What does Strive, Inc. do?
Strive, Inc. is a Nasdaq-listed structured-finance and institutional asset-management company that uses bitcoin as its capital-allocation hurdle. Class A common stock trades as ASST and variable-rate perpetual preferred stock trades as SATA. It combines an investment adviser, a capital-markets-funded bitcoin treasury and Semler Scientific's medical-device operation, acquired in January 2026.
Three businesses sit under one ticker
| Segment | What it does | Economic driver | Main analytical issue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset Management | Provides investment-advisory services through ETFs, collective investment trusts and direct indexing. | Fees charged largely as a percentage of AUM. | Whether AUM growth can turn a small recurring-fee base into operating scale. |
| Medical Device | Operates Semler Scientific's QuantaFlo-related testing, software licensing and hardware activities. | Software licensing, fee-per-test and hardware sales. | Whether the business is retained, improved or monetized after the acquisition. |
| Corporate & Other | Holds bitcoin and STRC preferred stock, raises capital and manages the corporate balance sheet. | Bitcoin appreciation, financing spreads and accretive capital issuance. | Bitcoin volatility, dilution and the senior claim created by SATA dividends. |
Why the company matters in public-market research
Strive is not a conventional operating company whose value can be inferred mainly from revenue growth and operating margin. The balance sheet is the strategy. As of July 10, 2026, its latest official update reported 19,900 bitcoin, $154.1 million of cash, $44.2 million of STRC preferred stock, 83.2 million common shares and 7.8 million SATA shares. Capital structure, control and bitcoin per diluted share therefore matter more than conventional earnings. The investor-relations overview explains the combined treasury and asset-management identity.
How does Strive make money and build bitcoin per share?
Strive has two economic engines. Operating subsidiaries earn conventional revenue, while the treasury strategy raises capital to expand bitcoin exposure per common share. Management calls open-market purchases funded by issuance “beta” initiatives and discounted acquisitions or exchanges “alpha” initiatives. Reported revenue is therefore small relative to balance-sheet activity.
Recurring fees versus capital-markets amplification
Which segment generated Q1 2026 revenue?
The Q1 2026 Form 10-Q reported total revenue of $2.760 million against operating expenses of $20.621 million. The gap means balance-sheet execution matters more than operating earnings. Common value is dominated by bitcoin acquired, acquisition price, securities issued and senior obligations.
What do the latest quarter and July 2026 updates show?
Q1 2026 was dominated by fair-value accounting
Q1's loss was largely noncash. Bitcoin is marked to fair value through earnings, so price declines can overwhelm GAAP income while the coins remain held; the unrealized loss was $295.8 million. The quarter also included a $66.7 million bargain-purchase gain, $6.5 million of transaction costs, $8.5 million of debt-extinguishment losses and $13.5 million of preferred dividends. Common-stockholder loss was $279.4 million, or $4.53 per diluted share.
| Metric | Q1 2026 | Q1 2025 | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.760M | $1.423M | Up 94.0%, mainly because Medical Device contributed after the Semler merger. |
| Operating expenses | $20.621M | $5.496M | Compensation, public-company costs and integration spending rose sharply. |
| Net loss | $(265.906)M | $(3.749)M | Bitcoin fair-value losses made GAAP earnings highly price-sensitive. |
| Financing cash flow | $182.371M | $0 | Capital issuance, not operations, funded the expansion of the balance sheet. |
| Cash | $95.092M | Not comparable | Liquidity remained material, but operating cash use was still negative. |
June and July show rapid balance-sheet scaling
The July 6, 2026 Form 8-K estimated that June 30 holdings reached 19,864 bitcoin valued at $1.165 billion. Cash was $144.5 million, STRC was worth $42.9 million, and the combined balance-sheet total reported in the update was $1.352 billion. During Q2, Strive acquired 6,236 bitcoin at an average cost of $74,290. The later July 13 update lifted the treasury to 19,900 bitcoin as of July 10. These operating updates are fresher than the last filed quarter, but they are not substitutes for complete GAAP statements.
How does SATA reshape Strive's capital structure?
SATA is Strive's variable-rate Series A perpetual preferred stock. It has no scheduled maturity, ranks ahead of common equity in dividends and liquidation, and is designed to provide continuous capital formation through public offerings and an at-the-market program. For Strive, preferred equity can finance bitcoin purchases without a conventional debt maturity. For common stockholders, however, it creates a senior perpetual claim that must be serviced before common value is realized.
Preferred equity creates leverage without maturity
The obligation sits ahead of common equity
| Capital item | June 30, 2026 | Economic meaning |
|---|---|---|
| SATA stated amount | $782.950M | A senior preferred claim with cumulative distributions and liquidation priority. |
| Annualized SATA obligation | $101.784M | A substantial recurring cash requirement relative to current operating revenue. |
| Debt principal | $0 | Legacy Semler debt was retired, but preferred equity still amplifies common exposure. |
| Amplification ratio | 67.2% | Management's measure of debt and preferred claims relative to bitcoin value. |
| Assumed diluted shares | 84.653M | The denominator used for bitcoin-per-share metrics; it exceeds basic Class A shares. |
Which turning points created Strive's current model?
A seven-step strategic transformation
-
2022Strive Asset Management launched its first ETF, establishing the regulated advisory platform that later supplied recurring fees, distribution and an institutional identity.
-
May 2025Strive agreed to combine with Asset Entities and announced a large private financing intended to fund the first wave of bitcoin accumulation.
-
September 12, 2025The reverse acquisition closed, Asset Entities changed its name to Strive, Strive securityholders obtained 94.2% of the pre-PIPE pro forma shares, and the public bitcoin-treasury strategy began.
-
November 2025SATA began trading after an upsized preferred-stock offering, giving Strive a perpetual financing instrument designed for repeated capital formation.
-
January 16, 2026Strive completed the all-stock Semler Scientific acquisition, adding roughly 5,048 bitcoin, a medical-device business and legacy debt that management later retired.
-
February 6, 2026A 1-for-20 reverse stock split became effective to maintain Nasdaq listing compliance, changing all per-share comparisons and emphasizing the need to use split-adjusted data.
-
June 30, 2026Preliminary holdings reached 19,864 bitcoin, debt fell to zero and SATA's stated amount rose to $783.0 million, crystallizing the present trade-off between bitcoin growth and preferred obligations.
The decisive change was not simply buying bitcoin. It was converting an investment manager into a publicly traded capital-markets platform capable of issuing common and preferred securities, acquiring another bitcoin treasury and measuring performance in bitcoin per diluted share. The September 2025 merger filing documents the change of control and dual-class governance, while the company's Semler completion announcement explains how the treasury, board and operating portfolio expanded in January 2026.
Who competes with Strive, and what is its market position?
Strive competes across asset management, public bitcoin exposure and income securities. Its funds face larger ETF sponsors; ASST faces spot bitcoin products and other treasury companies; SATA competes with preferred stocks and other yield instruments.
Competition comes from three directions
| Competitive arena | Alternative | Strive's distinction | Pressure point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bitcoin exposure | Spot bitcoin ETPs | Potential to increase bitcoin per diluted share through issuance and acquisitions. | ETPs offer cleaner asset exposure without operating costs or corporate tax complexity. |
| Treasury companies | Strategy and other listed bitcoin holders | Combination of asset management, preferred financing and acquisition-led “alpha” strategies. | Competitors may have greater scale, liquidity, brand recognition and cheaper capital. |
| Asset management | Large ETF and indexing sponsors | Distinctive shareholder-engagement positioning and bitcoin-focused corporate strategy. | Fee compression, distribution economics and the importance of scale. |
| Income securities | Preferred shares and high-yield credit | SATA links a variable distribution to a bitcoin-backed corporate balance sheet. | Investors compare its yield, liquidity and coverage with more conventional credits. |
The annual report notes that investors may choose spot bitcoin ETPs and that competition for capital can raise financing costs. Strive is an aggressive specialist with meaningful bitcoin scale, unusual financing and a small revenue base.
What gives Strive an advantage—and where is it fragile?
The moat is financial engineering plus access, not operating margin
Strive's most valuable resources are its public listing, shelf-registration access, management's capital-markets focus, the asset-management platform and SATA. Together, these resources can create a loop: issue securities when pricing is favorable, acquire bitcoin, improve bitcoin per diluted share, and use a larger balance sheet to support further financing. The Semler acquisition demonstrated another route by adding bitcoin through an all-stock transaction and then simplifying acquired debt.
There is also a strategic tension between purity and diversification. Asset-management fees and medical-device revenue can provide cash inflows, but they introduce expenses, regulation and execution risk that a spot bitcoin vehicle does not have. Conversely, selling the medical-device business could simplify the story but remove operating revenue. This tension is central to any SWOT-style or Five Forces analysis: Strive's strength is differentiated capital formation; its weakness is limited self-funded cash generation; its opportunity is continued accretive bitcoin accumulation; and its threat is a financing market that closes when bitcoin or the securities reprice.
Who owns and controls Strive?
Economic ownership and voting power are not aligned because Class A shares carry one vote each and Class B shares carry ten. At the March 6, 2026 proxy record date, Strive had 56.9 million Class A shares and 9.9 million Class B shares outstanding. Class B therefore represented only about 14.8% of common shares but approximately 63.5% of common voting power.
Dual-class voting separates economics from control
| Holder or group | Class A | Class B | Ownership signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vivek Ramaswamy | — | 5,693,897 | 57.63% of Class B; the largest disclosed high-vote position. |
| Ramaswamy 2021 Irrevocable Trust | — | 1,418,942 | 14.36% of Class B; reinforces concentrated voting influence. |
| Anson Frericks | 109,758 | 1,017,282 | 10.30% of Class B plus a small Class A stake. |
| Matthew Cole | 60,020 | 375,264 | Chairman and CEO; 3.80% of Class B as disclosed in the proxy. |
| All directors and executive officers | 1,181,360 | 626,523 | 2.08% of Class A and 6.34% of Class B as a group. |
The 2026 proxy statement provides the ownership figures. A separate shareholder agreement gives a controlling group board-nomination and voting-coordination rights while it holds at least 50% of voting power, and Strive has elected controlled-company treatment under Nasdaq rules while eligible. The board is chaired by CEO Matthew Cole; the official board page identifies current directors. For researchers, the implication is straightforward: public Class A investors have economic exposure but limited ability to redirect strategy when high-vote holders remain aligned.
What opportunities and risks matter most?
Where the growth case comes from
What could break the model
| Risk | Affected line or metric | What to monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Bitcoin volatility | Digital-asset fair value, equity and GAAP net income | Quarter-end bitcoin price versus average acquisition cost. |
| Financing-market closure | BTC Yield, cash, issuance proceeds | ASST and SATA issuance prices, volumes and remaining ATM capacity. |
| Preferred coverage pressure | Cash, STRC value, SATA distributions | Cash reserve, dividend rate and annualized preferred obligation. |
| Medical-device regulation | Segment revenue, legal expense and potential sale value | Reimbursement, product claims, litigation and strategic-disposition updates. |
| Controlled governance | Board oversight and capital-allocation discipline | Class B conversions, control-group ownership and related-party decisions. |
The 2025 Form 10-K combines bitcoin, financing, cybersecurity, dilution, adviser and healthcare risks. It also highlights limited operating history and the possibility that investors prefer spot bitcoin products—direct channels through which Strive can lose its financing advantage.
Which KPIs best explain Strive's performance?
BTC per diluted share is central, but incomplete
| KPI | Latest disclosed value | How to interpret it |
|---|---|---|
| Bitcoin held | 19,900 BTC, July 10, 2026 | Measures treasury scale, but not value available to common after senior claims. |
| Bitcoin per assumed diluted share | 23,465 SATs, June 30, 2026 | A cleaner accretion measure than absolute holdings because it includes dilution. |
| BTC Yield | 24.0%, Q2 2026 preliminary | Percentage change in bitcoin per diluted share; not cash yield or shareholder return. |
| AUM | Over $2.5B, March 31, 2026 | Drives recurring advisory fees and indicates distribution traction. |
| Operating cash flow | $(31.0)M, Q1 2026 | Shows whether operating businesses and overhead consume or produce cash. |
| SATA obligation | $101.8M annualized, June 30, 2026 | Quantifies the senior recurring burden created to finance treasury growth. |
No single metric is sufficient. More bitcoin can be offset by faster dilution, and rising SATs per share can overstate common value when preferred claims expand. A useful dashboard links treasury accretion, issuance, preferred coverage, cash burn and governance. The July filing states that management's bitcoin metrics supplement rather than replace financial statements.
Why is Strive difficult to value with a conventional DCF?
A DCF needs multiple linked scenarios
A standard DCF captures Strive's operating businesses but misses the dominant treasury component unless bitcoin, issuance and preferred claims are modeled separately. A sum-of-the-parts method is more informative: value operations, add bitcoin and liquid investments, subtract debt and preferred obligations, then divide by fully diluted common shares.
The key sensitivity is the interaction between bitcoin price and capital-market access. Favorably priced ASST or SATA issuance may increase bitcoin per share; weak pricing can make issuance dilutive while preferred dividends remain. ASST can also trade above or below net asset value because investors price future financing capacity, operations, taxes, governance and execution.
What is the key takeaway from Strive analysis?
Strive is important because it packages a bitcoin treasury, a regulated asset manager and a perpetual preferred-financing platform inside one public company. The strategy scaled quickly: bitcoin rose from 5,886 at September 30, 2025 to 19,900 by July 10, 2026, while debt was eliminated and AUM exceeded $2.5 billion. That execution is the strongest evidence supporting the story.
What should be monitored next?
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.
