Blackbaud, Inc. (BLKB) Company Overview

US | Technology | Software - Application | NASDAQ

What does Blackbaud do?

Blackbaud, Inc. is a Nasdaq-listed vertical software company focused on the social-impact economy. Its products help nonprofits raise and account for donations, schools manage tuition and constituent relationships, foundations administer grants, companies run employee-giving and volunteering programs, and individuals create fundraising campaigns. The company describes its portfolio as AI-powered software for fundraising, stewardship, online engagement, integrated payments, nonprofit finance, education management, grantmaking, workplace giving and peer-to-peer fundraising on its official company overview.

1981
Year founded; the company has spent decades specializing in social-impact workflows.
100+
Countries reached by Blackbaud users, according to investor relations.
~2,800
Employees worldwide at December 31, 2025.
1 segment
One operating and reportable segment in the FY2025 Form 10-K.

Which customers and workflows matter most?

The portfolio is broader than a single fundraising application. Raiser’s Edge NXT anchors donor relationship management; Financial Edge NXT supports fund accounting; Blackbaud CRM serves large and complex institutions; Tuition Management supports school billing; JustGiving enables peer-to-peer fundraising; Integrated Payments processes transactions inside customer workflows; and YourCause products support corporate giving, volunteering and grantmaking. This combination creates a shared data and payments layer across fundraising, finance, education and corporate-impact teams.

Customer group Core need Representative Blackbaud capability Economic relevance
Nonprofits and cultural institutions Fundraising, donor records, events and accounting Raiser’s Edge NXT, Financial Edge NXT, Altru and CRM Multi-year subscriptions plus payment volume
K–12 and higher education Advancement, tuition, billing and alumni engagement Education management and Tuition Management Contractual software and transaction fees
Companies and foundations Employee giving, volunteering and grants YourCause CSRconnect and GrantsConnect Enterprise subscriptions and program expansion
Individual fundraisers Campaign creation and digital giving JustGiving Volume-sensitive transaction revenue

How does Blackbaud make money?

Blackbaud monetizes customers through two recurring engines. Contractual recurring revenue comes mainly from cloud subscriptions and related services. Transactional recurring revenue comes from payment processing, online giving, tuition payments and other activity-based services. One-time consulting and implementation work is economically useful because it helps customers deploy complex systems, but it is small and less valuable for valuation because it is not recurring.

Step 1
Win a mission-critical workflow
Fundraising, accounting, tuition, grants or corporate-impact software becomes embedded in operations.
Step 2
Collect subscription revenue
Contracts are typically multi-year, commonly billed annually in advance.
Step 3
Attach payments and services
Giving, tuition and payment volumes add transaction-sensitive recurring revenue.
Step 4
Expand the customer relationship
Cross-selling finance, analytics, AI and adjacent applications can raise wallet share.

Which revenue stream is largest?

Revenue by type — quarter ended March 31, 2026
Contractual recurring$182.3M
Transactional recurring$94.2M
One-time and other$4.7M
Contractual subscriptions provide the base; transactions supply a second growth vector. Bar lengths are scaled to the largest category, not to total revenue.
98.3%
Recurring revenue share in Q1 2026. The combination of contractual and transactional recurring revenue totaled $276.5M of $281.1M.

The Q1 2026 Form 10-Q shows why revenue quality matters. Contractual recurring revenue increased through pricing and cloud demand, while transactional recurring revenue benefited from pricing and higher Integrated Payments volume. The main analytical distinction is predictability: subscriptions are contracted, while transaction revenue varies with giving events, campaigns, tuition payments and payment volume.

~92%Gross dollar retention for the twelve months ended March 31, 2026. Retention supports visibility, but it also implies that gross churn remains meaningful enough to monitor.

What did Blackbaud’s latest quarter show?

The latest available reporting package is the quarter ended March 31, 2026. Blackbaud’s Q1 2026 earnings release showed moderate top-line growth combined with a much larger improvement in GAAP profitability and cash generation. Revenue grew 4.2%, while operating income rose faster because acquisition, disposition and security-incident costs were lower and the operating model produced leverage.

$281.1M
Revenue, Q1 2026; up 4.2% year over year.
18.3%
GAAP operating margin, Q1 2026.
$31.1M
GAAP net income, Q1 2026.
$37.0M
Non-GAAP free cash flow, Q1 2026.

How did growth convert into profit?

Metric Q1 2026 Q1 2025 Interpretation
Revenue $281.1M $269.9M Positive organic growth from pricing, cloud demand and payments.
Gross profit $166.6M $156.2M Implied gross margin was about 59.2% in Q1 2026.
Operating income $51.4M $19.7M Operating leverage and lower special costs drove the step-up.
Diluted EPS $0.67 $0.09 Higher earnings were also spread across a lower share base.
Operating cash flow $51.5M $1.4M A sharp improvement, though first-quarter working-capital seasonality matters.

Where did the revenue come from?

Q1
United States — $233.1M — 82.9%
United Kingdom — $29.6M — 10.5%
Other countries — $18.5M — 6.6%

The geographic mix remains U.S.-centric, so domestic nonprofit budgets, education spending and charitable activity dominate the revenue base. Currency translation increased Q1 2026 revenue by $2.2M, which means reported growth was modestly helped by foreign exchange. Management reaffirmed 2026 revenue guidance of $1.173B to $1.179B and free-cash-flow guidance of $280M to $290M; those ranges are useful operating benchmarks, not guarantees. The company’s Q1 2026 investor presentation adds management’s framing around AI, margins and capital returns.

Which turning points built today’s Blackbaud?

Blackbaud’s strategic history is a shift from specialized nonprofit software toward a broader cloud, payments and social-impact platform. The most relevant events are those that changed customer scope, revenue mix, geographic reach or capital intensity.

  1. 1981
    Blackbaud was founded around nonprofit technology. That specialization created the domain knowledge still embedded in fundraising and fund-accounting workflows.
  2. 2012
    The Convio acquisition expanded online engagement, fundraising and cloud capabilities, increasing product breadth and integration complexity.
  3. 2017
    Blackbaud completed the JustGiving acquisition, adding consumer-facing peer-to-peer fundraising and greater U.K. exposure.
  4. 2019
    The company acquired YourCause for approximately $157M, extending the model into corporate social responsibility and employee engagement.
  5. 2021
    EVERFI was acquired to broaden corporate-impact and digital-education exposure. It also increased debt, integration demands and portfolio complexity.
  6. 2024
    Blackbaud sold EVERFI for a nominal amount at year-end after recognizing a major disposition-related charge. The exit refocused resources on core social-impact software and improved comparability for 2025 organic growth.
  7. 2026
    Blackbaud launched the first generally available agentic AI solution within its Agents for Good strategy, moving AI from embedded assistance toward workflow automation.

What did the EVERFI exit change?

The EVERFI sale announcement illustrates both strategic discipline and acquisition risk. FY2025 reported revenue declined because EVERFI was no longer included, yet organic revenue grew. That distinction matters: the underlying retained portfolio improved even though headline revenue fell. At the same time, selling a recently acquired business for nominal consideration shows why acquisition history must be evaluated alongside current margins.

Blackbaud’s current story is not simply “more products.” It is a narrower core portfolio, deeper workflow integration, more payments, and a deliberate attempt to convert domain data into AI-enabled productivity.

Why is Blackbaud difficult to displace?

Blackbaud’s advantage is primarily workflow depth and switching cost, not patent protection. The FY2025 filing reports only one active technology patent and one pending application. The more important assets are customer data structures, integrations, staff training, fundraising histories, accounting configurations, payment connections and the company’s reputation inside specialized markets.

Vertical workflow depth
Fundraising, restricted-fund accounting, tuition and grantmaking require specialized fields, controls and reporting that generic tools may not provide out of the box.
Embedded data and integrations
Years of donor, student and constituent records create migration risk. SKY APIs and connected products increase ecosystem value.
Payments attachment
Integrated transaction processing turns software adoption into recurring volume economics and reduces workflow fragmentation.
Sector trust and scale
Blackbaud has a long operating history and a broad installed base in organizations where data stewardship and continuity matter.

Who competes with Blackbaud?

Competitive group Examples named in filings Pressure point Blackbaud response
General enterprise platforms Microsoft, Oracle and Salesforce Scale, partner ecosystems and broad CRM or finance functionality Purpose-built social-impact workflows and integrated suite
Fundraising platforms GoFundMe and Facebook fundraising tools Consumer reach, simplicity and digital campaign distribution Institutional records, stewardship, accounting and end-to-end engagement
Vertical point solutions Specialist fundraising, education and grants vendors Lower complexity and sharper single-feature focus Cross-product integration, data continuity and payments
Traditional service providers Fundraising and consulting firms Human expertise and outsourced execution Software scale, analytics and repeatable automation

How durable is the moat?

Switching costsStrong
Vertical specializationStrong
Patent protectionLimited
Customer concentrationFavorable

The largest customer represented less than 1% of FY2025 revenue, which reduces single-account dependence. However, a 92% gross dollar retention rate is not perfect lock-in. Blackbaud must keep improving usability, service and innovation because cloud competitors can target dissatisfied customers without replicating the entire suite.

How strong are margins, cash flow, and the balance sheet?

FY2025 provides the cleanest full-year baseline after the EVERFI disposition. Blackbaud generated $1.128B of revenue, $663.3M of gross profit and $115.0M of net income. Reported revenue declined because the disposed business was absent, but the retained portfolio produced organic growth and much stronger GAAP profitability than the prior year, which included a large disposition charge. The audited figures are available in the FY2025 Form 10-K.

FY2025 annual baseline
16.9% operating margin
GAAP operating income divided by FY2025 revenue.
Q1 2026 current signal
18.3% operating margin
A higher quarterly margin, supported by operating leverage and fewer special costs.

How does cash convert after reinvestment?

$51.5M
GAAP operating cash flow, Q1 2026
−$1.7M
Property and equipment purchases, Q1 2026
−$12.8M
Capitalized software development, Q1 2026
$37.0M
Non-GAAP free cash flow, Q1 2026

Capitalized software development is economically important. It lowers current operating expense relative to expensing all development immediately, but it is still a real cash outflow and should be deducted when estimating free cash flow. For a DCF, the practical formula is operating cash flow minus property-and-equipment purchases minus capitalized software development, adjusted consistently for any nonrecurring items.

What limits financial flexibility?

Financial item Latest disclosed value Period Research implication
Cash and equivalents $34.1M March 31, 2026 Modest unrestricted cash relative to debt.
Debt carrying amount $1.186B March 31, 2026 Leverage raises interest and capital-allocation sensitivity.
Net leverage ratio 2.67× March 31, 2026 Manageable under current cash generation, but not trivial.
Restricted cash $418.7M March 31, 2026 Mostly customer funds and unavailable for operations.
Interest expense outlook $62M–$66M FY2026 guidance A material claim on operating profit and free cash flow.

Who owns Blackbaud and how is it governed?

Blackbaud has one common share class with one vote per share, so economic ownership and voting influence are broadly aligned. The 2026 proxy reported 46.15M shares outstanding as of April 13, 2026. Clearlake Capital was the largest disclosed holder and therefore an important governance factor even without formal control. The detailed ownership and board disclosures are in Blackbaud’s 2026 proxy statement.

Holder or group Disclosed ownership Source reference date Why it matters
Clearlake Capital Group 21.13% April 14, 2024 position cited in 2026 proxy A large strategic holder can influence capital allocation and transaction expectations.
BlackRock 12.02% December 31, 2023 position cited in 2026 proxy Represents substantial passive and institutional influence.
Morgan Stanley 9.78% March 31, 2025 position cited in 2026 proxy Adds another concentrated institutional voting block.
Directors and executives as a group 2.01% April 13, 2026 Management has economic exposure but does not control the vote.

What does the board structure signal?

7
Directors in the 2026 proxy board composition.
85.7%
Board independence; the CEO is the sole management director.
100%
Independent membership across board committees.

Michael Gianoni has served as chief executive since 2014 and also holds the titles of president and vice chairman. An independent chair and fully independent committees provide formal checks, while compensation metrics tied to recurring revenue and operating income align management with growth and profitability. Researchers should still distinguish governance independence from capital-allocation outcomes: board structure can be sound even when leverage, acquisitions or buybacks deserve scrutiny.

How aggressive is capital return?

$82.1MSpent on 1.60M shares in Q1 2026. Including net share settlement, the reduction represented about 4.5% of year-end 2025 shares.

Blackbaud repurchased $214.0M of shares in FY2025 and increased borrowings again in Q1 2026 partly to fund repurchases and employee tax obligations. No cash dividend has been paid since the first quarter of 2020. This makes per-share value increasingly dependent on repurchase price discipline and sustained free-cash-flow growth.

AI, payments, and operating leverage define the growth opportunity

Blackbaud’s growth case is not based on rapid customer-count expansion alone. It depends on increasing revenue per relationship through pricing, longer contracts, payments, cross-sell and AI-enabled workflow value. More than one-fifth of renewing customers selected contracts of at least four years in early 2026, and management reported growing requests for five-year terms. Longer commitments can improve visibility, although they also raise the importance of product quality and implementation success.

Agents for GoodIntegrated PaymentsRaiser’s Edge NXTSKY ecosystemLonger contractsCross-sell

Can AI become a monetized product advantage?

Blackbaud has embedded machine learning and generative features into fundraising and finance workflows, and more than half of Raiser’s Edge NXT customers use machine-learning prospect identification. The strategic opportunity is to make AI useful inside trusted data and permissions rather than sell a generic assistant. The risk is that customers may expect AI improvements as part of existing subscriptions, limiting incremental pricing.

AI adoption
Track usage of agentic workflows and whether they improve retention, upsell or pricing.
Transactional recurring growth
Payments volume converts customer activity into recurring revenue beyond subscriptions.
Gross dollar retention
A sustained improvement above the recent 92% level would strengthen lifetime value.
Operating margin
Margin expansion tests whether cloud, automation and portfolio simplification create durable leverage.

Why do payments matter so much?

Payments connect Blackbaud’s software economics to donation, campaign and tuition activity. They can grow faster than seat-based subscriptions when digital giving and integrated checkout adoption rise. They also expose Blackbaud to fraud, card-network rules, payment-service uptime and transaction costs. The opportunity and risk are inseparable: a larger payments mix can improve growth and customer integration, but it makes operational resilience and compliance more important.

The best version of Blackbaud’s growth model is a reinforcing loop: specialized software retains the institution, embedded payments monetize activity, and proprietary workflow data improves AI-assisted outcomes.

What risks could change Blackbaud’s story?

Blackbaud’s recurring model reduces volatility but does not remove execution risk. Its official annual-report archive emphasizes cybersecurity, competition, payments, leverage, cloud infrastructure and customer retention. These are directly connected to revenue, margin and valuation rather than abstract legal language.

Risk Financial transmission What to monitor
Cybersecurity and privacy Remediation costs, customer trust, litigation, regulatory obligations and higher insurance or security spending Incident disclosures, compliance costs and retention after security events
Competitive displacement Lower renewal rates, discounting, higher sales cost and slower new bookings Gross dollar retention, product adoption and sales efficiency
Payments dependence Fraud losses, processing-cost pressure, network-rule changes or service disruption Transaction growth, related costs and restricted-cash controls
Leverage and capital returns Interest expense and reduced flexibility if repurchases outpace durable cash generation Net leverage, interest coverage and repurchase funding
Portfolio and product execution Implementation delays, product sunsets, migration friction or weak acquisition returns Renewals, support trends, restructuring costs and impairment signals

Which risk is most company-specific?

Cybersecurity has unusual weight because Blackbaud stores sensitive constituent, donor and payment-related data and continues to meet obligations arising from its prior security incident. The company agreed to improve cybersecurity programs and tools through May 2044 under regulatory settlements. That long tail means security is not only a technology expense; it is part of the company’s license to operate.

What is the central strategic tension?

Supportive side
98.3% recurring
High Q1 2026 recurring mix and long contracts improve visibility.
Pressure side
2.67× leverage
Debt and buybacks increase sensitivity to execution and interest costs.

Blackbaud is trying to compound per-share cash flow while funding innovation and carrying substantial debt. That can work if retention holds, payments scale and margins expand. It becomes fragile if product execution weakens or if repurchases are funded at the expense of balance-sheet resilience.

What should a DCF model and research brief monitor?

A useful Blackbaud valuation model should separate reported growth from organic growth, distinguish contractual from transactional recurring revenue, and treat capitalized software as a cash reinvestment requirement. The business can support a long forecast horizon because revenue is highly recurring, but terminal assumptions should reflect competition, churn, cybersecurity costs and leverage.

Which KPIs drive intrinsic value?

Organic recurring revenue growth
Best indicator of retained-portfolio momentum after divestitures.
Contractual versus transactional mix
Determines how much revenue is committed versus volume-sensitive.
Gross dollar retention
Controls customer lifetime value and replacement-sales burden.
GAAP operating margin
Shows whether operating leverage persists without relying only on adjustments.
Free-cash-flow conversion
Must deduct both physical capex and capitalized software investment.
Net leverage and interest
Affects discount-rate risk and the portion of enterprise value accruing to equity.
Repurchase yield
Creates value only when shares are retired below conservative intrinsic value.
AI and payments adoption
Tests whether product innovation translates into monetization rather than cost alone.
DCF driver Bullish operating evidence Cautionary evidence
Revenue growth Pricing, long contracts, payments and cross-sell sustain mid-single-digit organic growth Retention weakens or transactions slow
Operating margin Cloud efficiency, AI productivity and portfolio focus expand GAAP margins Security, support or selling costs absorb savings
Reinvestment Capitalized development produces valuable, adopted products Development spending rises without retention or pricing benefits
Capital structure Free cash flow reduces leverage while repurchases shrink the share count Debt-funded repurchases reduce flexibility

What is the key takeaway?

Blackbaud matters because it occupies a specialized intersection of software, payments, data and mission-critical administration. The company’s strongest support comes from recurring revenue, vertical workflow depth, a diversified customer base and improving operating profitability. The weak points are leverage, imperfect retention, cybersecurity obligations, competition from both enterprise platforms and focused point solutions, and a mixed acquisition record.

Final synthesis
The central research question is whether Blackbaud can turn its installed base into steadily higher per-share free cash flow without overusing debt or underinvesting in the product. Students and analysts should watch organic recurring growth, retention, payment volume, GAAP margin, capitalized software spending, net leverage and repurchase discipline together. No single metric captures the story: recurring software quality supports the model, while capital allocation determines how much of that quality reaches shareholders.

DCF model

    5-Year Financial Model

    40+ Charts & Metrics

    DCF & Multiple Valuation

    Free Email Support



Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.

(BLKB) Blackbaud, Inc. Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$17 $9
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5