(ADSK) Autodesk, Inc. Bundle
What does Autodesk do?
Autodesk, Inc. is a Nasdaq-listed design-and-make software company for architects, engineers, construction teams, manufacturers, product designers, media studios, and education users. The company says its mission is to empower people to “design and make anything,” with technology spanning architecture, engineering and construction, product design and manufacturing, and media and entertainment on the official Autodesk company overview.
Which markets does it serve?
Autodesk is not a general enterprise software vendor. Its value is concentrated in technical workflows where the output is a building model, civil plan, manufactured part, construction project, animated scene, or operations record. The FY2026 Form 10-K describes software for AECO, manufacturing, and media and entertainment, including tools such as Revit, AutoCAD, Civil 3D, Autodesk Build, Fusion, Inventor, Maya, and 3ds Max. That matters because the customer problem is not only document creation; it is coordination across drawings, 3D models, project data, simulation, fabrication, and downstream operations.
| Research item | Autodesk-specific answer | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Official company name | Autodesk, Inc. | The company reports as one operating and reportable segment, so investors analyze product families and geographies rather than statutory operating segments. |
| Main workflows | Architecture, engineering, construction and operations; product design and manufacturing; media and entertainment. | Workflow depth creates switching costs because files, standards, trained users, and add-ons accumulate around the tools. |
| Business model | Subscription, enterprise business arrangements, cloud services, Flex usage, and smaller other revenue from consulting and services. | Recurring revenue makes deferred revenue, RPO, retention, billings, and cash conversion more important than license-unit volume alone. |
| FY2026 scale | $7.206B total net revenue and $7.024B recurring revenue. | The revenue base is large enough that growth depends on both seat expansion and migration into platform, cloud, and operations workflows. |
Why does one reportable segment not mean a simple business?
Autodesk reports one operating and reportable segment, the company as a whole, in its FY2026 Form 10-K. For analysis, that does not remove segment thinking; it shifts the analysis to product families, product type, channel, geography, and remaining performance obligations. A student or investor should therefore read Autodesk as a software platform with several vertical economic engines rather than as a single-product CAD company.
How does Autodesk make money, and which products matter most?
Autodesk makes most of its money from recurring access to software and cloud functionality. In Q1 FY2027, subscription revenue was $1.836B out of $1.934B of total net revenue, meaning roughly 95% of quarterly revenue came from subscription. In FY2026, recurring revenue was $7.024B, or 97% of total net revenue. The economic question is therefore not whether customers buy a box of software; it is whether Autodesk can expand seats, collections, enterprise agreements, cloud services, and workflow coverage faster than costs and competition rise.
What revenue streams does Autodesk disclose?
Autodesk discloses revenue by product type, product family, geography, channel, and product class. Product type is the cleanest high-level lens: Design is the main engine, Make is the smaller but faster platform-extension line, and Other captures services and other revenue. The Q1 FY2027 release showed Design revenue growing 18% year over year as reported, Make growing 25%, and Other growing 5% in the quarter ended April 30, 2026.
Which product families explain the mix?
Product family detail shows why AECO is central. In FY2026, AECO generated $3.583B, AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT generated $1.787B, Manufacturing generated $1.379B, Media and Entertainment generated $332M, and Other generated $125M. In Q1 FY2027, AECO was also the largest family at $970M. This is why Autodesk’s story increasingly revolves around building design, construction cloud, manufacturing cloud, and connected lifecycle data rather than only desktop drafting.
| Product family | FY2026 revenue | FY2026 YoY growth | Q1 FY2027 revenue | Analytical read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AECO | $3.583B | 22% | $970M | Largest family; supported by AEC Collections, enterprise agreements, and construction-cloud workflows. |
| AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT | $1.787B | 14% | $474M | Still a core installed-base product and migration pathway into collections and cloud features. |
| Manufacturing | $1.379B | 16% | $367M | Driven by MFG Collections, Fusion, and Inventor; strategically important for cloud manufacturing. |
| Media and Entertainment | $332M | 5% | $86M | Smaller family with creative-production relevance through Maya, 3ds Max, Flow, and related tools. |
| Other | $125M | 6% | $37M | Services and other items; useful but not the core valuation driver. |
What does Autodesk's latest quarter show?
The latest official period is Q1 FY2027, the quarter ended April 30, 2026. Autodesk reported $1.934B of revenue, up 18% as reported and 16% in constant currency; billings were $1.688B, also up 18%; GAAP operating margin was 28%; and non-GAAP operating margin was 39%. The company also announced an agreement to acquire MaintainX, a maintenance and operations software platform, in the same reporting package, which makes operations and lifecycle coverage a more important forward-looking theme. The numbers and guidance are from Autodesk’s Q1 FY2027 earnings release, with balance-sheet detail in the related Q1 FY2027 Form 10-Q.
What changed in Q1 FY2027?
The quarter was strong on both income statement and cash-flow lines. Gross profit was $1.759B, operating income was $541M, net income was $491M, diluted EPS was $2.32, operating cash flow was $893M, capex was only $17M, and free cash flow was $876M. That cash-flow profile is unusual for many software companies because Autodesk is capital-light in physical assets while also collecting substantial cash through subscriptions and deferred revenue.
| Metric | Q1 FY2027 | Q1 FY2026 | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.934B | $1.633B | 18% reported growth; the base is large, so growth quality matters more than early-stage acceleration. |
| Gross profit | $1.759B | $1.473B | Gross margin is structurally high because software revenue dominates cost of revenue. |
| Operating income | $541M | $233M | Operating leverage improved despite continued R&D and sales-model investment. |
| Net income | $491M | $152M | Profitability rebounded meaningfully versus the prior-year quarter. |
| Operating cash flow | $893M | $564M | Working-capital seasonality and subscription collections remain central to cash-flow analysis. |
| Free cash flow | $876M | $556M | Cash conversion stayed strong because capex was only $17M in the quarter. |
How much visibility comes from RPO?
Remaining performance obligations are important because Autodesk sells multi-period access to software and services. At April 30, 2026, deferred revenue was $4.457B, unbilled deferred revenue was $3.351B, total RPO was $7.808B, and current RPO was $5.383B. Current RPO represented about 69% of total RPO, which gives analysts a near-term visibility anchor for revenue recognition.
What strategic turning points still shape Autodesk today?
Autodesk’s current story is a migration from desktop CAD leadership toward subscriptions, industry collections, cloud collaboration, platform services, and lifecycle data. The FY2026 strategy focuses on the platform of choice for Design and Make, accelerating Fusion, Forma, and Flow, and transforming the customer experience. That explains the sales-model changes, AI investment, and extension from design into make and operate workflows.
-
1982Autodesk was incorporated in California in April 1982, and AutoCAD became the foundation for a PC-based CAD franchise. The long-term implication is a huge installed base of DWG workflows, trained users, and technical standards.
-
1994Autodesk reincorporated in Delaware in May 1994. Today, investors analyze it as a mature U.S. public software company with one-share-one-vote common stock and broad institutional ownership.
-
2010sThe business shifted from perpetual licenses and upgrades toward subscriptions and flexible access, changing reported revenue timing but improving recurring visibility.
-
2018-2019Construction software became more strategic through assets such as PlanGrid and BuildingConnected, expanding Autodesk beyond design authoring into construction execution and collaboration.
-
FY2025Payapps deepened the construction payments footprint, helping Autodesk Construction Cloud, now known as Forma for Construction, address more of the construction lifecycle.
-
FY2026-FY2027The company reorganized go-to-market activities, emphasized cloud, platform, and AI investment, and announced the MaintainX agreement to extend into operations workflows.
Why did the model evolve from CAD to platform?
The reason is economic as much as technological. Desktop CAD can be a strong product franchise, but a platform can capture more workflow value: design data, collaboration, construction handoff, manufacturing data, partner integrations, and potentially operations data. Autodesk Platform Services and API-based architecture are meant to let customers and partners build industry-specific solutions around Autodesk data and applications, which reinforces the ecosystem effect.
What strategic priority now dominates?
The current priority is convergence: Autodesk wants design, make, and operate data to connect across the lifecycle. The MaintainX announcement framed operations as a natural extension of the platform strategy. For investors, the opportunity is a larger workflow footprint; the risk is paying for and integrating a new operations platform while maintaining margin discipline.
What gives Autodesk a competitive advantage?
Autodesk’s advantage is not one simple patent or one brand claim. It is a bundle of installed-base depth, workflow integration, trained labor, file compatibility, partner ecosystems, product breadth, and increasingly cloud data. The company also spends heavily to keep that position: FY2026 R&D expense was $1.643B, up 11% from FY2025, and management expects R&D to increase in FY2027 as it invests in cloud, platform, and artificial intelligence.
What are the moat drivers?
Where can disruption enter?
The same technology shift that creates opportunity can threaten the moat. Autodesk’s filings explicitly warn that cloud, mobile, machine learning, and other AI technologies can alter the market in unpredictable ways and reduce demand if competitors or new entrants deliver better workflows. That is why management’s AI messaging should be analyzed as both defense and offense: Autodesk wants AI to be grounded in geometry, project context, and physical constraints, but the market will test whether customers see enough productivity gain to pay for it.
Who are Autodesk's main competitors?
Autodesk competes across several vertical markets, so a single “main competitor” answer is misleading. The FY2026 Form 10-K names competitors including Adobe, Bentley Systems, Dassault Systèmes and SolidWorks, Hexagon/Intergraph, MSC Software, Nemetschek, Oracle, Procore, PTC, 3D Systems, Siemens PLM, and Trimble. The competitive set changes by workflow: construction management is different from mechanical CAD or animation tools.
| Workflow arena | Representative rivals named or implied in filings | Autodesk position to analyze |
|---|---|---|
| AECO design and infrastructure | Bentley, Nemetschek, Trimble, Hexagon/Intergraph | Revit, Civil 3D, AutoCAD, Forma, and construction cloud tools create an end-to-end AECO argument. |
| Manufacturing and product design | Dassault Systèmes, SolidWorks, PTC, Siemens PLM | Fusion, Inventor, and manufacturing collections support cloud-enabled product design and production workflows. |
| Construction execution | Procore, Oracle construction software, Trimble | Construction cloud and Forma for Construction compete for project-management data beyond design files. |
| Media and entertainment | Adobe and other creative-production tools | Maya, 3ds Max, Flow, and related tools serve studios and creators but are smaller than AECO and manufacturing. |
Which rivals matter by workflow?
For AECO and infrastructure, the strongest rivals often attack with specialized tools or project-owner relationships. In manufacturing, rivals can pressure Autodesk with deep PLM, simulation, and enterprise-manufacturing portfolios. In construction execution, workflow ownership can shift toward project-management systems if design data is not connected to field execution. In media, creative users can switch more easily when tools are less tied to long asset lifecycles. This is why Autodesk’s platform claim matters: it wants customers to see one connected data environment, not a set of replaceable point products.
Why is competition not just price?
Price matters, especially for small businesses, students, and project-based users. But in Autodesk’s core professional markets, competition also centers on reliability, product breadth, data interoperability, customer training, partner support, and cloud collaboration. A cheaper tool can fail if it breaks project handoffs; an expensive tool can lose if it does not keep pace with AI, automation, and integrated workflows. The strategic test is whether Autodesk’s platform reduces total workflow friction enough to protect pricing power.
How financially strong is Autodesk?
Autodesk’s financial profile is a mix of high software gross margins, strong cash generation, meaningful stock-based compensation, restructuring costs, a sizable deferred revenue balance, and debt that is manageable relative to cash flow but still material. In FY2026, revenue was $7.206B, gross profit was $6.556B, operating income was $1.578B, net income was $1.124B, operating cash flow was $2.452B, capex was $43M, and share repurchases were $1.402B. The annual figures provide a better baseline than one quarter; the quarter provides current momentum.
How do margins and cash flow behave?
FY2026 GAAP operating margin was about 22%, while non-GAAP operating margin was 38%. The gap reflects stock-based compensation, amortization, restructuring, and other adjustments. For a DCF model, the key is not to mechanically use either figure; it is to decide which cost items are economically recurring. Stock-based compensation was $788M in FY2026, and it dilutes or must be offset with repurchases if management wants to protect per-share value.
What does balance sheet capacity look like?
At April 30, 2026, Autodesk held $2.671B in cash and cash equivalents, $253M in current marketable securities, and $385M in long-term marketable securities. Long-term notes payable were $2.484B, deferred revenue was $4.210B current plus $247M long-term, and stockholders’ equity was $3.189B. The pending MaintainX transaction creates an important balance-sheet watch item because the deal is cash-funded and may change leverage, liquidity, and capital allocation priorities after closing.
| Balance sheet item | April 30, 2026 | January 31, 2026 | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash equivalents | $2.671B | $2.249B | Strong immediate liquidity before the MaintainX cash outlay. |
| Total assets | $11.932B | $12.467B | Asset base includes goodwill and intangible assets from prior acquisitions. |
| Current deferred revenue | $4.210B | $4.406B | A liability accounting line but also a revenue visibility signal for subscriptions. |
| Long-term notes payable | $2.484B | $2.483B | Debt is material, but cash-flow capacity is the stronger debt-service indicator. |
| Stockholders' equity | $3.189B | $3.045B | Positive equity, though buybacks and accumulated deficit affect the book-equity story. |
Who owns Autodesk stock, and why does governance matter?
Autodesk has a dispersed public-company ownership profile rather than founder voting control. The 2026 proxy says holders of common stock had one vote per share and that 211,145,251 shares were outstanding and entitled to vote as of the April 22, 2026 record date. The same proxy reported Vanguard and BlackRock as the only principal stockholders above 5% in the beneficial ownership table, while directors and executive officers as a group owned less than 1%.
Who has economic and voting influence?
| Holder / group | Shares or stake | Source period | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Vanguard Group, Inc. | 21,413,983 shares; 10.1% | Proxy table as of March 31, 2026, with Vanguard realignment note | Large passive ownership means governance outcomes depend heavily on institutional voting policies. |
| BlackRock, Inc. | 19,233,480 shares; 9.1% | Proxy table as of March 31, 2026 | Another major passive holder; not strategic control, but relevant to director elections and pay votes. |
| Andrew Anagnost | 115,159 shares; less than 1% | Proxy table as of March 31, 2026 | CEO ownership is meaningful but not controlling; incentives rely heavily on compensation design. |
| All directors and executive officers as a group | 293,952 shares; less than 1% | 15 individuals, proxy table as of March 31, 2026 | The investor base is institutionally influenced rather than insider-controlled. |
| Board structure | 11 nominees; 10 independent | 2026 proxy | Independent oversight matters because capital allocation and acquisitions are central to the story. |
The ownership data comes from Autodesk’s 2026 definitive proxy statement. The table is not a shareholder directory; it shows control logic. Autodesk is not a dual-class founder-control case. It is a governance case where institutional investors, board independence, compensation design, and capital-allocation scrutiny matter.
What does capital allocation signal?
Capital allocation is central because Autodesk generates substantial free cash flow. In FY2026, the company repurchased $1.402B of common stock and spent $43M on capex. In Q1 FY2027, it repurchased $448M of common stock, generated $876M of free cash flow, and announced the MaintainX transaction. The mix tells researchers that Autodesk is not capital intensive in plants and equipment, but it is capital intensive in software talent, equity compensation, acquisitions, and buybacks.
Which KPIs best explain Autodesk's performance?
The most useful Autodesk KPIs are not the same as social-media users or retail same-store sales. For a subscription design-software company, the analyst should track revenue by product family, subscription mix, recurring revenue, billings, RPO, current RPO, net revenue retention, operating margin, free cash flow, stock-based compensation, and channel mix. Autodesk defines billings as total revenue plus net changes in deferred revenue, less net changes in contract assets, excluding acquired deferred revenue and currency effects. Billings is useful as a demand proxy, but it is not GAAP revenue.
Which metrics should researchers monitor next?
How should these KPIs feed a DCF model?
A DCF model should translate KPIs into revenue growth, margin, reinvestment, and cash conversion assumptions. Revenue growth depends on product-family mix and RPO conversion. Margin depends on sales-model changes, R&D, cloud infrastructure, acquisition integration, and stock-based compensation treatment. Reinvestment is mostly people, software development, acquisitions, and sales capacity rather than heavy plant capex. Terminal value should reflect competition and technology risk, not only historical recurring revenue strength.
What opportunities and risks should researchers watch?
Autodesk’s opportunity set is large because the physical world still contains fragmented design, construction, manufacturing, and operations workflows. The risk set is equally real because design software is competitive, AI may change how technical work is done, and Autodesk is actively changing its sales model and acquisition footprint. The best research approach is to map each opportunity and risk to a financial line item, not list generic software-company concerns.
| Opportunity or risk | Company-specific evidence | Line item to watch | Analytical implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platform expansion | Strategic priorities include platform of choice for Design and Make and acceleration of Fusion, Forma, and Flow. | Design, Make, RPO, current RPO | Upside comes if Autodesk captures more lifecycle workflow per customer. |
| MaintainX integration | Autodesk announced a MaintainX agreement to strengthen operations workflows. | Acquisition costs, debt/cash, margin, operations revenue | Strategic fit must translate into customer expansion without eroding margin targets. |
| AI and automation | Autodesk emphasizes AI grounded in geometry, context, and real-world constraints. | R&D, gross margin, product retention | AI can improve productivity or create lower-cost substitutes. |
| Sales-model transition | Direct revenue was about 63% of FY2026 revenue versus 42% in FY2025. | Revenue growth, marketing and sales expense, margin | Reported growth and expense classification can shift during the transaction-model change. |
| Macroeconomic pressure | Filings cite geopolitical, tariff, credit, inflation, FX, and government-spending risks. | Billings, renewal rates, FX-adjusted growth | Construction, manufacturing, and public-sector budgets can slow purchases. |
Why does Autodesk matter for valuation?
Autodesk matters for valuation because it combines high recurring revenue, high gross margin, global exposure, durable design workflows, low physical capex, and significant free cash flow. But it is not a simple “subscription equals safe” story. The DCF debate should focus on how much growth can come from AECO, Fusion, Forma, construction cloud, operations, and enterprise agreements; how much operating leverage survives R&D and sales-model changes; and whether acquisitions create more lifetime customer value than they consume in cash and integration risk.
What is the key takeaway from Autodesk analysis?
Autodesk is best analyzed as a scaled, cash-generative vertical software platform expanding from design authoring into connected design, make, and operate workflows. Evidence includes FY2026 revenue of $7.206B, recurring revenue at 97% of net revenue, Q1 FY2027 revenue growth of 18%, Q1 FY2027 free cash flow of $876M, and RPO of $7.808B. The tension is keeping AutoCAD and Revit relevant while making Fusion, Forma, Construction Cloud, APS, AI, and MaintainX-style operations large enough to move the growth curve.
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.
