Ellomay Capital Ltd. (ELLO) Company Overview

IL | Utilities | Renewable Utilities | AMEX

What does Ellomay Capital do?

€42.8M
FY2025 audited revenue
335.9 MW
Operating solar capacity in Spain, May 2026 disclosure
156 MW
Manara pumped-storage project capacity
€885.4M
Total assets at March 31, 2026

Ellomay Capital Ltd. is an Israeli renewable-energy developer, owner and operator listed on the NYSE American and Tel Aviv Stock Exchange under ELLO. Its official company overview describes a portfolio spanning solar generation, renewable gas, pumped hydro and battery-storage development in Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Texas and Israel. That mix makes Ellomay closer to a small infrastructure holding and development platform than to a single-technology solar producer.

The company matters because it combines mature operating assets with construction-stage and ready-to-build projects. Existing plants provide revenue, while development rights, permits, grid connections and financing structures create option value. The trade-off is capital intensity: growth requires large construction budgets, project debt and careful timing of power-purchase agreements, tax incentives and asset sales.

Business area Current footprint Economic role
Solar generation Spain, Italy and Texas Electricity sales through market exposure, tariffs and PPAs; the principal consolidated revenue source.
Renewable gas Three Dutch anaerobic-digestion plants Green-gas sales, gate fees, subsidies and green certificates, with feedstock and biological-process risk.
Energy storage Manara pumped storage plus battery projects in Spain, Italy and Israel Long-duration system capacity and price-arbitrage potential, but heavy capex and permitting exposure.
Development platform Italy, Texas, Spain and Israel pipeline Creates value by moving projects from land and permits to RTB, construction and operation.
Selected gross project capacity by status — disclosed May/June 2026
Spain solar operating335.9 MW
Italy solar RTB210 MW
Italy under construction160 MW
Manara pumped storage156 MW
Texas connected, test and construction63 MW
Gross capacity is not equity-adjusted: Ellomay owns 51% of the cited Italian operating/construction portfolio and 83.333% of Manara. The chart shows project scale, not attributable megawatts.

How does Ellomay Capital make money?

Which revenue streams matter most?

Ellomay earns recurring revenue when operating plants sell electricity or renewable gas. Solar economics depend on generation volume, irradiance, capture prices, regulated tariffs and contractual hedges. Talasol, the 300 MW Spanish plant that Ellomay controls through a 51% interest, sells electricity into the market while a financial power swap covers about 80% of output. Smaller Spanish plants receive subsidized economics, Italian projects use market and PPA structures, and Texas projects combine electricity revenue with U.S. tax-credit monetization.

The Dutch plants add a different model: they process organic feedstock into green gas, receive gate fees for accepting certain inputs, and generate certificates or subsidies. Their margin can improve when gate fees rise or feedstock costs fall, but biological interruptions and heat can reduce output. Ellomay's operating-project disclosures show how the portfolio diversifies technology, geography and revenue contracts.

Spain solar
€22.0M
FY2025 consolidated revenue from Talasol, subsidized Spanish plants and Ellomay Solar combined.
Netherlands biogas
€15.0M
FY2025 revenue; operating spread depends on gas value, certificates, gate fees and feedstock.
Italy solar
€5.0M
FY2025 revenue as newly connected projects increased their contribution.
Texas solar
€0.9M
FY2025 revenue during the first year of grid connection and commissioning.
FY2025 consolidated revenue mix by geography and technology
€42.8M
FY2025
Spain solar — €22.0M — 51.3%
Netherlands biogas — €15.0M — 35.1%
Italy solar — €5.0M — 11.7%
Texas solar — €0.9M — 2.0%
Calculated from FY2025 audited segment revenue. Dorad revenue was eliminated from consolidated revenue because it was an equity-accounted investment and was subsequently sold.
51.3%of FY2025 consolidated revenue came from Spanish solar assets, so Spanish capture prices and Talasol operating performance remain central to near-term earnings quality.

What did Ellomay Capital's latest quarter show?

€8.7M
Q1 2026 revenue, down 2.2% year over year
€2.1M
Q1 2026 company-reported EBITDA
€12.2M
Q1 2026 net loss
€1.9M
Q1 2026 operating cash outflow

Why did profit swing so sharply?

The quarter ended March 31, 2026 showed stable top-line revenue but weak accounting profit. Revenue declined from €8.9 million in Q1 2025 to €8.7 million because electricity prices in Spain and Italy were low and sometimes negative. Operating expenses rose to €5.1 million from €4.6 million as Dutch energy and feedstock costs increased and new Italian and Texas assets entered operation. Depreciation rose to €4.5 million from €4.2 million.

The larger swing occurred below operating profit. Net financing expense was €8.2 million in Q1 2026 versus €7.2 million of financing income in Q1 2025. Exchange-rate effects alone moved by €13.6 million between periods as the NIS appreciated 2.9% against the euro in Q1 2026 after depreciating 5.9% in Q1 2025. That volatility shows why a simple revenue-growth view is inadequate: Ellomay reports in euros but holds NIS cash and issues NIS-denominated debentures.

Metric Q1 2026 Q1 2025 Interpretation
Revenue €8.665M €8.860M New capacity did not fully offset lower European power prices.
Gross profit / loss €0.928M loss €0.005M loss Depreciation and operating costs exceeded quarterly revenue.
Operating loss €2.698M €2.514M Higher G&A offset lower project-development expense.
Net financing result €8.220M expense €7.221M income Currency translation and debenture interest dominated the earnings swing.
Cash from operations €1.9M used €0.3M generated Low prices and higher insurance and consulting costs pressured cash conversion.
March 31, 2026
€83.7M cash
Before the May 2026 Dorad sale proceeds were received.
May 10, 2026
€164M proceeds
Approximate euro value of the NIS 559.8M Dorad-holdings sale consideration.

Which turning points shaped Ellomay's current strategy?

Ellomay's history is best understood as repeated recycling of capital rather than uninterrupted ownership of every asset. Management has acquired, developed, financed, operated and sometimes sold projects when it judged the proceeds could strengthen the balance sheet or fund a larger pipeline.

  1. 2009
    Renewables pivot. The company began focusing on renewable energy and power, establishing the strategic identity it retains today.
  2. 2017-2018
    Dutch biogas platform. Two anaerobic-digestion projects entered operation, adding a non-solar revenue stream with feedstock and certificate economics.
  3. 2019
    Italian portfolio sale and Talasol partnership. Ellomay sold 22.6 MW of Italian PV assets and sold 49% of Talasol, demonstrating its willingness to crystallize value while retaining control of a larger project.
  4. 2020-2021
    Scale step-up. Talasol connected to the grid in December 2020 and reached preliminary acceptance in January 2021; Ellomay also acquired the Gelderland biogas plant and closed Manara project financing.
  5. 2023-2025
    New growth regions. Ellomay entered Texas solar development and partnered with Clal on a 198 MW Italian portfolio, bringing institutional co-investment into the buildout.
  6. 2026
    Dorad exit. The company sold its indirect 16.9% economic interest in Dorad based on a NIS 4.4B valuation and redirected proceeds toward deleveraging, liquidity and renewable development.
Ellomay's defining strategic skill is not simply generating electricity; it is advancing infrastructure assets through permits, financing, construction and selective monetization.

The Dorad sale is the clearest recent example. The completed transaction produced NIS 559.8 million of consideration, while the June 2026 presentation indicated a NIS 332 million pre-tax capital gain. It also removed a profitable equity-accounted asset, so future comparisons must separate the one-time gain and discontinued Dorad contribution from the continuing renewable portfolio.

What gives Ellomay a competitive advantage?

A multi-country development and financing capability

Ellomay's advantage is not global scale. It is the ability to originate and advance projects across several regulatory systems while using partnerships and project-level financing to reduce equity requirements. The company operates in five jurisdictions, uses local tariffs and PPAs, sells U.S. tax credits, and has attracted Clal as a 49% partner in Italian projects. These capabilities are difficult for a new entrant to reproduce quickly because land rights, grid access, permits, EPC contracts and lender relationships accumulate over years.

Control of complex assets creates optionality

Ellomay controls Talasol despite owning 51%, and it owns 83.333% of Manara. Control allows management to influence financing, operating and exit decisions, while minority capital shares risk. The 2026 investor presentation also shows a shift toward storage: 1,878 MWh of storage capacity was listed in the development portfolio, including stand-alone Italian BESS, Spanish battery projects and Israeli solar-plus-storage.

Development know-howStrong
Technology diversityStrong
Scale versus large IPPsLimited
Contracted cash-flow visibilityMixed
Capital flexibility after DoradImproved
Earnings stabilityVolatile

For a VRIO-style interpretation, development relationships and execution experience are valuable and relatively scarce, but the advantage is not fully insulated: larger competitors have cheaper capital, bigger teams and stronger procurement leverage. Ellomay's edge therefore depends on disciplined project selection and timing rather than an unassailable moat.

Who competes with Ellomay, and where is it positioned?

Ellomay competes at several stages. It competes with Israeli-listed renewable developers such as Enlight Renewable Energy, Energix, Doral, Nofar and Econergy for capital, projects and investor attention. In Europe and the United States it also competes with local developers, global independent power producers, utilities, infrastructure funds and tax-equity investors. Supplier power can rise when transformers, panels, batteries, EPC labor or project finance are scarce; buyer power varies according to whether output is sold under a long-term contract or into a merchant market.

Competitive dimension Ellomay position Strategic implication
Scale and cost of capital Smaller than major listed IPPs and utilities Partnerships, debentures and project finance are essential to compete for large assets.
Development pipeline Broad relative to current revenue base Successful conversion can transform earnings; delays can leave capital tied up without revenue.
Technology mix Solar, biogas, pumped storage and batteries Diversification reduces single-technology dependence but raises operational complexity.
Contracting Combination of tariffs, PPAs, hedges and merchant exposure Provides upside and risk diversification, but makes consolidated margins less predictable.
Asset recycling Demonstrated through Italian assets, Talmei Yosef and Dorad Can fund growth without permanent ownership, provided sales occur above invested capital.

How financially strong is Ellomay Capital?

FY2025 profitability was positive at the gross line but weak after financing

The audited 2025 Form 20-F reported €42.8 million of revenue and €6.9 million of gross profit, equivalent to a 16.2% gross margin after operating expenses and depreciation. Continuing operations then absorbed project-development and corporate costs. Net financing expense reached €27.4 million, while €16.9 million of discontinued-operation profit from the Dorad investment partly offset the continuing loss. The final audited net loss was approximately €6.4 million.

16.2%
FY2025 audited gross margin. Gross margin equals €6.938M gross profit divided by €42.827M revenue. The green arc represents the margin; the neutral track represents operating cost and depreciation absorbed before gross profit.

The balance sheet is large because projects are capital intensive

At March 31, 2026, Ellomay had €885.4 million of assets, €726.5 million of liabilities and €158.9 million of equity. Cash was €83.7 million, but gross bank, other-loan and debenture obligations exceeded €640 million when current and long-term balances are combined. Much of that debt is project-related, yet it still affects refinancing risk, interest expense and covenant capacity.

Balance-sheet item March 31, 2026 December 31, 2025 Research implication
Cash and equivalents €83.7M €87.6M Pre-Dorad-sale liquidity remained meaningful but was small relative to construction commitments.
Total assets €885.4M €843.5M Asset growth reflects continuing investment in construction-stage projects.
Total liabilities €726.5M €678.4M Leverage and project funding drive a large share of enterprise value sensitivity.
Total equity €158.9M €165.1M The Q1 comprehensive loss reduced the equity buffer before the Dorad transaction closed.
Fixed assets €585.4M €566.9M High fixed assets mean depreciation, capex and project utilization must be modeled explicitly.
FY2025 operating cash flow
€1.8M generated before heavy construction investment.
FY2025 fixed-asset purchases
€97.8M invested, plus €4.1M of capitalized interest.
Funding bridge
Debenture issuance, project loans, partner equity and tax-credit proceeds funded the gap.
Result
Accounting EBITDA did not translate into discretionary free cash flow because the portfolio was in a build phase.

How do ownership, governance and capital allocation affect the story?

Ownership is concentrated despite one-share-one-vote rights

Ellomay has one ordinary share class with one vote per share, but its shareholder base is not fully dispersed. The September 2025 annual-meeting materials reported 13,779,585 ordinary shares outstanding and 258,046 treasury shares. Shlomo Nehama beneficially owned 26.0%, Kanir Joint Investments 18.9%, and their shareholder agreement created shared voting power over 41.6% of outstanding shares. CEO Ran Fridrich is connected to Kanir's general partner, so governance and operating leadership are linked.

Holder or group Reported beneficial ownership Source period Why it matters
Shlomo Nehama 3,588,577 shares; 26.0% September 10, 2025 Large strategic shareholder and party to the voting agreement.
Kanir Joint Investments 2,605,845 shares; 18.9% September 10, 2025 Connected to CEO Ran Fridrich through the general partner.
Clal Insurance 1,940,045 shares; 13.6% August 2025 filing basis Institutional shareholder and project partner in the Italian portfolio.
Yelin Lapidot 1,632,040 shares; 11.8% Latest proxy disclosure Represents managed funds rather than a single operating sponsor.
Phoenix / Menora 9.5% / 7.1% Latest proxy disclosure Adds an institutional investor base, but concentrated strategic holders retain strong influence.

The Dorad proceeds reset capital allocation

The company used approximately NIS 170 million to repay Series E secured debentures early. Its presentation allocated roughly 60% of net proceeds to balance-sheet strengthening and financial flexibility, with 40% earmarked for growth investments. That policy is rational for a developer with a large pipeline: deleveraging lowers refinancing pressure, while retained cash can serve as equity beneath project loans.

Balance-sheet allocation
60%
Early repayment, additional liquidity and potential credit-profile improvement.
Growth allocation
40%
Equity for new projects, storage expansion and development pipeline advancement.

Which opportunities and risks could change Ellomay's outlook?

Growth depends on converting the pipeline into operating cash flow

Italy is the largest near-term growth engine. Ellomay reported 160 MW under construction with planned completion by the end of 2026 and 210 MW at RTB status. About 100 MW won FER X tenders with 20-year electricity-sale contracts, which can improve revenue visibility. In the Netherlands, licensed capacity expansion could increase annual green-gas output from about 16 million cubic meters to around 24 million. Texas offers tax-credit-supported growth, while Spanish batteries could reduce the damage caused by low midday prices.

The risk set is unusually interconnected

The same factors that create upside also create downside. Merchant electricity prices can fall when renewable output is abundant. Construction delays postpone revenue but continue interest capitalization and overhead. Interest rates affect project finance and debentures. Currency movements can produce large accounting gains or losses. War-related conditions have already stopped work at Manara's upper and lower reservoir sites even while tunneling continued. Dutch plants face feedstock, biological-process and regulatory timing risk, while U.S. projects face tariff and tax-policy uncertainty.

Italy 160 MW construction
Watch grid connection and completion timing through the end of 2026; delay would shift revenue and raise carrying costs.
Spain capture prices
Monitor negative-price hours and Talasol hedge performance; Spain generated 51.3% of FY2025 revenue.
Dutch output
Track progress from roughly 16M to 24M cubic meters of annual capacity and the January 2027 blending regime.
Manara schedule
Follow security conditions, compensation negotiations and the revised path toward 2030 completion.
Financing expense
Q1 2026 net financing expense was €8.2M; rates, NIS/euro moves and debt mix can outweigh operating changes.
Post-Dorad cash deployment
Measure whether proceeds lower recurring interest cost and fund projects without excessive new parent-level debt.
Risk or opportunity Financial line affected Evidence to monitor
Low European power prices Revenue, gross profit and operating cash flow Realized price, capture rate, negative-price hours and storage deployment.
Pipeline conversion Fixed assets, capex, depreciation and future revenue RTB milestones, notice to proceed, financing close and commercial operation dates.
Currency and rates Financing result, equity reserves and interest expense NIS/euro movement, debt issuance terms and hedge balances.
Storage buildout Capex and long-term revenue quality Permits, contracted capacity payments, arbitrage assumptions and battery costs.
Geopolitical disruption Manara schedule, claims and project cost Construction resumption, regulator compensation and revised completion budget.

Why does Ellomay's business model matter for valuation?

A single consolidated DCF can hide the economics

Ellomay is better analyzed with a sum-of-the-parts framework. Operating solar and biogas assets can be valued from production, realized prices, operating costs, maintenance capex, taxes and project debt. Construction-stage assets need probability-adjusted completion dates, remaining capex and financing assumptions. RTB and development projects deserve lower values until permits, contracts and funding are secured. Manara requires a separate long-duration model because its €615 million expected project cost, 2030 completion target and 1,872 MWh storage capacity are fundamentally different from solar economics.

Valuation block Primary drivers Common modeling mistake
Operating Spain solar Generation, capture price, Talasol hedge, degradation and project debt Applying a constant market price without hourly capture-price pressure.
Dutch biogas Output, gas price, certificates, gate fees, feedstock and uptime Treating revenue as solar-like when biological and commodity inputs matter.
Italy and Texas growth COD timing, PPA or tariff, tax credits, capex and partner ownership Valuing gross project MW as though Ellomay owned 100% of every asset.
Manara storage Completion cost, availability revenue, financing and delay compensation Ignoring construction risk because expected annual revenue is disclosed.
Parent balance sheet Cash, debentures, corporate costs, NCI and post-Dorad proceeds Subtracting all project debt twice or omitting minority interests.

Which KPIs belong in the model?

Revenue build
MW × yield × availability × realized price, adjusted for ownership and contract structure.
Cash conversion
Operating cash flow minus maintenance and development capex, not EBITDA alone.
Reinvestment
Remaining construction capex plus equity required beneath project financing.
Terminal risk
Asset life, contract expiry, merchant exposure, decommissioning and refinancing assumptions.

The valuation is therefore most sensitive to commissioning dates, European price capture, financing cost and how efficiently the Dorad proceeds are reinvested. Reported EBITDA is useful for operating comparison, but it excludes capex and can include equity-accounted or one-time effects; free cash flow and attributable project economics are more decision-useful.

What is the key takeaway from Ellomay Capital analysis?

Ellomay is a concentrated, capital-intensive renewable infrastructure platform with more project ambition than its current revenue base suggests. Its operating assets provide a foundation, but the investment case is driven by project conversion: completing 160 MW in Italy, advancing 210 MW of RTB capacity, expanding Dutch green gas, connecting Texas projects and eventually delivering Manara. The May 2026 Dorad sale materially improved financial flexibility and demonstrated asset-sale value creation, while also removing a profitable investee and making historical earnings less comparable.

The strongest support for the story is management's record of moving assets through development, financing and monetization. The principal weakness is that leverage, capex, currency movements and merchant power prices can overwhelm modest changes in revenue. Students and researchers should therefore treat Ellomay as an infrastructure case study in capital allocation, project finance and portfolio rotation rather than as a conventional growth company.

Research synthesis
What supports the company: a diversified technology base, a large permitted pipeline, institutional partnerships and fresh post-Dorad liquidity. What could weaken it: delayed construction, low capture prices, financing expense, currency volatility and geopolitical disruption at Manara. What to monitor next: Italy COD timing, Spanish realized prices, Dutch production licenses, Texas tax-credit economics, Manara compensation, parent-level debt reduction, operating cash flow and the share of new capacity covered by long-term contracts.

DCF model

    5-Year Financial Model

    40+ Charts & Metrics

    DCF & Multiple Valuation

    Free Email Support



Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.

(ELLO) Ellomay Capital Ltd. Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$17 $9
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5