What does CBIZ do?
CBIZ, Inc. is a NYSE-listed professional-services company serving middle-market organizations. It combines accounting, tax, advisory, benefits, insurance, payroll, retirement, human-capital, and technology capabilities in a national platform delivered largely through local client relationships. Customers also include individuals, governments, and not-for-profits in the United States and parts of Canada. The CBIZ corporate website summarizes this positioning.
A national middle-market advisory platform
CBIZ is a portfolio of knowledge-intensive services, not one accounting firm or insurance broker. Financial Services covers accounting, tax, transaction and risk advisory, forensics, valuation, technology, and government health-care consulting. Benefits and Insurance Services covers employee benefits, payroll, human capital, property-and-casualty brokerage, retirement plans, actuarial work, and administration. The 2025 Form 10-K also describes National Practices, which moved into Financial Services for 2026 reporting.
| Identity factor | CBIZ position | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Listing | NYSE: CBZ; one publicly traded common-stock class | Investors receive ordinary economic and voting exposure without a dual-class founder-control structure. |
| Core customer | Middle-market businesses, plus individuals, governments, and not-for-profits | The addressable market is broad, fragmented, and relationship-driven. |
| Delivery model | National resources combined with local-market teams | Scale supports specialist depth while local offices preserve trust and referrals. |
| Economic model | Fees, commissions, administrative-service revenue, and project work | Recurring relationships coexist with cyclical transaction and consulting demand. |
Why the alternative practice structure matters
Licensed CPA firms must perform attest work. CBIZ therefore provides non-attest tax, advisory, consulting, and administrative services, while the separate CBIZ CPAs P.C. performs attest services. Administrative service agreements give CBIZ economic participation without ownership of the CPA firm. The structure expands the client proposition but imposes independence rules, conflict checks, variable-interest-entity accounting, and limits on services sold to audit clients. It directly shapes cross-selling, revenue recognition, and regulatory risk.
How does CBIZ make money, and which segment matters most?
CBIZ monetizes professional expertise through recurring compliance work, time-based and fixed fees, project work, and administrative service fees linked to attest practices. Advisory and technology demand varies with transactions, regulation, cybersecurity needs, and enterprise investment. Benefits and Insurance earns consulting and administration fees, brokerage commissions, retirement-plan revenue, and investment income on payroll funds; CBIZ does not assume underwriting risk.
The revenue engine is labor, relationships, and cross-service penetration
Personnel is the dominant cost: FY2025 segment personnel expense totaled about $1.85 billion. Utilization, billing rates, staff mix, retention, global delivery, and technology productivity therefore drive margins. Cross-selling can deepen each relationship—for example, adding cybersecurity, valuation, benefits, payroll, or retirement work to a tax client—but breadth creates value only when incentives, systems, branding, and account ownership support integrated delivery.
| Revenue stream | Pricing logic | Quality and sensitivity |
|---|---|---|
| Accounting and tax | Recurring compliance, advisory fees, time-and-materials, fixed engagements, ASA fees | Relationship-based and seasonal; talent availability and realization rates matter. |
| Financial advisory | Project fees for transactions, risk, forensics, valuation, and accounting advice | Higher-value work, but more exposed to deal cycles and discretionary budgets. |
| Benefits and insurance | Consulting fees, commissions, administration fees, and payroll-fund income | Often recurring, but producer retention and carrier arrangements influence results. |
| Technology and managed services | Projects, managed services, hardware, cloud, cybersecurity, and consulting | Benefits from digital demand but faces rapid skill and vendor-platform change. |
Financial Services dominates the mix
CBIZ's valuation is now chiefly tied to accounting, tax, advisory, and technology economics. Benefits and Insurance diversifies revenue and supports cross-selling, but the Marcum-expanded Financial Services platform drives most growth, margin upside, goodwill, leverage risk, and integration work.
What did the first quarter of 2026 show?
The latest available period as of July 22, 2026 is Q1 2026. Revenue rose 1.3% to $848.6 million from $838.0 million; same-unit growth was 1.0% and acquisitions added about $2.1 million. Financial Services grew 2.1% to $740.3 million, while Benefits and Insurance declined 4.2% to $108.2 million. See the official Q1 2026 earnings release.
Growth was positive, but margin quality was mixed
Gross margin was $226.0 million, or 26.6%, versus $228.1 million and 27.2% in Q1 2025. Operating income fell to $196.4 million and operating margin to 23.1% from 23.9%. Adjusted EBITDA rose 1.5% to $244.3 million and adjusted diluted EPS increased 7.3% to $2.50. GAAP EPS of $2.63 included a $58.0 million acquisition-related gain, so the 31.6% increase in net income overstates recurring operating improvement.
| Metric | Q1 2026 | Q1 2025 | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $848.6M | $838.0M | Low-single-digit growth; same-unit growth was 1.0%. |
| Gross margin | 26.6% | 27.2% | A 60-basis-point decline signals cost, mix, or utilization pressure. |
| Operating margin | 23.1% | 23.9% | Reported operating leverage was negative despite revenue growth. |
| Adjusted EBITDA margin | 28.8% | 28.7% | Adjusted profitability was broadly stable. |
| Diluted EPS | $2.63 | $1.91 | GAAP growth was amplified by the nonrecurring acquisition adjustment. |
| Adjusted diluted EPS | $2.50 | $2.33 | Share repurchases and adjusted earnings supported per-share growth. |
Seasonality makes first-quarter cash flow look weak
Q1 2026 operating cash flow was negative $25.5 million and capital spending was $3.0 million, producing negative $28.5 million of free cash flow versus negative $93.4 million a year earlier. Busy-season receivables reached $769.4 million; DSO was 99 days, compared with 96 days a year earlier and 71 days at December 31, 2025. The Q1 2026 Form 10-Q makes collection speed and working-capital release key follow-up metrics.
Which turning points created today's CBIZ?
CBIZ's history is an acquisition-and-integration story. Since 1996, it has acquired local and specialist firms, retained client-facing professionals, added national resources, and pursued cross-selling. The test is whether acquired revenue becomes an integrated platform with durable margins.
-
1996Company founded. The original strategic premise was breadth of services and acquisition-led expansion, which still defines the model.
-
1998Jerome Grisko joined CBIZ. His long tenure, including becoming CEO in 2016, provides continuity in the acquisition and integration playbook.
-
2016Grisko became chief executive. Strategy continued to emphasize targeted acquisitions, organic growth, and national coordination.
-
July 2024Marcum transaction announced. The proposed approximately $2.3 billion consideration made it the largest deal in CBIZ history.
-
November 2024Marcum transaction closed. CBIZ acquired the non-attest business while CBIZ CPAs acquired specified attest assets, sharply increasing scale and leverage.
-
FY2025First full integration year. Revenue reached $2.76 billion, integration costs were about $64.3 million, and the company began converting the larger platform into operating synergies.
-
Q1 2026Reporting was simplified to two segments. National Practices moved into Financial Services, reflecting a more unified management structure.
Marcum reset scale, leverage, and integration risk
Marcum is the decisive contemporary event. The transaction used roughly $1.1 billion of cash and about 14.4 million CBIZ shares, subject to adjustments; the official transaction proxy statement details the structure. At December 31, 2025, net goodwill and intangibles were about $2.87 billion, while Q1 2026 gross credit-facility debt was $1.55 billion. CBIZ targets more than $50 million of cumulative synergies, including another $12 million in 2026, but must manage systems, culture, retention, and execution risk.
What gives CBIZ a competitive advantage?
CBIZ has no patent, consumer network effect, or regulated monopoly. Its advantage is organizational: a national bundle of professional services delivered through trusted local relationships. It can reduce vendor coordination for middle-market clients while supplying specialists that smaller firms may not employ.
Local relationships plus national capabilities
Long relationships create switching friction because changing tax advisers, payroll systems, benefits brokers, or transaction advisers requires data transfer and trust rebuilding. The friction is not absolute: clients can move work, professionals can depart with relationships, and specialists can win individual services. Durability therefore depends on quality, retention, and demonstrable cross-service value.
Talent, data, and technology are the operating moat
More than 9,500 team members create specialist density, while technology and global delivery can improve utilization. Management targets global resources for 10% of 2026 tax and attest hours. Benefits depend on workflow redesign, quality control, data governance, cybersecurity, and adoption. The moat is the combination of client history, talent, delivery processes, and cross-service access—not one software tool.
Who are CBIZ's competitors, and where does it sit?
Competition varies by service line and geography. CBIZ sits between the global scale of the Big Four and the intimacy of regional firms. Accounting and advisory rivals include RSM, BDO, Grant Thornton, Forvis Mazars, and CLA. Marsh McLennan, Aon, Gallagher, and regional brokers overlap in benefits and insurance, while ADP, Paychex, and specialist platforms compete in payroll and human-capital administration.
The competitive set is broad and fragmented
| Competitive group | Typical advantage | CBIZ response | Pressure point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Big Four and global consultancies | Global reach, brand, complex-enterprise capability | Middle-market focus, local relationships, lower coordination burden | Large clients may prefer global networks and broader international coverage. |
| National accounting and advisory firms | Similar service depth and recruiting scale | Expanded Marcum platform, industry specialization, multi-service cross-sell | Direct rivalry for professionals, acquisitions, pricing, and clients. |
| Regional and local specialists | Deep community ties and niche expertise | Local delivery backed by national capabilities | Smaller firms may be more agile and partner-led. |
| Insurance and HCM platforms | Scale, carrier relationships, software, and distribution | Integrated benefits, payroll, retirement, tax, and advisory relationship | Digital platforms can commoditize administration and simplify switching. |
Differentiation comes from breadth rather than one protected product
Talent is the key supplier: experienced professionals command compensation and may take client relationships when they leave. Buyers have many alternatives, especially for narrow services. Entry is easy for a local practice but harder for a national platform with regulatory controls, specialist teams, technology, carrier relationships, and acquisition capacity. Automation raises substitution risk in routine tax, payroll, analytics, and compliance, pushing CBIZ toward judgment-intensive work while lowering standardized delivery costs.
How financially strong is CBIZ after the Marcum acquisition?
CBIZ is operationally asset-light but debt- and acquisition-accounting-heavy. It carries substantial goodwill, acquired client relationships, leases, and Marcum financing rather than factories or inventory. Free cash flow can be strong, but leverage, interest, amortization, integration costs, and impairment risk remain central.
Debt is manageable, but now central to the model
| Financial factor | Official figure | Period | Research interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.758B | FY2025 | Scale increased sharply; future analysis should separate acquired from organic growth. |
| Net income | $115.4M | FY2025 | Net margin was about 4.2%, reflecting interest, amortization, and integration effects. |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $446.9M | FY2025 | Useful for operating capacity, but must be reconciled to cash and recurring costs. |
| Goodwill and intangibles, net | $2.870B | December 31, 2025 | A large share of assets depends on client retention and expected acquisition benefits. |
| Intangible amortization | $74.9M | FY2025 | Non-cash, but economically connected to acquired client relationships. |
| Integration costs | $64.3M | FY2025 | Expected to decline, but recurring acquisitions can make “one-time” costs persistent. |
Capital allocation balances deleveraging and repurchases
Management prioritizes organic growth and working capital, then aims to reduce net leverage below 2.5 times. CBIZ repurchased 2.5 million shares for $168 million in FY2025 and about 2 million shares for roughly $63 million through April 2026. A new 5 million-share authorization expires March 31, 2027. Buybacks can improve per-share value, but they compete directly with debt reduction and acquisitions.
The FY2025 results release and Q1 update frame 2026 at $2.8-$2.9 billion of revenue, $465-$475 million of adjusted EBITDA, and $270-$290 million of free cash flow. Cash conversion is the central balance-sheet test.
Who owns CBIZ, and how is it governed?
CBIZ has one common-stock class, not founder-controlled dual classes. Its institutionally influenced investor base votes through ordinary common shares. The 2026 proxy identifies major holders from available Schedule 13G filings; these positions are a governance snapshot, not permanent control.
Institutional ownership supports one-share-one-vote governance
| Holder or governance group | Disclosed position | Source period | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Vanguard Group | 4,672,672 shares | 2026 proxy disclosure | Large passive ownership increases the importance of governance, capital discipline, and voting engagement. |
| Capital Research Global Investors | 3,931,975 shares | 2026 proxy disclosure | A sizable active institutional position can focus attention on integration and long-term earnings quality. |
| BlackRock | 3,542,696 shares | 2026 proxy disclosure | Another major index and institutional holder; no single holder is disclosed as a controlling owner. |
| Morgan Stanley | 2,929,047 shares | 2026 proxy disclosure | Adds to a dispersed ownership structure rather than concentrated strategic control. |
| Jerome P. Grisko, Jr. | CEO since 2016; director since 2015 | As of 2026 filings | Long tenure aligns current strategy with the historical acquisition model, but increases succession relevance. |
The 2026 proxy statement shows a classified board and compensation oversight. CEO Jerome Grisko provides continuity; Brad Lakhia is CFO, Michael Kouzelos leads Benefits and Insurance, and Peter Scavuzzo oversees technology priorities tied to integration, data, and workflow standardization.
Dispersed ownership means no founder can unilaterally protect strategy; management must prove that Marcum produces cash returns, not only scale. A classified board supports integration continuity but can reduce responsiveness. Shareholders therefore rely on board oversight of capital allocation and succession.
Growth opportunities, risks, and the KPIs that matter
CBIZ operates in a fragmented market where clients increasingly need integrated tax, accounting, benefits, cybersecurity, transaction, and technology advice. The same model creates measurable risks: talent or client losses, missed Marcum synergies, cash absorbed by receivables, and independence limits on cross-selling.
What should researchers monitor next?
| Risk or opportunity | Financial line affected | Evidence to monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Cross-selling across the larger platform | Organic revenue, realization, margin | Same-unit growth, multi-service wins, pipeline conversion, and segment growth. |
| Marcum integration execution | Integration costs, adjusted EBITDA, free cash flow | Synergy delivery, system milestones, facility consolidation, and staff retention. |
| Talent scarcity or producer departures | Personnel cost, revenue retention, utilization | Senior hiring, turnover, compensation pressure, and Benefits and Insurance trends. |
| Economic and deal-cycle softness | Project advisory revenue and margin | Transaction advisory demand, consulting pipelines, and discretionary client spending. |
| Receivable collection | Operating cash flow and liquidity | DSO, bad-debt expense, receivable aging, and first-half cash conversion. |
| Cybersecurity and AI governance | Reputation, remediation cost, client retention | Security incidents, vendor controls, data governance, and deployment quality. |
| Goodwill or client-list impairment | Non-cash charges and equity | Retention, reporting-unit performance, discount rates, and acquisition forecast revisions. |
CBIZ scheduled Q2 and first-half 2026 results for July 29, 2026, according to its investor-relations overview. Key tests are whether organic growth improved from 1.0%, Benefits and Insurance stabilized, DSO normalized, and the $270-$290 million free-cash-flow outlook remained intact.
What is the key takeaway for valuation and research?
CBIZ has assembled a scaled middle-market professional-services platform without relying on one product. Recurring relationships, talent, utilization, pricing, cross-selling, integration, and working capital drive its economics. Marcum broadened the platform while making debt, goodwill, interest, and execution central.
A DCF should focus on sustainable organic growth, post-integration margins, receivable collection, acquisition reinvestment, and debt reduction—not FY2025's acquisition-driven growth. Analysts should separate GAAP earnings from acquisition gains, amortization, stock compensation, and integration adjustments, then test whether the 2026 free-cash-flow target is a durable base or a temporary working-capital release.
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.