Applied Aerospace & Defense, Inc. (AADX) Company Overview

US | Industrials | Aerospace & Defense | NYSE

What does Applied Aerospace & Defense do?

Applied Aerospace & Defense, Inc. is a U.S.-based designer, engineer, and advanced manufacturer of flight- and mission-critical subsystems for space and defense platforms. The company trades on the New York Stock Exchange under AADX after completing its initial public offering in June 2026. Its role is not to build an entire fighter aircraft, launch vehicle, satellite, or missile. Instead, it supplies difficult-to-qualify hardware that must work reliably under vibration, heat, pressure, fatigue, and other extreme operating conditions.

$134.4M
Revenue, quarter ended March 31, 2026
$1.06B
Contract backlog at March 31, 2026
11
Production facilities after the CBI acquisition
87%
FY2025 revenue from sole- or single-source positions

Where does the company sit in the aerospace supply chain?

Applied sits between platform designers and the broad base of commodity component suppliers. Customers use it for integrated assemblies and subsystems such as flight control surfaces, landing gear assemblies, fuel tanks, engine shafts, launch and payload deployment hardware, solar-array assemblies, communications antennas, radomes, missile bodies, launch assemblies, and solid rocket motor cases. Its official company overview emphasizes full-lifecycle support: rapid prototyping and design collaboration, production scaling, inspection and qualification, and aftermarket sustainment.

Which markets and customers matter?

Core market Representative systems Customer need Economic characteristic
Space and Launch Systems Launch structures, payload systems, solar arrays, antennas, deorbit systems Fast development, low weight, high reliability, scaling with launch cadence Growth-oriented, program-ramp exposure
Defense Aviation and Airborne Systems Flight controls, fuselage assemblies, landing gear, fuel systems, rotor hubs, transmissions Long production lives, fleet readiness, replacement of life-limited parts Largest revenue base and meaningful sustainment demand
C5ISR and Precision Strike Systems Radomes, RF systems, missile bodies, launch assemblies, rocket motor cases Battlefield connectivity, sensing, survivability, missile and munition capacity Fastest Q1 2026 growth, but smallest current revenue base

The company reports one operating segment but disaggregates revenue across these three end markets. It serves established prime contractors and newer technology-led defense and space companies, while approximately 83% of FY2025 revenue was ultimately associated with U.S. government contracts. That makes AADX a private-sector manufacturer with public-sector demand exposure.

How does Applied Aerospace & Defense make money?

Applied earns revenue by engineering and manufacturing specialized subsystems under customer contracts and purchase orders. Revenue is usually tied to program milestones, units produced, or work performed over time. In Q1 2026, $119.9 million, or 89.3% of total revenue, was recognized over time, while $14.4 million, or 10.7%, was recognized at a point in time. This accounting mix reflects long-duration manufacturing and development work rather than retail-like one-off sales.

01Win a design or program positionEngineering collaboration and qualification place Applied hardware into a customer platform.
02Prototype and qualifyMaterial science, testing, and process IP reduce technical risk before production.
03Scale productionRevenue expands as launch cadence, aircraft output, or missile production ramps.
04Support the installed baseAftermarket manufacturing, repair support, and configuration management extend program economics.

Why can qualified positions become durable revenue streams?

Aerospace and defense hardware is expensive to redesign and requalify. Once a supplier proves that a component can meet technical, safety, schedule, and documentation requirements, the customer has a strong incentive to preserve continuity. Applied says sole- or single-source positions represented about 87% of FY2025 revenue and 86% of pro forma FY2025 revenue. This does not guarantee volume, because contracts can be modified or terminated, but it creates switching costs and makes incumbency economically valuable.

89.3%of Q1 2026 revenue was recognized over time, illustrating the contract-based and production-program nature of the model.

What drives margins and cash conversion?

Margins depend on product mix, manufacturing throughput, pricing relative to inflation, learning-curve benefits, insourcing, and the stage of each program. Newly ramping programs can initially carry lower margins because labor, tooling, scrap, and overhead are not yet optimized. Cash conversion can also lag accounting earnings: contract assets rose by $25.2 million in Q1 2026, while accrued liabilities fell by $55.1 million, contributing to $72.0 million of operating cash outflow. For analysts, the central question is not merely whether backlog grows, but whether backlog converts into billed revenue and cash at acceptable margins.

Which end markets drive revenue and backlog?

Defense Aviation and Airborne Systems is the current earnings base, while Space and Launch Systems and C5ISR/Precision Strike provide faster-growth vectors. The FY2025 mix is important because it prevents the company from being analyzed as a pure space stock or a pure missile supplier. Its economics combine legacy fleet sustainment, next-generation platform ramps, and newer space technologies.

FY2025: 66.4%
Defense Aviation and Airborne Systems
$331.4 million of FY2025 revenue. Growth came from aftermarket demand and new production across fixed-wing, rotorcraft, and autonomous systems.
FY2025: 22.9%
Space and Launch Systems
$114.1 million of FY2025 revenue. Exposure includes launch vehicles, spacecraft structures, deployables, communications, thermal management, and deorbit systems.
FY2025: 10.7%
C5ISR and Precision Strike
$53.3 million of FY2025 revenue. Products support radar, communications, integrated air and missile defense, and precision-strike programs.

What did the FY2025 revenue mix look like?

Revenue by end market — FY2025
Defense Aviation and Airborne:$331.4M — 66.4%
Space and Launch:$114.1M — 22.9%
C5ISR and Precision Strike:$53.3M — 10.7%
Takeaway: the company is diversified by mission set, but the aviation and airborne portfolio still supplies roughly two-thirds of annual revenue. Values are calculated from the FY2025 disaggregation in the final prospectus.

How did the mix shift in Q1 2026?

Q1 2026 revenue by end market
Defense Aviation and Airborne$79.4M
Space and Launch$35.1M
C5ISR and Precision Strike$19.9M
Q1 2026 growth was 33.1% in Space and Launch, 10.2% in Defense Aviation and Airborne, and 57.1% in C5ISR and Precision Strike. Bars are scaled to the largest segment.

Backlog adds a second perspective. Contract backlog was $1.060 billion at March 31, 2026, up from $871.3 million at December 31, 2025 and $792.6 million at December 31, 2024. About $171.1 million of the Q1 increase came from Consolidated Boring Inc. The company separately reported $885.3 million of remaining performance obligations at March 31, 2026, expecting 61% to be recognized through the remainder of 2026, 35% in 2027, and 4% thereafter.

What does the latest reported period show?

The freshest comprehensive operating package is the Q1 2026 information included in the June 2026 IPO prospectus. Revenue growth was strong, but margin quality weakened and acquisition-related costs made GAAP earnings and cash flow difficult to interpret. This is a classic post-consolidation pattern: sales and backlog expand first, while integration, financing, and working-capital effects pressure reported profitability.

$134.4M
Q1 2026 revenue, up 21.0% year over year
$33.6M
Q1 2026 gross profit
25.0%
Q1 2026 gross margin, down from 27.8%
$26.5M
Q1 2026 Adjusted EBITDA
19.8%
Q1 2026 Adjusted EBITDA margin
($15.1M)
Q1 2026 net loss

Why did revenue grow faster than gross profit?

Metric Q1 2026 Q1 2025 Interpretation
Revenue $134.4M $111.0M Up 21.0%; approximately $13.4M of the increase came from acquisitions completed in 2025 and 2026.
Gross profit $33.6M $30.9M Up 8.7%, slower than revenue.
Gross margin 25.0% 27.8% Down 2.8 percentage points because mix shifted toward ramping programs with lower initial margins.
Operating income ($2.8M) $12.0M SG&A rose to $28.3M from $12.4M, including transaction and public-company preparation costs.
Interest expense $17.8M $16.7M Debt financing remained a major drag before IPO proceeds were used to repay borrowings.
Net loss ($15.1M) ($7.3M) The loss widened despite revenue growth.
25.0%
Q1 2026 gross margin. Gross margin equals gross profit divided by revenue. The decline from 27.8% in Q1 2025 signals that production mix and ramp costs temporarily outweighed volume benefits.

What does the quarterly trend reveal?

Revenue trend — five reported quarters
$111.0MQ1 25
$113.5MQ2 25
$122.5MQ3 25
$151.7MQ4 25
$134.4MQ1 26
Q1 2026 was below the seasonally stronger Q4 2025 level but 21.0% above Q1 2025. Column heights are scaled to Q4 2025, the maximum in this series.

Which turning points created today’s AADX platform?

Applied is a newly listed corporation built from businesses with much older operating histories. The relevant history is therefore not the age of the legal entity alone; it is the accumulation of specialized capabilities, customer qualifications, and facilities through combinations and acquisitions.

How did acquisitions change the capability set?

  1. 1900
    The heritage business that became PCX Aerosystems began operations, establishing a long history in precision aerospace manufacturing.
  2. 1954
    Applied Aerospace Structures Corporation’s heritage began, adding composite structures and space-oriented engineering depth.
  3. October 2024
    The acquisition of Innovative Composite Engineering expanded composite and advanced-manufacturing capabilities.
  4. March 2025
    NeXolve added deployable space technology and advanced polymer expertise, increasing content in spacecraft systems.
  5. November 2025
    Applied Aerospace and PCX were combined under Applied Aerospace & Defense, joining composite, polymer, and metal manufacturing with broader lifecycle support.
  6. January 2026
    Vestigo Aerospace added passive deorbit technology through the Spinnaker drag-sail product line, extending the space portfolio into end-of-mission disposal.
  7. March 2026
    Consolidated Boring added precision-strike manufacturing capacity, while Ultracor added specialized honeycomb-core materials and further vertical integration.
  8. June 2026
    AADX completed a 32.5 million-share IPO at $20 per share; the offering primarily refinanced debt rather than funding a large cash balance.

This sequence explains the central strategic trade-off. Acquisitions broaden the addressable market and create cross-selling and insourcing opportunities, but they also add goodwill, intangible assets, integration costs, and leverage. The company’s official release archive documents the recent platform-building transactions, while the prospectus provides the financial effects.

What gives Applied Aerospace & Defense a competitive advantage?

Applied’s moat is based less on a consumer brand or patented software network and more on qualification, process know-how, customer embeddedness, breadth of materials expertise, and the ability to move from prototype to scaled production. In a fragmented supplier market, the company aims to be a mid-tier integrator that can deliver more complex assemblies than a machine shop while remaining more agile than a large prime contractor.

For AADX, the strategic asset is not one product. It is a portfolio of qualified processes, facilities, engineers, and program positions that customers are reluctant to replace once production begins.

How strong are the moat elements?

Program switching costsStrong
Material and process expertiseStrong
Manufacturing scale and redundancyStrong
Revenue diversificationModerate
Balance-sheet flexibility before IPO debt paydownLimited

The ratings above are analytical summaries, not company disclosures. The supporting facts are 87% sole- or single-source revenue in FY2025, a nationwide network of 11 production facilities totaling about 1.5 million square feet, and capabilities spanning composites, polymers, metals, testing, and sustainment. Those resources are valuable because they reduce the number of supplier interfaces a customer must manage.

Who are the relevant competitors?

Competitive group Typical strength Applied’s positioning Pressure point
Specialized machine shops and component suppliers Low-cost throughput in a narrow process Broader engineering, qualification, and integrated subsystem capability Commodity work can still face price competition
Large aerospace structures and systems suppliers Scale, global purchasing power, major-program access Greater agility and focus on technically differentiated mid-tier work Larger rivals may invest more heavily or bundle products
Prime contractors’ internal manufacturing Direct control over design and production Outsourcing can reduce capital needs and accelerate schedules Customers can insource strategic work or demand price concessions
New defense-technology suppliers Rapid development and software-led architectures Applied can become the scaled hardware partner behind faster product cycles Programs may be less mature and volumes less predictable

How strong are cash flow, leverage, and capital allocation?

AADX entered the public market with strong operating demand but a leveraged, acquisition-heavy balance sheet. At March 31, 2026, it held $15.9 million of cash, $971.7 million of term debt, and $46.1 million drawn on its revolver. Total debt equaled 81% of debt plus equity capitalization. The IPO changed this structure materially because the company directed nearly all estimated net proceeds to debt repayment.

What did the pre-IPO balance sheet look like?

Balance-sheet item March 31, 2026 December 31, 2025 Analytical meaning
Cash and equivalents $15.9M $15.5M Limited cash cushion before the offering.
Term debt $971.7M $643.4M Increased mainly to finance acquisitions.
Revolver $46.1M $0.0M Added short-term financing pressure before repayment.
Goodwill $583.4M $342.5M A large share of assets reflects acquisition premiums.
Intangibles, net $363.5M $199.7M Future amortization will continue to affect GAAP earnings.
Shareholders’ equity $233.8M $159.5M Equity increased with capital contributions but remained small versus debt.

How did the IPO reshape capital allocation?

Estimated IPO net proceeds
$604.3M
Based on 32.5 million shares sold at $20, after estimated fees and expenses.
Term-loan repayment
$548.2M
The largest use of proceeds; as-adjusted term debt was $423.5 million.
Revolver repayment
$56.1M
Includes borrowings outstanding after March 31, 2026.

The closing was confirmed in the company’s June 2026 Form 8-K. The prospectus estimated that debt repayment would reduce annualized interest expense substantially; it showed a $56.0 million reduction for FY2025 on an as-if basis and $12.0 million for Q1 2026. This refinancing improves future earnings capacity, but it does not remove the need to convert backlog into cash.

($79.2M)Approximate Q1 2026 free cash flow using operating cash flow minus capital expenditures: negative $72.0M less $7.1M. Acquisition spending is excluded from this simplified calculation.

The Q1 cash outflow was unusually affected by transaction activity and working capital, so one quarter should not be annualized mechanically. Still, future analysis should reconcile Adjusted EBITDA to operating cash flow, capex, cash interest, and changes in contract assets. A high adjusted margin is not equivalent to distributable cash when leverage and working capital are material.

Who controls AADX, and how is the company governed?

AADX is publicly traded but remains controlled by its private-equity sponsor. Immediately after the offering, AA&D Holdings, LP owned 138.2 million shares, or approximately 81.0% of common stock assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ option. Greenbriar affiliates manage that holding. Public shareholders therefore own an economic minority and do not determine board composition or strategic direction through ordinary voting power.

Holder or group Shares / stake Source period Why it matters
AA&D Holdings, LP 138.2M shares; 81.0% post-IPO May 26, 2026 prospectus basis Greenbriar retains decisive voting and investment influence.
Public offering investors 32.5M newly issued shares June 2026 IPO Meaningful float, but not control.
Directors and executive officers No direct beneficial shares disclosed before offering May 26, 2026 Executives and some directors instead held indirect interests through partnership units in AA&D Holdings.
Board 8 directors At IPO Includes sponsor representatives and directors with defense, aerospace, finance, and audit experience.

What does controlled-company status change?

Sponsor influence
Greenbriar can shape director elections, acquisitions, financing, and exit timing while it maintains majority ownership.
NYSE exemptions
The company may rely on controlled-company exemptions from certain independent-board requirements.
Experienced operating leadership
CEO Trip Ferguson has defense-operations experience, while chairman David King previously led Dynetics and held NASA leadership roles.
Emerging-growth-company reporting
Reduced disclosure and compliance accommodations can make the early public record less extensive than for mature issuers.

The official board biographies show a mix of sponsor representatives and aerospace, defense, finance, and audit experience. The committee structure is also relevant because audit oversight and integration discipline matter for a newly public acquisition platform.

What opportunities, competitors, and risks define the outlook?

The opportunity is straightforward: defense budgets, missile replenishment, resilient space architectures, unmanned systems, and fleet sustainment can increase demand for qualified manufacturing capacity. The risk is that rapid growth occurs through acquisitions and program ramps that strain working capital, margins, quality systems, labor, and the balance sheet.

Where could growth come from?

Backlog conversion
Track revenue recognized from the $1.06B March 2026 backlog and whether new orders replace billings.
Space launch cadence
Higher launch and satellite production can lift structures, deployables, antennas, thermal systems, and deorbit demand.
Precision-strike capacity
CBI expands exposure to missile and munition programs where allied replenishment needs are elevated.
Aftermarket sustainment
Approximately 27% of pro forma FY2025 revenue was linked to aftermarket and sustainment demand across defense rotorcraft fleets.
Cross-selling and insourcing
The combined platform can increase content per aircraft, spacecraft, or missile and internalize processes previously outsourced.
Debt-adjusted earnings
Lower interest expense after the IPO can reveal the underlying earnings capacity of the operating portfolio.

Which risks are most financially important?

Risk Financial line affected Current evidence What to monitor
Program delays, cancellations, or convenience termination Revenue, backlog, utilization Backlog does not guarantee future sales; many orders lack minimum quantities. Backlog growth versus billings and program concentration.
Customer concentration and pricing pressure Revenue and gross margin A significant portion of sales is concentrated among aerospace and defense customers. Top-customer disclosures, contract renewals, and gross margin.
Acquisition integration SG&A, cash flow, goodwill Q1 2026 included $14.0M of transaction costs and $2.3M of integration and restructuring costs. Synergy realization, plant consolidation, turnover, and impairments.
Working-capital absorption Operating cash flow Q1 2026 operating cash outflow was $72.0M, including a $25.2M contract-asset increase. Contract assets, receivables, accrued liabilities, and cash conversion.
Supply chain and qualification constraints COGS, schedules, inventory Alternative materials and suppliers may require lengthy OEM certification. Lead times, material inflation, scrap, and on-time delivery.
Government budget and compliance exposure Awards, revenue timing, compliance cost U.S. government demand is material; ITAR, EAR, CMMC, and security requirements apply. Appropriations, continuing resolutions, export licenses, and cybersecurity certification.
Controlled ownership and future share sales Governance and market liquidity Greenbriar held about 81.0% immediately after the IPO. Sponsor sell-downs, lock-up expiration, and related-party decisions.

The company’s regulatory exposure is operational, not abstract. Many facilities and employees require security clearances; defense work can require CMMC compliance; exports are governed by ITAR and EAR; and failures can delay awards or result in penalties or debarment. These obligations create barriers to entry, but they also raise the cost of execution.

Why does AADX matter for valuation, and what should readers monitor?

AADX is best valued as a leveraged advanced-manufacturing platform rather than as a pure technology company. The DCF debate centers on how quickly backlog converts to revenue, whether ramping programs move from lower initial margins to mature economics, how much acquisition integration persists, and how much cash remains after working capital, capex, and interest. Revenue growth alone is insufficient because Q1 2026 showed a 21.0% sales increase alongside a 2.8-point gross-margin decline and negative operating cash flow.

Which valuation drivers deserve the highest weight?

Organic revenue growth
Separate acquired revenue from growth on existing programs.
Gross margin
Watch whether the 25.0% Q1 2026 margin recovers as ramping programs mature.
Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation
Measure how much adjustment activity remains after the IPO and integrations.
Operating cash flow
Confirm that contract assets and accrued liabilities normalize.
Net leverage
Use post-IPO debt, cash, and EBITDA rather than the pre-offering capital structure.
Backlog quality
Assess timing, cancellation rights, margins, and customer/program concentration.
Capital intensity
Q1 2026 capex was $7.1M, about 5.3% of revenue; future capacity expansion may change this rate.
Sponsor ownership
Track governance changes and the pace of any Greenbriar sell-down.

Students can extract a clear strategy case from the company. Supplier power is moderated by multiple raw-material sources but strengthened by qualification constraints. Buyer power is significant because customers are large primes and government-linked programs. Rivalry is fragmented, while barriers to entry come from technical qualification, security, process control, and program history. The company’s resources appear valuable and difficult to replicate quickly, but their economic durability depends on execution and integration rather than exclusivity alone.

Key analytical takeaway
Applied Aerospace & Defense matters because it combines scarce, qualified manufacturing capacity with exposure to space, defense aviation, missile systems, and long-lived aftermarket programs. The supporting case is a $1.06 billion backlog, 87% sole- or single-source FY2025 revenue, broad production capabilities, and post-IPO debt reduction. The counterweight is equally specific: acquisition-heavy growth produced large goodwill and intangibles, Q1 2026 gross margin fell to 25.0%, operating cash flow was negative $72.0 million, and Greenbriar retained about 81.0% ownership. The next phase of the story will be determined by backlog conversion, margin normalization, cash generation, and disciplined integration—not by defense-sector demand headlines alone.

For ongoing research, the most useful official starting points are the company’s investor-relations portal, its investor FAQ, and future filings posted through the official SEC reporting channel.

DCF model

    5-Year Financial Model

    40+ Charts & Metrics

    DCF & Multiple Valuation

    Free Email Support



Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.

(AADX) Applied Aerospace & Defense, Inc. Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$17 $9
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5
$9 $5