Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) Company Overview

US | Consumer Cyclical | Leisure | NYSE

What does Six Flags Entertainment Corporation do?

26
amusement parks, 2025 year-end portfolio
15
separately gated water parks, 2025
9
resort properties, 2025
47.4M
guest visits in FY2025

Six Flags Entertainment Corporation, traded on the New York Stock Exchange under ticker FUN, is the combined regional amusement-park group created by the July 2024 merger of Cedar Fair and the former Six Flags. The company describes itself as North America’s largest regional amusement-park operator. Its 2025 portfolio included 41 amusement and water parks across the United States, Canada, and Mexico, plus resort properties and an operating-management relationship in Saudi Arabia. The official investor overview emphasizes immersive entertainment, major roller coasters, water attractions, and licensed intellectual property including DC Comics, Looney Tunes, and PEANUTS.

Why is the portfolio economically important?

Regional parks sit between a local entertainment venue and a destination vacation. Most guests can reach a park by car, which lowers the travel barrier compared with a national destination resort, yet the rides and events are sufficiently differentiated to support season passes, memberships, premium access products, parking, food, games, merchandise, and hotel stays. That gives Six Flags several ways to monetize one visit and several ways to deepen the relationship across a season.

Admissions
$1.58B
FY2025 in-park admissions revenue, including park entry, parking, and online transaction fees.
In-park products
$1.35B
FY2025 food, beverage, merchandise, games, and premium add-ons.
Out-of-park
$255.5M
FY2025 resorts, sponsorships, international agreements, and adjacent operations.

How does Six Flags make money, and which revenue stream matters most?

The economic engine is attendance multiplied by guest spending. Admissions bring visitors through the gate; food, beverage, merchandise, games, front-of-line access, cabanas, and other extra-charge products raise revenue per visit; resorts and sponsorships extend monetization beyond the gate. The company’s 2025 Form 10-K reports $3.10 billion of net revenue, of which $2.93 billion came from in-park revenue before concessionaire remittances.

FY2025 gross revenue mix before concessionaire remittances
Admissions — $1.58B — 49.7%
In-park products — $1.35B — 42.4%
Out-of-park — $255.5M — 8.0%
Takeaway: admissions are the largest single stream, but nearly half of gross revenue comes from spending beyond the gate ticket. Period: FY2025.

What determines revenue quality?

Season passes and memberships improve visibility because cash is collected before or during the operating season and visits become more habitual. However, frequent-pass visitation can dilute admissions spending per visit. In FY2025, total per capita spending was $61.90, up 1.0%; admissions per capita fell 0.9% to $33.41, while in-park product spending rose 3.2% to $28.49. That mix shows the strategic trade-off: a larger pass base can support attendance and repeat engagement, but management must recover value through food, beverage, premium products, and disciplined pricing.

Revenue lever FY2025 evidence Analytical implication
Attendance 47.4M visits Volume spreads fixed park costs and expands the base for in-park spending.
Admissions per capita $33.41 Reflects ticket mix, pass mix, pricing, parking, and transaction fees.
In-park product per capita $28.49 Measures monetization after entry through food, games, merchandise, and premium access.
Out-of-park revenue $255.5M Adds resorts, sponsorships, and licensing-like income beyond daily park traffic.

What did Six Flags’ latest reported quarter show?

The latest available financial period is the quarter ended March 29, 2026. Because the business is highly seasonal, first-quarter results are structurally loss-making and should not be annualized. The company notes that roughly 70% of 2025 attendance and revenue occurred in the second and third quarters, while the first quarter historically represented only about 7% of annual revenue and 6% of attendance.

$225.6M
Q1 2026 net revenue, up 11.7%
2.92M
Q1 2026 attendance, up 3.7%
$69.26
Q1 2026 per capita spending, up 5.9%
$(123.0)M
Q1 2026 adjusted EBITDA loss

Was the improvement volume-driven or price-driven?

Both. Attendance rose by about 105,000 visits, while per capita spending increased $3.86. Admissions per capita reached $38.82, up 2.9%, and in-park product per capita reached $30.44, up 10.0%. Out-of-park revenue rose 20.4% to $28.8 million. Management attributed the gains to favorable operating conditions, a larger active pass base, Easter and spring-break timing, the earlier Boysenberry Festival at Knott’s Berry Farm, higher single-day pricing, and stronger food and beverage spending.

Metric Q1 2026 Q1 2025 Change
Net revenue $225.6M $202.1M +11.7%
Attendance 2.92M 2.82M +3.7%
Per capita spending $69.26 $65.40 +5.9%
Operating loss $(312.2)M $(321.0)M Improved $8.8M
Adjusted EBITDA loss $(123.0)M $(170.8)M Improved $47.8M
Operating cash flow $(83.2)M $(178.0)M Improved $94.9M

The detailed figures are available in the company’s Q1 2026 Form 10-Q.

Which strategic turning points created today’s Six Flags?

The current company cannot be understood as a simple continuation of either legacy operator. It is a post-merger integration story in which a large physical portfolio, multiple legacy systems, underinvestment concerns at some parks, and a heavy debt load must be converted into a coherent operating platform.

  1. 1961
    Six Flags Over Texas opened, establishing the regional theme-park model that later expanded through branded parks and licensed characters.
  2. 1983
    Cedar Fair was formed around Cedar Point and Valleyfair, building a separate operating culture centered on destination-quality regional parks.
  3. 2010
    Legacy Six Flags emerged from restructuring, reinforcing the importance of leverage, capital discipline, and sustainable attendance economics.
  4. 2021–2023
    Both legacy groups refined pass, pricing, and in-park spending strategies after pandemic disruption, making recurring products and guest yield more central.
  5. July 2024
    The merger of equals closed, combining Cedar Fair’s portfolio and FUN ticker with the Six Flags brand and park base.
  6. 2025
    The first full combined year exposed integration costs, attendance weakness in key periods, and a $1.52B goodwill and intangible impairment.
  7. 2026
    New CEO John Reilly, portfolio sales, refinancing, cost reduction, and COO transition signaled a reset toward execution and balance-sheet repair.

What did the merger change economically?

The merger expanded geographic diversification, intellectual-property reach, procurement scale, pass cross-selling opportunities, and corporate cost-saving potential. It also created more complexity. FY2025 revenue included a full year of the former Six Flags parks, while FY2024 included only six post-merger months, making headline growth less informative than same-park attendance and per-capita trends. The company’s merger filing provides the strategic and governance background.

The central strategic question is not whether the combined portfolio is large; it is whether management can standardize operations, restore underinvested assets, and turn scale into higher attendance, margins, and free cash flow.

What gives Six Flags a competitive advantage?

The strongest advantages are physical scarcity, local brand awareness, ride density, licensed intellectual property, and the installed base of passholders. Building a comparable major regional park can require hundreds of millions of dollars, years of permitting and construction, and a large population base within driving distance. Existing parks also occupy established locations that would be difficult to replicate near major metropolitan areas.

How durable is the moat?

Asset scarcityStrong
Regional brand and pass baseStrong
Pricing powerModerate
Switching costsLimited
Balance-sheet flexibilityConstrained

The moat is real but incomplete. Guests can substitute movies, sports, restaurants, travel, cruises, family entertainment centers, and home-based entertainment. A park’s relevance therefore depends on continuous reinvestment in new rides, festivals, food, cleanliness, reliability, and service. The company estimates required maintenance and infrastructure capital of roughly $125 million to $150 million annually, before growth attractions. In other words, the asset base creates barriers to entry but also creates a recurring capital claim.

Who are the main competitors?

Competitive set How it competes Six Flags response
Disney and Universal destination resorts Deep intellectual property, hotels, travel packages, and destination scale Lower travel burden, regional frequency, thrill rides, and season-pass value
SeaWorld, Busch Gardens, and regional park groups Similar ride, event, animal, and pass propositions Portfolio breadth, local market density, and cross-park pass potential
Local leisure alternatives Movies, sports, restaurants, festivals, and family centers Full-day experience, unique coasters, seasonal events, and bundled value
Travel and home entertainment Compete for discretionary time and household budgets Convenient drive-to access and recurring local visitation

How financially strong is Six Flags?

FY2025 operating scale
$3.10B revenue
Up 14.4%, but comparison includes only six months of legacy Six Flags in FY2024.
FY2025 park-level profitability
$792.0M adjusted EBITDA
Down $83.3M; modified EBITDA margin fell to 27.1% from 33.2%.
FY2025 cash generation
$327.5M operating cash flow
Below $479.7M of investing cash outflow, primarily capital spending.

Why does leverage dominate the financial analysis?

At December 31, 2025, debt before issuance-cost and fair-value adjustments totaled about $5.20 billion, while cash was $91.1 million, producing company-defined net debt of $5.11 billion. Interest expense was $360.0 million in FY2025, and management expected 2026 cash interest of $320 million to $330 million. This means a significant portion of operating cash must fund lenders before equity holders can benefit from discretionary capital allocation.

Selected FY2025 cash demands relative to operating cash flow
Investing cash outflow$479.7M
Operating cash flow$327.5M
Interest expense$360.0M
Takeaway: capital intensity and interest absorb substantial cash. Bars are scaled to the largest selected figure; period: FY2025.

How should the impairment be interpreted?

The FY2025 net loss of $1.55 billion was dominated by a $1.52 billion impairment of goodwill and other intangibles, a non-cash charge that reduced accounting equity but did not itself consume current cash. It is still strategically meaningful: the impairment signals that expected cash flows from acquired reporting units and trade names had weakened relative to prior carrying values. Researchers should therefore separate accounting loss from cash performance while not dismissing what the write-down says about merger assumptions.

Balance-sheet or cash item Period Amount Interpretation
Cash and equivalents Mar. 29, 2026 $116.5M Modest liquidity relative to debt and seasonal cash needs.
Gross debt Dec. 31, 2025 $5.20B Makes refinancing, interest, and covenant headroom central.
2026 planned capex Company outlook $400M–$425M Needed for attractions, infrastructure, and portfolio recovery.
Q1 operating cash flow Q1 2026 $(83.2)M Seasonal outflow, materially better than Q1 2025.

Which operating KPIs matter most for Six Flags?

A useful analytical model begins with visits and guest yield, then tests whether fixed-cost leverage converts those revenues into EBITDA and cash. Revenue growth alone can mislead because acquisition timing, park operating days, weather, and pass visitation mix can change the comparison.

1
Attendance: how many visits reach the parks?
2
Admissions per capita: what is earned at entry?
3
Product per capita: how much is spent inside?
4
Operating costs: how efficiently are parks staffed and maintained?
5
Cash conversion: what remains after interest and capital spending?

What KPI combination signals healthy growth?

KPI Latest reading What a researcher should infer
Attendance 2.92M, Q1 2026 Volume recovery matters because labor, maintenance, insurance, and utilities are largely fixed.
Per capita spending $69.26, Q1 2026 Tests pricing, product mix, food execution, and premium-product adoption.
Active pass base Company cited growth, Q1 2026 Supports repeat visitation but can pressure admissions yield per visit.
Adjusted EBITDA $(123.0)M, Q1 2026 Useful seasonally and for covenant analysis, but must be reconciled to GAAP and cash flow.
Operating days 369, Q1 2026 Separates calendar availability from true demand and spending changes.
Capital expenditure $400M–$425M plan, 2026 Shows the reinvestment burden required to protect attendance and asset quality.
70%of FY2025 attendance and net revenue occurred in the second and third quarters, making summer weather, operations, and guest satisfaction disproportionately important.

Who owns Six Flags stock, and what does governance signal?

Six Flags has one publicly traded common-stock class and a dispersed institutional ownership structure rather than founder control. The 2026 proxy reported approximately 101.7 million shares as the implied base for disclosed percentages and listed five holders above 5%. BlackRock was the largest disclosed holder at 15.1%, followed by Vanguard at 9.4%, Morgan Stanley at 9.0%, UBS at 5.2%, and Darlington Partners at 5.1%.

Holder or group Shares Stake Why it matters
BlackRock 15.38M 15.1% Largest disclosed institution; meaningful voting influence.
Vanguard 9.55M 9.4% Large passive-holder presence reinforces accountability to broad institutions.
Morgan Stanley 9.20M 9.0% Large economic position can amplify engagement around execution.
UBS 5.28M 5.2% Another concentrated institutional block.
Darlington Partners 5.20M 5.1% Active ownership may increase pressure on portfolio and capital decisions.
Directors and executives 2.16M 2.1% Meaningful but not controlling insider alignment as of Mar. 27, 2026.

How has governance changed after the merger?

The board remained classified, with directors serving staggered terms. Leadership changed materially: John Reilly became chief executive officer in December 2025, and Mark Pauls became chief operating officer effective July 15, 2026, replacing Tim Fisher. The COO change matters because Pauls’ remit covers park operations, food and beverage, maintenance, workforce management, and entertainment—the exact operational areas that determine guest satisfaction and fixed-cost productivity. The latest ownership and board information appears in the 2026 proxy statement, while the COO transition is described in the July 2026 Form 8-K.

What opportunities could improve the Six Flags story?

The opportunity set is less about opening many new North American parks and more about extracting better economics from the existing estate. Scale can create savings in procurement, media buying, insurance, technology, food sourcing, and corporate overhead. A unified pass architecture can encourage visits across parks, while shared intellectual property and event programming can improve return on creative investment.

Attendance recovery
Same-park visit growth above 2025 levels would improve fixed-cost absorption.
Pass-base expansion
A larger active pass base can support recurring demand and food or merchandise spending.
In-park product yield
Q1 2026 product spending rose 10.0%; sustaining that rate would improve revenue quality.
Merger savings
Lower labor, maintenance, insurance, technology, and overhead costs can rebuild margins.
Portfolio optimization
Asset sales can simplify operations and direct capital toward higher-return parks.
International agreements
Management and licensing relationships can monetize know-how with less owned capital.

Where can operating leverage emerge?

Q1 2026 offered an early example: revenue rose $23.6 million while adjusted EBITDA loss improved by $47.8 million, helped by lower full-time wages, maintenance, and operating supplies. That degree of incremental improvement will not repeat mechanically, but it illustrates the upside when attendance, per-capita spending, and cost discipline move together. The most valuable opportunity is a durable rise in park-level margin without cutting maintenance or guest-service quality.

Demand lever
Visits + yield
Attendance and per-capita spending must rise together rather than trade off.
Efficiency lever
Cost standardization
Shared systems and procurement can convert portfolio scale into margin.
Balance-sheet lever
Debt reduction
Asset-sale proceeds and cash flow can reduce interest sensitivity.

What risks could weaken Six Flags’ outlook?

The company’s risk profile combines outdoor leisure volatility with post-merger execution and leverage. Weather can erase high-value operating days; safety incidents can damage trust; weak consumer spending can reduce visits and premium purchases; and delayed attractions can miss an entire season. Because many costs are fixed, modest attendance shortfalls can produce disproportionate EBITDA pressure.

Which risks have the clearest financial transmission?

Risk Transmission channel Metric to monitor
Weather and seasonality Lost peak days reduce attendance and food, parking, and premium sales. Q2–Q3 attendance and operating days
High fixed costs Revenue misses flow quickly into EBITDA and cash flow. Modified EBITDA margin
Leverage and refinancing Higher rates or weaker earnings increase interest burden and covenant risk. Net debt, interest, and liquidity
Underinvestment or project delays Aging attractions or late openings reduce guest satisfaction and demand. Capex delivery and guest scores
Safety and accessibility litigation Claims, legal costs, operational changes, and reputation damage. Incident trends and disclosed proceedings
Integration execution Systems disruption or weak standardization delays savings and harms service. Merger costs and realized savings

Why is the legal context more than boilerplate?

The 2025 Form 10-K disclosed securities and derivative litigation tied to allegations that merger materials failed to disclose underinvestment and that financial plans were not reasonably achievable. The company intends to defend the claims. The filing also describes accessibility-related cases involving the process for obtaining attraction accommodations. These matters may not determine the operating thesis, but they connect directly to merger credibility, guest access, and potential legal expense.

Why does Six Flags matter for valuation?

A discounted cash flow model for Six Flags is unusually sensitive to seasonality, attendance, margins, capital expenditures, and leverage. The starting point should not be accounting net income because large impairment charges distort comparability. A better framework begins with normalized park-level earnings, subtracts cash interest, taxes, maintenance and growth capital, and working-capital needs, then tests how quickly debt can decline.

Which assumptions drive intrinsic value most?

Same-park attendance growth
A small change matters because much of the cost base is fixed.
Per-capita spending
Separately model admissions and in-park products to capture pass-mix effects.
Modified EBITDA margin
Tests whether merger scale becomes operational efficiency.
Maintenance versus growth capex
Underestimating recurring reinvestment overstates free cash flow.
Cash interest
Debt structure can absorb much of enterprise cash generation.
Terminal reinvestment
Mature parks still require attractions and infrastructure to defend attendance.

Comparable-company analysis should distinguish destination resorts from regional operators and should normalize for property ownership, lease structures, minority interests, and differing definitions of adjusted EBITDA. The company’s official filings archive is the appropriate source for debt, non-controlling interests, impairment adjustments, and recurring merger exclusions.

$400M–$425Mof planned 2026 capital expenditures is a reminder that enterprise value cannot be assessed from EBITDA alone; reinvestment is fundamental to the product.

What is the key takeaway from Six Flags analysis?

Six Flags is a scarce-asset leisure platform with recognizable regional brands, a broad passholder base, and multiple revenue streams from every guest visit. The merger created unmatched regional scale in North America, but scale is not yet the same as financial strength. FY2025 revealed weaker margins, a major impairment, heavy interest costs, and the operational burden of integrating two legacy systems. Q1 2026 showed a more constructive pattern—higher attendance, stronger guest spending, lower costs, and improved seasonal cash flow—but the peak summer quarters remain decisive.

Final synthesis

The supportive case rests on asset scarcity, attendance recovery, pricing and food execution, merger savings, portfolio optimization, and debt reduction. The pressure case rests on weather, underinvestment, fixed costs, safety or legal events, consumer weakness, and a balance sheet that leaves little room for prolonged execution misses.

Students and researchers should monitor eight items: same-park attendance, admissions per capita, in-park product spending, active pass trends, modified EBITDA margin, operating cash flow, capital spending delivery, and net debt. Together, those measures reveal whether Six Flags is becoming an integrated cash-generating platform or remaining a collection of valuable parks constrained by leverage and uneven execution.

DCF model

    5-Year Financial Model

    40+ Charts & Metrics

    DCF & Multiple Valuation

    Free Email Support



Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.

(FUN) Six Flags Entertainment Corporation Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$17 $9
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5