Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) Company Overview

US | Financial Services | Banks - Regional | NASDAQ

What does Chemung Financial Corporation do?

Chemung Financial Corporation is a Nasdaq-listed financial holding company headquartered in Elmira, New York. Its principal operating subsidiary, Chemung Canal Trust Company, provides community banking, commercial lending, consumer banking, mortgages, trust administration, and wealth management. A second subsidiary, CFS Group, distributes brokerage, mutual fund, annuity, insurance, and tax-related services. The official investor overview describes a 30-office franchise and identifies the bank as the oldest active independent bank in New York State, with roots dating to 1833.

Nasdaq: CHMGCommunity bankingTrust powersNew York and PennsylvaniaWealth management
$2.71B
Total assets, December 31, 2025
30
Retail offices reported in 2026
$2.34B
Wealth assets under management or administration, March 31, 2026
193 years
Operating history from 1833 through 2026

How is the franchise organized?

The company uses one legal bank but several market identities. The legacy Chemung Canal franchise covers the Southern Tier and Finger Lakes; Capital Bank serves the Albany region; and Canal Bank targets greater Buffalo. This structure lets management retain local relationship branding while centralizing credit, funding, technology, compliance, and capital. The current business profile is detailed in the 2025 Form 10-K.

Business area Primary customers Economic role Key sensitivity
Commercial banking Local and regional businesses, property owners, municipalities Largest loan balances and core spread income Credit quality, property values, interest rates
Retail banking Households and small businesses Deposits, mortgages, consumer loans, payments Deposit competition and consumer credit
Wealth management Individuals, families, trusts, institutions Recurring fee income and relationship depth Market levels and client retention
CFS Group Investment and insurance clients Brokerage and non-bank financial product revenue Transaction activity and partner economics

How does Chemung Financial make money?

The central earnings engine is net interest income: the difference between interest earned on loans, securities, and cash balances and interest paid on deposits and borrowings. In the second quarter of 2026, net interest income was $24.7 million, far larger than $6.5 million of non-interest income. That mix makes loan yields, deposit pricing, funding composition, and balance-sheet duration the most important economic variables.

Step 1
Gather deposits from consumers, businesses, municipalities, and reciprocal-deposit networks.
Step 2
Deploy funding into commercial, residential mortgage, and consumer loans plus securities.
Step 3
Earn a spread after deposit and borrowing costs; manage credit losses through underwriting and reserves.
Step 4
Add fee income from wealth, fiduciary, deposit-service, interchange, mortgage-sale, and brokerage activities.
Step 5
Retain capital, pay dividends, fund growth, and selectively repurchase shares.

Why are deposits the strategic input?

Deposits determine both the capacity to lend and the cost of funding. At June 30, 2026, non-interest-bearing deposits represented 28.8% of total deposits, up from 27.5% at year-end 2025. That improvement matters because checking balances with no explicit interest expense lower the blended cost of funds. Management also discontinued longer-term, higher-cost certificate promotions in the second half of 2025 and favored shorter-term products as market rates declined.

How important are fee businesses?

Fee income is smaller than spread income but strategically useful. Wealth management accounted for roughly half of first-quarter 2026 non-interest income, while interchange, deposit-service fees, brokerage revenue, and other items supplied additional diversification. Wealth revenue tends to follow assets under management and administration, so market appreciation can lift fees without requiring equivalent balance-sheet expansion. The company explains its fiduciary model and client safeguards on its official wealth-management information page.

Revenue stream Pricing logic Main driver Analytical implication
Net interest income Asset yield minus funding cost Loan mix, deposit beta, rates, volume Dominant earnings and valuation driver
Wealth management fees Asset-based and service fees Client assets and market performance Adds recurring, capital-light revenue
Deposit and interchange fees Account and transaction charges Customer activity and account mix Supports relationship profitability
Mortgage-sale gains Origination and secondary-market economics Mortgage volume and sale decisions More cyclical and transaction-dependent
CFS brokerage and insurance Commissions and distribution revenue Client activity and product penetration Broadens household financial relationships

Commercial real estate and relationship deposits define Chemung's banking model

Chemung's balance sheet is commercially oriented. At March 31, 2026, commercial loans were $1.787 billion out of $2.312 billion of total loans. The investor presentation separated total loans into 14.0% commercial and industrial, 7.7% owner-occupied commercial real estate, 55.6% non-owner-occupied commercial real estate, 12.4% residential mortgages, and 10.3% consumer loans. The resulting commercial real estate concentration is both an earnings advantage and the company's clearest structural risk.

Loan portfolio mix — March 31, 2026
$2.31B
loans
Non-owner-occupied CRE — 55.6%
Commercial and industrial — 14.0%
Residential mortgage — 12.4%
Consumer — 10.3%
Owner-occupied CRE — 7.7%
Commercial property exposure dominates the portfolio. Percentages are from the first-quarter 2026 investor presentation and sum to 100.0%.

Where is growth coming from?

Expansion has shifted toward Albany and Western New York. At March 31, 2026, loans by division were approximately $1.443 billion for Capital Bank, $599.4 million for the legacy Chemung market, and $269.7 million for Buffalo. In the second quarter, average commercial loans increased $248.3 million year over year, with growth relatively evenly distributed between Albany and Western New York and additional growth in the legacy franchise. This is the strategic trade-off: higher-growth metropolitan markets improve earning-asset momentum but also increase execution, competition, and credit-monitoring demands.

Capital Bank — 62.4% of loans, March 31, 2026
Legacy Chemung — 25.9%
Buffalo — 11.7%

What does the deposit mix say?

The deposit base combines legacy-market relationships, commercial operating accounts, municipal balances, and reciprocal products. At March 31, 2026, consumer deposits represented 46.9% of the customer mix, commercial deposits 30.5%, public funds 8.1%, and ICS/CDARS reciprocal balances 14.5%. The bank had no brokered deposits at March 31, 2026 or December 31, 2025, an important signal because it reduces reliance on rate-sensitive wholesale funding.

Deposit mix indicators — March 31, 2026
Consumer46.9%
Commercial30.5%
ICS / CDARS14.5%
Public funds8.1%
The mix is relationship-oriented, but municipal and reciprocal balances still require careful liquidity and collateral management.

What do Chemung Financial's second-quarter 2026 results show?

The second-quarter 2026 earnings release, filed July 22, 2026, shows the benefit of the 2025 balance-sheet repositioning. Net income was $8.8 million, or $1.82 per share, versus $9.2 million, or $1.91 per share, in Q1 2026 and a $6.5 million net loss in Q2 2025.

$8.8M
Net income, Q2 2026
$1.82
Diluted earnings per share, Q2 2026
3.67%
Fully taxable-equivalent net interest margin, Q2 2026
$24.7M
Net interest income, Q2 2026

What changed in the quarter?

Net interest income increased 4.7% sequentially and 18.8% year over year. Net interest margin rose to 3.67% from 3.60% in Q1 2026 and 3.05% in Q2 2025. Average earning-asset yield was 5.18%, interest-bearing liability cost was 2.27%, and total funding cost was 1.67%, showing that repricing and funding actions improved spread income.

Metric Q2 2026 Comparison Interpretation
Net income $8.8M $9.2M in Q1 2026; $(6.5)M in Q2 2025 Profitable after prior-year restructuring loss
Net interest income $24.7M +4.7% QoQ; +18.8% YoY Core spread engine strengthened
Net interest margin 3.67% 3.60% Q1 2026; 3.05% Q2 2025 Balance-sheet repositioning is visible in earnings
Non-interest income $6.5M $6.3M Q1 2026 Wealth and market-sensitive fees added support
Non-interest expense $19.3M $17.5M Q1 2026 Expense growth offset part of revenue improvement
Provision for credit losses $0.6M $1.1M Q2 2025 Modest provision despite stronger loan growth
Net charge-offs $0.2M $1.0M Q2 2025 Current-period realized losses remained contained

Is growth translating into better profitability?

Year-to-date annualized loan growth was 8.7%, including 13.0% commercial growth. Customer deposits grew 8.3% annualized, and the non-interest-bearing share reached 28.8%, indicating customer funding rather than brokered growth. Yet Q2 2026 non-interest expense rose 10.3% sequentially. Margin expansion was clear; operating leverage was less favorable.

Quarterly net income trend — Q3 2025 to Q2 2026
$7.8MQ3 2025
$7.7MQ4 2025
$9.2MQ1 2026
$8.8MQ2 2026
Profit remained near the record Q1 2026 level after the one-time 2025 securities-sale loss moved out of the comparison.

Which strategic turning points still shape Chemung today?

Chemung's history matters because the current model combines a very old local deposit franchise with more recent expansion and balance-sheet modernization. The official bank history emphasizes continuity and local management, while filings show that management has repeatedly used acquisitions, new market entry, capital actions, and branch consolidation to widen the opportunity set.

  1. 1833
    Chemung Canal Bank was established. The legacy still supports trust, local recognition, and stable relationships in the Southern Tier.
  2. 1902
    The bank combined with Elmira Trust Company, reinforcing full trust powers that remain central to the wealth-management proposition.
  3. 2011
    The acquisition of Fort Orange Financial expanded the franchise into the Albany market and created today's Capital Bank growth engine.
  4. 2020-2021
    The company entered Western New York under the Canal Bank brand and approved a 250,000-share repurchase authorization, signaling both geographic ambition and capital-return capacity.
  5. 2025
    Chemung sold more than $245 million of low-yielding available-for-sale securities, recognized an approximately $17.5 million pre-tax loss, issued $45 million of subordinated debt, paid down wholesale funding, and redirected capacity toward loans.
  6. 2026
    The bank applied to convert from a New York state trust-company charter to a national bank charter, subject to Office of the Comptroller of the Currency approval.

Why was the 2025 repositioning so important?

The securities sale deliberately traded a current loss for future earnings capacity. The sold portfolio had an average yield near 2%, while proceeds were used to reduce expensive wholesale liabilities and fund higher-yielding loans. Since June 30, 2025, the company reported a $79.3 million reduction in higher-cost wholesale funding and $179.3 million of loan growth by March 31, 2026. The first-quarter presentation filed with the SEC provides the clearest summary of that transaction and subsequent balance-sheet changes; see the first-quarter 2026 investor presentation.

Chemung's current investment story is less about a one-time securities loss and more about whether the replacement assets, deposit mix, and operating discipline can sustain the higher post-repositioning margin.

What could a national charter change?

A national charter would shift the bank's primary chartering authority to the OCC and could simplify a franchise spanning multiple New York markets and Pennsylvania, while changing supervisory and compliance processes. Approval and financial benefits are not assured, so the application remains a watch item rather than a completed advantage.

What gives Chemung a competitive advantage?

Chemung's advantage is not national scale. It is the combination of long-standing local relationships, meaningful market share in selected counties, a full-service trust platform, decentralized market branding, and centralized risk and capital management. In Chemung County, the company reported 64.56% deposit share as of June 30, 2025; in Schuyler County, the share was 73.96%. These positions can support lower-cost deposits and customer retention that newer entrants would have to purchase through high rates or marketing.

High relationship depth / Moderate market growth
Legacy Chemung and Finger Lakes markets: strong share, established funding, and slower demographic growth.
High relationship depth / High market growth
Strategic target position as Albany and Buffalo relationships mature.
Lower relationship depth / High market growth
Current expansion challenge in Western New York: attractive opportunity but greater competition and execution needs.
Lower relationship depth / Moderate market growth
Least attractive position because neither franchise loyalty nor market expansion offsets pricing pressure.
Analytical axes: customer-relationship depth and local-market growth. The highlighted quadrant represents the established legacy franchise.

Who competes with Chemung?

Competition comes from community banks, larger regional banks, credit unions, mortgage specialists, fintech providers, brokerage firms, and national wealth platforms. The 2026 proxy uses a 21-bank peer group ranging from $1.3 billion to $6.3 billion in assets. These peers are useful comparables because they face similar deposit, credit, capital, and regulatory economics even when local footprints differ.

Peer or competitor type Examples from official peer group Pressure on Chemung Chemung response
Upstate New York community banks Arrow Financial, Financial Institutions, Orange County Bancorp Commercial relationships, deposits, talent Local decision-making and multi-market brands
Regional community banks ACNB, Bar Harbor Bankshares, Mid Penn Bancorp Scale, technology budgets, product breadth Focused geography and relationship specialization
Large banks and digital banks National and super-regional institutions Deposit rates, convenience, digital experience Service quality, trust, and relationship bundles
Independent advisors and brokerages Local RIAs and national platforms Wealth assets and affluent clients Banking plus fiduciary and brokerage relationships

Is the moat durable?

The moat is strongest where Chemung has dense deposits, multigenerational relationships, and trusted fiduciary roles. It is weaker in Albany and Buffalo, where customers can compare many institutions. The core test is whether Chemung can reproduce its relationship model without relaxing underwriting or adding costs faster than revenue.

How strong are Chemung's capital, liquidity, and credit quality?

At December 31, 2025, Chemung reported $2.710 billion of assets, $2.270 billion of loans, $2.271 billion of deposits, and $254.7 million of shareholders' equity. At March 31, 2026, assets had increased to $2.749 billion, loans to $2.312 billion, deposits to $2.314 billion, and equity to $262.9 million. The March quarter figures are available in the first-quarter 2026 Form 10-Q.

$513.1Mremaining available liquidity from FHLB capacity, correspondent lines, brokered deposits, and unencumbered securities at March 31, 2026.

What does liquidity look like?

At March 31, 2026, cash and equivalents were $53.4 million and available-for-sale securities were $275.3 million. Management identified $513.1 million of remaining liquidity capacity across FHLB advances, correspondent lines, brokered deposits, and unencumbered securities. Uninsured deposits were $704.6 million, or 30.5% of deposits, including $187.5 million of public funds collateralized when required.

Indicator Period Value Assessment
Total shareholders' equity March 31, 2026 $262.9M Improved from $254.7M at year-end 2025
Allowance for credit losses / loans March 31, 2026 1.08% Reserve coverage should be judged against CRE concentration and criticized assets
Non-performing loans / loans March 31, 2026 0.33% Low headline ratio, though individual commercial credits can still matter
Non-performing assets / assets March 31, 2026 0.36% Included $1.9M of other real estate owned
Uninsured deposits / deposits March 31, 2026 30.5% Manageable only with robust liquidity and collateral practices
Subordinated debt March 31, 2026 $44.1M Supports regulatory capital but raises interest expense

How should credit quality be interpreted?

Low non-performing ratios are encouraging, but the portfolio's composition matters more than one headline number. Non-owner-occupied CRE alone was 55.6% of loans at March 31, 2026, and the broader commercial portfolio was heavily tied to real estate, rental, and leasing industries. In the first quarter, two commercial loans totaling $2.2 million entered non-performing status, while transfers of commercial real estate to other real estate owned changed the mix of problem assets. The second-quarter provision remained only $0.6 million despite $55.4 million of quarterly loan growth, so future reserve development deserves close attention.

Deposit funding qualityStrong
Liquidity coverageStrong
Current asset qualityStrong
Portfolio diversificationConcentrated
Earnings resilience after repositioningImproving

Who owns Chemung stock, and how is the company governed?

Chemung has one common share class and no founder-controlled dual-class structure. Nevertheless, ownership is unusually local and relationship-linked. The 2026 proxy statement reported 4,819,440 shares outstanding on April 6, 2026. Directors and executive officers as a group beneficially owned 611,654 shares, or 12.69%, creating meaningful economic alignment without absolute voting control.

Holder or group Shares Stake Source period Why it matters
Directors and executive officers as a group 611,654 12.69% April 6, 2026 Meaningful insider alignment and local influence
Chemung Canal Trust Company in fiduciary capacities 321,985 6.68% April 6, 2026 Shares are held for trusts and beneficiaries; voting depends on fiduciary arrangements
Dalrymple Family Limited Partnership 272,018 5.64% April 6, 2026 Concentrated local family ownership
RD Wood LLC 246,814 5.12% April 6, 2026 Additional Dalrymple-related beneficial ownership
Anders M. Tomson, President and CEO 65,056 1.35% April 6, 2026 Direct executive exposure to long-term value creation

What does the ownership structure imply?

The company is neither fully dispersed nor controlled by one shareholder. Local families, insiders, and fiduciary holdings create continuity and may favor patient strategy, conservative credit culture, and dividends. The same structure can reduce trading liquidity and make governance more relationship-driven than at a widely held national bank. Investors should also avoid treating the bank's fiduciary stake as management-owned stock because the voting and dispositive rights depend on trust arrangements.

Board structure
13 directors
The board was divided into three classes in the 2026 proxy, with four nominees standing for three-year terms.
Leadership continuity
CEO since 2016
Anders Tomson previously led Capital Bank, linking current management to the Albany expansion.
Board refreshment
7+ since 2016
More than half of the 13-member board had joined since 2016, according to the proxy.

The compensation committee considers net income, return on equity, efficiency, asset quality, peer performance, and long-term strategic objectives without using a rigid formula for every award. Researchers should compare those priorities with actual loan growth, margin, efficiency, criticized assets, capital ratios, and shareholder returns.

What opportunities and risks could change Chemung's outlook?

The central opportunity is to sustain the earnings lift from the 2025 repositioning while expanding Albany and Buffalo. The central risk is that rapid commercial and real-estate growth creates credit costs that outweigh the margin benefit. Rate sensitivity matters because 72% of commercial loans were variable or adjustable at March 31, 2026.

Net interest margin
Q2 2026 was 3.67%. Watch whether deposit costs fall faster than loan yields after rate changes.
Commercial loan growth
Annualized growth was 13.0% in the first half of 2026. Strong volume must be matched by underwriting discipline.
Non-owner-occupied CRE
55.6% of loans at March 31, 2026. Monitor criticized, classified, delinquent, and nonaccrual balances.
Customer deposit growth
Annualized growth was 8.3% in the first half of 2026. Composition matters more than headline volume.
Expense discipline
Q2 2026 non-interest expense rose 10.3% sequentially. Watch the adjusted efficiency ratio and headcount leverage.
Wealth assets and fees
AUM/AUA was $2.338B at March 31, 2026. Market levels and net client flows drive fee resilience.
National charter decision
Approval timing, conversion costs, and operating benefits remain uncertain until the OCC process is completed.
Capital allocation
Quarterly dividend was $0.34 in Q2 2026; 200,816 shares remained under repurchase authorization at March 31, 2026.

Which growth drivers are most credible?

Albany and Buffalo offer larger addressable markets, and consolidation among larger banks can open space for relationship lenders. Wealth management can deepen affluent relationships with less regulatory capital than lending. Repricing also supports near-term earnings sensitivity: 38% of total loans and 46% of commercial loans repriced or matured within 90 days at March 31, 2026.

What risks are most material?

Risk Evidence or exposure Financial line affected What to monitor
Commercial real estate concentration Non-owner-occupied CRE was 55.6% of loans at March 31, 2026 Provision, charge-offs, capital, loan growth Property cash flow, classifications, maturities, collateral values
Interest-rate and deposit competition Margin depends on loan repricing versus deposit beta Net interest income and margin Cost of deposits, time-deposit mix, non-interest-bearing share
Growth execution Albany and Buffalo are expanding faster than the legacy market Expenses, credit quality, efficiency Loan officer productivity, branch economics, new-market losses
Liquidity confidence Uninsured deposits were 30.5% at March 31, 2026 Funding cost and available liquidity Deposit concentration, collateral, FHLB usage, cash buffers
Cybersecurity and fraud Banking and payments require continuous controls and compliance investment Operating expense, losses, reputation Incidents, insurance, vendor controls, fraud-loss trends
Regulatory change Pending national charter conversion and extensive banking regulation Compliance costs, capital, business flexibility OCC approval, conversion expense, supervisory requirements

Why does Chemung's business model matter for valuation?

A bank DCF should focus on distributable equity cash flow rather than industrial-company free cash flow. Deposits and borrowings are operating inputs, loans are operating assets, and regulatory capital constrains distributions. For Chemung, valuation is therefore driven by sustainable net interest income, fee revenue, credit costs, operating efficiency, required capital, and the pace at which book value compounds after dividends and repurchases.

Earnings driver
3.67% NIM
Q2 2026 margin sets the current run-rate starting point, but rate sensitivity can move it quickly.
Growth driver
8.7%
Annualized year-to-date loan growth in the first half of 2026 expands income but consumes capital.
Risk driver
55.6%
Non-owner-occupied CRE share of loans at March 31, 2026 raises terminal credit sensitivity.
Capital return
$0.34
Quarterly dividend declared in Q2 2026; payout capacity depends on earnings and regulatory capital.

Which KPIs belong in a DCF or comparable-company model?

A useful forecast starts with earning assets and asset yield, subtracts funding costs, then adds fee income and deducts operating expense, credit provision, and tax. Net income must then be reconciled to required retained capital. Faster commercial growth is not automatically more valuable if it raises expected losses and capital needs.

  • Net interest margin: measures spread profitability relative to average earning assets.
  • Efficiency ratio: tests whether revenue growth outpaces operating expense; the adjusted ratio was 58.27% in Q1 2026.
  • Provision and net charge-offs: translate credit risk into current earnings.
  • Common equity and tangible book value growth: indicate retained-value creation after dividends and market-value changes.
  • Deposit mix and cost: determine funding durability and margin sensitivity.
  • Wealth AUM/AUA: supports fee-income forecasts without equivalent balance-sheet capital.

How should the 2025 loss be normalized?

Fiscal 2025 net income was $15.1 million, or $3.14 per share, but included a $13.2 million after-tax loss from securities sales. A valuation model should separate that nonrecurring charge from the ongoing economics while still recognizing the real capital cost already incurred. The appropriate question is whether post-transaction earnings justify the sacrificed book value. Q1 and Q2 2026 suggest a positive operating response, but a full-cycle judgment requires more quarters of margin, deposit, expense, and credit evidence.

What is the key takeaway from Chemung Financial analysis?

Chemung Financial is a relationship-oriented community bank whose value rests on a rare combination: dominant legacy-market deposits, a substantial trust and wealth platform, and faster-growing commercial franchises in Albany and Buffalo. The 2025 securities sale and subordinated-debt issuance temporarily depressed reported earnings and book value, but they also improved the funding profile and enabled higher-yielding loan growth. By the second quarter of 2026, net interest margin had reached 3.67%, net interest income had risen 18.8% year over year, and quarterly net income remained near the company's record first-quarter level.

The counterweight is concentration. Commercial real estate represents most of the loan portfolio, and new-market expansion increases the importance of disciplined underwriting, deposit retention, and expense control. Ownership and governance provide continuity: insiders held 12.69% as a group, local family entities each held more than 5%, and the bank itself held 6.68% in fiduciary capacities. That structure can support patient decision-making but also contributes to a relatively small and locally influenced public float.

Final synthesis
Chemung's story is a test of whether a 193-year-old local franchise can redeploy stable deposits into higher-growth markets without weakening credit culture. The evidence to monitor is concrete: net interest margin, commercial loan growth, non-interest-bearing deposit share, adjusted efficiency, CRE classifications and charge-offs, wealth assets, capital ratios, dividend coverage, and the OCC charter decision. Strong execution would make the 2025 restructuring look like a deliberate investment in future earnings; deterioration in CRE or funding quality would make the same strategy appear too aggressive.

DCF model

    5-Year Financial Model

    40+ Charts & Metrics

    DCF & Multiple Valuation

    Free Email Support



Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.

(CHMG) Chemung Financial Corporation Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$17 $9
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5