What does Ames National Corporation do?
Ames National Corporation is an Iowa bank holding company listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the ticker ATLO. It owns six separately chartered community banks and conducts essentially all operations in Iowa. The group serves central, north-central, and south-central markets through First National Bank, State Bank & Trust, Boone Bank & Trust, Reliance State Bank, United Bank & Trust, and Iowa State Savings Bank. The official company website describes its mission as customer focused, locally empowered, and team member driven.
Why does the multi-bank structure matter?
The unusual feature is not simply that Ames National owns several banks; it is that each affiliate retains a local board and president while the holding company supplies shared support in compliance, auditing, human resources, technology, marketing, appraisals, financial reporting, and training. The 2025 Form 10-K frames this as a relationship model aimed at small and medium-sized businesses that prefer an exclusive relationship with one bank. Economically, ATLO combines decentralized credit and customer decisions with centralized infrastructure. That can preserve local responsiveness without duplicating every corporate function six times.
How does Ames National make money?
Like most commercial banks, Ames National earns most of its profit from spread income. It gathers deposits and other funding, invests those funds in loans and securities, and retains the difference between asset yields and funding costs. Net interest income is therefore the central earnings engine, while credit losses and operating expenses determine how much of that spread becomes net income.
Which revenue streams are most important?
| Revenue stream | Q1 2026 amount | Economic driver | Research implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $15.431M | Loan and securities yields minus deposit and borrowing costs | Rate sensitivity and deposit pricing dominate near-term earnings. |
| Wealth management | $1.596M | Trust, estate, agency, planning, and investment relationships | Fee growth diversifies revenue away from the interest-rate cycle. |
| Service fees | $0.378M | Deposit-account activity | Stable but sensitive to customer behavior and regulation. |
| Merchant and card fees | $0.318M | Payments and transaction processing | Small contributor that deepens commercial relationships. |
| Gain on loans sold | $0.140M | Mortgage originations sold into the secondary market | More variable and volume-sensitive than recurring service fees. |
This mix explains the company’s strategic tension: wealth management is strategically valuable because it is less balance-sheet intensive, but the spread business remains overwhelmingly larger. Any analysis that focuses on fee growth while ignoring the cost of deposits, securities yields, and loan repricing will miss the main earnings mechanism.
Which affiliate banks matter most?
Ames National reports one consolidated banking segment, so investors do not receive formal segment revenue and profit reporting for each charter. The 2025 annual filing does, however, disclose subsidiary assets, capital, employees, and net income. First National Bank is clearly the anchor institution: at December 31, 2025, it held about $1.109 billion of assets, more than any other affiliate and roughly half of the sum of disclosed subsidiary assets.
How do the charters differ?
| Affiliate | Primary market or emphasis | FY2025 net income | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| First National Bank | Ames, Greater Des Moines, and Osceola; broad commercial banking | $10.0M | Largest scale, deepest urban exposure, and the main earnings contributor. |
| Iowa State Savings Bank | Creston and Lenox; strong agricultural orientation | $2.9M | Extends the franchise into south-central Iowa and adds agricultural relationships. |
| Reliance State Bank | Story City and Garner; agricultural emphasis | $2.5M | Meaningful rural exposure and a sizable balance sheet relative to the smaller charters. |
| State Bank & Trust | Nevada; agricultural, commercial, and residential real estate | $2.4M | Diversifies lending categories within a concentrated Iowa footprint. |
| United Bank & Trust | Marshalltown; deposits, loans, and wealth management | $1.5M | Adds local trust and commercial relationships in Marshall County. |
| Boone Bank & Trust | Boone; agricultural, consumer, and commercial lending | $1.1M | Provides local diversification but operates at smaller scale. |
The official fourth-quarter 2025 investor presentation characterizes four banks as having modest agricultural exposure and two as mainly commercial. That balance is important: the group is not a pure farm lender, yet agricultural conditions remain material because several affiliates depend on rural borrowers and land-based collateral.
What does the latest quarter show?
The latest available official reporting package is the quarter ended March 31, 2026. Ames National reported net income of $5.960 million, or $0.67 per diluted share, compared with $3.443 million, or $0.39 per share, in Q1 2025. The company’s Q1 2026 earnings release attributes the improvement mainly to higher net interest income and a lower credit-loss expense.
Where did the earnings improvement come from?
| Metric | Q1 2026 | Q1 2025 | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total interest income | $22.216M | $21.118M | Higher investment balances and yields lifted asset income. |
| Total interest expense | $6.785M | $8.203M | Lower market rates and reduced borrowings materially improved the spread. |
| Credit loss expense (benefit) | ($0.347M) | $0.962M | Loan contraction released reserves; this benefit should not automatically be annualized. |
| Noninterest income | $2.785M | $2.547M | Wealth management growth produced a 9.3% year-over-year increase. |
| Noninterest expense | $10.873M | $10.263M | Salaries, benefits, and professional fees increased, but revenue grew faster. |
What strategic turning points shaped the six-bank model?
Ames National’s history is best understood as a sequence of charter additions and local-market extensions. The relevant question is not when every office opened, but how each move built the current mix of urban commercial banking, rural agriculture, and trust services.
-
1903First National Bank was formed in Ames, creating the core franchise that remains the group’s largest affiliate.
-
1975Ames National Corporation was organized as the holding company for First National, creating the legal platform for a multi-bank strategy.
-
1983-1995State Bank, Boone Bank, and Reliance State Bank joined the group, expanding the model into additional central and north-central Iowa communities.
-
2002United Bank & Trust was chartered in Marshalltown, demonstrating that growth could come from new-bank formation as well as acquisitions.
-
2012-2014Reliance added a Garner office, while First National expanded into West Des Moines and nearby markets, increasing both rural and metropolitan exposure.
-
2018First National acquired offices in the Osceola area, extending the leading charter into south-central Iowa.
-
2019The acquisition of Iowa State Savings Bank added Creston and surrounding communities, completing the present six-bank portfolio.
What did this history produce strategically?
That model creates benefits and constraints. Local boards can understand borrowers and respond quickly, but six charters also add governance, regulatory, and operating complexity. The structure works best when centralized functions reduce cost and risk without weakening the local accountability that differentiates a community bank.
Why can local autonomy be a competitive advantage?
Ames National competes in markets where borrowers can choose among regional banks, national banks, local banks, credit unions, fintech lenders, and non-bank investment providers. The 2025 filing notes that the Ames market alone included fifteen banks, five credit unions, and several financial investment companies. Credit unions also carry a structural tax advantage, while larger banks can spend more on digital platforms and specialized products.
Which resources are hardest to copy?
The advantage is conditional. Relationships create switching costs, but weak digital execution or aggressive competitor pricing can erode them. Local autonomy creates value only while it supports sound credit, stable deposits, and acceptable efficiency.
How strong are credit, capital, and liquidity?
A community bank can report attractive earnings while still carrying balance-sheet risk. For Ames National, the most important checks are loan quality, commercial real estate concentration, regulatory capital, securities marks, and deposit stability. The latest Form 10-Q for March 31, 2026 shows capital ratios comfortably above minimum requirements, but also shows worsening problem-loan ratios.
| Balance-sheet indicator | Latest value | Period | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Problem loans / total loans | 1.57% | March 31, 2026 | Up from 1.19% at December 31, 2025 and above the cited Iowa peer average. |
| Commercial real estate and multifamily | $510.5M / 39.8% | March 31, 2026 | A meaningful concentration requiring occupancy, collateral, and borrower monitoring. |
| Total capital ratio | 16.1% | March 31, 2026 | Well above the 10.5% capital-adequacy threshold shown in the filing. |
| Common equity Tier 1 ratio | 14.8% | March 31, 2026 | Provides a substantial regulatory cushion against risk-weighted assets. |
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 10.2% | March 31, 2026 | More than twice the 4.0% minimum shown for capital-adequacy purposes. |
| Unrealized securities losses | $30.1M | March 31, 2026 | Interest-rate-driven marks reduce accumulated other comprehensive income but were not considered credit losses. |
What does the loan mix reveal?
Is liquidity adequate?
Cash and cash equivalents were $118.2 million at March 31, 2026, and management described liquidity as satisfactory. Deposits rose to $1.867 billion, while repurchase agreements and other borrowings totaled $54.9 million. Because the holding company relies on bank dividends, subsidiary capital and regulatory limits directly affect shareholder distributions.
How have profitability and capital allocation changed?
The full-year trend improved sharply in 2025. Net income rose to $19.027 million from $10.218 million in 2024, while net interest income increased 23.8% to $55.662 million. The annual tax-equivalent net interest margin expanded to 2.75% from 2.22%, return on average assets improved to 0.90%, and return on average equity reached 9.95%. These figures show a bank recovering from the funding-cost pressure that affected 2024.
How is capital being returned or retained?
The capital-allocation priority is balance: maintain well-capitalized status, support organic loan growth, consider acquisitions, pay dividends, and repurchase shares opportunistically. The company’s annual reports page provides the longer record needed to judge whether management consistently protects capital through rate and credit cycles.
Who owns ATLO and how is it governed?
ATLO has a conventional single-class common-stock structure: the 8,857,220 shares outstanding on the February 27, 2026 proxy record date each carried one vote. There is no founder-controlled super-voting class. Influence is therefore dispersed among institutions, local shareholders, directors, executives, and trust accounts. The latest 2026 proxy statement identifies BlackRock and Vanguard as the only disclosed holders above 5%.
| Holder or group | Shares | Stake | Source period | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock, Inc. | 648,408 | 7.2% | Latest Schedule 13G cited in 2026 proxy | Largest disclosed outside holder, but without controlling influence. |
| The Vanguard Group | 486,925 | 5.4% | Latest Schedule 13G cited in 2026 proxy | Passive ownership increases institutional voting relevance. |
| Directors and executive officers as a group | 206,748 | 2.33% | February 27, 2026 | Meaningful alignment, but not enough to control shareholder votes. |
| John P. Nelson, president and CEO | 65,358 | Less than 1% | February 27, 2026 | Some reported shares reflect trust-officer powers, so economic exposure is lower than the headline beneficial-ownership figure may imply. |
What governance signals matter?
John P. Nelson has led the company as president and CEO since 2018 after serving as CFO and secretary. The official executive-management page also highlights Chief Lending Officer Michael Wilson and CFO Justin Clausen. For investors, the key governance issue is less about concentrated control and more about whether a staggered, locally rooted board provides rigorous challenge on credit, technology, succession, and capital allocation.
What opportunities and risks could change the earnings path?
Management’s near-term priorities are organic loan growth and further development of wealth management. A supportive rate environment could preserve margin, while stronger local activity could rebuild loan balances. Acquisitions remain possible, but any transaction must justify integration risk and capital use.
Which risks are most material?
| Risk | Transmission channel | Current factual anchor | What to monitor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest-rate reversal | Deposit costs may reprice faster than loans and securities. | Q1 2026 margin was 3.01% after a favorable funding-cost decline. | Deposit cost, earning-asset yield, and net interest margin. |
| Credit deterioration | Higher provisions and charge-offs reduce earnings and capital. | Problem loans reached 1.57% of loans at March 31, 2026. | Nonaccrual migration, criticized loans, and reserve coverage. |
| Iowa concentration | Local employment, agriculture, property, and business cycles affect the entire franchise. | All material operations are conducted in Iowa. | Local unemployment, farm income, CRE occupancy, and borrower cash flow. |
| Competitive pressure | Aggressive deposit or loan pricing compresses spreads. | The Ames market included fifteen banks and five credit unions in the 2025 filing. | Loan yields, deposit retention, and customer acquisition costs. |
| Technology and cybersecurity | Service disruption, fraud, regulatory cost, and reputational damage. | The risk committee explicitly oversees cybersecurity, information security, and technology risk. | Incidents, vendor dependence, digital adoption, and remediation costs. |
The SEC filing index for the 2025 Form 10-K helps track formal risk changes. A strong quarter did not remove every risk: reserve release supported Q1 2026 earnings while the problem-loan ratio increased.
Which KPIs and valuation drivers matter most?
Enterprise-value DCF methods are awkward for banks because deposits are operating inputs, regulatory capital constrains distributions, and interest expense is part of the product. Valuation is better anchored in distributable earnings, excess capital, sustainable return on equity, and bank trading multiples.
| KPI | Definition | Latest reference point | Valuation relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest margin | Tax-equivalent net interest income divided by average earning assets | 3.01%, Q1 2026 | Sets the earnings power of the balance sheet. |
| Efficiency ratio | Noninterest expense divided by net interest plus noninterest income | 59.69%, Q1 2026 | Indicates how much revenue is consumed by operating cost. |
| Return on average assets | Net income divided by average assets | 0.90%, FY2025 | Measures profitability relative to the bank’s asset base. |
| Return on average equity | Net income divided by average equity | 9.95%, FY2025 | Should be compared with the required return and the durability of credit quality. |
| Loan-to-deposit ratio | Gross loans divided by deposits | 70.0%, December 31, 2025 | Shows balance-sheet deployment and funding capacity. |
| Common equity Tier 1 | Core common capital divided by risk-weighted assets | 14.8%, March 31, 2026 | Determines resilience and capacity for growth, dividends, and repurchases. |
What would a bank DCF need to assume?
Valuation improves with stable margin, renewed loan growth, rising fees, controlled problem assets, and disciplined capital return. It weakens if spread compresses before volumes recover or credit stress raises provisions. Small changes in spread and credit cost can materially change normalized earnings.
What is the key takeaway from Ames National analysis?
Ames National is a concentrated Iowa community-bank franchise built around six local charters, relationship lending, and shared corporate support. Its importance comes from the operating design: First National Bank supplies scale, the other affiliates extend local reach, and trust services provide a growing fee stream. The model can create durable customer ties, but it does not eliminate the disadvantages of limited scale, geographic concentration, technology cost, and intense deposit competition.
What should students, researchers, and investors monitor next?
- Whether net interest margin remains near the Q1 2026 level as deposits and securities reprice.
- Whether loan balances return to growth after the Q1 2026 decline.
- Whether problem loans and commercial real estate exposures stabilize.
- Whether wealth management continues to grow faster than operating expenses.
- Whether strong capital is used for disciplined dividends, repurchases, organic expansion, or accretive acquisitions.
- Whether local autonomy continues to produce better service and underwriting than larger competitors can offer.
ATLO is best analyzed as a spread-and-credit institution with a distinctive local governance model. Deposit economics, underwriting, fee diversification, and capital stewardship matter more than headline growth alone.
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.
