not the central Moody's case.
Dispersed ownership / high independence
Moody's fits here: large institutions and Berkshire-related holders matter, but independent board oversight remains central.
Dispersed ownership / low independence
Would be a red flag for a reputation-sensitive ratings and analytics company.

What opportunities could extend Moody's growth?

Moody's growth opportunities are not limited to one product cycle. The company can expand through rated-issuance activity, analytics subscriptions, KYC and compliance workflows, insurance and climate-risk modeling, data products, private-credit transparency, and AI-enabled risk intelligence. The company's official investor-relations site groups financial reports, filings, results, dividends, and investor materials in one place on its annual reports and proxy materials page.

Analytics
Decision Solutions
$432M
Q1 2026 revenue across Banking, Insurance, and KYC; ARR was $1.601B.
Ratings
Corporate Finance
$633M
Q1 2026 MIS corporate finance revenue, supported by investment-grade and high-yield issuance.
Data
Data & Information
$239M
Q1 2026 MA revenue from data, feeds, and information products.

Growth opportunities

  • More global debt issuance can increase MIS transaction revenue, especially in investment-grade corporate, infrastructure, and financial-institution markets.
  • MA ARR growth can compound through higher renewal value, cross-selling, KYC adoption, insurance analytics, and data integration.
  • Private credit and bank disintermediation may create demand for better credit transparency, risk models, and issuer/investor analytics.
  • AI adoption can raise demand for clean, connected, traceable financial data and decision tools, where Moody's already has domain-specific content.
  • International expansion remains meaningful because Q1 2026 non-U.S. revenue was $899M, including $615M from EMEA.

What would confirm the opportunity?

The cleanest confirmation would be simultaneous growth in MIS transaction revenue and MA ARR without margin compression. If MA can sustain high-single-digit ARR growth while MIS retains mid-60s adjusted operating margins in normal issuance environments, Moody's can preserve the combination that makes it unusual: capital-market upside plus subscription durability.

What risks could weaken Moody's outlook?

The biggest Moody's risks are not generic macro risks; they come from the same factors that create the company's value. The ratings business depends on reputation, regulatory standing, analytical quality, and capital-market activity. The analytics business depends on data quality, software execution, cybersecurity, customer retention, and competitive product development. Official filings discuss these risks in the context of regulation, litigation, competition, technology, data, macro conditions, and credit-market activity.

Risk Where it hits Financial line to monitor Company-specific reading
Weak debt issuance MIS transaction revenue Corporate Finance, Structured Finance, PPIF revenue High-margin revenue can fall quickly if refinancing and new issuance slow.
Ratings credibility or legal challenge Brand, regulation, litigation MIS margin, legal reserves, disclosure language Trust is both the moat and the vulnerability.
Analytics execution risk MA ARR and margins ARR growth, retention, adjusted operating margin Subscription growth requires product investment and integration discipline.
Cybersecurity or data-quality failure Data, software, customer trust Costs, churn, reputation, regulatory disclosure A risk-intelligence company cannot easily absorb a trust failure.
Higher rates or recession Issuance, defaults, client budgets MIS transaction revenue, MA sales cycles Macro weakness can reduce issuance but may also increase demand for risk tools.

Risk and opportunity monitoring panel

MA ARR growth
Watch whether ARR stays in the high-single-digit range after the Regulatory Solutions divestiture effect.
Rated issuance
Q1 2026 exceeded $2T. A large decline would pressure the highest-margin part of the model.
MIS adjusted margin
A drop from the mid-60s would signal either weaker mix, higher cost, or less operating leverage.
Free cash flow
FY2026 guidance of $2.8B to $3.0B is central to buybacks, dividends, and reinvestment capacity.
Debt and buybacks
Q1 2026 capital returns of $1.7B exceeded quarterly free cash flow, so leverage and authorization use matter.
Regulatory language
Changes in rating-agency oversight, data privacy, or AI governance could alter compliance cost and reputation risk.

Why does Moody's matter for valuation?

Moody's is a useful DCF case because small changes in revenue mix, margin, and cash-flow conversion can have large effects on intrinsic-value estimates. A valuation model should not treat every dollar of revenue equally. MIS transaction revenue is very profitable but cyclical; MA recurring revenue is lower margin but more durable. The model's terminal assumptions should reflect that trade-off rather than blindly applying a market multiple.

Valuation drivers without a price target

DCF input Moody's-specific driver Evidence to use Modeling implication
Revenue growth MIS issuance growth plus MA ARR expansion Q1 2026 revenue up 8%; MA ARR up 8% Separate cyclical ratings growth from recurring analytics growth.
Operating margin Segment mix between MIS and MA Q1 adjusted margins: MIS 66.7%, MA 32.5% Higher MA mix may improve durability but mechanically changes consolidated margin.
Reinvestment Technology, data, acquisitions, and product development FY2025 capital additions $326M; Q1 2026 capital additions $95M Capital intensity is modest, but software and data investment remain necessary.
Free cash flow Operating cash flow less capital additions FY2025 FCF $2.575B; Q1 2026 FCF $844M Cash conversion is one of the main valuation supports.
Terminal risk Reputation, regulation, competition, and technology disruption Risk factors in annual and quarterly filings A high-quality moat still deserves a risk-adjusted terminal assumption.

Student case-study angle

For a strategy class, Moody's illustrates a strong resource-based advantage: trusted ratings, long-lived credit datasets, analytical expertise, and embedded workflows. For a finance class, it illustrates operating leverage and free cash flow conversion. For a risk-management class, it illustrates the paradox of trust-based businesses: the same credibility that supports pricing power can become the main source of downside if quality, independence, or reputation is questioned.

Modeling note
A clean Moody's model should usually separate MA and MIS revenue, apply different margin logic to each segment, then reconcile to consolidated free cash flow, debt, dividends, buybacks, and reinvestment.

What should students and investors take away from Moody's analysis?

Moody's is important because it sits between global credit markets and risk-intelligence workflows. It helps investors and issuers price and understand credit risk, while also selling analytics, data, and software that become embedded inside financial decision-making. The company's FY2025 record revenue of $7.718B and Q1 2026 revenue of $2.079B show that both the annual baseline and the latest quarter are strong. The deeper story, however, is about quality: Q1 2026 adjusted operating margin of 53.2%, free cash flow of $844M, MA ARR of $3.607B, and MIS adjusted operating margin of 66.7% all point to a business with unusually attractive economics.

Final synthesis

Moody's is a high-margin credit infrastructure company trying to become a broader decision-intelligence platform.
The company is not risk-free: debt issuance can slow, ratings credibility can be challenged, regulation can change, analytics competition can intensify, and technology failures could damage trust. But the current research brief points to a distinctive combination: a profitable ratings franchise, a growing recurring analytics base, strong cash conversion, and governance shaped by major institutional ownership rather than founder voting control. The most useful watch items are MA ARR, MIS rated issuance, segment margins, free cash flow, debt-funded capital returns, and any regulatory or reputational signal that could affect the trust embedded in Moody's brand.

What to monitor next

  • Whether FY2026 revenue remains in the high-single-digit range management reaffirmed after Q1 2026.
  • Whether MA ARR continues growing after portfolio changes, including the pending Regulatory Solutions divestiture discussed in 2026 guidance.
  • Whether MIS transaction revenue remains supported by investment-grade, high-yield, infrastructure, and financial-institution issuance.
  • Whether consolidated adjusted operating margin stays near the 52% to 53% FY2026 guidance range.
  • Whether free cash flow stays near the $2.8B to $3.0B FY2026 guidance range while buybacks rise to about $2.5B.
  • Whether ownership, board oversight, and compensation metrics continue to align management with recurring analytics growth, ratings performance, and EPS quality.

DCF model

    5-Year Financial Model

    40+ Charts & Metrics

    DCF & Multiple Valuation

    Free Email Support



Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.