What does Datacentrex do?
Datacentrex, Inc. is a Nasdaq Capital Market company that owns Scrypt mining equipment deployed at third-party U.S. colocation facilities. Hosts provide power, cooling, rack space, connectivity, and site operations. Datacentrex owns and manages the ASIC fleet, sells its hashrate, and holds cash and digital assets; it does not own the blockchain protocols or data centers.
How should readers classify the business?
Datacentrex is a capital-intensive digital-infrastructure operator with a treasury component. The official company profile classifies it as blockchain infrastructure and cryptocurrency mining. The 2025 Form 10-K also outlines data-center-adjacent acquisitions, but these are not yet a separate revenue source.
| Identity item | Official position | Analytical implication |
|---|---|---|
| Listing | Nasdaq Capital Market, DTCX | Public-market access is strategically important because fleet expansion and acquisitions can require external capital. |
| Current business | Owned Scrypt compute in third-party colocation | Returns depend on equipment economics, power contracts, uptime, marketplace pay rates, and asset prices. |
| Customers | Broad marketplace buyers of hashrate | Traditional customer concentration is limited, but platform and counterparty dependence remains. |
| Geography | Four U.S. colocation facilities | Site diversification reduces single-location exposure but does not remove host, grid, or power-cost risk. |
How does Datacentrex make money?
Datacentrex deploys owned Scrypt ASICs and monetizes their hashrate mainly through marketplaces. Buyers pay market rates, usually settling in Bitcoin. Pool and merged-mining activity can also produce Dogecoin, Litecoin, and auxiliary assets. Revenue is recognized when delivered hashrate is paid and the assets enter a company-controlled wallet.
Why does merged mining matter economically?
Merged mining lets one energy input support several compatible networks. The January 2026 investor presentation highlights exposure to Dogecoin, Litecoin, and auxiliary currencies without separate power for each network. Value still depends on whether combined payouts exceed hosting and hardware-replacement costs.
| Revenue driver | Mechanism | What improves economics | Main constraint |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hashrate marketplace | Market-priced sale of compute, usually settled in BTC | High buyer demand, strong uptime, efficient hardware | Marketplace liquidity, counterparty reliability, BTC price |
| Pool or protocol rewards | Pro-rata rewards in DOGE, LTC, and auxiliary assets | Favorable network rewards and low pool fees | Network difficulty, token prices, pool downtime |
| Treasury management | Holding, selling, or redeploying mined assets | Disciplined liquidity and favorable asset-price moves | Fair-value volatility and custody or trading risk |
| Future transactions | Potential acquisitions or partnerships | Accretive assets and operating synergies | Execution, valuation, dilution, and integration |
What does Datacentrex’s latest quarter show?
For the quarter ended March 31, 2026, revenue was $2.179 million versus $0.160 million in Q1 2025, gross profit was $0.513 million, and the net loss was $6.152 million.
Which expense lines explain the loss?
The Q1 2026 Form 10-Q reported $1.666 million of cost of revenue and $5.531 million of operating expenses, including $3.287 million of depreciation, $1.156 million of stock compensation, and $1.087 million of G&A. Digital-asset losses added $1.212 million of other expense. The earnings release emphasizes growth; the filing shows the full cost structure.
| Metric | Q1 2026 | Q1 2025 | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.179M | $0.160M | Fleet expansion and marketplace monetization drove growth. |
| Gross profit | $0.513M | $0.084M | Direct economics remained positive, below the FY2025 margin. |
| Operating expenses | $5.531M | $0.391M | Depreciation and stock compensation drove the increase. |
| Operating loss | $(5.018)M | $(0.308)M | Gross profit did not cover operating expenses. |
| Net loss / diluted EPS | $(6.152)M / $(0.20) | $(0.309)M / $0.00 | Treasury losses widened the net deficit. |
How does the quarter compare with the 2025 baseline?
Q1 2026 should not be annualized mechanically: hashrate pricing and power move direct margins, while two-year depreciation burdens reported earnings.
How did the current Datacentrex platform take shape?
Datacentrex’s listed entity and mining platform came together through a reverse recapitalization. This explains its young operating record, complex share structure, sizable cash balance, and rapidly changing 2025 cost base.
Which turning points still shape the company today?
-
2020Thumzup Media Corporation was incorporated as a social-media advertising and content-monetization company. This legacy explains the public shell and some inherited equity arrangements, not the current revenue engine.
-
Q1 2025Dogehash began digital-asset mining with approximately 1,500 Scrypt ASIC miners at one non-U.S. colocation site, establishing the operating base used in later comparative financials.
-
Q2 2025Approximately 1,000 additional units were deployed across two domestic sites, increasing scale and reducing reliance on the original facility.
-
July–Q3 2025Dogehash acquired mining assets from US Data & Energy and relocated the original fleet to the United States in response to tariffs and operating-cost considerations.
-
December 15, 2025Thumzup completed the Dogehash transaction, issued 13.835 million common shares plus Series D preferred convertible into 16.240 million common shares, changed its name to Datacentrex, and began trading as DTCX.
-
March–April 2026A public offering sold 4.510 million common shares and 5.575 million pre-funded warrants at an effective $2.00 price, producing $20.17 million gross proceeds; $11.15 million related to the pre-funded warrants was received on April 2.
What gives Datacentrex a competitive advantage?
Datacentrex’s potential advantage is an operating configuration: owned Scrypt hardware, diversified U.S. hosting, marketplace monetization, and merged-mining exposure. Scrypt ASICs are not interchangeable with Bitcoin-focused machines, so sourcing and operating know-how can create a barrier. Existing colocation contracts also govern power pricing and availability.
How durable is the Scrypt differentiation?
The advantage can weaken as Scrypt hardware supply expands, competing hashrate rises, payouts fall, or hosting costs increase. It strengthens with efficient machines, favorable power, high uptime, and higher realized revenue per megawatt.
Who are the main competitors and substitutes?
Direct rivals are other Scrypt miners bidding for the same rewards and hardware. Bitcoin miners such as Riot Platforms, MARA Holdings, CleanSpark, Cipher Mining, IREN, and Bitdeer also compete for power, sites, equipment, talent, and capital. Direct tokens and ETFs are investment substitutes.
| Competitive set | Basis of competition | Datacentrex position | Pressure point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other Scrypt miners | Hardware efficiency, network share, pool terms | Specialized fleet and marketplace strategy | Difficulty growth can reduce output per unit of hashrate. |
| Large SHA-256 miners | Power access, capital, facilities, procurement | Smaller scale but a distinct algorithm niche | Larger firms may outbid for power or acquire infrastructure. |
| AI and HPC operators | Highest-value use of scarce electricity | Potential future transaction opportunity | AI customers may support higher power prices than mining economics can bear. |
| Direct tokens and ETFs | Simpler financial exposure | Operating leverage plus treasury exposure | Investors may prefer liquid exposure without execution and dilution risk. |
How financially strong is Datacentrex through the cycle?
At March 31, 2026, Datacentrex held $42.474 million of cash and $5.365 million of digital assets. Current assets were $59.735 million versus $0.260 million of current liabilities, although Q1 operations used $3.227 million of cash.
What do margins and cash flow say?
Free cash flow—operating cash flow minus capex—was about $(3.227) million in Q1 2026 because no equipment was purchased. Adjusted EBITDA excludes depreciation and stock compensation.
How much balance-sheet capacity is available?
| Balance-sheet item | March 31, 2026 | December 31, 2025 | Change / meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and equivalents | $42.474M | $38.919M | Increased before the $11.150M April 2 receipt. |
| Digital assets at fair value | $5.365M | $4.430M | Receipts exceeded sales, partly offset by $1.212M of losses. |
| Net equipment | $15.283M | $18.537M | Declined 17.6% mainly through depreciation; no Q1 purchases. |
| Total assets | $79.411M | $66.842M | Offering receivables and cash increased asset capacity. |
| Current liabilities | $0.260M | $0.595M | Low near-term recorded liabilities support liquidity. |
| Stockholders’ equity | $79.151M | $66.247M | Financing raised book capital and expanded the share base. |
Who owns Datacentrex stock, and what does governance signal?
Ownership reflects the Dogehash merger and multiple security classes. At April 13, 2026, Parker Scott beneficially owned 3.000 million common shares, or 8.29%; all five directors and officers held 4.368 million shares, or 11.98%, based on 36.208 million common shares outstanding.
How much insider influence exists?
| Holder / group | Beneficial common shares | Percent | Source period | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parker Scott, CEO | 3,000,000 | 8.29% | April 13, 2026 | Meaningful alignment without majority control. |
| Robert Steele, CFO | 857,813 | 2.35% | April 13, 2026 | Includes 257,813 option shares exercisable within 60 days. |
| Other three directors | 510,650 | Below 1% each | April 13, 2026 | Board equity is present but individually modest. |
| Officers and directors as a group | 4,368,463 | 11.98% | April 13, 2026 | Material collective incentives without absolute control. |
| Series D preferred holders | Convertible into about 16.240M common shares | Not included as current common ownership unless convertible within the rule period | March 31, 2026 | Potential dilution is a major consideration. |
At March 31, 2026, 164,638 Series A shares were outstanding. Each converted into 23 common shares, subject to adjustment, carried a $0.875 quarterly dividend when declared, and voted as converted within limits. Economic and voting ownership therefore differ.
What do leadership and capital allocation priorities indicate?
The governance page shows relevant operating and public-company experience. The test is whether spending improves per-share returns, not only scale.
Which KPIs best explain Datacentrex’s performance?
Revenue can rise while unit economics weaken. Key inputs are realized revenue per hashrate, power, uptime, hardware cycles, asset prices, network difficulty, and treasury decisions.
Which operating measures should researchers calculate?
| KPI | Formula or anchor | Latest disclosed level | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fleet size | Operating ASIC miners | 3,094 at March 31, 2026 | Shows scale, not efficiency or uptime. |
| Deployed hashrate | Miners × nameplate GH/s | 43.3 TH/s at full uptime | Capacity denominator for realized revenue. |
| Power capacity | Miners × nameplate kW | 12.5 MW at March 31, 2026 | Links infrastructure cost to gross profit. |
| Gross margin | Gross profit ÷ revenue | 23.5% in Q1 2026 | Direct economics before depreciation. |
| Revenue per miner | Quarterly revenue ÷ average operating miners | About $704 per miner in Q1 2026 | Interpret with uptime, hardware, and market conditions. |
| Operating cash burn | Net cash used in operations | $3.227M in Q1 2026 | Shows liquidity consumed before investment. |
| Digital-asset exposure | Fair value by asset | $5.365M total at March 31, 2026 | Adds balance-sheet volatility beyond operations. |
What accounting signals deserve special attention?
What opportunities and risks could change Datacentrex’s outlook?
Growth can come from fleet efficiency, better marketplace payouts, disciplined treasury conversion, or infrastructure acquisitions. The best transaction would convert liquidity and operating experience into recurring cash flow that is more durable than token-sensitive mining.
Where can growth come from?
The FY2025 release cited more than $59 million of post-financing cash and digital assets. Because this was not the March 31 GAAP balance sheet, acquisition analysis should reconcile subsequent cash receipts, spending, and operating burn.
Which risks are most material?
What is the key takeaway from Datacentrex analysis?
Datacentrex combines specialized compute, outsourced infrastructure, marketplace revenue, a digital-asset treasury, and acquisition optionality. It has meaningful scale for a young Scrypt platform and substantial liquidity, but also negative GAAP earnings, operating cash burn, a complex capital structure, and externally driven economics.
Why does the business model matter for valuation?
A DCF is sensitive to token prices, network competition, power, and replacement spending. Model mining operations, net cash and digital assets, and acquisitions separately; vary margins, utilization, capex, treasury values, and diluted shares.
What should students, researchers, and investors monitor next?
- Quarterly revenue per miner and per unit of deployed hashrate.
- Gross margin versus the 23.5% Q1 2026 level and the 48.9% FY2025 baseline.
- Operating cash use relative to cash and liquid digital assets.
- Fleet additions, equipment deposits, and changes in the 12.5 MW footprint.
- Digital-asset holdings by token and related fair-value changes.
- Hosting renewals, uptime, power terms, and site concentration.
- Share issuance, preferred conversions, warrants, and awards.
- Strategic transactions: price, financing, cash yield, and per-share impact.
The March 2026 offering confirms capital access. The test is whether operating value outgrows diluted shares.
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.