Ames National Corporation (ATLO) Company Overview

US | Financial Services | Banks - Regional | NASDAQ

What does Ames National Corporation do?

Ames National Corporation is an Iowa bank holding company listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the ticker ATLO. It owns six separately chartered community banks and conducts essentially all operations in Iowa. The group serves central, north-central, and south-central markets through First National Bank, State Bank & Trust, Boone Bank & Trust, Reliance State Bank, United Bank & Trust, and Iowa State Savings Bank. The official company website describes its mission as customer focused, locally empowered, and team member driven.

Nasdaq: ATLO Iowa community banking Six bank charters Commercial and agricultural lending Wealth management and trust
$2.143B
Total assets, March 31, 2026
$1.265B
Net loans, March 31, 2026
$1.867B
Deposits, March 31, 2026
260
Employees, December 31, 2025

Why does the multi-bank structure matter?

The unusual feature is not simply that Ames National owns several banks; it is that each affiliate retains a local board and president while the holding company supplies shared support in compliance, auditing, human resources, technology, marketing, appraisals, financial reporting, and training. The 2025 Form 10-K frames this as a relationship model aimed at small and medium-sized businesses that prefer an exclusive relationship with one bank. Economically, ATLO combines decentralized credit and customer decisions with centralized infrastructure. That can preserve local responsiveness without duplicating every corporate function six times.

How does Ames National make money?

Like most commercial banks, Ames National earns most of its profit from spread income. It gathers deposits and other funding, invests those funds in loans and securities, and retains the difference between asset yields and funding costs. Net interest income is therefore the central earnings engine, while credit losses and operating expenses determine how much of that spread becomes net income.

1. Gather funding
Checking, savings, money-market, and time deposits supplied $1.867 billion of funding at March 31, 2026.
2. Deploy earning assets
Net loans were $1.265 billion and available-for-sale securities were $688.8 million at March 31, 2026.
3. Earn the spread
Q1 2026 net interest income reached $15.431 million as funding costs declined.
4. Add fee revenue
Q1 2026 noninterest income was $2.785 million, led by wealth management.
5. Absorb costs and credit
Q1 2026 noninterest expense was $10.873 million; credit loss benefit was $347 thousand.

Which revenue streams are most important?

Revenue stream Q1 2026 amount Economic driver Research implication
Net interest income $15.431M Loan and securities yields minus deposit and borrowing costs Rate sensitivity and deposit pricing dominate near-term earnings.
Wealth management $1.596M Trust, estate, agency, planning, and investment relationships Fee growth diversifies revenue away from the interest-rate cycle.
Service fees $0.378M Deposit-account activity Stable but sensitive to customer behavior and regulation.
Merchant and card fees $0.318M Payments and transaction processing Small contributor that deepens commercial relationships.
Gain on loans sold $0.140M Mortgage originations sold into the secondary market More variable and volume-sensitive than recurring service fees.
84.7%of Q1 2026 operating revenue before credit losses came from net interest income, calculated from $15.431 million of net interest income plus $2.785 million of noninterest income.

This mix explains the company’s strategic tension: wealth management is strategically valuable because it is less balance-sheet intensive, but the spread business remains overwhelmingly larger. Any analysis that focuses on fee growth while ignoring the cost of deposits, securities yields, and loan repricing will miss the main earnings mechanism.

Which affiliate banks matter most?

Ames National reports one consolidated banking segment, so investors do not receive formal segment revenue and profit reporting for each charter. The 2025 annual filing does, however, disclose subsidiary assets, capital, employees, and net income. First National Bank is clearly the anchor institution: at December 31, 2025, it held about $1.109 billion of assets, more than any other affiliate and roughly half of the sum of disclosed subsidiary assets.

Affiliate bank assets ranked — December 31, 2025
First National Bank$1.109B
Reliance State Bank$284.9M
Iowa State Savings$282.7M
State Bank & Trust$196.4M
Boone Bank & Trust$160.4M
United Bank & Trust$122.9M
Bars are scaled to First National Bank, the largest affiliate. Subsidiary totals are not a substitute for consolidated assets because holding-company balances and eliminations may differ.

How do the charters differ?

Affiliate Primary market or emphasis FY2025 net income Why it matters
First National Bank Ames, Greater Des Moines, and Osceola; broad commercial banking $10.0M Largest scale, deepest urban exposure, and the main earnings contributor.
Iowa State Savings Bank Creston and Lenox; strong agricultural orientation $2.9M Extends the franchise into south-central Iowa and adds agricultural relationships.
Reliance State Bank Story City and Garner; agricultural emphasis $2.5M Meaningful rural exposure and a sizable balance sheet relative to the smaller charters.
State Bank & Trust Nevada; agricultural, commercial, and residential real estate $2.4M Diversifies lending categories within a concentrated Iowa footprint.
United Bank & Trust Marshalltown; deposits, loans, and wealth management $1.5M Adds local trust and commercial relationships in Marshall County.
Boone Bank & Trust Boone; agricultural, consumer, and commercial lending $1.1M Provides local diversification but operates at smaller scale.

The official fourth-quarter 2025 investor presentation characterizes four banks as having modest agricultural exposure and two as mainly commercial. That balance is important: the group is not a pure farm lender, yet agricultural conditions remain material because several affiliates depend on rural borrowers and land-based collateral.

What does the latest quarter show?

The latest available official reporting package is the quarter ended March 31, 2026. Ames National reported net income of $5.960 million, or $0.67 per diluted share, compared with $3.443 million, or $0.39 per share, in Q1 2025. The company’s Q1 2026 earnings release attributes the improvement mainly to higher net interest income and a lower credit-loss expense.

$5.960M
Net income, Q1 2026
$0.67
Diluted EPS, Q1 2026
$15.431M
Net interest income, Q1 2026
3.01%
Tax-equivalent net interest margin, Q1 2026
59.69%
Efficiency ratio, Q1 2026
$207.6M
Stockholders’ equity, March 31, 2026

Where did the earnings improvement come from?

Q1 2026 operating revenue mix before credit losses
Net interest income — $15.431M — 84.7%
Noninterest income — $2.785M — 15.3%
Calculated from Q1 2026 reported amounts. The chart excludes the credit-loss benefit and operating expenses.
Metric Q1 2026 Q1 2025 Interpretation
Total interest income $22.216M $21.118M Higher investment balances and yields lifted asset income.
Total interest expense $6.785M $8.203M Lower market rates and reduced borrowings materially improved the spread.
Credit loss expense (benefit) ($0.347M) $0.962M Loan contraction released reserves; this benefit should not automatically be annualized.
Noninterest income $2.785M $2.547M Wealth management growth produced a 9.3% year-over-year increase.
Noninterest expense $10.873M $10.263M Salaries, benefits, and professional fees increased, but revenue grew faster.

What strategic turning points shaped the six-bank model?

Ames National’s history is best understood as a sequence of charter additions and local-market extensions. The relevant question is not when every office opened, but how each move built the current mix of urban commercial banking, rural agriculture, and trust services.

  1. 1903
    First National Bank was formed in Ames, creating the core franchise that remains the group’s largest affiliate.
  2. 1975
    Ames National Corporation was organized as the holding company for First National, creating the legal platform for a multi-bank strategy.
  3. 1983-1995
    State Bank, Boone Bank, and Reliance State Bank joined the group, expanding the model into additional central and north-central Iowa communities.
  4. 2002
    United Bank & Trust was chartered in Marshalltown, demonstrating that growth could come from new-bank formation as well as acquisitions.
  5. 2012-2014
    Reliance added a Garner office, while First National expanded into West Des Moines and nearby markets, increasing both rural and metropolitan exposure.
  6. 2018
    First National acquired offices in the Osceola area, extending the leading charter into south-central Iowa.
  7. 2019
    The acquisition of Iowa State Savings Bank added Creston and surrounding communities, completing the present six-bank portfolio.

What did this history produce strategically?

Ames National’s moat is not national scale; it is the attempt to combine local authority, long-tenured relationships, and multiple community brands with shared holding-company discipline.

That model creates benefits and constraints. Local boards can understand borrowers and respond quickly, but six charters also add governance, regulatory, and operating complexity. The structure works best when centralized functions reduce cost and risk without weakening the local accountability that differentiates a community bank.

Why can local autonomy be a competitive advantage?

Ames National competes in markets where borrowers can choose among regional banks, national banks, local banks, credit unions, fintech lenders, and non-bank investment providers. The 2025 filing notes that the Ames market alone included fifteen banks, five credit unions, and several financial investment companies. Credit unions also carry a structural tax advantage, while larger banks can spend more on digital platforms and specialized products.

ATLO’s relationship advantage
11 years
Average employee tenure at December 31, 2025 supports continuity and local knowledge.
Scale limitation
$2.143B
Total assets at March 31, 2026 are meaningful locally but small against regional and national banks.

Which resources are hardest to copy?

Local credit judgment
Separate boards and presidents can evaluate borrowers using community knowledge, especially in commercial and agricultural relationships where standardized scoring may be incomplete.
Trust and wealth relationships
Five of six banks offer trust services. Estate, agency, and investment relationships can persist across generations and generate fee income without expanding the loan book at the same rate.
Stable deposit franchises
Long-term customer ties support core funding, although approximately 15% of deposits were tied to external indexes at March 31, 2026 and therefore reprice more quickly.
Centralized support
Shared audit, compliance, technology, marketing, and human-resources functions can lower duplication and standardize risk controls across the charters.

The advantage is conditional. Relationships create switching costs, but weak digital execution or aggressive competitor pricing can erode them. Local autonomy creates value only while it supports sound credit, stable deposits, and acceptable efficiency.

How strong are credit, capital, and liquidity?

A community bank can report attractive earnings while still carrying balance-sheet risk. For Ames National, the most important checks are loan quality, commercial real estate concentration, regulatory capital, securities marks, and deposit stability. The latest Form 10-Q for March 31, 2026 shows capital ratios comfortably above minimum requirements, but also shows worsening problem-loan ratios.

Balance-sheet indicator Latest value Period Interpretation
Problem loans / total loans 1.57% March 31, 2026 Up from 1.19% at December 31, 2025 and above the cited Iowa peer average.
Commercial real estate and multifamily $510.5M / 39.8% March 31, 2026 A meaningful concentration requiring occupancy, collateral, and borrower monitoring.
Total capital ratio 16.1% March 31, 2026 Well above the 10.5% capital-adequacy threshold shown in the filing.
Common equity Tier 1 ratio 14.8% March 31, 2026 Provides a substantial regulatory cushion against risk-weighted assets.
Tier 1 leverage ratio 10.2% March 31, 2026 More than twice the 4.0% minimum shown for capital-adequacy purposes.
Unrealized securities losses $30.1M March 31, 2026 Interest-rate-driven marks reduce accumulated other comprehensive income but were not considered credit losses.

What does the loan mix reveal?

Commercial real estate and multifamily share of total loans — March 31, 2026
Multifamily16.1%
Owner-occupied CRE13.0%
Retail / other CRE3.7%
Hotel CRE2.8%
Warehouse CRE2.5%
Office CRE1.7%
The categories sum to 39.8% of total loans. Multifamily and owner-occupied properties are the largest components.

Is liquidity adequate?

Cash and cash equivalents were $118.2 million at March 31, 2026, and management described liquidity as satisfactory. Deposits rose to $1.867 billion, while repurchase agreements and other borrowings totaled $54.9 million. Because the holding company relies on bank dividends, subsidiary capital and regulatory limits directly affect shareholder distributions.

How have profitability and capital allocation changed?

The full-year trend improved sharply in 2025. Net income rose to $19.027 million from $10.218 million in 2024, while net interest income increased 23.8% to $55.662 million. The annual tax-equivalent net interest margin expanded to 2.75% from 2.22%, return on average assets improved to 0.90%, and return on average equity reached 9.95%. These figures show a bank recovering from the funding-cost pressure that affected 2024.

Annual net income trend
$10.817MFY2023
$10.218MFY2024
$19.027MFY2025
FY2025 net income nearly doubled from FY2024 as spread income recovered and operating expenses remained broadly flat.
59.69%
Efficiency ratio, Q1 2026. A lower ratio generally indicates that less operating expense is required for each dollar of net interest and noninterest income. The ratio improved from 66.38% in Q1 2025.

How is capital being returned or retained?

Cash dividends declared, FY2025
$5.323M
Equivalent to $0.60 per share and a 28.04% payout ratio for FY2025.
Shares repurchased, FY2025
91,890
The authorization had 165,053 shares remaining at December 31, 2025.
Equity retained, FY2025 year-end
$207.9M
Up from $174.7 million at December 31, 2024, aided by earnings retention and lower unrealized securities losses.

The capital-allocation priority is balance: maintain well-capitalized status, support organic loan growth, consider acquisitions, pay dividends, and repurchase shares opportunistically. The company’s annual reports page provides the longer record needed to judge whether management consistently protects capital through rate and credit cycles.

Who owns ATLO and how is it governed?

ATLO has a conventional single-class common-stock structure: the 8,857,220 shares outstanding on the February 27, 2026 proxy record date each carried one vote. There is no founder-controlled super-voting class. Influence is therefore dispersed among institutions, local shareholders, directors, executives, and trust accounts. The latest 2026 proxy statement identifies BlackRock and Vanguard as the only disclosed holders above 5%.

Holder or group Shares Stake Source period Why it matters
BlackRock, Inc. 648,408 7.2% Latest Schedule 13G cited in 2026 proxy Largest disclosed outside holder, but without controlling influence.
The Vanguard Group 486,925 5.4% Latest Schedule 13G cited in 2026 proxy Passive ownership increases institutional voting relevance.
Directors and executive officers as a group 206,748 2.33% February 27, 2026 Meaningful alignment, but not enough to control shareholder votes.
John P. Nelson, president and CEO 65,358 Less than 1% February 27, 2026 Some reported shares reflect trust-officer powers, so economic exposure is lower than the headline beneficial-ownership figure may imply.

What governance signals matter?

Board independenceHigh
Insider voting controlLow
Local banking expertiseExtensive
Board structure, 2026 proxy
The board had eleven directors divided into three staggered classes. Nine qualified as independent under Nasdaq standards, while the CEO and a former employee did not. The CEO and chair roles were separated. Four standing committees covered audit, personnel, nominating, and risk management.

John P. Nelson has led the company as president and CEO since 2018 after serving as CFO and secretary. The official executive-management page also highlights Chief Lending Officer Michael Wilson and CFO Justin Clausen. For investors, the key governance issue is less about concentrated control and more about whether a staggered, locally rooted board provides rigorous challenge on credit, technology, succession, and capital allocation.

What opportunities and risks could change the earnings path?

Management’s near-term priorities are organic loan growth and further development of wealth management. A supportive rate environment could preserve margin, while stronger local activity could rebuild loan balances. Acquisitions remain possible, but any transaction must justify integration risk and capital use.

Organic loan growth
Net loans fell 1.2% in Q1 2026. Growth would show that recovery is moving beyond rates.
Wealth management income
Q1 2026 income was $1.596 million. Continued growth would diversify revenue.
Deposit beta and mix
About 15% of deposits were index-linked at March 31, 2026, creating faster repricing risk.
Problem-loan ratio
The ratio rose to 1.57% at March 31, 2026, arguing against annualizing the Q1 credit benefit.
Commercial real estate
CRE and multifamily were 39.8% of loans at March 31, 2026; occupancy and refinancing matter.
Consulting and operating costs
Q1 2026 included $300 thousand of contract-negotiation consulting fees expected to continue during 2026.

Which risks are most material?

Risk Transmission channel Current factual anchor What to monitor
Interest-rate reversal Deposit costs may reprice faster than loans and securities. Q1 2026 margin was 3.01% after a favorable funding-cost decline. Deposit cost, earning-asset yield, and net interest margin.
Credit deterioration Higher provisions and charge-offs reduce earnings and capital. Problem loans reached 1.57% of loans at March 31, 2026. Nonaccrual migration, criticized loans, and reserve coverage.
Iowa concentration Local employment, agriculture, property, and business cycles affect the entire franchise. All material operations are conducted in Iowa. Local unemployment, farm income, CRE occupancy, and borrower cash flow.
Competitive pressure Aggressive deposit or loan pricing compresses spreads. The Ames market included fifteen banks and five credit unions in the 2025 filing. Loan yields, deposit retention, and customer acquisition costs.
Technology and cybersecurity Service disruption, fraud, regulatory cost, and reputational damage. The risk committee explicitly oversees cybersecurity, information security, and technology risk. Incidents, vendor dependence, digital adoption, and remediation costs.

The SEC filing index for the 2025 Form 10-K helps track formal risk changes. A strong quarter did not remove every risk: reserve release supported Q1 2026 earnings while the problem-loan ratio increased.

Which KPIs and valuation drivers matter most?

Enterprise-value DCF methods are awkward for banks because deposits are operating inputs, regulatory capital constrains distributions, and interest expense is part of the product. Valuation is better anchored in distributable earnings, excess capital, sustainable return on equity, and bank trading multiples.

KPI Definition Latest reference point Valuation relevance
Net interest margin Tax-equivalent net interest income divided by average earning assets 3.01%, Q1 2026 Sets the earnings power of the balance sheet.
Efficiency ratio Noninterest expense divided by net interest plus noninterest income 59.69%, Q1 2026 Indicates how much revenue is consumed by operating cost.
Return on average assets Net income divided by average assets 0.90%, FY2025 Measures profitability relative to the bank’s asset base.
Return on average equity Net income divided by average equity 9.95%, FY2025 Should be compared with the required return and the durability of credit quality.
Loan-to-deposit ratio Gross loans divided by deposits 70.0%, December 31, 2025 Shows balance-sheet deployment and funding capacity.
Common equity Tier 1 Core common capital divided by risk-weighted assets 14.8%, March 31, 2026 Determines resilience and capacity for growth, dividends, and repurchases.

What would a bank DCF need to assume?

Sustainable margin
Model loan and securities repricing against deposit beta rather than simply annualizing Q1 2026.
Normalized credit cost
Use a through-cycle provision assumption consistent with problem loans and concentrations.
Balance-sheet growth
Separate spread recovery from actual loan growth; Q1 2026 loans declined.
Distributable capital
Estimate earnings that can be paid out after maintaining regulatory buffers and funding prudent organic growth.

Valuation improves with stable margin, renewed loan growth, rising fees, controlled problem assets, and disciplined capital return. It weakens if spread compresses before volumes recover or credit stress raises provisions. Small changes in spread and credit cost can materially change normalized earnings.

What is the key takeaway from Ames National analysis?

Ames National is a concentrated Iowa community-bank franchise built around six local charters, relationship lending, and shared corporate support. Its importance comes from the operating design: First National Bank supplies scale, the other affiliates extend local reach, and trust services provide a growing fee stream. The model can create durable customer ties, but it does not eliminate the disadvantages of limited scale, geographic concentration, technology cost, and intense deposit competition.

The analytical synthesis
The favorable evidence is the earnings recovery: FY2025 net income reached $19.027 million, Q1 2026 net interest margin improved to 3.01%, Q1 efficiency improved to 59.69%, and regulatory capital remained strong. The counterweight is that net loans declined, the problem-loan ratio increased to 1.57%, and 39.8% of loans were concentrated in commercial real estate and multifamily at March 31, 2026. The company’s next phase therefore depends on converting rate-driven margin recovery into sound organic growth without weakening credit quality.

What should students, researchers, and investors monitor next?

  • Whether net interest margin remains near the Q1 2026 level as deposits and securities reprice.
  • Whether loan balances return to growth after the Q1 2026 decline.
  • Whether problem loans and commercial real estate exposures stabilize.
  • Whether wealth management continues to grow faster than operating expenses.
  • Whether strong capital is used for disciplined dividends, repurchases, organic expansion, or accretive acquisitions.
  • Whether local autonomy continues to produce better service and underwriting than larger competitors can offer.

ATLO is best analyzed as a spread-and-credit institution with a distinctive local governance model. Deposit economics, underwriting, fee diversification, and capital stewardship matter more than headline growth alone.

DCF model

    5-Year Financial Model

    40+ Charts & Metrics

    DCF & Multiple Valuation

    Free Email Support



Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.

(ATLO) Ames National Corporation Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$17 $9
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5