(BFC) Bank First Corporation Company Overview

US | Financial Services | Banks - Regional | NASDAQ

What does Bank First Corporation do?

$6.07B
Total assets at March 31, 2026
38
Banking locations at March 31, 2026
$4.52B
Gross loans at March 31, 2026
$5.09B
Deposits at March 31, 2026

Bank First Corporation is the Nasdaq-listed holding company for Bank First, N.A., a regional bank headquartered in Manitowoc, Wisconsin. It serves households, businesses, agricultural customers, and nonprofits across Wisconsin and northern Illinois through deposits, commercial and consumer loans, mortgages, treasury management, trust, wealth, and related fee services. The official investor-relations overview and the latest quarterly filing describe one operating bank rather than a collection of unrelated business segments.

Identity Current fact Research implication
Public company Bank First Corporation, Nasdaq: BFC The equity represents a regulated bank holding company, so capital and credit metrics matter more than industrial gross margin.
Primary footprint Wisconsin plus Winnebago County, Illinois; 38 offices at March 31, 2026 The franchise is geographically concentrated, but local density can support relationship depth and lower-cost deposits.
Business structure One wholly owned bank subsidiary Analysis should focus on spread income, fee income, loan quality, deposits, and regulatory capital.
Latest major change Centre 1 Bancorp acquired January 1, 2026 The first-quarter balance sheet is materially larger than the 2025 year-end baseline.

Where does the bank operate?

The March 2026 Form 10-Q lists offices across eighteen Wisconsin counties and one Illinois county. The footprint spans several local economies, but regional employment, property values, and business formation remain central credit variables.

What does relationship banking mean here?

Bank First’s stated model is to become a customer’s primary financial institution rather than compete only for one loan. Its 2025 annual report said the bank captured the primary checking relationship in 85% of mortgage originations over the preceding five years and reported a Net Promoter Score of 78 for 2025. Those figures suggest that a mortgage can lead to checking, payments, deposits, and wealth relationships, improving lifetime customer economics.

How does Bank First make money?

The model has two engines. Net interest income is the spread between interest earned on loans and securities and interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Noninterest income comes from service charges, trust and wealth fees, mortgage sales, treasury-management activity, and other services. In the first quarter of 2026, net interest income was $53.2 million and noninterest income was $10.5 million. On that pre-provision revenue base, the mix was approximately 83.5% spread income and 16.5% fees.

83.5%of first-quarter 2026 pre-provision revenue was net interest income, calculated from officially reported net interest and noninterest income.
Revenue mix before credit provision — Q1 2026
Net interest income — $53.2M, 83.5%
Noninterest income — $10.5M, 16.5%
Takeaway: deposit cost, asset yield, and loan growth still dominate earnings, while fees provide a growing but smaller diversification layer. Period: quarter ended March 31, 2026.

Which revenue stream matters most?

Revenue stream Q1 2026 Economic driver What can pressure it
Net interest income $53.2M Loan volume, loan yields, securities yields, deposit mix, and funding cost Deposit repricing, lower asset yields, weak loan demand, or excess liquidity
Service charges $4.7M Deposit accounts, payments, and treasury-management activity Customer migration, regulation, fee competition, and digital substitution
Trust and wealth $1.6M Assets under administration, advisory relationships, and acquired capabilities Market levels, client retention, and integration execution
Mortgage-sale gains $1.1M Origination volume, secondary-market pricing, and rate environment Housing turnover, affordability, and spread volatility

How do deposits fund the model?

Deposits are the raw material of a bank. At March 31, 2026, Bank First held $5.09 billion of deposits, including roughly $1.38 billion acquired with Centre. Noninterest-bearing deposits represented 29.4% of total deposits, up from 27.1% at December 31, 2025. A larger noninterest-bearing share lowers average funding cost and can protect net interest margin, although customers can move balances into interest-bearing products when rate competition intensifies.

Acquisitions and digital investment reshaped the franchise

  1. 1894
    The predecessor institution was founded in Manitowoc, establishing the community-banking identity that still anchors the brand.
  2. 2017
    Waupaca Bancorporation added approximately $429M of assets and extended the footprint westward, beginning the current acquisition era.
  3. 2019
    Partnership Community Bancshares added approximately $310M of assets and deepened eastern Wisconsin density.
  4. 2022
    Denmark Bancshares added approximately $681M of assets, demonstrating that Bank First could integrate a larger community franchise.
  5. 2023
    Hometown Bancorp added approximately $654M of assets and expanded markets around Madison and the Fox Valley.
  6. 2025
    A unified digital banking platform, omnichannel account opening, and an AI-enabled service chatbot improved the operating platform before the next scale step.
  7. January 2026
    Centre 1 Bancorp closed with about $1.48B of assets, adding southern Wisconsin, northern Illinois, trust, wealth, treasury, and fraud capabilities.
  8. May 2026
    Bank First agreed to acquire PSB Holdings, proposing another $1.50B-asset expansion subject to approvals and closing conditions.

Bank First began in 1894, but its modern scale is the result of a deliberate combination of local-bank acquisitions and internal technology investment. The history matters because Centre closed at the start of 2026 and a second transaction with PSB Holdings was announced in May.

Which turning points still matter?

The official PSB transaction presentation frames the acquisition record as a repeatable competency. Yet repetition does not eliminate integration risk. Each deal changes branch coverage, systems, staffing, credit marks, customer retention, and intangible assets. The strategic question is whether scale economies grow faster than complexity. A common digital platform can help, but conversion quality determines whether customers experience convenience or disruption.

What does the latest quarter show?

$20.0M
GAAP net income, Q1 2026
$1.78
Diluted EPS, Q1 2026
$25.1M
Adjusted net income, Q1 2026
3.96%
Net interest margin, Q1 2026

The first-quarter 2026 earnings release is the freshest official reporting package available before the scheduled second-quarter release. It captures the first three months after Centre closed. Revenue expanded sharply with the acquired balance sheet, but merger costs and temporary operating duplication reduced reported profitability.

Metric Q1 2026 Q4 2025 Q1 2025 Interpretation
Net interest income $53.2M $40.2M $36.5M Centre, purchase accounting, and the larger earning-asset base drove the step-up.
Net interest margin 3.96% 4.01% 3.65% Margin improved year over year but eased sequentially; purchase accounting added about 20 basis points.
Noninterest income $10.5M $4.8M $6.6M The acquired trust, wealth, deposit, and service capabilities broadened fees.
Noninterest expense $39.1M $22.0M $20.6M The quarter included $6.5M of acquisition costs plus conversion-period duplication.
GAAP net income $20.0M $18.4M $18.2M Reported earnings increased sequentially even though integration costs arrived before full synergies.

Why did earnings lag adjusted earnings?

Management reported adjusted net income of $25.1 million and adjusted diluted EPS of $2.24 after excluding $6.5 million of Centre acquisition costs and $0.2 million of net gains on asset sales. The distinction is useful, but the cash costs are real. Researchers should separate one-time conversion items from recurring expense and test whether efficiency improves after the second-quarter system conversion.

What changed after Centre?

Quarterly net interest income trend
$36.5MQ1'25
$36.7MQ2'25
$38.3MQ3'25
$40.2MQ4'25
$53.2MQ1'26
Takeaway: the acquired balance sheet created a clear revenue step-change, but part of the first-quarter increase came from purchase-accounting accretion. Periods: Q1 2025 through Q1 2026.

Deposits, credit quality, and capital define financial strength

Noninterest-bearing deposit share — March 31, 2026
29.4%
Green arc = noninterest-bearing deposits as a share of total deposits. The 29.4% mix supports funding economics, although deposit retention and pricing remain competitive.

How strong are funding and capital?

Balance-sheet signal March 31, 2026 December 31, 2025 Why it matters
Total assets $6.07B $4.51B Centre increased assets by roughly one-third at closing.
Deposits $5.09B $3.70B Core deposits are the principal funding source and now include Centre customers.
Cash and securities $999.8M $511.4M Liquidity expanded, while the securities portfolio rose to 9.9% of assets.
Borrowings $124.8M $122.0M wholesale funding The bank repaid $65.0M of FHLB advances during Q1 2026, reducing higher-cost funding.
Tangible common equity / tangible assets 9.14% 10.49% The merger diluted the ratio, but tangible capital remained meaningful for a community-bank model.
Tangible book value per share $47.04 $46.01 Per-share tangible value still increased despite transaction accounting.

Where did credit risk rise?

Nonperforming assets increased to $30.0 million, or 0.50% of assets, from $9.0 million, or 0.20%, at year-end 2025. The increase included $3.2 million of other real estate owned, $3.5 million of acquired nonaccrual loans, and one $12.9 million relationship moved to nonaccrual. The allowance for credit losses equaled 1.26% of loans, and net charge-offs remained only 0.01% annualized in Q1 2026. Realized loss remained low, but problem-asset formation and acquired-loan seasoning deserve attention.

Financial-health scorecard based on Q1 2026 disclosures
Core deposit mixStrong
Tangible capitalSolid
Current credit trendWatch
Integration visibilityDeveloping
The words carry the interpretation; dots only provide a visual scale. This is an analytical scorecard, not a credit rating.

Which loans and fee businesses matter most?

Loan portfolio mix — March 31, 2026
CRE-related categories — $2.51B, 55.6%
Residential mortgages — $1.10B, 24.4%
Commercial and industrial — $823.8M, 18.2%
Consumer and other — $81.2M, 1.8%
CRE-related combines owner-occupied CRE, non-owner-occupied CRE, multifamily, and construction/development. Percentages are calculated from the reported $4.52B gross loan portfolio.

How concentrated is real estate?

Loan category March 31, 2026 Share of loans Main analytical exposure
Owner-occupied commercial real estate $1.13B 25.1% Borrower operating cash flow plus property collateral
Residential 1–4 family $1.10B 24.4% Household income, housing values, and mortgage rates
Commercial and industrial $823.8M 18.2% Regional business conditions, leverage, and working capital
Non-owner commercial real estate $660.4M 14.6% Tenant demand, capitalization rates, and refinancing
Multifamily $456.4M 10.1% Occupancy, rent growth, operating costs, and property values
Construction and development $259.4M 5.7% Completion, absorption, budget, and sponsor equity risk

Real estate is not homogeneous: owner-occupied properties depend on business cash flow, while investor properties rely more on rent, occupancy, and refinancing. Local knowledge helps, but a regional downturn could affect several categories together.

Can wealth management diversify revenue?

Trust and wealth income
$1.6M
Q1 2026; a newly expanded recurring-fee capability following Centre.
Service charges
$4.7M
Q1 2026; tied to deposit relationships, payments, and treasury services.
Mortgage-sale gains
$1.1M
Q1 2026; useful but more sensitive to rates and housing activity.

Fees do not yet redefine Bank First, but they can deepen relationships and reduce spread dependence. The key test is whether acquired trust and wealth clients and advisers remain after integration.

What gives Bank First a competitive advantage?

Bank First’s advantage is not national scale; it is the combination of local relationship density, a high-value deposit base, disciplined acquisition experience, and a common operating platform.

Why do core relationships matter?

Primary-account capture
The bank reported primary checking relationships in 85% of mortgage originations over the five years through 2025, suggesting effective cross-selling.
Customer advocacy
A 2025 Net Promoter Score of 78 indicates strong stated willingness to recommend, which can support retention and referrals.
Low-cost funding
Noninterest-bearing balances were 29.4% of deposits at March 31, 2026, improving the economics of the spread model.
Integration experience
Multiple completed bank acquisitions provide institutional knowledge in due diligence, conversion, branch rationalization, and customer communication.

The underlying strategy is resource-based: relationships and deposits create value, local networks are hard to reproduce quickly, integration know-how accumulates, and the digital platform organizes a larger franchise. Competitors can still pay more for deposits, hire lenders, or improve digital service.

Where is rivalry strongest?

Large and regional banks
They can match product breadth, invest heavily in technology, and price deposits or loans aggressively.
Community banks and credit unions
They compete directly on local service, borrower knowledge, and customer trust.
Digital specialists
They increase price transparency and reduce the convenience advantage of a physical branch network.
Competitive implication
Customers can move deposits and refinance loans, so buyer power is meaningful. Bank First’s counterweight is a broader relationship that combines local decisions, payments, lending, deposits, and advice.

Who owns Bank First stock, and how is it governed?

Bank First has one common share class, and each outstanding share carried one vote at the April 6, 2026 proxy record date. The ownership base is dispersed rather than founder-controlled. The latest 2026 definitive proxy statement listed 11,222,441 shares outstanding and identified three holders above 5%.

Holder or group Shares Ownership Source date Why it matters
BlackRock, Inc. 692,746 6.17% Proxy disclosure based on December 31, 2025 information Large passive ownership can influence governance standards but does not create operating control.
Vanguard Group, Inc. 598,817 5.33% Schedule 13G filed January 30, 2026 Adds another institutionally governed voting block.
Richard S. Molepske 582,547 5.19% April 6, 2026 A meaningful individual economic stake, but not majority or blocking control.
Directors and executive officers as a group 557,882 4.97% April 6, 2026 Management has material exposure to per-share outcomes while outside holders retain decisive voting power.
Michael B. Molepske, CEO 103,652 Less than 1% April 6, 2026 Personal ownership aligns the chair and chief executive with long-term equity value.

Is the company controlled?

No disclosed holder has majority voting power, and there is no dual-class structure. Strategic decisions therefore require support across a broad shareholder base and an independent board process. Michael B. Molepske combines the chairman and chief executive roles, while the board designates a lead independent director to set executive-session agendas, liaise with the chair, and communicate with major shareholders. That structure concentrates strategic leadership but retains a formal independent counterweight.

How do ownership rules align management?

CEO and president
15,000 shares
Minimum ownership required by the fifth anniversary in the role; 5,000 shares are required on accepting the position.
Senior management
1.5× salary
Minimum company-stock value required within five years.
Directors
3,000 shares
Required by the fifth anniversary after a 1,000-share initial threshold.

The policy reinforces a per-share mindset when acquisitions issue stock, making dilution, tangible-book-value earnback, dividends, and repurchases personally relevant to management.

Opportunities and risks after two large transactions

Centre already closed
$1.48B assets
Acquired January 1, 2026; added roughly 33% to Bank First’s asset base and expanded trust, wealth, fraud, and treasury capabilities.
PSB proposed
$1.50B assets
PSB balance sheet at March 31, 2026; transaction remains subject to approvals and closing conditions.
Pro forma scale
$7.6B assets
Management estimate for the combined Bank First–PSB organization, with 50 branches.

Under the May 2026 merger filing, PSB shareholders would receive 0.3470 Bank First share for each PSB share. The transaction was valued at approximately $202.9 million using Bank First’s May 18 closing price. Management’s presentation assumed $14.8 million of fully phased pretax cost savings, 14.2% EPS accretion in 2027, 1.0% tangible-book-value dilution, and a 0.25-year earnback. These are forward-looking transaction assumptions, not realized results.

What could the PSB deal add?

PSB would bring $1.12 billion of net loans, $1.19 billion of deposits, $133.9 million of equity, and twelve branches based on March 31, 2026 figures. It would extend Bank First into central and northern Wisconsin, add deposits, and spread technology and compliance costs over a larger base. Cross-selling could add value beyond expense savings.

What could go wrong?

Centre conversion
Watch expense normalization, customer attrition, staffing duplication, and service quality after the Q2 2026 conversion.
PSB approvals and closing
The expected Q4 2026 closing depends on shareholder, regulatory, and contractual conditions.
Credit marks
Management assumed a 2.68% PSB loan credit mark; actual losses and recoveries can differ materially.
Problem assets
Track nonperforming assets after the Q1 2026 increase to $30.0M and the seasoning of acquired portfolios.
Deposit retention
Integration disruption or aggressive competitor pricing can raise funding cost and weaken the 29.4% noninterest-bearing mix.
Cybersecurity and fraud
More customers, systems, employees, and third parties increase operational attack surface and conversion risk.
Interest-rate sensitivity
Changes in deposit beta and asset repricing can compress the 3.96% Q1 2026 net interest margin.
Capital and dilution
Monitor tangible common equity, tangible book value per share, and regulatory ratios after another stock-funded deal.

The central tension is speed versus control: two large additions can strengthen the franchise, but overlapping conversions can strain management. The company’s 2025 annual report and latest filings emphasize disciplined relationships and risk management; 2026 will test whether those qualities scale.

What is the key takeaway from Bank First analysis?

Bank First is best understood as a relationship-funded regional bank transitioning into a larger Wisconsin–Illinois platform. The 2025 baseline was already profitable: net income was $71.5 million, diluted EPS was $7.23, return on average assets was 1.62%, and return on average tangible common equity was 16.34%. The audited 2025 Form 10-K provides that pre-Centre benchmark. First-quarter 2026 then showed the scale benefit and the cost burden of acquisition at the same time.

Which drivers belong in a bank valuation?

Valuation driver Current anchor What improves value What weakens value
Net interest margin 3.96% in Q1 2026 Stable core deposits, disciplined pricing, and productive loan deployment Higher deposit beta, lower asset yields, or excess liquidity
Credit cost 0 provision; 0.01% net charge-offs in Q1 2026 Low losses and successful acquired-loan seasoning Migration from the $30.0M nonperforming pool into charge-offs
Operating efficiency $39.1M noninterest expense in Q1 2026 Removal of $6.5M acquisition costs and conversion duplication Persistent staffing, technology, compliance, or integration expense
Tangible book value $47.04 per share at March 31, 2026 Retained earnings and fast transaction earnback Unexpected credit losses, goodwill pressure, or stock-funded dilution
Capital returns $0.55 quarterly dividend; $2.4M repurchases in Q1 2026 Sustainable earnings support dividends and selective repurchases Capital needs from growth, regulation, or acquisitions crowd out returns
Integration economics Centre closed; PSB pending Synergies, retention, cross-selling, and lower unit costs Delay, attrition, conversion errors, or unrealized cost savings

An enterprise free-cash-flow DCF is less natural for a bank because deposits are operating inputs and regulation limits distributable capital. A bank model should project spread income, fees, expenses, credit losses, growth, and required capital, then estimate dividends or excess capital. Price-to-tangible-book and earnings multiples are useful only after normalizing purchase accounting and merger costs.

Net interest marginDeposit betaLoan growthNonperforming assetsNet charge-offsTangible book valueTCE / tangible assetsIntegration expense
Final synthesis
Bank First’s story rests on a valuable core: relationship-driven deposits, strong historical profitability, local credit knowledge, and a demonstrated ability to acquire community banks. The story can strengthen if Centre costs normalize, fee capabilities scale, deposits remain sticky, and PSB closes with limited disruption. It can weaken if nonperforming assets continue rising, deposit pricing compresses margin, or two integrations overwhelm operating discipline. The most decision-useful next evidence is not headline asset growth; it is post-conversion expense, core margin excluding purchase accounting, acquired-loan credit performance, tangible book value per share, and customer retention.

DCF model

    5-Year Financial Model

    40+ Charts & Metrics

    DCF & Multiple Valuation

    Free Email Support



Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.