What does i3 Verticals do?
i3 Verticals, Inc. is a Nasdaq-listed public-sector software company operating under ticker IIIV. It supplies mission-critical applications to state, county, municipal, utility, transportation, court, public-safety, and school customers. Its systems handle workflows such as case management, e-filing, vehicle registration, utility billing, government accounting, permitting, tax collection, school nutrition, and payments. The company reports thousands of installations across all 50 states and Canada in its fiscal 2025 Form 10-K.
Which public-sector workflows does it serve?
Why does the one-segment structure matter?
The company now reports one public-sector segment, so investors cannot use segment margins to separate product families. Research must instead follow revenue type, ARR, acquisitions, implementation activity, and consolidated margins. The simpler identity is clearer than the former mix of merchant acquiring, healthcare RCM, and software, but nearly the entire continuing thesis now depends on public-sector execution.
| Identity item | Current position | Research implication |
|---|---|---|
| Listing | Nasdaq: IIIV | Small-cap software economics, acquisition financing, and share count require close attention. |
| Business model | Vertical-market software plus embedded payments | Recurring contracts and transaction fees can compound, while implementations and licenses create lumpiness. |
| Customer base | State and local public entities, utilities, courts, transportation agencies, and schools | Long sales cycles and budget exposure are balanced by mission-critical use and switching friction. |
| Geography | United States and Canada | The opportunity is primarily North American public-sector modernization rather than broad international expansion. |
How does i3 Verticals make money?
Revenue comes from three disclosed categories. Software and related services include SaaS subscriptions, transaction-based software fees, maintenance, support, licenses, implementation, and professional services. Proprietary payments include percentage-of-volume discount fees and fixed transaction or service fees processed through i3’s payment-facilitator platform. “Other” includes equipment, non-software services, bundled obligations, and equipment leasing. The company’s March 2026 Form 10-Q shows that software remains the economic center.
Which revenue source matters most?
Software creates the workflow position from which i3 can add payments, maintenance, upgrades, support, and modules. Once a court, utility, or motor-vehicle agency embeds payments in an operational system, i3 can earn transaction revenue without winning a separate merchant relationship.
Why is recurring revenue the core quality signal?
What turning points created the current company?
i3’s history is a sequence of portfolio choices. Management assembled vertical products through acquisitions, then sold two large non-core operations to concentrate on public-sector software. That reset makes recast continuing operations more useful than historical consolidated earnings.
-
2012i3 Verticals, LLC was founded. The original strategic idea paired vertical-market software with payments, establishing the acquisition-and-integration model used today.
-
2018i3 Verticals, Inc. completed its IPO and became the managing public holding company above i3 Verticals, LLC. The Up-C structure still shapes ownership, taxes, and non-controlling interests.
-
2022The company acquired Celtic for $85.0M, expanding public-sector software and transportation capabilities. This increased product depth but added acquired intangibles and integration demands.
-
2024i3 acquired inLumon for $27.5M to expand permitting and licensing software, including contingent consideration tied to performance through 2027.
-
September 2024The Merchant Services Business was sold for approximately $439.5M in cash. This removed the former merchant-services segment and repositioned i3 primarily as a software company.
-
May 2025The Healthcare RCM Business was sold for $96.3M. The remaining company moved to one reportable public-sector segment, sharpening focus but increasing concentration.
-
January 2026i3 bought a driver and motor-vehicle insurance-verification software company for $60.0M cash, plus up to $20.0M contingent consideration, deepening the transportation vertical.
Why did the divestitures change the valuation narrative?
The merchant sale generated a $205.6M FY2024 gain, and the healthcare RCM sale produced a $26.0M FY2025 gain. These were not repeatable earnings. The relevant base is recast continuing operations: $213.2M of FY2025 revenue and $5.6M of net income. A DCF should start there, not with headline consolidated profit.
What did i3 Verticals’ latest quarter show?
The latest reported period as of July 26, 2026 is Q2 FY2026, ended March 31, 2026. The official earnings release showed revenue and ARR growth, but lower GAAP operating income as expenses rose faster than sales.
Growth improved, but GAAP operating leverage was negative
| Q2 metric | FY2026 | FY2025 | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $57.5M | $54.1M | 6.2% growth, supported by recurring streams and the January 2026 acquisition. |
| Costs of services | $17.1M | $16.6M | 3.4% growth; software costs rose while people costs declined. |
| SG&A | $29.1M | $26.3M | 10.6% growth, faster than revenue, driven partly by people and professional costs. |
| Operating income | $3.7M | $5.1M | 26.0% decline; GAAP margin fell to 6.5% from 9.4%. |
| Interest expense | $1.1M | $0.4M | Higher debt after acquisitions and repurchases increased financing cost. |
What does fiscal 2026 guidance imply?
Management revised FY2026 guidance to $221M-$229M of revenue, $61M-$65M of adjusted EBITDA, and $1.09-$1.15 of adjusted diluted EPS. The revenue and EBITDA top ends were lowered. Midpoints imply about a 28.0% adjusted margin, assuming process improvements preserve profitability while GAAP results absorb amortization, stock compensation, integration, and financing costs.
Public-sector software and embedded payments define the moat
The moat is narrower than a broad enterprise-software platform but potentially durable within specific government functions. Public entities often replace legacy systems through formal procurement, implementation, data conversion, configuration, training, and compliance review. Once a court, transportation department, utility, or school runs daily operations on a system, replacement becomes expensive and disruptive. i3’s official public-sector overview groups its offering around JusticeTech, public administration, transportation, utilities, and education.
Where do switching costs come from?
A replacement provider must migrate records, preserve uptime, integrate agencies, support statutory reporting, and maintain public access. i3 also operates across AWS and Microsoft Azure and has migrated most collocated assets to the cloud. This supports scale and security but creates vendor dependence and ongoing cloud and cyber costs.
How do embedded payments deepen the economics?
Payments can raise lifetime value as transaction usage grows and can be added to acquired products. However, economics depend on volumes, networks, banks, underwriting, chargebacks, and a processing partner. The model gains monetization but also inherits financial-services compliance and operational risk.
Who competes with i3 Verticals, and where is it positioned?
The FY2025 filing names Tyler Technologies, Constellation Software, Verra Mobility, EverCommerce, Roper Technologies, Axon Enterprise, Paymentus, Flywire, and Cellebrite. i3 competes across government ERP, justice technology, transportation software, vertical-software portfolios, and payments. Its position is specialized products plus embedded payments and acquisition experience, not dominance across the full market.
| Competitive group | Pressure on i3 | i3’s counter-position |
|---|---|---|
| Tyler Technologies | Broad public-sector suite, scale, installed base, and larger resources. | Focused vertical products, service, flexible implementation, and payments inside workflows. |
| Constellation, Roper, EverCommerce | Competition for attractive vertical-software acquisitions and management talent. | Public-sector specialization and a payment-facilitator platform that can add value to targets. |
| Verra Mobility | Transportation and government-payment adjacency with greater scale. | Title, registration, licensing, compliance, and insurance-verification depth. |
| Axon and Cellebrite | Strong public-safety technology, evidence, and agency relationships. | Court, dispatch, records, jail, and administrative workflow breadth. |
| Paymentus and Flywire | Specialized billing and payment experiences can compete for transaction economics. | Payments are attached to i3-owned operational software rather than sold only as a payment layer. |
Why is the scale gap both a weakness and an opportunity?
Larger rivals can outspend i3 and offer more modules. Yet fragmented public-sector markets and legacy systems leave room for specialists where product fit, implementation certainty, support, and domain knowledge matter. The strategic test is whether i3 integrates acquisitions into a coherent portfolio rather than a loose collection of brands and code bases.
How financially strong is i3 Verticals?
The balance sheet is liquid but no longer debt-free. Cash fell from $66.7M at September 30, 2025 to $7.1M at March 31, 2026, while long-term debt rose from zero to $81.0M. The change mainly reflects the $60.0M January acquisition and an unusually large $88.8M of Class A share repurchases during the first half. Available credit capacity remained $319.0M, and the company reported a 1.2x total leverage ratio and 16.2x interest-coverage ratio at March 31, 2026.
Cash conversion and reinvestment
This proxy matters because software development is partly capitalized. It is not adjusted EBITDA and can be affected by working capital, discontinued-operation settlements, taxes, and timing. Still, the swing from negative $15.6M operating cash flow in the prior-year first half to positive $24.2M is meaningful.
Debt, goodwill, and acquisition capacity
| Balance-sheet item | March 31, 2026 | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Cash and equivalents | $7.1M | Low on-balance-sheet cash is partly intentional because i3 uses the revolver to manage liquidity. |
| Long-term debt | $81.0M | Raises interest expense and makes acquisition returns more sensitive to integration performance. |
| Available revolver capacity | $319.0M | Provides acquisition flexibility, subject to covenants and the cost of borrowing. |
| Goodwill plus intangible assets | $439.1M | About 69.0% of $636.4M total assets; future underperformance could create impairment risk. |
| Capitalized software | $52.3M | Shows meaningful product investment and future amortization embedded in GAAP earnings. |
| Total equity | $438.2M | Includes a $120.9M non-controlling interest from the Up-C structure. |
Who owns i3 Verticals stock, and why does governance matter?
i3 has Class A and Class B shares, but each carries one vote and the classes generally vote together. Class B corresponds one-for-one with LLC units held by continuing equity owners. The Up-C structure, founder-linked units, and institutions therefore shape control. The 2026 proxy used 22.6M Class A and 8.4M Class B shares outstanding on January 2, 2026.
| Holder or group | Beneficial Class A equivalent | Combined voting power | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gregory Daily | 7.27M; 24.6% | 23.5% | Founder, chairman, and CEO influence strategic direction; 6.96M Class B shares represented 83.0% of that class. |
| T. Rowe Price Investment Management | 3.17M; 14.0% | 10.2% | Largest disclosed outside institutional holder in the proxy. |
| Vanguard | 1.85M; 8.2% | 6.0% | Passive institutional ownership increases focus on governance and capital discipline. |
| BlackRock | 1.77M; 7.8% | 5.7% | Another large institutional block, based on the filing cited by the proxy. |
| Geneva Capital Management | 1.68M; 7.4% | 5.4% | Meaningful active-manager exposure for a company of i3’s size. |
| Directors and executive officers | 10.91M; 33.6% | 32.9% | Management and board interests are economically substantial, including 92.0% of Class B beneficially owned by the group. |
Founder influence and board oversight
Greg Daily combines the chairman and CEO roles. David Morgan became lead independent director on November 14, 2025, while independent committees and executive sessions provide oversight. The structure can support decisive strategy, but founder influence remains material without super-voting shares.
What do management incentives signal?
What opportunities and risks could change the story?
Many public agencies still use fragmented legacy systems while citizens expect digital self-service, mobile access, secure payments, and faster processing. i3 can cross-sell, migrate customers to cloud products, expand transportation and utilities, and acquire niche software. The January 2026 insurance-verification deal in the Q1 FY2026 release illustrates the model.
Which growth drivers deserve the most attention?
How can the main risks reach the financial statements?
- Public-sector concentration: budget cuts, procurement delays, political pressure, or regulatory changes can postpone projects and reduce one-time license and service revenue.
- Integration and capital allocation: acquisitions can miss retention or cross-sell targets, increase debt, create contingent payments, and add goodwill that may later be impaired.
- Competition: larger providers can bundle more products, spend more on technology, or bid aggressively, limiting prices and raising sales costs.
- Cybersecurity and privacy: i3 handles government, payment, court, driver, utility, and student data. Breaches or outages could trigger contract losses, remediation expense, fines, and reputational damage.
- Third-party dependency: cloud infrastructure, card networks, banks, and processing partners affect uptime, economics, and compliance even when i3 owns the customer relationship.
- Post-divestiture obligations: indemnification claims and retained liabilities from the merchant-services and healthcare RCM sales can create costs after the businesses are gone.
Why does i3 Verticals matter for valuation?
i3 is a useful DCF case because adjusted profitability looks strong while GAAP margins and cash conversion are still developing. Capitalizing adjusted EBITDA can overstate earnings if a model ignores stock compensation, acquired-intangible amortization, capitalized software, acquisitions, contingent consideration, and interest. Current GAAP income can also understate value if recurring growth and integration lift future cash margins.
| DCF driver | Current evidence | Modeling question |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | Q2 FY2026 revenue +6.2%; ARR +11.6% | How much growth is organic, acquired, recurring, and payment-volume driven? |
| Margin path | 28.8% adjusted EBITDA margin versus 6.5% GAAP operating margin in Q2 FY2026 | Which adjustments persist, and how quickly can SG&A and hosting scale? |
| Reinvestment | $4.4M capitalized software in the first half of FY2026 | What product investment is required to sustain retention, security, and cloud modernization? |
| Acquisition intensity | $60.0M cash acquisition plus up to $20.0M contingent consideration in January 2026 | Should acquisitions be modeled as recurring reinvestment rather than optional upside? |
| Capital structure | $81.0M debt and $88.8M first-half repurchases at March 31, 2026 | Do buybacks create value after considering leverage, acquisition needs, and dilution from equity awards? |
| Terminal risk | Mission-critical government workflows but rapid technology and cybersecurity change | How durable are switching costs after cloud migrations, procurement cycles, and competitor investment? |
Which KPIs should anchor the model?
A disciplined model should connect ARR to revenue, separate recurring from point-in-time sales, reconcile adjusted EBITDA to GAAP operating income, subtract capex and capitalized software, track taxes and interest, and model acquisitions explicitly. Repurchases reduced Class A shares to 20.5M at March 31, 2026 from 24.0M at September 30, 2025; Class B remained 8.4M, while equity awards can offset some reduction.
What is the key takeaway from i3 Verticals analysis?
i3 Verticals is no longer best understood as a diversified payments company. It is a focused public-sector software consolidator with embedded payment economics, a founder-influenced Up-C structure, and a portfolio that serves difficult, regulated workflows. Its importance comes from combining specialized software, implementation capability, recurring contracts, and transaction monetization in markets where legacy replacement can be slow but sticky.
What supports the story: $183.5M of Q2 FY2026 ARR growing 11.6%, 86.3% of quarterly revenue recognized over time, thousands of installations, diversified public-sector use cases, and $319.0M of available credit capacity.
What could weaken it: GAAP operating income fell 26.0% in Q2 FY2026 even as revenue rose, debt returned to $81.0M, goodwill and intangibles reached $439.1M, and the one-segment company is highly dependent on public-sector execution.
What to monitor: organic versus acquired growth, ARR and SaaS conversion, adjusted-to-GAAP margin reconciliation, capitalized software, acquisition returns, payment penetration, debt, share count, cybersecurity, and the pace of government procurement.
Research conclusion: the central analytical tension is whether i3 can turn a growing recurring-revenue base into durable GAAP cash returns while continuing to acquire, integrate, and modernize specialized government software. That question—not a single quarter’s adjusted EPS—should drive student casework, investor monitoring, and DCF assumptions.
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.