(CMI) Cummins Inc. Bundle
What does Cummins do?
Cummins Inc. is a global power-technology company headquartered in Columbus, Indiana and listed on the New York Stock Exchange under ticker CMI. The company designs, manufactures, distributes and services engines, powertrains, power generation systems and related components for trucks, buses, construction, mining, agriculture, marine, rail, defense, data centers and industrial customers. Cummins describes its purpose as “making people’s lives better by powering a more prosperous world” on its official company page, but the operating reality is more specific: Cummins sits at the intersection of commercial transportation, industrial power, emissions technology, aftermarket service and energy transition.
Cummins is best understood as an industrial company with a large installed base and cyclical end markets. Its five segments matter because the company is not just an engine supplier; it also earns from aftermarket parts, field service, generator sets, aftertreatment, turbochargers, transmissions, braking systems, software, electrolyzers and zero-emissions technologies.
Which markets does Cummins serve?
The customer base includes truck manufacturers, fleet operators, dealers, industrial equipment makers, data center developers, mining companies, government buyers and customers that need standby or prime power. Diversification helps, but Cummins remains sensitive to truck cycles, industrial production, tariffs, emissions rules and zero-emissions adoption.
How does Cummins make money?
Cummins makes money by selling engineered products and by supporting those products through a global distribution and service network. In the Engine segment, revenue depends on unit shipments, engine content, pricing, emissions standards and demand for trucks, buses and off-highway equipment. In Components, revenue comes from drivetrain and braking, emission solutions, electronics, software and related systems. Distribution captures parts, service, power generation and engine sales through company-owned and independent channels. Power Systems sells generator sets, engines and alternators for standby, prime and industrial power. Accelera sells electrified and hydrogen-related technologies, but it remains loss-making and much smaller than the legacy industrial businesses.
The official financial results archive shows both external sales and segment EBITDA, which is crucial because Power Systems can be smaller than Distribution by revenue yet more powerful for margin when data-center demand is strong.
Which revenue streams are most important?
Distribution was the largest external-sales contributor in FY2025, followed by Components and Engine. That is important because Distribution includes aftermarket service and parts, which are less tied to a single new-truck production cycle than original equipment sales. Power Systems was smaller by external sales, but its profitability improved sharply as data-center backup power and broader power generation demand accelerated.
Which segments matter most in 2025 and Q1 2026?
Cummins’ FY2025 results show a balanced revenue base but a changing profit mix. In the FY2025 earnings release, Cummins reported $33.7 billion of net sales, down 1% from FY2024, while Distribution and Power Systems grew as Engine and Components declined. Power generation and service exposure offset pressure in commercial vehicle end markets.
FY2025 revenue mix by external sales
Which segment is most profitable?
In FY2025, Power Systems generated $1.694 billion of EBITDA on $7.463 billion of total sales, a 22.7% EBITDA margin. Distribution generated $1.808 billion of EBITDA on $12.405 billion of total sales, a 14.6% margin. Engine and Components remained profitable, while Accelera produced an $896 million EBITDA loss, including significant electrolyzer-related charges. That means Cummins’ consolidated story depends on two forces moving in opposite directions: legacy industrial platforms fund the business, while Accelera and energy-transition investments can dilute near-term earnings.
| Segment | FY2025 external sales | FY2025 EBITDA | EBITDA margin on total segment sales | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distribution | $12.386B | $1.808B | 14.6% | Largest external-sales segment and a major installed-base monetization channel. |
| Components | $8.643B | $1.398B | 13.8% | Content and emissions-related systems support relevance across truck platforms. |
| Engine | $8.104B | $1.382B | 12.7% | Core franchise, but exposed to truck and equipment cycles. |
| Power Systems | $4.114B | $1.694B | 22.7% | Smaller external revenue base, but currently the highest-margin profit engine. |
| Accelera | $0.423B | $(0.896)B | NM | Strategic transition platform with material near-term losses. |
What does Cummins’ latest quarter show?
The latest official reporting period is Q1 2026, the quarter ended March 31, 2026. Cummins reported first-quarter revenue of $8.398 billion in its Q1 2026 earnings release, up 3% year over year. North America sales declined 6%, while international sales rose 16%. Net income attributable to Cummins was $654 million, or $4.71 diluted EPS.
The quarter was stronger operationally than the net-income comparison first appears. Cummins recorded $199 million of charges, or $1.44 per share, connected to the sale of the low-pressure fuel-cell business and related customer obligations. EBITDA was $1.3 billion, or 15.4% of sales. Management also raised full-year 2026 revenue guidance to growth of 8% to 11% and EBITDA margin guidance to 17.75% to 18.50%, excluding the fuel-cell charges.
What changed below the revenue line?
The Q1 2026 Form 10-Q shows gross margin of $2.243 billion, or 26.7% of net sales. Operating income was $949 million, equal to an 11.3% operating margin. Research, development and engineering expense was $358 million, or 4.3% of sales. Operating cash flow was $309 million, and capital expenditures were $189 million, implying roughly $120 million of free cash flow before considering the many timing effects that can affect first-quarter working capital.
| Metric | Q1 2026 | Q1 2025 | What it indicates |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net sales | $8.398B | $8.174B | Modest growth despite North America pressure. |
| Gross margin | $2.243B / 26.7% | $2.106B / 25.8% | A better cost-of-sales ratio helped offset below-the-line charges. |
| Operating income | $949M / 11.3% | $1.171B / 14.3% | Lower because other operating expense included fuel-cell related costs. |
| Operating cash flow | $309M | $(3)M | Better first-quarter cash generation than the prior-year period. |
| Capital expenditures | $189M | $162M | Industrial reinvestment remained meaningful but manageable relative to sales. |
Why do power generation and data centers matter so much for Cummins now?
The most company-specific development in Cummins’ current story is power generation strength, especially data-center backup power. That creates a profit offset to weaker truck markets and gives Cummins exposure to electricity reliability, cloud infrastructure and industrial backup-power investment without turning it into a utility or pure data-center supplier.
Power Systems economics are the current swing factor
In Q1 2026, Power Systems sales rose 19% to $2.0 billion, with power generation up 28% within the segment. Segment EBITDA was $577 million, or 29.5% of sales, far above Cummins’ consolidated EBITDA margin. Distributionalso benefited from power generation, with Q1 2026 power-generation sales of $1.275 billion, up 17%. For a DCF model, this means revenue mix matters as much as consolidated growth: a dollar of Power Systems revenue can carry a different margin profile than a dollar of Engine revenue in a softer truck market.
How geography affected the quarter
Q1 2026 also shows why international exposure matters. U.S. and Canada sales were $4.772 billion, while international sales were $3.626 billion. The North America line declined year over year, but international growth helped the company still report consolidated sales growth. That mix is important for analysts because China, Asia Pacific, India, Europe and other international markets can move differently from North American commercial vehicles.
What strategic turning points still shape Cummins today?
Cummins’ history matters most when it explains today’s portfolio choices. The company’s original diesel-engine identity still supports the installed base, service network and engineering credibility, but recent strategic moves show a broader goal: defend profitable power and component franchises while preparing for lower-carbon and alternative-power technologies. The strategic challenge is sequencing. Cummins must invest early enough to stay relevant but avoid funding loss-making technologies faster than customers adopt them.
-
1919Cummins was founded in Columbus, Indiana. The long operating history helps explain its installed base, manufacturing know-how and customer relationships in demanding industrial applications.
-
2024The Atmus filtration divestiture reshaped the portfolio and reduced exposure to a non-core business while highlighting management’s willingness to simplify capital allocation.
-
2025Cummins advanced HELM engine platforms, including the X10 and B7.2, showing that internal-combustion platforms still require product investment even during the energy transition.
-
2025The company acquired First Mode assets to support mining and hybrid applications, a move that fits industrial decarbonization rather than consumer electric-vehicle exposure.
-
2025Accelera recorded large electrolyzer-related charges, making clear that zero-emissions opportunities can carry near-term financial drag and demand-timing risk.
-
Q1 2026Cummins sold its low-pressure fuel-cell business and recorded $199M of related charges, narrowing part of the zero-emissions portfolio while preserving investment in other transition technologies.
-
Q1 2026Management raised 2026 revenue and EBITDA guidance, driven by stronger Power Systems demand and improving expectations for North American truck markets.
What does this history mean for strategy?
The timeline shows a practical industrial transition rather than a clean replacement story. Diesel, natural gas and power-generation platforms remain economically central. Accelera and lower-carbon products are strategic, but the company has already shown it will restructure or sell parts of that portfolio when demand develops more slowly than expected. For MBA analysis, Cummins is a case of ambidexterity: harvesting mature installed-base economics while funding new technologies under uncertainty.
What gives Cummins a competitive advantage?
Cummins’ advantage is an industrial capability moat: engineering depth, emissions expertise, manufacturing scale, equipment-maker relationships, a large installed base and a service network that supports customers when downtime is expensive. About 3,700 service locations worldwide help explain why Distribution is more than a sales channel.
Which resources are hardest to replicate?
Who are Cummins’ main competitors?
Cummins competes with commercial powertrain, industrial engine, truck component, power-generation and electrification suppliers. The exact rival set depends on the application: large truck OEMs may integrate more of their own powertrains; engine and power-system manufacturers compete for industrial and generator customers; component suppliers compete on content, cost and emissions technology; and energy-transition players compete in hydrogen, electrification and related infrastructure. The competitive question is therefore not simply “who sells engines?” It is whether Cummins can keep enough content, service relevance and power-system demand as customers evaluate alternative powertrains and stricter or shifting emissions regimes.
How financially strong is Cummins through the cycle?
Cummins’ financial strength comes from profitability across multiple industrial segments, a meaningful cash and securities balance, access to credit, and a long record of returning cash to shareholders. It is still a cyclical industrial company: working capital, inventory, truck demand and project timing can shift cash flow across quarters. As of March 31, 2026, Cummins had $3.182 billion of cash and marketable securities, $7.686 billion of total debt, working capital of $7.212 billion and a current ratio of 1.71. Total debt to capital was 36.5%.
Balance sheet and liquidity signals
| Metric | March 31, 2026 | December 31, 2025 | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and marketable securities | $3.182B | $3.609B | Liquidity cushion declined but remained material. |
| Inventories | $6.126B | $5.822B | Inventory is a major working-capital item and should be watched in a cycle. |
| Long-term debt | $6.729B | $6.792B | Debt load is manageable but not immaterial for valuation. |
| Total assets | $34.445B | $33.992B | Scale reflects manufacturing assets, working capital and goodwill/intangibles. |
| Cummins shareholders’ equity | $12.351B | $12.349B | Equity base was broadly stable quarter over quarter. |
Cash conversion and reinvestment
Q1 2026 operating cash flow was $309 million and capital expenditures were $189 million. A simple free-cash-flow bridge therefore starts with operating cash flow and subtracts capex, yielding about $120 million for the quarter. That is not a full-year run-rate forecast; first-quarter working capital can be seasonally noisy. But it does show the mechanism analysts should track: EBITDA must convert into cash after inventory, receivables, capex, dividends and restructuring or portfolio charges.
Who owns Cummins stock and why does governance matter?
Cummins has a conventional public-company voting structure rather than founder control. The 2026 proxy statement says holders of common stock had one vote per share and that 138,257,420 shares were outstanding on the March 16, 2026 record date. That means governance influence is dispersed across institutional holders, directors, executives and ordinary shareholders rather than concentrated in a dual-class founder structure.
Major holders and insider ownership
| Holder or group | Shares or stake disclosed | Source period | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Vanguard Group | 17,754,995 shares / 12.9% | Proxy table based on Schedule 13G/A information | Large passive ownership means governance votes can matter on board and shareholder proposals. |
| BlackRock | 11,524,411 shares / 8.4% | Proxy table based on Schedule 13G/A information | Another major passive holder; influence is institutional rather than founder-driven. |
| Jennifer W. Rumsey | 119,419 shares / less than 1% | March 16, 2026 proxy record date | CEO and Chair ownership aligns economically but does not create voting control. |
| Directors and current executive officers as a group | 415,453 shares / less than 1% | 28 persons in the 2026 proxy | Management influence comes more from roles and incentive design than from voting power. |
Governance signals for researchers
The 2026 annual meeting agenda included election of eleven directors, advisory approval of executive compensation, auditor ratification, approval of a 2026 omnibus incentive plan and two shareholder proposals. The board recommended against proposals to separate the Chair and CEO roles and to require a charitable giving report. For an investor profile, those details matter because they show which governance topics shareholders are pressing: board leadership structure, incentive capacity and transparency around corporate spending.
What risks and opportunities could change the Cummins story?
Cummins’ biggest opportunities and risks come from the same feature: it is exposed to multiple powertrain and power-generation transitions at once. Demand for data-center backup power, international power generation and improving truck markets can lift growth and margins. At the same time, tariffs, trade restrictions, material costs, emissions standards, zero-emissions adoption timing, customer obligations, product coverage costs and cyclical truck demand can pressure earnings.
Opportunities to monitor
Risks tied to official filings
Cummins’ Q1 2026 filing discusses several risks that are more specific than a generic industrial warning. Trade disruptions can affect input costs and production. Export controls, embargoes and geopolitical events can interfere with supply chains or customer demand. Changes in greenhouse-gas and emissions rules can create compliance costs, credit-value changes or uncertainty for product planning. The pace of zero-emissions adoption also matters because slower demand has already led to restructuring and impairment-style charges in Accelera-related businesses.
| Risk or opportunity | Financial line to watch | Current evidence | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power-generation demand | Power Systems revenue and EBITDA margin | Q1 2026 Power Systems sales up 19%; EBITDA margin 29.5% | A high-margin growth driver if demand persists. |
| North America truck cycle | Engine and Components sales | Q1 2026 Engine sales down 4%; Components sales down 5% | Recovery would support volumes; further weakness would pressure margins. |
| Zero-emissions timing | Accelera EBITDA and restructuring charges | Q1 2026 Accelera EBITDA loss of $277M including $199M charges | Strategic option value comes with visible near-term earnings drag. |
| Emissions regulation | Compliance credits, R&D and product costs | Q1 2026 filing discussed $99M of emissions compliance credits subject to rule changes | Regulatory shifts can alter compliance economics and product planning. |
| Tariffs and trade | Cost of sales, pricing and supply-chain efficiency | Management cited tariffs and trade disruptions as ongoing challenges | The issue is margin pressure, not just revenue exposure. |
Which KPIs best explain Cummins’ performance?
For Cummins, the most useful KPIs are industrial and cash-flow indicators rather than consumer engagement metrics. Researchers should track segment sales, segment EBITDA margin, engine unit shipments, power-generation sales, operating cash flow, capex, inventory, debt-to-capital, R&D intensity and Accelera losses. These metrics connect directly to the company’s business model: volume, pricing, mix, working capital and reinvestment decide whether revenue growth becomes durable free cash flow.
| KPI | Q1 2026 or FY2025 anchor | How to interpret it |
|---|---|---|
| Segment EBITDA margin | Power Systems 29.5% in Q1 2026; Distribution 14.2% | Shows whether mix is improving or whether truck-cycle weakness is compressing margins. |
| Engine shipments | 144,300 total Engine units in Q1 2026, up 2% | Unit volume helps separate market demand from pricing and mix. |
| Power generation sales | Power Systems power generation $1.283B in Q1 2026, up 28% | A direct read on data-center and industrial backup-power demand. |
| Operating cash flow minus capex | About $120M in Q1 2026 | Useful for cash conversion, but should be evaluated over a full year because working capital moves quarterly. |
| Inventory turnover | 4.0 at March 31, 2026 | Important for a manufacturer with $6.126B of inventories. |
| Debt-to-capital | 36.5% at March 31, 2026 | A balance-sheet guardrail for dividends, buybacks, acquisitions and downturn resilience. |
How should a student read the KPIs?
A useful Cummins analysis separates demand, mix and cash conversion. Demand shows up in engine unit shipments, power generation sales and regional revenue. Mix shows up in segment margins, especially Power Systems versus Engine and Components. Cash conversion shows up in operating cash flow, inventory, receivables and capex. A simple revenue-growth chart can miss the story if growth comes from a low-margin segment, if working capital absorbs cash, or if Accelera losses offset legacy industrial profits.
Why does Cummins matter for valuation and research?
Cummins matters in valuation work because it combines mature industrial cash flows, service-channel resilience, power generation growth and international reach with truck-cycle exposure, working-capital needs, regulatory uncertainty and a zero-emissions platform that has produced losses. It is better analyzed through normalized earnings and segment mix than through a one-year revenue multiple.
A DCF model should treat FY2025 and Q1 2026 as evidence, not as a mechanical forecast. FY2025 revenue was $33.7 billion and EBITDA margin was 16.0%. Q1 2026 revenue was $8.398 billion and EBITDA margin was 15.4%, with charges that management excluded from updated guidance. The investor question is whether Power Systems growth and truck-market recovery can raise normalized margins faster than Accelera losses, regulatory costs and cycle pressure pull them down.
| Valuation driver | Cummins-specific variable | Why it changes intrinsic value |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 2026 guidance: revenue up 8% to 11% | Higher growth raises cash flows only if mix and working capital do not dilute conversion. |
| Normalized margin | FY2025 EBITDA margin 16.0%; Q1 2026 EBITDA margin 15.4% | Small margin changes have large value impact on a $30B-plus revenue base. |
| Power Systems mix | Q1 2026 segment EBITDA margin 29.5% | A higher share of this business can lift consolidated profitability. |
| Reinvestment | Q1 2026 capex $189M; R&D and engineering $358M | Industrial assets and technology development require cash before returns are certain. |
| Capital returns | $519M returned to shareholders in Q1 2026 | Dividends and buybacks affect per-share value but compete with reinvestment and debt priorities. |
What is the key takeaway from Cummins analysis?
Cummins is important because it is not a simple diesel-engine legacy story and not a clean energy pure play. It is a diversified industrial power company whose cash flows still depend on trucks, components, service and power generation, while its strategic future depends on managing emissions rules, zero-emissions technologies and customer adoption curves. The strongest part of the story today is the combination of Distribution resilience and Power Systems profitability. The most important constraint is that transition investments and regulatory uncertainty can absorb capital and complicate normalized margins.
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.