What does Bogota Financial Corp. do?
Bogota Financial Corp. is the Nasdaq-listed mid-tier holding company for Bogota Savings Bank, a New Jersey-chartered community savings bank founded in 1893. Almost all operating activity sits inside the bank. BSBK trades publicly, while Bogota Financial, MHC, retains majority voting control. The company’s investor-relations page centralizes its public reports and stockholder materials.
Where does the bank operate, and whom does it serve?
The bank operates seven offices in Bogota, Hasbrouck Heights, Newark, Oak Ridge, Parsippany, Teaneck, and Upper Saddle River, plus a loan-production office in Spring Lake. Its deposit base includes households, local businesses, and municipalities. Its lending footprint is concentrated in Bergen, Essex, Morris, Monmouth, and Ocean Counties, so the economic health and property values of northern and central New Jersey matter more than national growth statistics alone.
| Element | Company-specific fact | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Listing | Nasdaq Capital Market, ticker BSBK | Public investors own a minority economic stake in a controlled-company structure. |
| Core institution | Bogota Savings Bank, founded in 1893 | The franchise is built around local deposits, real-estate lending, and community relationships. |
| Primary assets | Residential mortgages, commercial real estate, multifamily loans, and securities | Earnings depend on interest spreads, credit performance, and the shape of the yield curve. |
| Regulation | Federal Reserve, FDIC, and New Jersey banking supervision | Capital, liquidity, acquisitions, dividends, and repurchases operate within bank-regulatory constraints. |
Why is this a specialized banking story?
Bogota Financial is not a diversified national bank. At year-end 2025, about 99.5% of loans were real-estate secured and residential mortgages were 68.3% of the portfolio. Analysis therefore centers on deposit costs, property credit, funding duration, local competition, and regulatory capital. The company’s 2025 Form 10-K is therefore more useful than a generic revenue-growth screen because it explains portfolio composition and interest-rate sensitivity.
How does Bogota Financial make money?
The bank earns most revenue from net interest income: interest on loans, securities, and cash minus interest paid on deposits and Federal Home Loan Bank advances. Fee income is small. The operating task is to gather affordable funding, deploy it into yielding assets, control credit losses, and contain overhead.
Which loan categories drive the economics?
Residential mortgages remain the largest category and provide long-duration interest income, but they can reprice slowly when market rates change. Commercial and multifamily loans are smaller but generally offer higher yields, shorter repricing periods, and more complex credit underwriting. Management has stated that it wants to preserve residential lending while increasing commercial and multifamily exposure to improve portfolio yield and diversification.
What determines profitability in this model?
Three variables dominate: the speed at which asset yields and funding costs reset, credit costs from concentrated exposures, and operating efficiency. In 2025, net interest income was $15.5 million while non-interest expense was $15.3 million, leaving a thin cushion before provisions and non-interest income.
What does the latest reported quarter show?
The latest official period is the quarter ended March 31, 2026. Net interest income rose despite lower average loans and assets because deposit and borrowing expense declined faster than loan interest income. The company’s first-quarter 2026 Form 10-Q provides the detailed balance-sheet and income-statement figures, while the accompanying earnings Form 8-K documents the release date.
Why did stronger spread income not produce stronger net income?
Net interest income rose $833,000 to $4.43 million as total interest expense fell 17.3% to $6.06 million. Yet non-interest income dropped 63.9% to $321,000 because Q1 2025 included a life-insurance death benefit, and tax expense rose to $212,000 from a $28,000 benefit. Better core spread income was therefore offset by normalization elsewhere.
| Metric | Q1 2026 | Q1 2025 | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total interest income | $10.49M | $10.92M | Lower average loan balances outweighed higher yields on loans and securities. |
| Total interest expense | $6.06M | $7.33M | Lower certificate rates and lower average wholesale borrowing balances improved the spread. |
| Net interest income | $4.43M | $3.59M | Core banking revenue strengthened despite balance-sheet contraction. |
| Provision for credit losses | $50K | $(80K) recovery | Higher delinquent commercial balances moved the line from recovery to expense. |
| Non-interest income | $321K | $889K | The comparison was distorted by a prior-year life-insurance benefit. |
| Non-interest expense | $3.78M | $3.86M | Lower staffing, processing, advertising, and director costs offset higher legal and occupancy costs. |
| Net income | $706K | $731K | Core earnings improved, but nonrecurring income and taxes explain the slight decline. |
How did the balance sheet change during Q1 2026?
Assets fell 3.1% from year-end to $877.2 million. Net loans were $639.4 million, securities $144.9 million, and cash $27.9 million. Deposits declined $51.6 million to $600.9 million, mainly from certificates, while FHLB advances rose $22.6 million to $115.9 million. Operating cash flow was $703,000.
How has Bogota Financial’s strategic history shaped the bank today?
The relevant history is a sequence of structural decisions affecting control, funding, asset mix, and scale. Bogota evolved from a local thrift into a publicly traded, majority-controlled bank now pursuing branch expansion and an in-market merger.
-
1893Bogota Savings Bank was founded. Its long local operating history remains the basis for deposit relationships and the community-bank positioning.
-
2019Bogota Financial Corp. was formed. The holding-company structure separated the listed corporation from the operating bank.
-
2020The stock offering raised $56.6 million. Public investors bought 5,657,735 shares at $10 each, while the mutual holding company retained majority control.
-
2024A balance-sheet restructuring repositioned securities and property. The resulting higher securities yield supported the 2025 margin recovery, although 2024 reported a net loss.
-
2025The company returned to profit. Net income reached $2.1 million, FHLB borrowings fell sharply, and equity increased to $140.9 million.
-
2026Expansion accelerated. Management planned a Point Pleasant branch and signed an agreement to merge GSL Savings Bank into Bogota Savings Bank.
Why does the GSL transaction matter?
The proposed GSL merger is the largest current strategic event. The official merger announcement says assets would rise from about $877.2 million to approximately $1.0 billion and add GSL’s Guttenberg and Fairview locations. Bogota Financial would issue shares to the MHC equal to GSL’s appraised value. Closing is targeted for the second half of 2026, subject to approvals. The test is whether scale produces stable deposits and efficiencies without integration or credit problems.
What gives Bogota Financial a competitive position?
Bogota’s advantage is local knowledge, personalized service, flexible underwriting, long relationships, and capital for adjacent-market growth. These strengths can support relationship lending, but they do not remove price competition. The bank held only 0.82% of Bergen County insured deposits at June 30, 2025 and far smaller shares in Essex and Morris Counties.
Who are the main competitors?
The 2025 filing names Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citi, TD Bank, M&T Bank, and PNC, alongside community banks, credit unions, mortgage brokers, fintech firms, and money-market alternatives. Larger rivals offer broader products and aggressive pricing; Bogota competes through service speed, local decisions, and relationship continuity.
| Competitive group | Their advantage | Bogota’s response | Constraint |
|---|---|---|---|
| Money-center banks | Brand, digital platforms, product breadth, and low unit costs | Personalized service and faster local decisions | Bogota cannot match national scale or marketing budgets. |
| Regional banks | Dense branch networks and larger lending limits | Community focus and targeted real-estate expertise | Regional banks can compete directly on both price and relationships. |
| Community banks and credit unions | Similar service model and local familiarity | Long history, existing franchise, and acquisition capital | Differentiation is subtle, so deposit pricing remains important. |
| Fintech and market alternatives | Convenience, rate transparency, and non-branch distribution | Trust, insured deposits, and relationship bundling | Technology lowers geographic barriers and raises service expectations. |
Is the competitive advantage durable?
The advantage is durable only if relationships produce stable core deposits and sound credit. Core deposits were just 24.3% of total deposits at December 31, 2025, so the franchise has not yet achieved a strongly low-cost funding mix.
How strong are capital, liquidity, and credit quality?
Capital is the clearest strength. Liquidity is adequate but certificate runoff increased wholesale borrowing in Q1 2026. Credit quality is mixed: there were no charge-offs, yet one construction loan is unusually large relative to earnings.
What does the funding mix reveal?
At March 31, 2026, deposits were $600.9 million and FHLB advances were $115.9 million, or 83.8% and 16.2% of these principal funding sources. FHLB capacity totaled $236.4 million, leaving about $120.5 million undrawn. This is a useful backstop, but greater wholesale reliance can compress margins.
How should researchers interpret credit risk?
At March 31, 2026, delinquent loans were $28.1 million, or 4.4% of loans, and nonperforming assets were $13.4 million, or 1.5% of assets. The $2.58 million allowance equaled 0.40% of loans and 19.69% of nonperforming loans. The main issue was a $10.9 million catering-hall construction loan, 99% complete at a 45% loan-to-value ratio. Foreclosure had begun, with no specific reserve or charge-off recorded.
Who controls BSBK stock, and why does governance matter?
Bogota Financial is a controlled company. According to the 2026 proxy statement, Bogota Financial, MHC owned 8,504,556 shares, or 65.83%, at March 20, 2026. Public holders owned 4,414,810 shares. The MHC therefore determines stockholder votes.
| Holder or group | Shares / stake | Source period | Governance implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bogota Financial, MHC | 8,504,556 shares; 65.83% | March 20, 2026 | Controls stockholder outcomes and preserves the mutual-holding-company structure. |
| Public stockholders | 4,414,810 shares; 34.17% | March 20, 2026 | Receive economic exposure but cannot outvote the MHC. |
| Directors and executive officers | 475,069 shares; 3.68% | March 20, 2026 | Creates financial alignment, although control remains with the MHC. |
| John Masterson | 210,483 shares; 1.63% | March 20, 2026 | The independent chairman has the largest disclosed individual director stake. |
| Kevin Pace | 119,166 shares; under 1% | March 20, 2026 | The CEO has meaningful economic exposure but no control independent of the MHC. |
How is oversight structured?
The five-member board separates the CEO and chair roles: Kevin Pace is chief executive and John Masterson is independent chairman. All directors except the CEO were considered independent, all standing committee members were independent, and directors serve in three staggered classes. Public investors still cannot overcome the MHC’s voting majority.
What opportunities could change Bogota Financial’s earnings power?
Bogota can improve earnings by lowering deposit costs, rebuilding loans at better yields, converting branch and merger investments into relationship deposits, and spreading fixed costs over more assets. Excess regulatory capital provides flexibility beyond current profitability.
Which strategic levers deserve the most attention?
- Deposit mix: moving customers from maturing certificates into NOW, savings, money-market, and noninterest accounts would lower funding sensitivity.
- Loan remix: selective commercial and multifamily growth can raise asset yield, but underwriting discipline must remain stronger than the temptation to chase volume.
- Branch productivity: the planned Point Pleasant location must attract enough deposits and loans to absorb its start-up costs.
- Merger execution: GSL creates the clearest path to scale, but only if systems, personnel, customers, and cost savings integrate as expected.
- Securities reinvestment: maturing lower-yield assets can improve earnings if reinvested prudently without excessive duration or credit risk.
What risks and valuation drivers matter most?
A valuation model should focus on earning assets, net interest margin, credit provisions, non-interest expense, taxes, and regulatory capital. Excess capital matters only if it can fund profitable growth, acquisitions, or repurchases. Dividend or excess-capital models and price-to-tangible-book comparisons are more informative than a standard industrial free-cash-flow framework.
| Driver or risk | Current evidence | Financial line affected | What to monitor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest-rate mismatch | NPV modeling shows value declines under rising-rate shocks. | Net interest income, OCI, equity, and asset value | Deposit beta, loan repricing, hedge notional, and securities duration |
| Deposit concentration and runoff | Certificates were 71.3% of Q1 2026 deposits; brokered deposits were 14.9%. | Funding cost, liquidity, and FHLB dependence | Renewal rates, uninsured deposits, and growth in core accounts |
| Problem construction loan | $10.9M nonperforming exposure in foreclosure | Provision expense, charge-offs, legal cost, and capital | Collateral value, sale timing, reserve decisions, and recovery proceeds |
| Real-estate concentration | About 99.5% of year-end 2025 loans were real-estate secured. | Credit losses and loan growth | Local property values, unemployment, debt-service coverage, and delinquencies |
| Merger integration | GSL deal targets second-half 2026 closing and about $1.0B combined assets. | Expenses, deposits, EPS, tangible book value, and capital | Approvals, customer retention, cost saves, systems conversion, and new shares |
| Competitive pressure | Small county deposit shares and larger national/regional rivals | Loan pricing, deposit costs, growth, and efficiency | Market share, digital capabilities, branch productivity, and employee retention |
How should a bank valuation treat annual performance?
The 2025 rebound is not yet a mature baseline. Net income improved to $2.09 million from a $2.17 million loss, and net interest income rose to $15.47 million from $10.55 million, while assets fell 6.9% and net loans 9.0%. The recovery was rate-driven, not growth-driven, and unusual life-insurance income should not be treated as recurring.
| Annual metric | FY2025 | FY2024 | Valuation relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | $904.9M | $971.5M | The balance sheet contracted, so earnings improvement did not come from scale. |
| Net loans | $647.6M | $711.7M | Runoff reduces earning assets unless originations recover. |
| Net interest income | $15.47M | $10.55M | A 46.6% increase shows the power of spread recovery. |
| Net interest margin | 1.80% | 1.16% | Future earnings are highly sensitive to margin durability. |
| Non-interest expense | $15.30M | $14.59M | Scale benefits must eventually outpace compliance, occupancy, and professional costs. |
| Net income | $2.09M | $(2.17M) | Profitability returned, but absolute returns remain modest relative to $140.9M of equity. |
Which assumptions are most sensitive?
What should students and investors take away from Bogota Financial?
Bogota Financial is a small, controlled, real-estate-focused community bank at an inflection point. Its 2025 recovery, Q1 2026 margin expansion, and 16.39% leverage ratio demonstrate earnings recovery and capital strength. Offsetting factors are certificate-heavy funding, shrinking loans and deposits, modest market share, and a large nonperforming construction loan.
The GSL merger could lift assets to approximately $1.0 billion, add two branches, and improve efficiency and deposit reach. It also creates approval, integration, dilution, and credit-review risk. Shares issued for GSL are expected to go to the MHC, reinforcing majority control.
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.